This is a remedial run for missed papers from 08/14/2026 to 08/14/2026.

Results generated on 09/13/2026.

Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2026-08-15

_{Token counts are not reported for this run. 6 of 21 model calls succeeded, 11,235s of model wall clock.}

Topic Coverage:

Table of contents by topic:

MoE Training (3)

1. FreeBalance: Pre-Routing Online Moe Load Balancing via Residual Workload Prediction Authors: Pengfei Chen, Yize Wu, Shouxu Kuang, Ke Gao, Ling Li

2. TEMPO: Makespan-Aware Expert-Parallel Load Balancing Across Memory- and Compute-Bound Regimes Authors: Jie Li, Chenxin Jia, Jinliang Shen, Cunzhuang Liu, Ruiyi Ding, Jianwen Xian, Kang He, Chengru Song

3. MedMix: Specialization-Consistent Federated Sparse MoEs under Modality Heterogeneity Authors: Adiba Orzikulova, Dong Min Kim, Jaehong Yoon, Sung-Ju Lee

Architecture and Training Dynamics (3)

1. p-Spin Glass Network Efficient Single-Batch Continual Learning Authors: Vladimer Khasia

2. You Only Pass Once: Answering and Abstaining Together in a Single Forward Pass of a Frozen Language Model Authors: Ziyang Luo, Zhongyao Chu, Xinjie He, Youting Wang, Xukui Qin, Runxiong Wu, Yan-Syuan Chen

3. Is Grokking a Loss of Normal Hyperbolicity of the Interpolation Manifold? Authors: Suvinava Basak

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (3)

1. CodeQuant: Unified Clustering and Quantization for Enhanced Outlier Smoothing in Low-Precision Mixture-of-Experts Authors: Xiangyang Yin, Xingyu Liu, Tianhua Xia, Bo Bao, Vithursan Thangarasa, Valavan Manohararajah, Eric Sather, Sai Qian Zhang

2. LORA-CRAFT: Cross-layer Rank Adaptation via Frozen Tucker Decomposition of Pre-trained Attention Weights Authors: Kasun Dewage, Marianna Pensky, Suranadi De Silva, Shankadeep Mondal

3. ShortOPD: Recovering Pruned LLMs with Short-to-Long On-Policy Distillation Authors: Qingyu Zhang, Qianhao Yuan, Hongyu Lin, Yaojie Lu, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Ming Xu, Jiarui Li

MoE Training (3)

1. FreeBalance: Pre-Routing Online Moe Load Balancing via Residual Workload Prediction

ArXiv ID: 2608.14205

Primary Topic: MoE Training

Also Matches: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Pengfei Chen, Yize Wu, Shouxu Kuang, Ke Gao, Ling Li

Abstract: Load imbalance poses a major bottleneck to the efficiency of expert parallelism in distributed inference of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models. The most heavily loaded rank stalls global execution due to skewed routing distributions, directly increasing latency. While offline expert placement can alleviate persistent imbalance, practical multi-task serving workloads exhibit layer- and batch-dependent routing dynamics, making online load balancing indispensable. Existing approaches rely on routing statistics collected after each MoE router, requiring expert weight load or migration to begin only after routing decisions are available, consequently placing migration overhead on the inference critical path. In this work, we observe that online balancing can instead be largely overlapped with computation before target routing (e.g., attention), if routing distributions can be predicted accurately in advance. Therefore, we propose FreeBalance, a lossless online load-balancing framework that overlaps expert migration with preceding computation stages via residual workload prediction. FreeBalance leverages cross-layer similarities in hidden representations within the residual network to build a lightweight workload predictor. This enables proactive expert migration planning before routing decisions are available, creating substantial overlap between weight transfer and computation-heavy pre-routing stages. Furthermore, a cost model constrains the number of swaps to fully hide the synchronization overhead within the available window. Experiments across models and datasets show that FreeBalance reduces the max-to-mean rank load ratio by 32.8% and end-to-end prefill latency by 13.1%. Specifically, our method hides balancing overhead of an average of 5.1 experts per layer, which would otherwise account for about 8.5% of the critical-path latency.

Comment: Predicts future MoE routing loads so expert migration can overlap with pre-routing computation.

Topic Match: Its central mechanism addresses expert-parallel load balancing and communication scheduling, although for inference rather than training.

Relevance: 6 Novelty: 7

2. TEMPO: Makespan-Aware Expert-Parallel Load Balancing Across Memory- and Compute-Bound Regimes

ArXiv ID: 2608.13057

Primary Topic: MoE Training

Also Matches: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Jie Li, Chenxin Jia, Jinliang Shen, Cunzhuang Liu, Ruiyi Ding, Jianwen Xian, Kang He, Chengru Song

Abstract: In expert-parallel (EP) MoE serving, every layer synchronizes at the slowest GPU. Dispatchers balance token counts (EPLB, LPLB, UltraEP) or activated-expert counts (METRO), assuming expert time is linear in one. Measurements on two datacenter GPU generations show it is neither: below $n^* \approx 156$--$168$ tokens, HBM weight streaming dominates---cost attaches to $activated replicas$, not tokens; above it, grouped GEMM rounds tokens to 128-tile $M$-tiles, so $splitting$ an expert adds padded compute. A max-affine profile $t=\max(a+bG,\,c+βN)$ captures both regimes. Realistic decode batches hold hot experts in the linear regime and cold in the flat $simultaneously$; recorded batches show proxy dispatches differ by $1.4$--$1.6\times$ in modeled block time (p95 up to $1.7\times$), and $which$ proxy wins flips with the regime. We formalize per-batch dispatch as a fixed-charge makespan problem---NP-hard on two fully replicated GPUs, polynomial in degenerate limits---and present TEMPO, a makespan-aware dispatcher solving it in milliseconds off the critical path; its SGLang integration runs out-of-process and fuses dispatch with count collection into one in-graph kernel. Anchored by an 8-GPU Testbed A microbenchmark, TEMPO stays within $1\%$ of the best fixed baseline everywhere and wins by up to $15.5\%$ where regimes mix. End-to-end on Testbed B, Qwen3-235B (inside the win region) gains $4$--$6\%$ throughput and cuts p99 latency by $\sim 15.6\%$; DeepSeek-V3 (outside, communication-dominated) shows only mechanism cost. A phase diagram, not a universal win, is the claim: it predicts both outcomes before deployment.

Comment: Formulates MoE dispatch as a hardware-aware fixed-charge makespan problem spanning memory- and compute-bound regimes.

Topic Match: It contributes an expert-parallel load-balancing algorithm grounded in grouped-GEMM and weight-streaming costs, but targets serving.

Relevance: 6 Novelty: 7

3. MedMix: Specialization-Consistent Federated Sparse MoEs under Modality Heterogeneity

ArXiv ID: 2608.13911

Primary Topic: MoE Training

Authors: Adiba Orzikulova, Dong Min Kim, Jaehong Yoon, Sung-Ju Lee

Abstract: Federated multimodal medical AI faces modality heterogeneity at both the client and sample levels: clients may systematically lack access to specific modality types, while individual records within the same client may contain different partial modality subsets. Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures are a promising remedy for modality-adaptive computation, but their use in federated learning is fragile under cross-client modality heterogeneity, where locally learned routing policies can diverge across clients and drive experts toward incompatible specializations. Different clients may assign the same observed modality configuration to different experts, or train similarly indexed experts on different missing-modality configurations, causing standard aggregation to misalign or overwrite the expert specialization that sparse MoEs are intended to learn. To address this challenge, we propose MedMix, a semantic-alignment framework for federated multimodal sparse MoEs that coordinates cross-client routing and expert specialization using modality context. At the client side, MedMix uses modality-context-aware routing to guide expert selection using each token's modality identity, position, and incompleteness context. Across clients, it uses consensus-guided routing alignment to construct server-side consensus anchors for shared modality patterns and align local routing distributions across clients. Complementing these routing mechanisms, client-adaptive expert aggregation leverages client-specific modality-pattern prototypes to match and aggregate functionally similar experts across clients. Experiments on real-world multimodal medical datasets show that MedMix achieves the best average F1 across diverse modality heterogeneity and modality incompleteness settings, with especially clear gains under severe heterogeneity.

Comment: Aligns sparse-MoE routing and expert specialization across heterogeneous federated clients.

Topic Match: The strongest foundational component is its routing-alignment and expert-matching machinery, though it is tailored to medical multimodality.

Relevance: 6 Novelty: 6

Architecture and Training Dynamics (3)

1. p-Spin Glass Network Efficient Single-Batch Continual Learning

ArXiv ID: 2608.14774

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Also Matches: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Vladimer Khasia

Abstract: Modern sequence models heavily rely on massive memory footprints and large-batch stochastic optimization, barriers that restrict sample efficiency and continual learning. We introduce the $p$-Spin Glass Network, a novel architecture that overcomes these limitations, structurally manages optimization variance and yields four noticeable capabilities: 1. It enforces memory efficiency: native ternary quantization compresses internal parameters by $8\times$, while exact implicit gradients strictly bound activation memory to $\mathcal{O}(B \cdot T \cdot D)$. 2. it demonstrates sample efficiency, matching the asymptotic performance of a Transformer baseline while utilizing $8\times$ fewer training sequences. 3. Method enables single-batch stability and smooth, monotonic convergence at a stochastic micro-batch size of $1$. 4. Finally, this stability proves modality-agnostic, maintaining robust temporal credit assignment across both discrete subword and long horizon uncompressed raw byte streams. Ultimately, this work removes large batch requirement for stable deep learning, establishing a foundation for continuous learning and edge AI.

Comment: Proposes a spin-glass-inspired sequence architecture with ternary parameters, implicit gradients, and stable micro-batch-one training.

Topic Match: Its main contribution is a new computational architecture coupled to unusual stability and memory-efficiency properties.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 8

2. You Only Pass Once: Answering and Abstaining Together in a Single Forward Pass of a Frozen Language Model

ArXiv ID: 2608.14465

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Also Matches: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Ziyang Luo, Zhongyao Chu, Xinjie He, Youting Wang, Xukui Qin, Runxiong Wu, Yan-Syuan Chen

Abstract: A frozen language model on reasoning tasks has two coupled weaknesses: it under-uses evidence its own residual stream already encodes, and it fails to detect when the input is insufficient to answer, so it confabulates. This paper consolidates two research lines that address these on the same residual stream: a conditional steering probe writes the stream at mid-stack layers and recovers reasoning accuracy from a frozen backbone, and a zero-shot sufficiency direction reads the stream and abstains when information is insufficient. Deployed in one forward pass they interfere: the steering write shifts the state the direction reads, costing up to 8 AUROC points of cross-domain transfer on small models; a separate clean pass doubles inference cost. We keep the direction fixed and train a small network to reconstruct the pre-steering residual from the steered one -- mean-squared error on (steered, clean) pairs, no sufficiency labels -- and read the direction on the reconstruction. The resulting system, YOPO (You Only Pass Once), answers, steers, and abstains in one forward pass of a frozen Qwen2.5 backbone (1.5B/3B/7B). End to end, three-way accuracy more than doubles the frozen baseline (0.375->0.798 on 1.5B alphaNLI) and one pass beats the two-pass reference at every scale (0.798/0.830/0.893 vs 0.753/0.790/0.863) and on ten backbones across six model families. We chart the capacity-transfer frontier quantifying the principle that abstention should not be trained in; a source-side audit catches our own alphaNLI construction leaking a surface artifact, so architectural claims are anchored on native-label replications (SQuAD2, RepLiQA, MuSiQue); and on the standard four-domain suite we contribute, to our knowledge, the first answer-or-abstain benchmark, where our gate tops every in-domain dataset and the label-free direction is the only gate family to survive domain transfer.

Comment: Reconstructs pre-steering residual states so steering and abstention share one forward pass.

Topic Match: The central mechanism manages interacting residual-stream reads and writes, while also eliminating a second inference pass.

Relevance: 6 Novelty: 7

3. Is Grokking a Loss of Normal Hyperbolicity of the Interpolation Manifold?

ArXiv ID: 2608.14803

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Suvinava Basak

Abstract: A recent line of work recasts the post-memorization phase of grokking as constrained optimization: once a network interpolates the training set, weight decay drives a slow drift along the zero-loss manifold toward lower norm. In the language of dynamical systems, this is a fast-slow system in which the interpolation manifold plays the role of a slow manifold. We ask a question that this framing makes natural but the existing literature does not address: is the sharp generalization transition a loss of normal hyperbolicity of that manifold: a fold- or bifurcation-like event in which a normal restoring direction goes flat? Or does the manifold stay uniformly attracting while generalization happens by smooth drift? We propose a simple, optimizer-agnostic diagnostic: the smallest nonzero singular value $σ{\min}^{+}(\mathbf J)$ of the residual Jacobian, which, for the squared loss, equals the slowest normal restoring rate of the manifold. On a two-layer ReLU network trained to grok modular addition under squared loss, $σ(\mathbf J)$ does not collapse at the transition; it is near zero only before memorization and attains its largest values during the transition. The result holds across five seeds, and the six smallest singular values behave identically; there is no subspace-local collapse either. This is preliminary evidence against the bifurcation hypothesis and in favor of the smooth-contraction picture. We are explicit that a single-setting, gradual-transition experiment under Adam optimizer does not prove the absence of a bifurcation; it constrains where one could hide.}^{+

Comment: Tests whether grokking coincides with loss of normal hyperbolicity using residual-Jacobian singular values.

Topic Match: This is a mechanistic analysis of training dynamics, albeit in a small and preliminary grokking setting.

Relevance: 6 Novelty: 6

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (3)

1. CodeQuant: Unified Clustering and Quantization for Enhanced Outlier Smoothing in Low-Precision Mixture-of-Experts

ArXiv ID: 2604.10496

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Xiangyang Yin, Xingyu Liu, Tianhua Xia, Bo Bao, Vithursan Thangarasa, Valavan Manohararajah, Eric Sather, Sai Qian Zhang

Abstract: Outliers have emerged as a fundamental bottleneck in preserving accuracy for low-precision large models, particularly within Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures that are increasingly central to large-scale language modeling. Under post-training quantization (PTQ), these outliers induce substantial quantization errors, leading to severe accuracy degradation. While recent rotation-based smoothing techniques alleviate the problem by redistributing outlier magnitudes, residual errors remain and continue to impede reliable low-precision deployment. In this work, we tackle this challenge by introducing CodeQuant, a unified quantization-and-clustering scheme that contains smoothing activation outliers via learnable rotation and absorbing weight outliers into fine-tuned cluster centroids for MoE. This design reduces the influence of extreme values by fitting them within cluster centroids, thereby lowering quantization error while maintaining expressive capacity. Coupled with a dedicated kernel design for GPU and CPU, CodeQuant achieves up to $4.15\times$ speedup while delivering significantly higher accuracy than state-of-the-art quantization approaches across diverse MoE models. Our results highlight CodeQuant as a promising direction for efficient and accurate deployment of MoE-based large language models under low-precision constraints. Our code is available at https://github.com/SAI-Lab-NYU/CodeQuant.

Comment: Combines learned rotation, centroid-based outlier absorption, and dedicated kernels for low-bit MoE quantization.

Topic Match: The paper directly targets MoE compression and low-precision execution with a new quantization mechanism and implementation.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 7

2. LORA-CRAFT: Cross-layer Rank Adaptation via Frozen Tucker Decomposition of Pre-trained Attention Weights

ArXiv ID: 2602.17510

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Kasun Dewage, Marianna Pensky, Suranadi De Silva, Shankadeep Mondal

Abstract: We introduce LoRA-CRAFT (\textbf{C}ross-layer \textbf{R}ank \textbf{A}daptation via \textbf{F}rozen \textbf{T}ucker), abbreviated CRAFT throughout, an extremely parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) method that applies Tucker tensor decomposition to pre-trained attention weight matrices stacked across transformer layers and trains only small square adaptation matrices on the resulting frozen Tucker factors. Existing tensor-based PEFT methods decompose \textit{gradient updates}: LoTR applies Tucker decomposition with shared factor matrices, while SuperLoRA groups and reshapes $ΔW$ across layers before applying Tucker decomposition. Separately, methods such as PiSSA apply SVD to \textit{pre-trained weights} but operate independently per layer. CRAFT bridges these two lines of work: it performs full Tucker decomposition via Higher-Order SVD (HOSVD) directly on \textit{pre-trained weights} organized as cross-layer 3D tensors, freezes all resulting factors, and adapts the model through lightweight trainable transformations applied to each factor matrix. Experiments on the GLUE benchmark using RoBERTa-base and RoBERTa-large, as well as commonsense reasoning benchmarks using LLaMA2-7B and LLaMA3-8B, demonstrate that CRAFT achieves competitive performance with existing methods while requiring only \rev{\textbf{extremely low Tucker adaptation parameters}}. \fixw{On LLaMA3-8B, CRAFT} \rev{exceeds the average accuracy of LoRA} \textbf{using hundreds of times fewer parameters}\fixw{; on LLaMA2-7B the same holds at a $0.252$M budget}. Our results suggest that CRAFT's efficiency advantage grows with model scale, as the frozen Tucker factors better capture the richer cross-layer structure of larger pre-trained models.

Comment: Adapts frozen cross-layer Tucker factors using extremely small trainable matrices.

Topic Match: Its core contribution is a new low-rank, cross-layer parameter-efficient adaptation mechanism.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

3. ShortOPD: Recovering Pruned LLMs with Short-to-Long On-Policy Distillation

ArXiv ID: 2607.13124

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Qingyu Zhang, Qianhao Yuan, Hongyu Lin, Yaojie Lu, Xianpei Han, Le Sun, Ming Xu, Jiarui Li

Abstract: Structured pruning is a hardware-friendly way to compress LLMs, but it is mostly validated on multiple-choice recognition tasks, while the same compressed checkpoints can collapse on the free-form generation that deployment actually requires. Two observations trace this gap. First, greedy \textsc{pass}@$1$ nearly vanishes after compression, yet \textsc{pass}@$k$ recovers substantially under repeated sampling: useful generations are demoted, not erased. Second, the recoverable regime fails mainly through suffix repetition. Recovery should therefore train on the compressed model's own on-policy states with dense token-level supervision, which On-Policy Distillation (OPD) provides by reusing the pre-compression model as a frozen teacher. However, long on-policy rollouts spend early recovery budget on low-information repetitive suffixes, delaying loss descent. To mitigate this waste, we propose \textbf{\shortopd}, a short-to-long OPD schedule that detects teacher-confirmed repetitive suffixes, treats the surviving prefix as each rollout's effective length, and allocates future rollout budgets to the effective lengths the policy can currently use. Across math, code, and open-ended generation, \shortopd\ raises the compressed model's score to about $9\times$ its unrecovered value and $1.6$--$4.4\times$ standard recovery recipes (SFT w/o KD, KD, and SeqKD), and it matches a fixed $8192$-token rollout horizon within two points using a quarter of the training time ($8.5$ vs.\ $35.9$ hours) and $71\%$ fewer rollout tokens. We hope this recipe helps move structured pruning beyond marginal gains on perplexity and multiple-choice benchmarks, a step closer to deployment-ready generation quality.

Comment: Recovers structured-pruned LLMs with an adaptive on-policy rollout schedule that cuts recovery tokens and training time.

Topic Match: The core contribution is an efficient training procedure for restoring generation quality after structured pruning.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

Paper Selection Prompt

System Prompt

You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.

User Prompt

Instructions

Respond in JSONL. Output exactly one JSON object per paper, one per line:

{"ARXIVID":"...","COMMENT":"...","RELEVANCE":0,"NOVELTY":0,"PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID":"...","MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS":[],"TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT":"...","HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS":[],"HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT":"..."}

Rules: - ARXIVID: the arXiv ID. - COMMENT: identify the single strongest matching criterion. Be brief and specific. Do not rely on generic phrases like "language modeling" or "advancement". Do not mention non-matching criteria. - RELEVANCE: integer from 1 to 10. - NOVELTY: integer from 1 to 10. - PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID: exactly one stable topic ID from the allowed topic registry. - MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS: zero or more stable topic IDs from the same allowed set. Include PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID when there are multiple matches. - TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT: briefly explain why the primary topic is the best fit. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS: zero or more tags from this exact set only: daily_hot, new_frontier. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT: briefly explain why the paper belongs in the daily hotspot paper feed when HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS is non-empty; otherwise use an empty string. - Use HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS sparingly. Most papers should return []. - daily_hot means the paper feels broadly important to the day and belongs in the daily hotspot paper section even if it is not part of the personalized foundational reading list. - new_frontier means the paper appears to open a genuinely new direction, paradigm, or field, even if the work is still early. - Do not output markdown, code fences, or any extra text.

Scoring Criteria

Relevance and Novelty are independent axes. Score both from 1 to 10.

Relevance Scoring

• 9-10: directly centered on the target foundational topics; highest when the core contribution is clearly within them.
• 7-8: substantially related, but partly peripheral or focused on a narrower aspect.
• 5-6: touches the target topics, but the main contribution is elsewhere.
• 3-4: largely outside the target topics, often application-focused or domain-specific.
• 1-2: unrelated.

Important: Broad frontier relevance, major launch status, or daily buzz is not enough for a high Relevance score here. Those cases belong in the hotspot digest unless the paper strongly matches the specialized paper topics.

Novelty Scoring

• 9-10: new paradigm, theory, or major methodological breakthrough.
• 7-8: substantial methodological advance or strong new insight.
• 5-6: meaningful but incremental extension or refinement.
• 3-4: minor, narrow, or mostly engineering or domain-specific improvement.
• 1-2: little originality; mainly standard application of existing methods.

Topic Registry

Use exactly one PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID chosen from the stable topic IDs below. - moe_training: MoE Training - Mixture-of-Experts training: routing, load balancing, expert granularity and shared experts, training stability, MoE parallelism and communication, and MoE kernels. - training_systems: Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency - Large-scale training systems and efficiency: distributed training algorithms, optimizers, and communication. - architecture_training: Architecture and Training Dynamics - Core architectural or computational mechanisms, dynamic computation, and training-stability dynamics. - efficiency_scaling: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training - Compression, sparsity, memory or cache efficiency, and large-scale training systems that materially change cost or behavior.

Papers

[PAPER LIST HERE]

Relevant Topics

This is a training-side feed. The centre of gravity is Mixture-of-Experts training and the large-scale training systems it sits on; architecture and efficiency work is kept when it bears on how a large model is trained or what it costs to train.

Keep a paper when its CORE CONTRIBUTION falls in one of the four topics below. Filter it when the topic is merely the setting for a downstream application, a benchmark, or a product result.

1. MoE Training (primary) - Keep: expert routing and gating mechanisms; load balancing, with or without auxiliary losses; expert granularity, fine-grained and shared experts; MoE training stability (loss spikes, router collapse, z-loss and related fixes); expert and hybrid parallelism; all-to-all dispatch/combine and the communication schedules MoE needs; MoE kernels and grouped-GEMM style implementations; expert capacity, token dropping, and upcycling dense checkpoints into MoE. - Filter: papers that merely train on top of a MoE model without a new routing, balancing, stability, parallelism, or kernel contribution; "mixture of experts" in the classical ensemble or recommender sense.

2. Large-Scale Training Systems - Keep: distributed training algorithms (data, tensor, pipeline, sequence, and expert parallelism, FSDP and ZeRO-style sharding); optimizers and preconditioners for large-scale pretraining; communication algorithms, overlap, and collective design; throughput and MFU work that materially changes what a training run costs or whether it converges; scaling-law work that informs how such runs are configured. - Filter: routine infrastructure tuning with no new algorithmic or systems idea.

3. Architecture and Training Dynamics - Keep: new or analysed architectural mechanisms (attention variants, normalization and residual design, state-space and recurrent sequence modelling, dynamic or modular computation); optimisation and training-dynamics analysis that explains why large models train the way they do. - Filter: applying an existing architecture to a new task or benchmark with no mechanistic insight.

4. Efficiency and Compression - Keep: quantization, sparsity, pruning, low-rank adaptation, KV-cache and memory-efficient designs, and other work that materially changes the cost of running or training a large model, especially when the mechanism is new rather than a tuned variant. - Filter: straightforward application of standard efficiency methods, and deployment or serving engineering with no new idea.

Leave these to the hotspot digest unless the core contribution clearly falls in one of the four topics above: - major model or product releases - agent, tooling, and RAG launches - benchmark, leaderboard, or evaluation-only papers - representation-learning theory, interpretability, and feature-formation analysis - memory mechanisms and agent memory systems - world models, exploration, and reinforcement learning - alignment and post-training (RLHF, DPO, GRPO, RFT, instruction tuning) - downstream applications in medical imaging, segmentation, 3D vision, video understanding, information retrieval, summarization, recommendation, machine translation, speech recognition, time series, knowledge graphs, and similar domains