Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2026-05-06

_{Papers on this page were re-scored with local agent CLI; the usage above is from the original run.}

Topic Coverage:

Table of contents by topic:

Architecture and Training Dynamics (23)

1. The Right Answer, the Wrong Direction: Why Transformers Fail at Counting and How to Fix It Authors: Gabriel Garcia

2. Arithmetic in the Wild: Llama uses Base-10 Addition to Reason About Cyclic Concepts Authors: Sheridan Feucht, Tal Haklay, Usha Bhalla, Daniel Wurgaft, Can Rager, Rapha\"el Sarfati, Jack Merullo, Thomas McGrath, Owen Lewis, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Thomas Fel, Atticus Geiger

3. Nora: Normalized Orthogonal Row Alignment for Scalable Matrix Optimizer Authors: Jinghui Yuan, Jiaxuan Zou, Shuo Wang, Yong Liu, Feiping Nie

4. Concepts Whisper While Syntax Shouts: Spectral Anti-Concentration and the Dual Geometry of Transformer Representations Authors: Pratyush Acharya, Nuraj Rimal, Habish Dhakal

5. Anon: Extrapolating Optimizer Adaptivity Across the Real Spectrum Authors: Yiheng Zhang, Kaiyan Zhao, Shaowu Wu, Yiming Wang, Jiajun Wu, Leong Hou U, Steve Drew, Xiaoguang Niu

6. Steer Like the LLM: Activation Steering that Mimics Prompting Authors: Geert Heyman, Frederik Vandeputte

7. Understanding Emergent Misalignment via Feature Superposition Geometry Authors: Gouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Takeshi Kojima, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo

8. Neuron-Anchored Rule Extraction for Large Language Models via Contrastive Hierarchical Ablation Authors: Francesco Sovrano, Gabriele Dominici, Marc Langheinrich

9. Artificial Jagged Intelligence as Uneven Optimization Energy Allocation Capability Concentration, Redistribution, and Optimization Governance Authors: Wesley Shu, Peng Wei

10. Task Vector Geometry Underlies Dual Modes of Task Inference in Transformers Authors: Hao Yan, Haolin Yang, Yiqiao Zhong

11. Model Merging: Foundations and Algorithms Authors: Donato Crisostomi

12. When Attention Collapses: Residual Evidence Modeling for Compositional Inference Authors: Niklas Houba

13. Automated Interpretability and Feature Discovery in Language Models with Agents Authors: Arnau Marin-Llobet, Javier Ferrando

14. Probe-Geometry Alignment: Erasing the Cross-Sequence Memorization Signature Below Chance Authors: Anamika Paul Rupa, Anietie Andy

15. Learning Dynamics of Zeroth-Order Optimization: A Kernel Perspective Authors: Zhe Li, Bicheng Ying, Zidong Liu, Haibo Yang

16. CoFlow: Coordinated Few-Step Flow for Offline Multi-Agent Decision Making Authors: Guowei Zou, Haitao Wang, Beiwen Zhang, Boning Zhang, Hejun Wu

17. Discovering Reinforcement Learning Interfaces with Large Language Models Authors: Akshat Singh Jaswal, Ashish Baghel, Paras Chopra

18. Deciphering Shortcut Learning from an Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective Authors: Xiayang Li, Kuo Gai, Shihua Zhang

19. Beyond Activation Alignment: The Geometry of Neural Sensitivity Authors: Amirhossein Yavari, Farnaz Zamani Esfahlani

20. Most ReLU Networks Admit Identifiable Parameters Authors: Moritz Grillo, Guido Mont\'ufar

21. From Cortical Synchronous Rhythm to Brain Inspired Learning Mechanism: An Oscillatory Spiking Neural Network with Time-Delayed Coordination Authors: Tingting Dan, Guorong Wu

22. Optimal Posterior Sampling for Policy Identification in Tabular Markov Decision Processes Authors: Cyrille Kone, Kevin Jamieson

23. Taming the Curses of Multiagency in Robust Markov Games with Large State Space through Linear Function Approximation Authors: Jingchu Gai, Laixi Shi

Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible (2)

1. Remote Action Generation: Remote Control with Minimal Communication Authors: Szymon Kobus, Deniz G\"und\"uz

2. VUDA: Breaking CUDA-Vulkan Isolation for Spatial Sharing of Compute and Graphics on the Same GPU Authors: Bin Xu, Pengfei Hu, Wenxin Zheng, Jinyu Gu, Haibo Chen

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (10)

1. Component-Aware Self-Speculative Decoding in Hybrid Language Models Authors: Hector Borobia, Elies Segu\'i-Mas, Guillermina Tormo-Carb\'o

2. HeadQ: Model-Visible Distortion and Score-Space Correction for KV-Cache Quantization Authors: Jorge L. Ruiz Williams

3. Compress Then Adapt? No, Do It Together via Task-aware Union of Subspaces Authors: Jingze Ge, Yun Liu, Xue Geng, Wanqi Dong, Wang Zhe Mark, Min Wu, Xulei Yang

4. Stochastic Sparse Attention for Memory-Bound Inference Authors: Kyle Lee, Corentin Delacour, Kevin Callahan-Coray, Kyle Jiang, Can Yaras, Samet Oymak, Tathagata Srimani, Kerem Y. Camsari

5. Rethinking the Rank Threshold for LoRA Fine-Tuning Authors: Juneyoung Park

6. MEMAUDIT: An Exact Package-Oracle Evaluation Protocol for Budgeted Long-Term LLM Memory Writing Authors: Nishant Bhargava, Rodrigo Sobral Barrento

7. Gated Subspace Inference for Transformer Acceleration Authors: Stephen J. Thomas

8. The Model Knows, the Decoder Finds: Future Value Guided Particle Power Sampling Authors: Tu Nguyen, Rasul Tutunov, Xiaotong Ji, Matthieu Zimmer

9. CoVSpec: Efficient Device-Edge Co-Inference for Vision-Language Models via Speculative Decoding Authors: Yuanyuan Jia, Shunpu Tang, Qianqian Yang

10. Provable Accuracy Collapse in Embedding-Based Representations under Dimensionality Mismatch Authors: Dionysis Arvanitakis, Vaggos Chatziafratis, Yiyuan Luo

Architecture and Training Dynamics (23)

1. The Right Answer, the Wrong Direction: Why Transformers Fail at Counting and How to Fix It

ArXiv ID: 2605.03258

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Gabriel Garcia

Abstract: Large language models often fail at simple counting tasks, even when the items to count are explicitly present in the prompt. We investigate whether this failure occurs because transformers do not represent counts internally, or because they cannot convert those representations into the correct output tokens. Across three model families, Pythia, Qwen3, and Mistral, ranging from 0.4B to 14B parameters, we find strong evidence for the second explanation. Linear probes recover the correct count from intermediate layers with near-perfect accuracy ($R^2>0.99$), showing that the information is present. However, the internal directions that encode counts are nearly orthogonal to the output-head rows for digit tokens ($|\cos|\leq0.032$). In other words, the model stores the count in a form that the digit logits do not naturally read out. We localize this failure with two interventions. Updating only the digit rows of the output head (36,864 parameters) substantially improves constrained next-token digit prediction (60.7 to 100.0% across four tasks), but it does not fix autoregressive generation. By contrast, a small LoRA intervention on attention Q/V weights (7.67M parameters) improves upstream routing and achieves 83.1% +/- 7.2% in true greedy autoregressive generation. Logit-lens measurements confirm the mechanism: the correct digit's vocabulary rank drops from 55,980 to 1, a 50,000x improvement. Additional norm, logit-lens, and cross-task analyses show that the bottleneck generalizes across character counting, addition, and list length, while remaining absent from broader multi-step reasoning benchmarks, including MMLU, GSM8K, and DROP. These results identify counting failure as a geometric readout bottleneck rather than a failure of internal representation: the model knows the count but the output pathway is geometrically misaligned with the tokens needed to express it.

Comment: Separates count representation from readout failure using output-head and attention-pathway interventions across model families.

Topic Match: Tests competing explanations of an architectural readout bottleneck, including the precise limitation of head-only correction during generation.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 9

2. Arithmetic in the Wild: Llama uses Base-10 Addition to Reason About Cyclic Concepts

ArXiv ID: 2605.01148

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Sheridan Feucht, Tal Haklay, Usha Bhalla, Daniel Wurgaft, Can Rager, Rapha\"el Sarfati, Jack Merullo, Thomas McGrath, Owen Lewis, Ekdeep Singh Lubana, Thomas Fel, Atticus Geiger

Abstract: Does structure in representations imply structure in computation? We study how Llama-3.1-8B reasons over cyclic concepts (e.g., "what month is six months after August?"). Even though Llama-3.1-8B's representations for these concepts are circularly structured, we find that instead of directly computing modular addition in the period of the cyclic concept (e.g., 12 for months), the model re-uses a generic addition mechanism across tasks that operates independently of concept-specific geometry. First, it computes the sum of its two inputs using base-10 addition (six + August=14). Then, it maps this sum back to cyclic concept space (14->February). We show that Llama-3.1-8B uses task-agnostic Fourier features to compute these sums--in fact, these features have periods that respect standard base-10 addition, e.g., 2, 5, and 10, rather than the cyclic concept period (e.g., 12 for months). Furthermore, we identify a sparse set of 28 MLP neurons re-used across all tasks (approximately 0.2% of the MLP at layer 18) that can be partitioned into disjoint clusters, each computing the sum for a Fourier feature with a different period. Our work highlights how an interplay between causal abstraction and feature geometry can deepen our mechanistic understanding of LMs.

Comment: Identifies a shared base-10 addition circuit reused across cyclic tasks, testing a concrete alternative to concept-specific modular computation.

Topic Match: Explains what a sparse, reused MLP circuit computes, directly addressing the organization of trained-model computation.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 9

3. Nora: Normalized Orthogonal Row Alignment for Scalable Matrix Optimizer

ArXiv ID: 2605.03769

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Jinghui Yuan, Jiaxuan Zou, Shuo Wang, Yong Liu, Feiping Nie

Abstract: Matrix-based optimizers have demonstrated immense potential in training Large Language Models (LLMs), however, designing an ideal optimizer remains a formidable challenge. A superior optimizer must satisfy three core desiderata: efficiency, achieving Muon-like preconditioning to accelerate optimization; stability, strictly adhering to the scale-invariance inherent in neural networks; and speed, minimizing computational overhead. While existing methods address these aspects to varying degrees, they often fail to unify them, either incurring prohibitive computational costs like Muon, or allowing radial jitters that compromise stability like RMNP. To bridge this gap, we propose Nora, an optimizer that rigorously satisfies all three requirements. Nora achieves training stability by explicitly stabilizing weight norms and angular velocities through row-wise momentum projection onto the orthogonal complement of the weights. Simultaneously, by leveraging the block-diagonal dominance of the Transformer Hessian, Nora effectively approximates structured preconditioning while maintaining an optimal computational complexity of $\mathcal{O}(mn)$. Furthermore, we prove that Nora is a scalable optimizer and establish its corresponding scaling theorems. With a streamlined implementation requiring only two lines of code, our preliminary experiments validate Nora as an efficient and highly promising optimizer for large-scale training.

Comment: Projects momentum orthogonally to weight rows to stabilize norms and angular updates while approximating matrix preconditioning.

Topic Match: Optimizer parameterization, scale invariance, and weight-norm stability directly concern how large-model training behaves.

Relevance: 10 Novelty: 7

4. Concepts Whisper While Syntax Shouts: Spectral Anti-Concentration and the Dual Geometry of Transformer Representations

ArXiv ID: 2605.01609

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Pratyush Acharya, Nuraj Rimal, Habish Dhakal

Abstract: We test whether the causal inner product of \citet{park2024linear} -- defined by the unembedding covariance $\Sigma$ -- enables cross-lingual concept transport. Across 17 models and 4 language pairs, a matched-spectrum randomization test finds that Whitened Causal Alignment is indistinguishable from spectral regularization alone ($p = 0.95$). However, this failure reveals a broader phenomenon: anti-concentration is observed in residual-stream difference-of-means vectors across five architecture families ($p < 10^{-33}$) and supported by SAE features (e.g., $p = 4.5 \times 10^{-19}$) and linear probes on Gemma and Llama. We discover a \emph{dual geometry}: activation-space concept directions anti-concentrate in the spectral tail, while static unembedding-row contrasts \emph{concentrate} in high-variance directions ($p < 10^{-4}$). Split-injection causal interventions support the functional basis on Gemma and Llama (Cohen's $d$ up to $1.80$), and POS-tag probing across 8 models shows syntax preferentially encodes in the high-variance subspace in 6 of 8 architectures ($p < 0.013$), with the Qwen~2.5 family showing a significant reversal consistent with architecture-specific spectral structure. These results suggest transformers may rotate semantic content into spectrally quiet regions during contextualized processing, encoding concepts where they can be manipulated with reduced grammatical disruption.

Comment: Tests semantic and syntactic subspace function with matched-spectrum randomization and causal interventions.

Topic Match: Investigates how computation is organized across representation subspaces, with falsifiable controls and an explicit architecture-dependent reversal.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 9

5. Anon: Extrapolating Optimizer Adaptivity Across the Real Spectrum

ArXiv ID: 2605.02317

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Yiheng Zhang, Kaiyan Zhao, Shaowu Wu, Yiming Wang, Jiajun Wu, Leong Hou U, Steve Drew, Xiaoguang Niu

Abstract: Adaptive optimizers such as Adam have achieved great success in training large-scale models like large language models and diffusion models. However, they often generalize worse than non-adaptive methods, such as SGD on classical architectures like CNNs. We identify a key cause of this performance gap: adaptivity in pre-conditioners, which limits the optimizer's ability to adapt to diverse optimization landscapes. To address this, we propose Anon (Adaptivity Non-restricted Optimizer with Novel convergence technique), a novel optimizer with continuously tunable adaptivity in R, allowing it to interpolate between SGD-like and Adam-like behaviors and even extrapolate beyond both. To ensure convergence across the entire adaptivity spectrum, we introduce incremental delay update (IDU), a novel mechanism that is more flexible than AMSGrad's hard max-tracking strategy and enhances robustness to gradient noise. We theoretically establish convergence guarantees under both convex and non-convex settings. Empirically, Anon consistently outperforms state-of-the-art optimizers on representative image classification, diffusion, and language modeling tasks. These results demonstrate that adaptivity can serve as a valuable tunable design principle, and Anon provides the first unified and reliable framework capable of bridging the gap between classical and modern optimizers and surpassing their advantageous properties.

Comment: Extends optimizer adaptivity across the real spectrum and introduces delayed updates to preserve convergence.

Topic Match: Changes optimizer preconditioning and update dynamics, with language-model training included among its intended settings.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

6. Steer Like the LLM: Activation Steering that Mimics Prompting

ArXiv ID: 2605.03907

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Geert Heyman, Frederik Vandeputte

Abstract: Large language models can be steered at inference time through prompting or activation interventions, but activation steering methods often underperform compared to prompt-based approaches. We propose a framework that formulates prompt steering as a form of activation steering and investigates whether distilling successful prompt steering behavior into simpler, interpretable models can close this gap. Our analysis reveals that popular activation steering methods are not faithful to the mechanics of prompt steering, which applies strong interventions on some tokens while barely affecting others. Based on these insights, we introduce Prompt Steering Replacement (PSR) models that estimate token-specific steering coefficients from the activations themselves and are trained to imitate prompt-based interventions. Experiments on three steering benchmarks across multiple language models show that PSR models outperform existing activation steering methods, especially when controlling for high-coherence completions, and also compare favorably to prompting on AxBench and persona steering.

Comment: Fits token-specific steering coefficients to the activation changes induced by prompting.

Topic Match: Closest to architecture_training through activation mechanics, but the method targets inference-time behavioral steering.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 6

7. Understanding Emergent Misalignment via Feature Superposition Geometry

ArXiv ID: 2605.00842

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Gouki Minegishi, Hiroki Furuta, Takeshi Kojima, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo

Abstract: Emergent misalignment, where fine-tuning on narrow, non-harmful tasks induces harmful behaviors, poses a key challenge for AI safety in LLMs. Despite growing empirical evidence, its underlying mechanism remains unclear. To uncover the reason behind this phenomenon, we propose a geometric account based on the geometry of feature superposition. Because features are encoded in overlapping representations, fine-tuning that amplifies a target feature also unintentionally strengthens nearby harmful features in accordance with their similarity. We give a simple gradient-level derivation of this effect and empirically test it in multiple LLMs (Gemma-2 2B/9B/27B, LLaMA-3.1 8B, GPT-OSS 20B). Using sparse autoencoders (SAEs), we identify features tied to misalignment-inducing data and to harmful behaviors, and show that they are geometrically closer to each other than features derived from non-inducing data. This trend generalizes across domains (e.g., health, career, legal advice). Finally, we show that a geometry-aware approach, filtering training samples closest to toxic features, reduces misalignment by 34.5%, substantially outperforming random removal and achieving comparable or slightly lower misalignment than LLM-as-a-judge-based filtering. Our study links emergent misalignment to feature superposition, providing a basis for understanding and mitigating this phenomenon.

Comment: Links fine-tuning-induced feature amplification to interference between geometrically overlapping representations.

Topic Match: Closest to architecture_training through gradient interference, but the core subject is safety misalignment rather than architectural destabilization.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 7

8. Neuron-Anchored Rule Extraction for Large Language Models via Contrastive Hierarchical Ablation

ArXiv ID: 2605.03058

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Francesco Sovrano, Gabriele Dominici, Marc Langheinrich

Abstract: A key goal of explainable AI (XAI) is to express the decision logic of large language models (LLMs) in symbolic form and link it to internal mechanisms. Global rule-extraction methods typically learn symbolic surrogates without grounding rules in model circuitry, while mechanistic interpretability can connect behaviors to neuron sets but often depends on hand-crafted hypotheses and expensive neuron-level interventions. We introduce MechaRule, a pipeline that grounds rule extraction in LLM circuits by efficiently localizing sparse neurons called agonists, whose activation neutralization disrupts rule-related behaviors. MechaRule rests on two empirical observations. First, within a fixed baseline/flip regime, sparse agonist effects can be approximately monotone and saturating: a few dominant neuron activations can overtop weaker ones at coarse scales, while overlapping neurons flip many of the same examples. This motivates viewing localization as adaptive group testing driven by a regime-conditional strength predicate with confidence-guided conservative pruning, yielding Theta(k log(N/k) + k) interventions over N candidates when k << N neurons are agonists under the monotone-overtopping abstraction. Second, agonists emerge more reliably when ablations are verified through data splits aligned with close-to-faithful rule behavior; spectral splits remain a useful rule-free fallback, while unfaithful splits degrade localization. Empirically, overtopping appears mainly in learned, task-aligned regimes: on arithmetic and jailbreak tasks across Qwen2 and GPT-J, MechaRule recalls 96.8% of high-effect brute-force agonists in completed comparisons, and suppressing localized agonists reduces arithmetic accuracy and jailbreak success by up to 71.1% and 8.8%, respectively.

Comment: Uses controlled ablations to connect symbolic rules to sparse neuron sets with measurable behavioral effects.

Topic Match: Internal computation is the nearest topic, but the core contribution is an interpretability-framed rule-extraction pipeline.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 6

9. Artificial Jagged Intelligence as Uneven Optimization Energy Allocation Capability Concentration, Redistribution, and Optimization Governance

ArXiv ID: 2605.01420

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Wesley Shu, Peng Wei

Abstract: Artificial Jagged Intelligence (AJI) denotes a recurring pattern in which large learning systems exhibit strong local capabilities while remaining weak or brittle in other domains. This paper develops a formal theory of AJI as uneven allocation of optimization pressure. We model training as a finite-budget process that distributes gradient-driven update energy across capability-relevant directions in parameter space. In this model, jagged capability profiles arise from anisotropic objective structure, data geometry, and representational coupling rather than from a single scalar quantity called intelligence. The paper defines capability gain, optimization energy share, and jaggedness, then proves that persistent concentration of cumulative update energy yields lower bounds on dispersion in capability gains. A finite-budget tradeoff theorem shows why prioritizing one capability can impose opportunity costs on others unless positive coupling or shared structure offsets the cost. The analysis also studies redistribution mechanisms, including energy-variance regularization and auxiliary structural objectives, as interventions that reshape the optimization field. The resulting framework links uneven emergence, training architecture, and optimization governance. It predicts that early concentration of update energy should forecast later capability jaggedness; that scaling under a narrow objective need not eliminate anisotropy; and that explicitly funded auxiliary objectives can revive neglected capabilities. AJI is therefore not merely a descriptive label for uneven model behavior, but a testable theory of how finite optimization resources produce concentrated, delayed, and structurally uneven capability formation.

Comment: Models uneven capability growth through anisotropic allocation of gradient-update energy.

Topic Match: Optimization-energy allocation connects to training dynamics, but the abstract establishes no language-model-specific application or validation.

Relevance: 5 Novelty: 6

10. Task Vector Geometry Underlies Dual Modes of Task Inference in Transformers

ArXiv ID: 2605.03780

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Hao Yan, Haolin Yang, Yiqiao Zhong

Abstract: Transformers are effective at inferring the latent task from context via two inference modes: recognizing a task seen during training, and adapting to a novel one. Recent interpretability studies have identified from middle-layer representations task-specific directions, or task vectors, that steer model behavior. However, a lack of rigorous foundations hinders connecting internal representations to external model behavior: existing work fails to explain how task-vector geometry is shaped by the training distribution, and what geometry enables out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization. In this paper, we study these questions in a controlled synthetic setting by training small transformers from scratch on latent-task sequence distributions, which allows a principled mathematical characterization. We show that two inference modes can coexist within a single model. In-distribution behavior is governed by Bayesian task retrieval, implemented internally through convex combinations of learned task vectors. OOD behavior, by contrast, arises through extrapolative task learning, whose representations occupy a subspace nearly orthogonal to the task-vector subspace. Taken together, our results suggest that task-vector geometry, training distributions, and generalization behaviors are closely related.

Comment: Connects training-distribution geometry to separate representation subspaces for task retrieval and novel-task adaptation.

Topic Match: Closest to architecture_training through training-shaped representations, but the demonstration concerns small synthetic task-inference transformers.

Relevance: 5 Novelty: 8

11. Model Merging: Foundations and Algorithms

ArXiv ID: 2605.01580

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Donato Crisostomi

Abstract: Modern deep learning usually treats models as separate artifacts: trained independently, specialized for particular purposes, and replaced when improved versions appear. This thesis studies model merging as an alternative paradigm: combining independently trained neural networks directly in weight space, with little or no optimization and without requiring access to the original training data. The thesis considers two main regimes. In the single-task setting, where models share an objective but differ in initialization, we introduce C$^2$M$^3$, a cycle-consistent merging algorithm based on Frank-Wolfe optimization. C$^2$M$^3$ aligns multiple networks into a shared, reference-free parameter space, making weight averaging meaningful without privileging any individual model. In the multi-task setting, where models are fine-tuned for different downstream tasks from a common pretrained initialization, we first develop a theoretical account of task vectors as approximate gradients. This explains both the effectiveness and the limitations of task arithmetic. Building on this view, we show that task vectors inherit the low-rank structure of gradients and introduce Task Singular Vectors (TSV), a decomposition that enables compression and interference reduction through TSV-Merge. We then present MASS, an input-adaptive routing method that uses TSV geometry to select task-relevant subspaces at inference time. Finally, we introduce MERGE$^3$, an evolutionary merging framework that uses Item Response Theory to reduce evaluation costs by up to 50$\times$ while preserving solution quality. Together, these contributions provide theoretical and algorithmic foundations for model merging, supporting a paradigm in which learned capabilities can be composed, reused, and extended across models.

Comment: Aligns independently trained networks in a reference-free parameter space to make weight averaging meaningful.

Topic Match: Closest to architecture_training through weight-space alignment, but the thesis centers on composing already-trained models.

Relevance: 5 Novelty: 6

12. When Attention Collapses: Residual Evidence Modeling for Compositional Inference

ArXiv ID: 2605.02323

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Niklas Houba

Abstract: Compositional inference - the decomposition of observations into an unknown number of latent components - is central to perception and scientific data analysis. Attention-based models perform well when components are approximately separable, as in object-centric vision. Under additive superposition, however - where multiple components contribute to every observation - we identify a structural failure mode we term slot collapse: multiple slots converge to the same dominant component while weaker ones remain unrepresented. We trace this to a general limitation: attention is memoryless with respect to explained evidence. All slots repeatedly operate on the same input without accounting for what has already been explained, so gradients are dominated by the strongest component, inducing shared fixed points across slots. As a result, attention fails to enforce non-redundant allocation under additive superposition. We address this by introducing residual evidence modeling, instantiated via evidence depletion - a minimal modification combining multiplicative depletion with an attention bias. Controlled ablations show that parallel attention, sequential processing alone, and loss-based regularization fail to resolve collapse; evidence depletion, which adds residual state to sequential attention, consistently succeeds. Across synthetic benchmarks and real-world audio mixtures (FUSS), evidence depletion reduces slot collapse by up to an order of magnitude, generalizing beyond synthetic settings. On gravitational-wave source inference for the ESA/NASA LISA mission, under identical architectures, data, and losses, standard attention fails while evidence depletion prevents collapse and enables multi-source posterior estimation. These results show that under additive superposition, residual evidence tracking is the operative ingredient for preventing collapse and enabling compositional inference.

Comment: Shows that tracking residual evidence prevents redundant attention-slot allocation under additive superposition.

Topic Match: Closest to architecture_training through attention dynamics, but the trained models perform source separation and scientific inference.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

13. Automated Interpretability and Feature Discovery in Language Models with Agents

ArXiv ID: 2605.01555

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Arnau Marin-Llobet, Javier Ferrando

Abstract: We introduce an autonomous multiagent framework for mechanistic interpretability that automates both explaining and finding internal features in large language models. The system runs two coupled loops: (1) explanation refinement, where an agent proposes competing hypotheses and iteratively tests them with targeted prompt controls and a multi-metric evaluation; and (2) feature discovery, where an agent generates prompt sets, constructs a k-nearest-neighbor graph in activation space, and retrieves candidate features using statistical separability and semantic coherence criteria. On Gemma-2 family models and MLP neurons in weight-sparse transformers, our agent improves over one-shot auto-interpretations, discovers language-specific and safety-relevant features, and produces auditable explanation traces, showing that agent-driven empirical loops yield sharper and more falsifiable explanations than one-shot labels.

Comment: Automates falsifiable feature explanations through competing hypotheses and targeted prompt controls.

Topic Match: Closest to architecture_training through internal activations, but the contribution is agent-driven feature discovery and interpretation.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 5

14. Probe-Geometry Alignment: Erasing the Cross-Sequence Memorization Signature Below Chance

ArXiv ID: 2605.01699

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Anamika Paul Rupa, Anietie Andy

Abstract: Recent attacks show that behavioural unlearning of large language models leaves internal traces recoverable by adversarial probes. We characterise where this retention lives and show it can be surgically removed without measurable capability cost. Our central protocol is a leave-one-out cross-sequence probe that tests whether a memorisation signature generalises across held-out sequences. The signature is real and consistent across scale: memorisation-specific gaps of +0.32, +0.19, +0.30 on Pythia-70M, GPT-2 medium, and Mistral-7B; on Pythia-70M, the random-initialisation control collapses to -0.04 at the deepest layer where the pretrained signature peaks. The probe direction is causally separable from recall -- projecting it out collapses the signature locally (+0.44 -> -0.19) while behavioural recall barely changes -- and a probe trained on naturally memorised content does not classify fine-tuning-injected secrets, marking two representationally distinct regimes. We then introduce probe-geometry alignment (PGA), a surgical erasure that aligns activations along the probe's live readout direction at each depth. PGA drives the cross-sequence probe below random chance at all four scales tested (toy depth-4: 0.17; Pythia-70M: 0.07; Mistral-7B: 0.45; GPT-2 medium: 0.06 via MD-PGA k=2) and remains robust to six adversarial probe variants. Against a re-fitting attacker who trains a fresh probe on PGA-treated activations, we extend PGA adversarially, defeating the re-fit probe at every memorisation-relevant depth while preserving five zero-shot capability benchmarks within 2.8 percentage points per task (mean {\Delta}acc = +0.2pp). The cross-sequence signature is a real, causally separable, regime-specific property of pretrained representations -- removable below chance with a single rank-one intervention per depth at no measurable capability cost.

Comment: Uses rank-one interventions to separate probe-accessible memorization signatures from behavioral recall.

Topic Match: Closest to architecture_training through representation interventions, but the core subject is unlearning.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

15. Learning Dynamics of Zeroth-Order Optimization: A Kernel Perspective

ArXiv ID: 2605.03373

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Zhe Li, Bicheng Ying, Zidong Liu, Haibo Yang

Abstract: Classical optimization theory establishes that zeroth-order (ZO) algorithms suffer from a dimension-dependent slowdown, with convergence rates typically scaling with the model dimension compared to first-order methods. However, in contrast to these theoretical expectations, a growing body of recent work demonstrates the successful application of ZO methods to fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) with billions of parameters. To explain this paradox, we derive the one-step learning dynamics of ZO SGD, where the empirical Neural Tangent Kernel (eNTK) naturally emerges as the key term governing the learning behavior. Inspection of the eNTK produced by ZO SGD reveals that each element corresponds to the inner product of neural tangent vectors projected onto a random low-dimensional subspace. Thus, by invoking the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma, our analysis shows that the fidelity of the ZO eNTK is governed primarily by the number of perturbations. Crucially, the approximation error depends on the model output size rather than the massive parameter dimension. This dimension-free property provides a theoretical justification for the scalability of ZO methods to LLMs finetuning tasks. We believe that this kernel-based framework offers a novel perspective for understanding ZO methods within the context of learning dynamics.

Comment: Derives kernel-approximation error governed by output size and perturbation count instead of parameter count.

Topic Match: Closest to architecture_training through optimizer dynamics, but its core is stochastic-gradient analysis of zeroth-order fine-tuning.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 9

16. CoFlow: Coordinated Few-Step Flow for Offline Multi-Agent Decision Making

ArXiv ID: 2605.01457

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Guowei Zou, Haitao Wang, Beiwen Zhang, Boning Zhang, Hejun Wu

Abstract: Generative models have emerged as a major paradigm for offline multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), but existing approaches require many iterative sampling steps. Recent few-step accelerations either distill a joint teacher into independent students or apply averaged velocities independently per agent, suggesting that few-step inference requires sacrificing inter-agent coordination. We show this trade-off is not necessary: single-pass multi-agent generation can preserve coordination when the velocity field is natively joint-coupled. We propose Coordinated few-step Flow (CoFlow), an architecture that combines Coordinated Velocity Attention (CVA) with Adaptive Coordination Gating. A finite-difference consistency surrogate further replaces memory-prohibitive Jacobian-vector product backpropagation through the averaged velocity field with two stop-gradient forward passes. Across 60 configurations spanning MPE, MA-MuJoCo, and SMAC, CoFlow matches or surpasses Gaussian / value-based, transformer, diffusion, and prior flow baselines on episodic return. Three independent coordination probes confirm that the gains flow through inter-agent coordination rather than per-agent capacity. A denoising-step sweep shows that single-pass inference suffices on every configuration. CoFlow reaches state-of-the-art coordination quality in 1-3 denoising steps under both centralized and decentralized execution. Project page: https://github.com/Guowei-Zou/coflow.

Comment: Joint velocity coupling preserves multi-agent coordination in single-pass flow generation.

Topic Match: Velocity-field architecture is the closest connection, but the trained models generate multi-agent policies outside the language-model scope.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

17. Discovering Reinforcement Learning Interfaces with Large Language Models

ArXiv ID: 2605.03408

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Akshat Singh Jaswal, Ashish Baghel, Paras Chopra

Abstract: Reinforcement learning systems rely on environment interfaces that specify observations and reward functions, yet constructing these interfaces for new tasks often requires substantial manual effort. While recent work has automated reward design using large language models (LLMs), these approaches assume fixed observations and do not address the broader challenge of synthesizing complete task interfaces. We study RL task interface discovery from raw simulator state, where both observation mappings and reward functions must be generated. We propose LIMEN (Code available at https://github.com/Lossfunk/LIMEN), a LLM guided evolutionary framework that produces candidate interfaces as executable programs and iteratively refines them using policy training feedback. Across novel discrete gridworld tasks and continuous control domains spanning locomotion and manipulation, joint evolution of observations and rewards discovers effective interfaces given only a trajectory-level success metric, while optimizing either component alone fails on at least one domain. These results demonstrate that automatic construction of RL interfaces from raw state can substantially reduce manual engineering and that observation and reward components often benefit from co-design, as single-component optimization fails catastrophically on at least one domain in our evaluation suite.

Comment: Jointly evolves observation mappings and reward programs using policy-training feedback.

Topic Match: Closest through training-objective and input design, but those choices train RL policies; the language model serves as the search tool.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

18. Deciphering Shortcut Learning from an Evolutionary Game Theory Perspective

ArXiv ID: 2605.02658

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Xiayang Li, Kuo Gai, Shihua Zhang

Abstract: Shortcut learning causes deep learning models to rely on non-essential features within the data. However, its formation in deep neural network training still lacks theoretical understanding. In this paper, we provide a formal definition of core and shortcut features and employ evolutionary game theory to analyze the origins of shortcut bias by modeling data samples as players and their corresponding neural tangent features as strategies, assuming the existence of core and shortcut subnetworks. We find that gradient descent (GD) and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) lead to two distinct stochastically stable states, each corresponding to a different strategy. The former primarily optimizes the shortcut subnetwork, while the latter primarily optimizes the core subnetwork. We investigate the influence of these strategies on shortcut bias through a continuous stochastic differential equation, and reveal the impact of data noise and optimization noise on the formation of shortcut bias. In brief, our work employs evolutionary game theory to characterize the dynamics of shortcut bias formation and provides a theoretical view on its mitigation.

Comment: Derives different shortcut-selection equilibria for deterministic and stochastic gradient descent.

Topic Match: Closest to architecture_training through optimization dynamics, but the subject is general stochastic-gradient shortcut theory.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

19. Beyond Activation Alignment: The Geometry of Neural Sensitivity

ArXiv ID: 2605.03222

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Amirhossein Yavari, Farnaz Zamani Esfahlani

Abstract: Activation-alignment measures such as Representational Similarity Analysis (RSA), Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA), and Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) are widely used to compare biological and artificial neural representations. Recent theoretical work interprets many of these methods as assessing agreement between optimal linear readouts over broad families of global tasks. However, agreement at the level of global readouts does not determine how a system uses local stimulus evidence. Specifically, representations may align in activation space yet differ in their sensitivity to small perturbations. To address this challenge, we introduce a complementary framework based on local decodable information, which focuses on a representation's ability, under noise, to discriminate small perturbations within a specified stimulus-coordinate subspace. Building on Fisher information and local representation geometry, we summarize each representation using the expected projected pullback/Fisher metric over that subspace. This formulation induces a second-moment family of local discrimination tasks, for which the resulting operator provides a minimal, complete dataset-level summary of expected discriminability. We compare these regularized signatures using a log-spectral distance on the manifold of symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrices, yielding the Spectral Riemannian Alignment Score (S-RAS) and a uniform multiplicative certificate over the corresponding family of lifted task values. Empirically, this framework enables the recovery of corresponding layers across independently trained artificial neural networks, supports transferable class-conditional probes, reveals controlled dissociations between standard and robust training, and uncovers stimulus-coordinate family effects across mouse visual cortex using the Allen Brain Observatory static gratings dataset.

Comment: Fisher-metric signatures distinguish activation alignment from sensitivity to local perturbations.

Topic Match: Representation geometry is the nearest architectural connection; the demonstrated scope concerns artificial-network comparisons and visual neuroscience.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

20. Most ReLU Networks Admit Identifiable Parameters

ArXiv ID: 2605.03601

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Moritz Grillo, Guido Mont\'ufar

Abstract: We study the realization map of deep ReLU networks, focusing on when a function determines its parameters up to scaling and permutation. To analyze hidden redundancies beyond these standard symmetries, we introduce a framework based on weighted polyhedral complexes. Our main result shows that for every architecture whose input and hidden layers have width at least two, there exists an open set of identifiable parameters. This implies that the functional dimension of every such architecture is exactly the number of parameters minus the number of hidden neurons. We further show that minimal functional representations can still have non-trivial parameter redundancies. Finally, we establish a generic depth hierarchy, whereby for an open set of parameters the realized function cannot be represented generically by any shallower network.

Comment: Characterizes parameter identifiability, functional dimension, and depth expressivity after accounting for scaling and permutation symmetries.

Topic Match: Closest to architecture_training through parameter symmetries and depth, but the contribution is general ReLU-network theory.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

21. From Cortical Synchronous Rhythm to Brain Inspired Learning Mechanism: An Oscillatory Spiking Neural Network with Time-Delayed Coordination

ArXiv ID: 2605.01656

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Tingting Dan, Guorong Wu

Abstract: Human cognition emerges from coordinated spiking dynamics in distributed neural circuits, where information is encoded via both firing rates and precise spike timing determined by brain rhythms. Inspired by this notion, we propose a brain-inspired learning primitive in which cognition-level neural synchrony emerges through iterative bottom-up and top-down interactions between micro-scale dynamics of spiking neurons and a macro-scale mechanism of oscillatory synchronization. Specifically, we model each parcel (e.g., a cortical region or an image pixel) in the target system as a spiking neuron embedded in a predefined connectivity scaffold. Low-level information is encoded in a spatiotemporal domain, where neurons are selectively grouped and fire spontaneously over time through self-organized dynamics. In the bottom-up route, oscillatory synchronization is formed from past spiking activity accumulated over a finite memory window. Since brain dynamics operate in a regime of partial and transient synchronization rather than global phase locking, we model oscillatory coordination using a time-delayed synchronization formulation, which enables a top-down modulation of heterogeneous neural spiking for a large-scale distributed system. Together, we devise a spiking-by-synchronization neural network (S2-Net) that uses rhythmic timing as a control mechanism for efficient information processing. Promising results have been achieved across a broad range of tasks, including neural activity decoding, energy-efficient signal processing, temporal binding and semantic reasoning.

Comment: A time-delayed synchronization loop coordinates local spiking dynamics through network-level rhythmic feedback.

Topic Match: The contribution is architectural, but spiking neural networks are an excluded core subject and no language-model training is demonstrated.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

22. Optimal Posterior Sampling for Policy Identification in Tabular Markov Decision Processes

ArXiv ID: 2605.03921

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Cyrille Kone, Kevin Jamieson

Abstract: We study the $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-PAC policy identification problem in finite-horizon episodic Markov Decision Processes. Existing approaches provide finite-time guarantees for approximate settings ($\varepsilon>0$) but suffer from high computational cost, rendering them hard to implement, and also suffer from suboptimal dependence on $\log(1/\delta)$. We propose a randomized and computationally efficient algorithm for best policy identification that combines posterior sampling with an online learning algorithm to guide exploration in the MDP. Our method achieves asymptotic optimality in sample complexity, also in terms of posterior contraction rate, and runs in $O(S^2AH)$ per episode, matching standard model-based approaches. Unlike prior algorithms such as MOCA and PEDEL, our guarantees remain meaningful in the asymptotic regime and avoid sub-optimal polynomial dependence on $\log(1/\delta)$. Our results provide both theoretical insights and practical tools for efficient policy identification in tabular MDPs.

Comment: Posterior-sampling exploration combines asymptotically optimal policy identification with tractable per-episode computation.

Topic Match: Optimization algorithms are the nearest registry connection; tabular policy identification is outside language-model training.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 7

23. Taming the Curses of Multiagency in Robust Markov Games with Large State Space through Linear Function Approximation

ArXiv ID: 2605.03125

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Jingchu Gai, Laixi Shi

Abstract: Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) holds great potential but faces robustness challenges due to environmental uncertainty. To address this, distributionally robust Markov games (RMGs) optimize worst-case performance when the environment deviates from the nominal model within a uncertainty set. Beyond robustness, an equally urgent goal for MARL is data efficiency -- sampling from vast state and action spaces that grow exponentially with the number of agents potentially leads to the curse of multiagency. However, current provably data-efficient algorithms for RMGs are limited to tabular settings with finite state and action spaces, which are only computationally manageable for small-scale problems, leaving RMGs with large-scale (or infinite) state spaces largely unexplored. The only existing work beyond tabular settings focuses on linear function approximation (LFA) for a restrictive class of RMGs using vanish minimal value assumption and still suffers from sample complexity with the curse of multiagency. In this work, we focuses on general RMGs with LFA. For uncertainty sets defined by total variation distance, we develop provably data-efficient algorithms that break the curse of multiagency in both the generative model setting and a newly proposed online interactive setting. To our knowledge, our results are the first to break the curse of multiagency of sample complexity for RMGs with large (possibly infinite) state spaces, regardless of the uncertainty set construction.

Comment: Linear function approximation removes exponential agent-count dependence from robust-game sample complexity.

Topic Match: Learning-algorithm theory is the closest category, but the subject is robust Markov games rather than language-model optimization.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 7

Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible (2)

1. Remote Action Generation: Remote Control with Minimal Communication

ArXiv ID: 2605.01833

Primary Topic: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible

Authors: Szymon Kobus, Deniz G\"und\"uz

Abstract: We address the challenge of remote control where one or more actors, lacking direct reward access, are steered by a controller over a communication-constrained channel. The controller learns an optimal policy from observed rewards and communicates action guidance to the actors, which becomes demanding for large or continuous action spaces. To achieve rate-efficient communication throughout this interactive learning and control process, we introduce a novel framework leveraging remote generation. Instead of transmitting full action specifications, the controller sends minimal information, enabling the actors to locally generate actions by sampling from the controller's evolving target policy. This guided sampling is facilitated by an importance sampling approach. Concurrently, the actors use the received guidance as supervised learning data to learn the controller's policy. This actor-side learning improves their local sampling capabilities, progressively reducing future communication needs. Our solution, Guided Remote Action Sampling Policy (GRASP), demonstrates significant communication reduction, achieving an average 12-fold data reduction across all experiments (50-fold for continuous action spaces) compared to direct action transmission, and a 41-fold reduction compared to reward transmission.

Comment: Learns actor-side policy approximations to reduce the communication needed for guided action sampling.

Topic Match: Closest to training_systems through communication-efficient learning, but the trained policies perform remote control.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

2. VUDA: Breaking CUDA-Vulkan Isolation for Spatial Sharing of Compute and Graphics on the Same GPU

ArXiv ID: 2605.01352

Primary Topic: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible

Authors: Bin Xu, Pengfei Hu, Wenxin Zheng, Jinyu Gu, Haibo Chen

Abstract: GPU-based simulation environments for embodied AI interleave physics simulation (CUDA) and photorealistic rendering (Vulkan) on a single device. We observe that two foundational scenarios -- simulation data generation and RL training -- can be naturally adapted to execute their simulation and rendering phases concurrently, presenting a significant opportunity to improve GPU utilization through spatial multiplexing. However, a fundamental obstacle we term execution isolation prevents this: CUDA and Vulkan create separate GPU contexts whose channels are bound to different scheduling groups, confining compute and graphics to mutually exclusive time slices. Existing spatial-sharing techniques are limited to the CUDA ecosystem, while temporal-sharing approaches underutilize available resources. This paper presents VUDA, a system that breaks execution isolation to enable spatial parallelism between CUDA compute and Vulkan graphics workloads. VUDA is built on two key observations: although CUDA and Vulkan expose different programming abstractions, their execution paths converge to a common channel primitive at the driver and hardware level; meanwhile, their virtual-address spaces are inherently disjoint, making safe page-table merging feasible without remapping. VUDA exposes a thin API for developers to annotate co-schedulable CUDA streams, and realizes spatial sharing through channel redirection into Vulkan's scheduling domain and page-table grafting to unify address spaces, eliminating all data copying on the critical path. Experiments on representative embodied-AI workloads show that VUDA delivers up to 85% higher throughput than temporal-sharing baselines, while improving GPU utilization and reducing end-to-end latency.

Comment: Enables concurrent CUDA and Vulkan execution through shared scheduling and grafted page tables.

Topic Match: Closest to training_systems through GPU execution, but the contribution is runtime engineering for embodied-AI workloads.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 8

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (10)

1. Component-Aware Self-Speculative Decoding in Hybrid Language Models

ArXiv ID: 2605.01106

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Hector Borobia, Elies Segu\'i-Mas, Guillermina Tormo-Carb\'o

Abstract: Speculative decoding accelerates autoregressive inference by drafting candidate tokens with a fast model and verifying them in parallel with the target. Self-speculative methods avoid the need for an external drafter but have been studied exclusively in homogeneous Transformer architectures. We introduce component-aware self-speculative decoding, the first method to exploit the internal architectural heterogeneity of hybrid language models, isolating the SSM/linear-attention subgraph as a zero-cost internal draft. We evaluate this on two architecturally distinct hybrid families: Falcon-H1 (parallel: Mamba-2 + attention per layer) and Qwen3.5 (sequential: interleaved linear and attention layers), with a pure Transformer control (Qwen2.5). Parallel hybrids achieve acceptance rates of alpha = 0.68 at draft length k=2 under greedy decoding, while sequential hybrids yield only alpha = 0.038 -- an 18x gap attributable to how each architecture integrates its components. The property is scale-invariant: Falcon-H1 at 3B reproduces the rates observed at 0.5B. We further show that perplexity degradation from a companion ablation study predicts speculative viability without running speculative decoding: a 3.15x ratio (Falcon) maps to alpha = 0.37 at k=4, while 81.96x (Qwen) maps to alpha = 0.019. For sequential hybrids, generic LayerSkip achieves 12x higher acceptance rates than the component-aware strategy. The composition pattern of hybrid models -- not merely the presence of alternative components -- determines whether component-level self-speculation is viable.

Comment: Shows that parallel versus sequential hybrid composition determines whether an internal subgraph can serve as a speculative drafter.

Topic Match: Self-speculative inference is the main contribution; the useful composition analysis remains secondary to decoding acceleration.

Relevance: 5 Novelty: 7

2. HeadQ: Model-Visible Distortion and Score-Space Correction for KV-Cache Quantization

ArXiv ID: 2605.03562

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Jorge L. Ruiz Williams

Abstract: KV-cache quantizers usually optimize storage-space reconstruction, even though attention reads keys through logits and values through attention-weighted readout. We argue that persistent cache error should be measured in model-visible coordinates. For keys, the visible object is score error modulo constant shifts; this yields HeadQ, a key-side method that stores a low-rank residual side code in a calibration-learned query basis and applies it as an additive logit correction. For values, fixed-attention readout gives an $A^2$-weighted token-distortion surrogate. Across six models, Fisher/score-space error predicts attention KL far better than raw key MSE; same-budget counterexamples, null-space interventions, query-PCA controls, and wrong-sign HeadQ falsify storage-MSE alternatives. Matched Pythia checkpoints localize the main anomaly to a small-model low-entropy route-flip boundary. In K-only WikiText-103 decode experiments with dense values, HeadQ removes roughly $84$--$94\%$ of the excess perplexity on the strongest 2-bit rows; in an auxiliary full-KV 2-bit composition, HeadQ plus an $A^2$ value policy improves all six models.

Comment: Measures key-quantization distortion in attention-score coordinates and corrects it with a low-rank residual code.

Topic Match: Closest to efficiency_scaling through cache quantization, but its core contribution is post-training inference compression.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 8

3. Compress Then Adapt? No, Do It Together via Task-aware Union of Subspaces

ArXiv ID: 2605.02829

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Jingze Ge, Yun Liu, Xue Geng, Wanqi Dong, Wang Zhe Mark, Min Wu, Xulei Yang

Abstract: Adapting large pretrained models to diverse tasks is now routine, yet the two dominant strategies of parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) and low-rank compression are typically composed in sequence. This decoupled practice first compresses and then fine-tunes adapters, potentially misaligning the compressed subspace with downstream objectives and squandering a global parameter budget. To overcome this limitation, we introduce JACTUS (Joint Adaptation and Compression with a Task-aware Union of Subspaces), a single framework that unifies compression and adaptation. From a small calibration set, JACTUS estimates input and pre-activation gradient covariances, forms their orthogonal union with the pretrained weight subspace, performs a projected low-rank approximation inside this union, allocates rank globally by marginal gain per parameter, and trains only a compact core matrix. This explicitly mitigates the potential misalignment between the compressed subspace and downstream objectives by coupling the directions preserved for compression with those required for adaptation, yielding a deployable low-rank model that avoids retaining full frozen weights while enabling fast and robust tuning. On vision, JACTUS attains an average 89.2% accuracy on ViT-Base across eight datasets at 80% retained parameters, surpassing strong 100% PEFT baselines (e.g., DoRA 87.9%). On language, JACTUS achieves an 80.9% average on Llama2-7B commonsense QA at the same 80% retained-parameter budget, outperforming 100% PEFT (e.g., DoRA 79.7%) and exceeding prior compress-then-finetune pipelines under the same ratained-parameter budget. We will release code.

Comment: Jointly selects compression and adaptation subspaces under a fixed global parameter budget.

Topic Match: Closest to efficiency_scaling through low-rank compression, but parameter-efficient task adaptation is the core contribution.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 6

4. Stochastic Sparse Attention for Memory-Bound Inference

ArXiv ID: 2605.01910

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Kyle Lee, Corentin Delacour, Kevin Callahan-Coray, Kyle Jiang, Can Yaras, Samet Oymak, Tathagata Srimani, Kerem Y. Camsari

Abstract: Autoregressive decoding becomes bandwidth-limited at long contexts, as generating each token requires reading all $n_k$ key and value vectors from KV cache. We present Stochastic Additive No-mulT Attention (SANTA), a method that sparsifies value-cache access by sampling $S \ll n_k$ indices from the post-softmax distribution and aggregates only those value rows. This yields an unbiased estimator of the post-softmax value aggregation while replacing value-stage multiply-accumulates with gather-and-add. We introduce stratified sampling to design variance-reduced, GPU-friendly variants, demonstrating $1.5\times$ decode-step attention kernel speedup over FlashInfer and FlashDecoding on an NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada while matching baseline accuracy at 32k-token contexts. Finally, we propose Bernoulli $qK^\mathsf{T}$ sampling as a complementary technique to sparsify the score stage, reducing key-feature access through stochastic ternary queries. Both methods are orthogonal to upstream techniques such as ternary quantization, low-rank projections, and KV-cache compression. Together, they point toward sparse, multiplier-free, and energy-efficient inference. We open-source our kernels at: https://github.com/OPUSLab/SANTA.git

Comment: Uses unbiased attention-value sampling to reduce value-cache reads during decoding.

Topic Match: Closest to efficiency_scaling through sparse cache access, but the deliverable is faster inference kernels.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 6

5. Rethinking the Rank Threshold for LoRA Fine-Tuning

ArXiv ID: 2605.03724

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Juneyoung Park

Abstract: A recent landscape analysis of LoRA fine-tuning in the neural tangent kernel regime establishes a sufficient condition $r(r+1)/2 > KN$ on the LoRA rank $r$ for the absence of spurious local minima under squared-error loss, prescribing $r \geq 12$ on canonical few-shot RoBERTa setups. The condition is stated for general output dimension $K$, so its sharpness in any particular regime, and its practical implication for the cross-entropy loss actually used in fine-tuning, are open. We give three results that together reduce the prescribed rank to $r = 1$ for binary classification in this regime. First, replacing the symmetric Sard-form count with the non-symmetric LoRA manifold dimension yields a strictly weaker capacity requirement, $r(m+n) - r^2 > C^ \cdot KN$ with $C^ \approx 1.35$ under Gaussian-iid features, satisfied at $r = 1$ on canonical setups. Second, in the cross-entropy setting the Polyak--\L{}ojasiewicz inequality removes the rank threshold entirely. Third, a Rademacher-complexity bound predicts rank-one variance optimality precisely when the bias term is saturated, which is the case for binary classification but not for $K > 2$. Empirically, across four GLUE-style binary tasks, three encoder architectures, and at scale on RoBERTa-large, rank one is competitive with the existing prescription $r = 12$; on multi-class MNLI the optimal rank shifts above one, also as predicted. The binary-regime guarantees are conditional on standard NTK assumptions; the multi-class extension is left to future work.

Comment: Shows that binary-classification LoRA rank requirements can collapse to one under neural-tangent-kernel assumptions.

Topic Match: Closest to low-rank parameter efficiency, but conditional LoRA fine-tuning theory is an explicitly excluded core subject.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

6. MEMAUDIT: An Exact Package-Oracle Evaluation Protocol for Budgeted Long-Term LLM Memory Writing

ArXiv ID: 2605.02199

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Nishant Bhargava, Rodrigo Sobral Barrento

Abstract: Long-term LLM agents must compress streams of past interactions into persistent memory before future queries are known. Existing evaluations usually measure final question-answering accuracy, which entangles memory writing with retrieval, prompting, and reader reasoning. We introduce MEMAUDIT, an exact packageoracle evaluation protocol for budgeted long-term memory writing. A MEMAUDIT package fixes an experience stream, candidate memory representations, storage costs, semantic evidence units, future-query requirements, and a budget, turning write-time memory selection into a finite auditable optimization problem with a certified denominator. We instantiate this protocol with a concave-over-modular semantic coverage objective under storage and one-representation-per-experience constraints, and compute exact package optima using branch-and-bound with MILP certification. Across controlled exact packages, validity-heavy stress tests, human-audited natural support slices, and exported Mem0, A-Mem, and Letta stores, MEMAUDIT separates representation quality, validity-state preservation, and budget-aware selection effects that end-to-end QA cannot localize. The resulting artifact provides reusable package generators, certified solvers, natural package exports, external-system scorers, and cached reproducibility metadata for evaluating what memory writers actually preserve under fixed storage budgets.

Comment: Uses certified storage-budget optima to isolate memory-writing quality from downstream question-answering performance.

Topic Match: Closest to efficiency_scaling through storage budgets, but it proposes an agent-memory evaluation protocol rather than auditing an existing benchmark.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 6

7. Gated Subspace Inference for Transformer Acceleration

ArXiv ID: 2605.03109

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Stephen J. Thomas

Abstract: A method is presented for accelerating inference in transformer language models by exploiting the low effective rank of the token activation manifold at each layer. The method decomposes each activation vector into a subspace component and a residual, computes the linear-layer output on the subspace component via a cached low-rank weight image at reduced memory bandwidth, and applies a per-token gate that determines whether the residual correction is computed or skipped. The gate ensures that the output distribution is preserved to within a controllable tolerance. Validation on three model families (GPT-2 124M, GPT-J 6B, OPT 6.7B) on AMD MI300X demonstrates effective speedups of 3.0x to 10.5x on linear-layer weight reads with perplexity ratios below 1.00 and top-1 token agreement above 98%. The method requires no retraining, no architectural modification, and no approximation of the attention mechanism. At the operating point (k = 256, {\epsilon} = 0.05) on GPT-J 14 6B, the accelerated model produces character-for-character identical output to the baseline.

Comment: Uses tokenwise residual gates over cached low-rank weight images to reduce linear-layer memory traffic.

Topic Match: Accelerates existing inference through conditional approximation; reported weight-read speedups do not establish a change in training feasibility or model capacity.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 6

8. The Model Knows, the Decoder Finds: Future Value Guided Particle Power Sampling

ArXiv ID: 2605.02427

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Tu Nguyen, Rasul Tutunov, Xiaotong Ji, Matthieu Zimmer

Abstract: A recurring pattern in "reasoning without training" is that base LLMs already assign non-trivial probability mass to correct multi-step solutions; the bottleneck is locating these modes efficiently at inference time. Power sampling provides a principled way to bias decoding toward such modes by targeting p_theta(x)^alpha with alpha > 1, but practical approximations must account for future-dependent correction factors that determine which prefixes remain promising. We introduce Auxiliary Particle Power Sampling (APPS), a blockwise particle algorithm for approximating the sequence-level power target with a bounded population of partial solutions. APPS propagates hypotheses in parallel using proposal-corrected power reweighting and refines their survival through future-value-guided selection at resampling boundaries. This redistributes finite compute across competing prefixes rather than committing to a single unfolding path, while providing a direct scaling knob in the particle count and predictable peak memory. We instantiate the future-value signal with short-horizon rollouts and also study an amortized variant that replaces rollouts with a lightweight learned selection head. Across reasoning benchmarks, APPS improves the accuracy-runtime trade-off of training-free decoding and suggests that part of the gap to post-trained systems can be recovered through more faithful inference-time power approximation.

Comment: Future-value-guided particle resampling reallocates decoding compute across partial solutions.

Topic Match: Compute allocation connects to efficiency, but the contribution concerns inference-time reasoning search and falls under test-time scaling.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 6

9. CoVSpec: Efficient Device-Edge Co-Inference for Vision-Language Models via Speculative Decoding

ArXiv ID: 2605.02218

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Yuanyuan Jia, Shunpu Tang, Qianqian Yang

Abstract: Vision-language models (VLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in multimodal perception and reasoning. However, deploying large VLMs on mobile devices remains challenging due to their substantial computational and memory demands. A practical alternative is device-edge co-inference, where a lightweight draft VLM on the mobile device collaborates with a larger target VLM on the edge server via speculative decoding. Nevertheless, directly extending speculative decoding to VLMs suffers from severe inefficiency due to excessive visual-token computation and high communication overhead. To address these challenges, we propose CoVSpec, an efficient collaborative speculative decoding framework for VLM inference. Specifically, we first develop a training-free visual token reduction framework that prunes redundant visual tokens on the mobile device by jointly considering query relevance, token activity, and low-rank dependency. Moreover, we design an adaptive drafting strategy that dynamically adjusts both the verification frequency and the draft length. In addition, we introduce a parallel branching mechanism with decoupled verification-correction to improve draft-side utilization during target-side verification and reduce correction-related transmission overhead. Experiments on multiple benchmarks show that CoVSpec achieves up to 2.21x higher throughput than target-only inference and reduces communication overhead by more than 96% compared with baselines, without compromising task accuracy.

Comment: Coordinates visual-token pruning and speculative verification to reduce device-edge communication.

Topic Match: Closest to efficiency_scaling through reduced inference work and communication, but it is a deployment framework.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 5

10. Provable Accuracy Collapse in Embedding-Based Representations under Dimensionality Mismatch

ArXiv ID: 2605.03346

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Dionysis Arvanitakis, Vaggos Chatziafratis, Yiyuan Luo

Abstract: Embedding-based representations in Euclidean space $\mathbb{R}^d$ are a cornerstone of modern machine learning, where a major goal is to use the \emph{smallest dimension} that faithfully captures data relations. In this work, we prove sharp dimension--accuracy tradeoffs and identify a fundamental information-theoretic limitation: unless the embedding dimension $d$ is chosen close to the ground-truth dimension $D$, accuracy undergoes a sudden collapse. Our main result shows that this phenomenon arises even in standard contrastive learning settings, where supervision is limited to a set of $m$ anchor--positive--negative triplets $(i,j,k)$ encoding distance comparisons $\mathrm{dist}(i,j) < \mathrm{dist}(i,k)$. Specifically, given triplets realizable by an unknown ground-truth embedding in $D$ dimensions, we prove that there exists constant $c < 1$, such that \emph{every embedding of dimension at most $cD$ violates half of the triplets}, yielding accuracy as low as a trivial one-dimensional solution that ignores the input. We complement our information-theoretic bounds with strong computational hardness results: under the Unique Games Conjecture, even if the given triplets are nearly realizable in $D=1$ dimension, no polynomial-time algorithm -- \textit{regardless of its dimension} -- can achieve accuracy above the trivial $50\%$ baseline.

Comment: Derives sharp limits on preserving triplet comparisons when embedding dimension falls below the underlying relational dimension.

Topic Match: Closest to efficiency_scaling through representation-dimension limits, but the results concern general embedding theory.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 8

Paper Selection Prompt

System Prompt

You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.

User Prompt

Relevant Topics

This is a training-side feed for someone who builds and modifies model internals. The centre of gravity is what a frontier model is made of and how it is trained: architecture, training dynamics, and the decisions a lab actually made. MoE is still in scope, but only when the contribution changes the design space, not when it tunes an existing MoE.

Keep a paper when its CORE CONTRIBUTION falls in one of the five topics below. Filter it when the topic is merely the setting for a downstream application, a benchmark, or a product result.

THE SUBJECT IS LANGUAGE-MODEL TRAINING. Every topic below is scoped to it. A technique named in one of them -- decentralised or asynchronous training, discrete diffusion, byte-level modelling, 1-bit weights, mixture-of-experts -- earns nothing when the model being trained is an image generator, a recommender, a scientific surrogate, or a vision classifier. Match on what is being trained, not on the vocabulary in the abstract.

THE ONE QUESTION THAT DECIDES A HIGH SCORE, asked before the topic list:

Does this paper REMOVE or REPLACE a component that everyone downstream inherits without thinking, or DECOUPLE two quantities the field currently conflates -- and does it say which end is held fixed while the other moves?

A paper that ADDS a mechanism on top of existing primitives is ordinary work, however good the numbers. A paper that takes one away, or splits one knob into two, is the reason this feed exists. Papers whose gains are CONDITIONAL (only above some batch size, only in one budget regime, only with an extra training stage) are ordinary work too, even when the mechanism is new: a conditional win is a new knob, not a removed one.

1. Frontier Model Releases and Technical Reports (primary) - Keep: model and technical reports that DISCLOSE architecture or training decisions -- layer and attention design, normalization and residual choices, hybrid attention/state-space stacks, sparsity and expert layout, tokenizer and vocabulary decisions, data mixture and curriculum, optimizer and schedule, precision and numerics, stability fixes and what broke; open-weight releases whose report explains a choice rather than only reporting it. - Filter: releases that are a scorecard -- benchmark tables, a capability announcement, a product or API launch, or a report that names its recipe without saying why it was chosen. A frontier name in the title earns nothing on its own.

2. Architecture and Training Dynamics (primary) - Keep: new or analysed architectural mechanisms (attention variants, normalization and residual design, state-space and recurrent sequence modelling, positional schemes, dynamic or modular computation, tokenizer-free and byte-level or learned-chunking stacks, non-autoregressive and discrete-diffusion generation); optimizers, preconditioners, and parameterisations, especially hyperparameter transfer across scale; training-dynamics and stability analysis that explains why large models train the way they do; work that removes a standard component (normalization, weight decay, positional encoding, the tokenizer, left-to-right decoding) and shows the model still trains. - Filter: applying an existing architecture to a new task or benchmark with no mechanistic insight; an architectural tweak evaluated only at toy scale with no account of what it costs.

3. Large-Scale Training Systems - Keep: distributed training ALGORITHMS that change what is possible, not only what is fast -- asynchronous, low-communication and decentralised optimisation, sharding and parallelism schemes with a new invariant, numerics and low-precision training (FP8, FP4, ternary and 1-bit) when the claim is about training stability rather than a kernel; scaling-law work that informs how a run is configured, including data-constrained and repeated-data regimes and critical batch size. - Filter: kernel engineering, communication scheduling, overlap, caching, serving and inference throughput. This is a real exclusion, not a soft one: work whose contribution is "the same model, faster" belongs to someone else's feed even when it is excellent and even when it is about MoE.

4. MoE Where It Changes the Design Space - Keep: routing that is newly differentiable or newly stable; the training/inference router gap; expert collapse and what actually prevents it; expert granularity, shared experts and layout when a new axis is opened rather than tuned; dense-to-MoE conversion; MoE scaling laws that fix one quantity and vary another; analyses that carry a criterion which could have failed (a random-guess baseline, an ablation with a predicted sign) rather than similarity heatmaps. - Filter: MoE SYSTEMS and inference work (expert parallelism, all-to-all schedules, grouped GEMM, offload, prefetching, capacity and scheduling tricks, compression for serving); MoE surveys; papers that train on top of a MoE without a routing, balancing, stability, or structural contribution; "mixture of experts" in the classical ensemble or recommender sense. - The exclusion above is about MAKING MoE RUN FASTER, and it does not reach routing and expert design. A paper on how tokens are assigned to experts, how experts specialise, how balance is enforced, or how a dense model becomes sparse stays fully in scope and scores on its merits, even when the mechanism is a small one.

5. Efficiency and Compression When the Mechanism Is New - Keep: quantization, sparsity, pruning and low-rank work whose mechanism is new and whose gain is unconditional; compression that changes what can be trained, not only what can be served; attribution of a model's behaviour to its data. - Filter: tuned variants of standard efficiency methods; deployment and serving engineering; anything whose headline is a compression ratio with no account of what was given up.

Also keep, even though they read like evaluation work, because the field has no one checking them: - benchmark validity itself: contamination, saturation, LLM-as-judge reliability, whether a benchmark measures what it claims. A paper AUDITING a benchmark is in scope; a paper PROPOSING one is not.

Subjects He Has Never Once Kept

Measured, not guessed. Over nine months where he was actively curating, 4953 papers passed this filter and 274 made his list -- a keep rate of 5.2%. Each subject below appeared in the rejected pile the number of times shown and appeared ZERO times in his entire 508-entry list.

Filter a paper whose CORE SUBJECT is one of these. The count is the evidence; where a paper only mentions the term in passing while contributing somewhere in the five topics above, keep it.

variational methods and inference (52) unlearning (41) long-context methods (40) neural operators (35) time series (35) vision transformers (35) parameter-efficient fine-tuning (28) stochastic gradient analysis (21) LLM safety (20) LLM reasoning as a subject (20) hallucination (20) sequence modelling as a subject (19) differential equations (19) spiking neural networks (17) post-training quantization (16) mechanistic interpretability as a framing (15) test-time scaling (13)

Two more he kept exactly once each, so suppress rather than drop: graph neural networks (1 of 42), knowledge distillation (1 of 39).

Do NOT extend this list by analogy. Four subjects that look like they belong here were checked and do not: diffusion models (8.1% kept), prompting (10.0%), benchmarks (9.1%) and neural architecture search (13.3%) all sit ABOVE his 5.2% base rate.

Note the one distinction that matters: he rejects papers FRAMED as interpretability, while analysis of how a trained model's computation is organised is among his highest-rated work. The subject is the framing, not the act of analysing.

Leave these to the hotspot digest unless the core contribution clearly falls in one of the five topics above: - agent, tooling, and RAG launches, and agent framework papers - new benchmarks, leaderboards, and evaluation-only papers - interpretability that stops at cataloguing features, with nothing said about the mechanism that produced them. Analysis of how a trained model's computation is organised -- what drives expert selection, what a circuit computes, how representations reorganise across training -- is IN scope, not here. - memory mechanisms and agent memory systems - world models, exploration, and reinforcement learning - alignment and post-training (RLHF, DPO, GRPO, RFT, instruction tuning), EXCEPT where the subject is how post-training destabilises the architecture itself - downstream applications in medical imaging, segmentation, 3D vision, video understanding, information retrieval, summarization, recommendation, machine translation, speech recognition, time series, knowledge graphs, and similar domains

Scoring Criteria

Score five independent axes from 1 to 10: Relevance, Novelty, Evidence, Load, Proximity.

They answer different questions and must not be collapsed. Relevance: is this the kind of work this feed is for. Evidence: did the paper earn its claim. Load: what does it cost to get the usable result out. Proximity: how close is it to what the reader is working on right now (see Active Lines below).

Novelty is scored for continuity with the archive and for the hotspot spotlight cutoffs, and it does NOT order the feed. Measured against 274 hand-tiered papers it carried no signal at all: papers scoring 8 or more were his must-reads exactly as often as papers scoring 5 or less, both at the pool's base rate. Every abstract claims novelty, so the axis measures the claiming rather than the work. Score it honestly and do not let it influence the other four.

A strong claim with thin evidence is a worse read than a modest claim that holds. Score each axis on its own; do not let a high one pull up a low one.

Relevance Scoring

• 9-10: directly centered on the target topics; highest when the core contribution is clearly within them and the paper is about how a model is BUILT or TRAINED.
• 7-8: substantially related, but partly peripheral or focused on a narrower aspect.
• 5-6: touches the target topics, but the main contribution is elsewhere.
• 3-4: largely outside the target topics, often application-focused or domain-specific.
• 1-2: unrelated.

Important: Daily buzz, a frontier lab's name, or a large headline number is not enough for a high Relevance score. A model release scores high only when the report explains an architecture or training decision; a release that only reports results is hotspot material, not this feed.

Work whose contribution is "the same model, faster" -- kernels, communication schedules, overlap, caching, serving -- caps at Relevance 5 even when it is excellent and even when it is about MoE. Making a known design run faster is a different job from changing the design.

That cap is about SPEED, not about size. Compression that is lossless, or that changes what can be trained or held in memory at all rather than how quickly it runs, is not capped: it changes what is possible, which is the thing this feed is for.

Analysis of how a trained model's computation is actually organised -- what a circuit computes, what drives expert selection, how representations reorganise over training -- IS in scope and scores like any other work on mechanism. Only interpretability that stops at describing features, with nothing said about the mechanism that produced them, drops out of the feed.

Novelty Scoring

Novelty means a change to the design space, not a change to a number. Score against this ladder:

• 9-10: removes or replaces a component the whole field inherits without thinking (normalization, weight decay, the tokenizer, positional encoding, left-to-right decoding, the standard optimizer, a numerical format), or decouples two quantities everyone conflates -- AND states which end is held fixed while the other moves. The claim is unconditional: it does not require a particular scale, budget regime, or extra stage. An ANALYSIS paper reaches this band when it settles a mechanism-level question with a criterion that could have come out the other way.
• 7-8: a substantial new mechanism, or a decoupling whose gain is real but CONDITIONAL (holds above some batch size, in one budget band, or with an added training phase). A conditional win is a new knob, not a removed one, and belongs here rather than above.
• 5-6: meaningful but incremental extension or refinement of an existing primitive; a tuned variant; a well-executed combination of known parts.
• 3-4: minor, narrow, or mostly engineering or domain-specific improvement; a survey or overview, however thorough.
• 1-2: little originality; mainly standard application of existing methods.

Score the claim as the paper states it here. Whether the paper supports that claim is Evidence, and it is scored separately -- do not discount Novelty for weak experiments, and do not raise it because the framing is confident. Phrases like "we remove", "without X", "holding Y fixed" are what the paper SAYS; they earn a high Novelty only if the thing named really is a component the field inherits by default, not a component this paper introduced two sentences earlier.

Evidence Scoring

Does the demonstration reach as far as the claim?

• 9-10: shown at the scale and breadth the claim asserts -- language-model pretraining at billion-parameter or hundred-billion-token scale, or across several model families, sizes, or domains -- with ablations that isolate the named mechanism and could have failed.
• 7-8: one credible setting that matches the claim's stated scope, with the baselines a skeptic would ask for.
• 5-6: a single small setting, or a claim stated more broadly than the demonstration reaches.
• 3-4: the claim is about transformers or language models in general, but the demonstration lives in one narrow domain or one small benchmark -- image classification alone, a single toy task, one dataset; or the comparisons a reader needs in order to believe it are missing.
• 1-2: the central claim is asserted, illustrated, or supported only by plots that could not have come out the other way.

A structural claim demonstrated only outside the setting it claims is capped at 4, however striking the claim. "We removed a component everyone uses" shown only on small vision models is a result about small vision models.

When the abstract names no scale, no dataset, and no baseline at all, score exactly 5. Do not infer rigor from confident writing. Unstated is not the same as strong, and two thirds of abstracts say nothing here: guessing on those was measured to make this axis worse.

Adjustments: subtract 1 when no code is released and the procedure is not reproducible from the paper alone; subtract 1 when the method's cost grows in the number of components it adds (one loss per pair of experts, one module per domain) and the paper does not account for that growth; add 1 when the paper states its own limitation precisely enough that a reader could design the experiment that breaks it.

Load Scoring

What does it cost to get the usable result out? This is about the reader's effort, not quality.

• 9-10: the result cannot be taken without following the derivation -- a new theoretical framework, unfamiliar mathematical machinery, or a proof that IS the contribution.
• 7-8: substantial theory or an involved formalism, but the operational result is stated plainly somewhere.
• 4-6: ordinary methods paper; the recipe is legible from the paper's own description.
• 1-3: the takeaway is a single decision or number a reader can act on immediately.

A high Load is not a criticism. It only says the paper is a project rather than a read.

Proximity Scoring

How close is this to the Active Lines stated below? This axis is about the reader, not the paper, and a paper can be excellent and distant at the same time.

• 9-10: squarely on a centre line -- the paper's core contribution is the thing the reader is working on, and a result here changes what they would do next.
• 7-8: on a centre line but from a direction they are not working from, or on an adjacent line where the result carries over directly.
• 5-6: adjacent: same stack, different layer; they would want to know it happened.
• 3-4: far: recognisable as the same field, but nothing here reaches their work.
• 1-2: another area entirely.

Judge distance from the reader's stated centre, NOT from whatever is currently prominent in the field. A paper everyone is discussing is not thereby close.

Topic Registry

Use exactly one PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID chosen from the stable topic IDs below. - frontier_models: Frontier Model Releases and Technical Reports - Frontier model and technical reports that disclose an architecture or training decision: layer and attention design, normalization and residual choices, hybrid stacks, sparsity layout, tokenizer and data mixture, optimizer and schedule, precision, and the stability problems that had to be solved. - architecture_training: Architecture and Training Dynamics - Architectural and optimisation mechanisms, and the training dynamics that explain them: attention and normalization design, positional schemes, state-space and recurrent stacks, tokenizer-free and learned-chunking models, non-autoregressive and discrete-diffusion generation, optimizers and parameterisations including hyperparameter transfer across scale, and work that removes a standard component and shows the model still trains. - training_systems: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible - Distributed training algorithms that change what can be trained rather than how fast it runs: asynchronous, low-communication and decentralised optimisation, parallelism schemes with a new invariant, low-precision and 1-bit training when the claim is stability, and scaling laws including data-constrained regimes and critical batch size. - moe_training: MoE Where It Changes the Design Space - Mixture-of-Experts work that opens or closes a design axis: differentiable and stable routing, the training/inference router gap, expert collapse, granularity and layout as a new axis, dense-to-MoE conversion, and MoE scaling laws that fix one quantity and vary another. MoE systems and inference work is out. - efficiency_scaling: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training - Compression, sparsity, quantization, pruning, low-rank and memory or cache efficiency whose mechanism is new and whose gain is unconditional.

Papers

[PAPER LIST HERE]

Instructions

Respond in JSONL. Output exactly one JSON object per paper, one per line:

{"ARXIVID":"...","COMMENT":"...","RELEVANCE":0,"NOVELTY":0,"EVIDENCE":0,"LOAD":0,"PROXIMITY":0,"PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID":"...","MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS":[],"TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT":"...","HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS":[],"HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT":"..."}

Rules: - ARXIVID: the arXiv ID. - COMMENT: identify the single strongest matching criterion. Be brief and specific. Do not rely on generic phrases like "language modeling" or "advancement". Do not mention non-matching criteria. - RELEVANCE: integer from 1 to 10. - NOVELTY: integer from 1 to 10, scoring the claim as stated. - EVIDENCE: integer from 1 to 10, scoring whether the demonstration reaches as far as the claim. - LOAD: integer from 1 to 10, scoring what it costs the reader to extract the usable result. - PROXIMITY: integer from 1 to 10, scoring distance from the stated Active Lines. - PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID: exactly one stable topic ID from the allowed topic registry. - MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS: zero or more stable topic IDs from the same allowed set. Include PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID when there are multiple matches. - TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT: briefly explain why the primary topic is the best fit. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS: zero or more tags from this exact set only: daily_hot, new_frontier. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT: briefly explain why the paper belongs in the daily hotspot paper feed when HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS is non-empty; otherwise use an empty string. - Use HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS sparingly. Most papers should return []. - daily_hot means the paper feels broadly important to the day and belongs in the daily hotspot paper section even if it is not part of the personalized foundational reading list. - new_frontier means the paper appears to open a genuinely new direction, paradigm, or field, even if the work is still early. - Do not output markdown, code fences, or any extra text.