Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2026-05-05

_{Papers on this page were re-scored with local agent CLI; the usage above is from the original run.}

Topic Coverage:

Table of contents by topic:

Architecture and Training Dynamics (25)

1. Projection-Free Transformers via Gaussian Kernel Attention Authors: Debarshi Kundu, Archisman Ghosh, Swaroop Ghosh, Vasant Honavar

2. Sharpness-Aware Pretraining Mitigates Catastrophic Forgetting Authors: Ishaan Watts, Catherine Li, Sachin Goyal, Jacob Mitchell Springer, Aditi Raghunathan

3. Caracal: Causal Architecture via Spectral Mixing Authors: Bingzheng Gan, Tianyi Zhang, Yusu Li, Jing Huang, Wei Shi, Yangkai Ding, Tao Yu

4. Concepts Whisper While Syntax Shouts: Spectral Anti-Concentration and the Dual Geometry of Transformer Representations Authors: Pratyush Acharya, Nuraj Rimal, Habish Dhakal

5. Focus and Dilution: The Multi-stage Learning Process of Attention Authors: Zheng-An Chen, Pengxiao Lin, Zhi-Qin John Xu, Tao Luo

6. Anon: Extrapolating Optimizer Adaptivity Across the Real Spectrum Authors: Yiheng Zhang, Kaiyan Zhao, Shaowu Wu, Yiming Wang, Jiajun Wu, Leong Hou U, Steve Drew, Xiaoguang Niu

7. Rethinking Model Selection in VLM Through the Lens of Gromov-Wasserstein Distance Authors: Muyang Li, Yucheng Liu, Jianbo Ma, Elliot Osborne, Bo Han, Tongliang Liu

8. Escaping Mode Collapse in LLM Generation via Geometric Regulation Authors: Xin Du, Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii

9. Linear-Readout Floors and Threshold Recovery in Computation in Superposition Authors: Hector Borobia, Elies Segu\'i-Mas, Guillermina Tormo-Carb\'o

10. Attention Is Where You Attack Authors: Aviral Srivastava, Sourav Panda

11. Odysseus: Scaling VLMs to 100+ Turn Decision-Making in Games via Reinforcement Learning Authors: Chengshuai Shi, Wenzhe Li, Xinran Liang, Yizhou Lu, Wenjia Yang, Ruirong Feng, Seth Karten, Ziran Yang, Zihan Ding, Gabriel Sarch, Danqi Chen, Karthik Narasimhan, Chi Jin

12. Probe-Geometry Alignment: Erasing the Cross-Sequence Memorization Signature Below Chance Authors: Anamika Paul Rupa, Anietie Andy

13. A Theory of Generalization in Deep Learning Authors: Elon Litman, Gabe Guo

14. PACE: Parameter Change for Unsupervised Environment Design Authors: Fang Yuan, Quanjun Yin, Siqi Shen, Yuxiang Xie, Junqiang Yang, Long Qin, Junjie Zeng, Qinglun Li

15. Minimal, Local, Causal Explanations for Jailbreak Success in Large Language Models Authors: Shubham Kumar, Narendra Ahuja

16. TRAP: Tail-aware Ranking Attack for World-Model Planning Authors: Siyuan Duan, Ke Zhang, Xizhao Luo

17. Barren Plateaus as Destructive Interference: A Diagnostic Framework and Implications for Structured Ansatzes Authors: Pilsung Kang

18. Hyperspherical Forward-Forward with Prototypical Representations Authors: Shalini Sarode, Brian Moser, Joachim Folz, Federico Raue, Tobias Nauen, Stanislav Frolov, Andreas Dengel

19. Geometric and Spectral Alignment for Deep Neural Network I Authors: Ziran Liu, Wei Wang, Jinhao Wang, Pengcheng Wang, Xinyi Sui, Cihan Ruan, Nam Ling, Wei Jiang

20. Diffusion Operator Geometry of Feedforward Representations Authors: Kanishka Reddy

21. Stable GFlowNets with Probabilistic Guarantees Authors: Zengxiang Lei, Ananth Shreekumar, Jonathan Rosenthal, Ruoyu Song, Alvaro A. Cardenas, Daniel J. Fremont, Dongyan Xu, Satish Ukkusuri, Z. Berkay Celik

22. How Label Imbalance Shapes Geometry: A General Spectral Analysis of Multi-Label Neural Collapse Authors: Xiaoxuan Ma, Yixuan Yang, Song Li, Xiangyun Hui

23. Augmented Lagrangian Multiplier Network for State-wise Safety in Reinforcement Learning Authors: Jiaming Zhang, Yujie Yang, Yao Lyu, Shengbo Eben Li, Liping Zhang

24. Scalable Learning in Structured Recurrent Spiking Neural Networks without Backpropagation Authors: Bo Tang, Weiwei Xie

25. Online Generalised Predictive Coding Authors: Mehran H. Z. Bazargani, Szymon Urbas, Adeel Razi, Thomas Brendan Murphy, Karl Friston

Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible (3)

1. Prescriptive Scaling Laws for Data Constrained Training Authors: Justin Lovelace, Christian Belardi, Srivatsa Kundurthy, Shriya Sudhakar, Kilian Q. Weinberger

2. Bringing Order to Asynchronous SGD: Towards Optimality under Data-Dependent Delays with Momentum Authors: Tehila Dahan, Roie Reshef, Sharon Goldstein, Kfir Y. Levy

3. Breaking the Computational Barrier: Provably Efficient Actor-Critic for Low-Rank MDPs Authors: Ruiquan Huang, Donghao Li, Yingbin Liang, Jing Yang

MoE Where It Changes the Design Space (1)

1. Boundary Mass and the Soft-to-Hard Limit in Mixture-of-Experts Authors: Reza Rastegar

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (5)

1. Activation Compression in LLMs: Theoretical Analysis and Efficient Algorithm Authors: Wen-Da Wei, Han-Bin Fang, Yang-Di Liu, Jiang-Xin Shi, James Kwok, Yu-Feng Li

2. SAGA: Workflow-Atomic Scheduling for AI Agent Inference on GPU Clusters Authors: Dongxin Guo, Jikun Wu, Siu Ming Yiu

3. LEAP: Layer-wise Exit-Aware Pretraining for Efficient Transformer Inference Authors: Shashank Kapadia, Deep Naryan Mishra, Sujal Reddy Alugubelli, Haoan Wang, Saipraveen Vabbilisetty, Rishi Bhatia, Anupriya Sharma

4. DurableUn: Quantization-Induced Recovery Attacks in Machine Unlearning Authors: Abdullah Ahmad Khan, Ferdous Sohel

5. BWLA: Breaking the Barrier of W1AX Post-Training Quantization for LLMs Authors: Zhixiong Zhao, Zukang Xu, Dawei Yang

Architecture and Training Dynamics (25)

1. Projection-Free Transformers via Gaussian Kernel Attention

ArXiv ID: 2605.02144

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Debarshi Kundu, Archisman Ghosh, Swaroop Ghosh, Vasant Honavar

Abstract: Self-attention in Transformers is typically implemented as $\mathrm{softmax}(QK^\top/\sqrt{d})V$, where $Q=XW_Q$, $K=XW_K$, and $V=XW_V$ are learned linear projections of the input $X$. We ask whether these learned projections are necessary, or whether they can be replaced by a simpler similarity-based diffusion operator. We introduce \textbf{Gaussian Kernel Attention} (GKA), a drop-in replacement for dot-product attention that computes token affinities directly using a Gaussian radial basis function (RBF) kernel applied to per-head token features. Each head learns only a bandwidth parameter $\sigma_h$, while a single output projection $W_O$ preserves compatibility with the standard Transformer interface. GKA can be interpreted as normalized kernel regression over tokens, linking modern Transformer architectures to classical non-local filtering and kernel smoothing methods. We evaluate GKA in both vision and language modeling settings. For autoregressive language modeling within the \texttt{nanochat} framework, we implement causal masking and sliding-window constraints by masking and renormalizing the Gaussian kernel. At depth 20, a GKA model with $0.42\times$ the parameters and $0.49\times$ the total training FLOPs of a standard attention baseline trains stably, exhibits a near-zero train-validation gap, and demonstrates competitive behavior on standard benchmarks, albeit with higher bits-per-byte (BPB) at this compute scale. Overall, GKA provides a minimal, interpretable attention mechanism with an explicit locality scale, offering a dimension in the accuracy-efficiency trade-off for Transformer design.

Comment: Removes learned Q/K/V projections, leaving per-head bandwidths and an output projection.

Topic Match: Directly challenges an inherited attention component; depth-20 training remains stable, with reported parameter savings and an acknowledged BPB penalty.

Relevance: 10 Novelty: 9

2. Sharpness-Aware Pretraining Mitigates Catastrophic Forgetting

ArXiv ID: 2605.02105

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Ishaan Watts, Catherine Li, Sachin Goyal, Jacob Mitchell Springer, Aditi Raghunathan

Abstract: Pretraining optimizers are tuned to produce the strongest possible base model, on the assumption that a stronger starting point yields a stronger model after subsequent changes like post-training and quantization. This overlooks the geometry of the base model which controls how much of the base model's capabilities survive subsequent parameter updates. We study three pretraining optimization approaches that bias optimization toward flatter minima: Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM), large learning rates, and shortened learning rate annealing periods. Across model sizes ranging from 20M to 150M parameters, we find that these interventions consistently improve downstream performance after post-training on five common datasets with up to 80% less forgetting. These principles hold at scale: a short SAM mid-training phase applied to an existing OLMo-2-1B checkpoint reduces forgetting by 31% after MetaMath post-training and by 40% after 4-bit quantization.

Comment: Changes pretraining optimization geometry to preserve capabilities through subsequent parameter updates.

Topic Match: Pretraining optimizer and schedule choices are the intervention, making optimization geometry the primary contribution.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 6

3. Caracal: Causal Architecture via Spectral Mixing

ArXiv ID: 2605.00292

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Bingzheng Gan, Tianyi Zhang, Yusu Li, Jing Huang, Wei Shi, Yangkai Ding, Tao Yu

Abstract: The scalability of Large Language Models to long sequences is hindered by the quadratic cost of attention and the limitations of positional encodings. To address these, we introduce Caracal, a novel architecture that replaces attention with a parameter-efficient, $\mathcal{O}(L \log L)$ Multi-Head Fourier (MHF) module. Our contributions are threefold: (1) We leverage the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) for sequence mixing, inherently addressing both bottlenecks mentioned above. (2) We apply a frequency-domain causal masking technique that enforces autoregressive capabilities via asymmetric padding and truncation, overcoming a critical barrier for Fourier-based generative models. (3) Unlike efficient models relying on hardware-specific implementations (e.g., Mamba), we uses standard library operators. This ensures robust portability, eliminating common deployment barriers. Evaluations demonstrate that Caracal performs competitively with Transformer and SSM baselines, offering a scalable and simple pathway for efficient long-sequence modeling. Code is available in Appendix.

Comment: Replaces attention with causal Fourier mixing at O(L log L) sequence cost.

Topic Match: A causal sequence-mixing block replaces a standard architectural primitive in autoregressive language models.

Relevance: 10 Novelty: 9

4. Concepts Whisper While Syntax Shouts: Spectral Anti-Concentration and the Dual Geometry of Transformer Representations

ArXiv ID: 2605.01609

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Pratyush Acharya, Nuraj Rimal, Habish Dhakal

Abstract: We test whether the causal inner product of \citet{park2024linear} -- defined by the unembedding covariance $\Sigma$ -- enables cross-lingual concept transport. Across 17 models and 4 language pairs, a matched-spectrum randomization test finds that Whitened Causal Alignment is indistinguishable from spectral regularization alone ($p = 0.95$). However, this failure reveals a broader phenomenon: anti-concentration is observed in residual-stream difference-of-means vectors across five architecture families ($p < 10^{-33}$) and supported by SAE features (e.g., $p = 4.5 \times 10^{-19}$) and linear probes on Gemma and Llama. We discover a \emph{dual geometry}: activation-space concept directions anti-concentrate in the spectral tail, while static unembedding-row contrasts \emph{concentrate} in high-variance directions ($p < 10^{-4}$). Split-injection causal interventions support the functional basis on Gemma and Llama (Cohen's $d$ up to $1.80$), and POS-tag probing across 8 models shows syntax preferentially encodes in the high-variance subspace in 6 of 8 architectures ($p < 0.013$), with the Qwen~2.5 family showing a significant reversal consistent with architecture-specific spectral structure. These results suggest transformers may rotate semantic content into spectrally quiet regions during contextualized processing, encoding concepts where they can be manipulated with reduced grammatical disruption.

Comment: Tests semantic and syntactic subspace function with matched-spectrum randomization and causal interventions.

Topic Match: Investigates how computation is organized across representation subspaces, with falsifiable controls and an explicit architecture-dependent reversal.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 9

5. Focus and Dilution: The Multi-stage Learning Process of Attention

ArXiv ID: 2605.01199

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Zheng-An Chen, Pengxiao Lin, Zhi-Qin John Xu, Tao Luo

Abstract: Transformer-based models have achieved remarkable success across a wide range of domains, yet our understanding of their training dynamics remains limited. In this work, we identify a recurrent focus-dilution cycle in attention learning and provide a rigorous explanation in a one-layer Transformer setting for Markovian data via gradient-flow analysis. Using stage-wise linearization around critical points, we show that a single focus-dilution cycle can be decomposed into a sequence of distinct stages. First, embedding and projection rapidly condense to a rank-one structure, while attention parameters remain effectively frozen. Then, the attention parameters begin to increase, inducing a frequency-driven focus toward high-frequency tokens. As attention continues to evolve, it generates next-order perturbations in embeddings, leading to a mass-redistribution mechanism that progressively dilutes this focus. Finally, small asymmetries among low-frequency tokens lift a degenerate critical point, opening new embedding directions and initiating the next cycle. Experiments on synthetic Markovian data as well as WikiText and TinyStories corroborate the predicted stages and cyclical dynamics.

Comment: Predicts an attention focus-dilution cycle driven by token frequencies and embedding reorganization.

Topic Match: Directly explains attention-training phases, with predicted stages tested on Markov data, WikiText, and TinyStories; the theory is scoped to one layer.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 9

6. Anon: Extrapolating Optimizer Adaptivity Across the Real Spectrum

ArXiv ID: 2605.02317

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Yiheng Zhang, Kaiyan Zhao, Shaowu Wu, Yiming Wang, Jiajun Wu, Leong Hou U, Steve Drew, Xiaoguang Niu

Abstract: Adaptive optimizers such as Adam have achieved great success in training large-scale models like large language models and diffusion models. However, they often generalize worse than non-adaptive methods, such as SGD on classical architectures like CNNs. We identify a key cause of this performance gap: adaptivity in pre-conditioners, which limits the optimizer's ability to adapt to diverse optimization landscapes. To address this, we propose Anon (Adaptivity Non-restricted Optimizer with Novel convergence technique), a novel optimizer with continuously tunable adaptivity in R, allowing it to interpolate between SGD-like and Adam-like behaviors and even extrapolate beyond both. To ensure convergence across the entire adaptivity spectrum, we introduce incremental delay update (IDU), a novel mechanism that is more flexible than AMSGrad's hard max-tracking strategy and enhances robustness to gradient noise. We theoretically establish convergence guarantees under both convex and non-convex settings. Empirically, Anon consistently outperforms state-of-the-art optimizers on representative image classification, diffusion, and language modeling tasks. These results demonstrate that adaptivity can serve as a valuable tunable design principle, and Anon provides the first unified and reliable framework capable of bridging the gap between classical and modern optimizers and surpassing their advantageous properties.

Comment: Extends optimizer adaptivity across the real spectrum and introduces delayed updates to preserve convergence.

Topic Match: Changes optimizer preconditioning and update dynamics, with language-model training included among its intended settings.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

7. Rethinking Model Selection in VLM Through the Lens of Gromov-Wasserstein Distance

ArXiv ID: 2605.01325

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Muyang Li, Yucheng Liu, Jianbo Ma, Elliot Osborne, Bo Han, Tongliang Liu

Abstract: Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have enhanced traditional LLMs with visual capabilities through the integration of vision encoders. While recent works have explored various combinations of vision encoders and LLMs, there still lacks a principled understanding of what makes a vision encoder suitable for VLM alignment. In this paper, we systematically investigate this question via comprehensive experiments on a curated collection of 19 pre-trained vision encoders from diverse sources. We first demonstrate that common practices, such as choosing encoders with the largest size or highest zero-shot accuracy, consistently fail to identify optimal models. In fact, these metrics show only weak to moderate correlation with VLM performance. This intriguing finding begs a fundamental question: What factors of vision-encoders matter in VLM? Through comprehensive analysis, we identify that the structural similarity across modalities plays a crucial but previously overlooked role in vision-encoder selection, which we measure using the Gromov-Wasserstein distance as a proxy. From a theoretical perspective, we show that the learnability of cross-modality mapping can be provably associated with the Gromov-Wasserstein distance. Empirical verification on 60+ full VLM training runs shows that our proposed inference-only metric performs significantly better than alternative model selection strategies and exhibits a much stronger correlation with final VLM performance, thereby enabling efficient and effective prediction of VLM performance before full training.

Comment: Links encoder-to-language-model geometric compatibility to the learnability of cross-modal alignment.

Topic Match: Relates component geometry to VLM trainability and informs the architectural choice of vision encoder.

Relevance: 7 Novelty: 7

8. Escaping Mode Collapse in LLM Generation via Geometric Regulation

ArXiv ID: 2605.00435

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Xin Du, Kumiko Tanaka-Ishii

Abstract: Mode collapse is a persistent challenge in generative modeling and appears in autoregressive text generation as behaviors ranging from explicit looping to gradual loss of diversity and premature trajectory convergence. We take a dynamical-systems view and reinterpret mode collapse as reduced state-space accessibility caused by geometric collapse: during generation, the model's internal trajectory becomes confined to a low-dimensional region of its representation space. This implies mode collapse is not purely a token-level phenomenon and cannot be reliably solved by symbolic constraints or probability-only decoding heuristics. Guided by this perspective, we propose Reinforced Mode Regulation (RMR), a lightweight, online state-space intervention that regulates dominant self-reinforcing directions in the Transformer value cache (implemented as low-rank damping). Across multiple large language models, RMR substantially reduces mode collapse and enables stable, high-quality generation at extremely low entropy rates (down to 0.8 nats/step), whereas standard decoding typically collapses near 2.0 nats/step.

Comment: Tests a geometric account of generation collapse by damping self-reinforcing value-cache directions.

Topic Match: Its mechanism concerns transformer state dynamics, with the intervention and evidence confined to decoding.

Relevance: 7 Novelty: 7

9. Linear-Readout Floors and Threshold Recovery in Computation in Superposition

ArXiv ID: 2605.01192

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Hector Borobia, Elies Segu\'i-Mas, Guillermina Tormo-Carb\'o

Abstract: Two recent approaches to computation in superposition reach different recursive capacity regimes: H\"anni et al. certify $\tilde{O}(d^{3/2})$ computable features in width $d$ via an approximate-linear recursive template, while Adler and Shavit reach near-quadratic capacity (up to logarithmic factors) using thresholded Boolean recovery. The main contribution of this paper is conceptual: we argue these results are not contradictory because they maintain different interface invariants, and we formalize the distinction. As a tool, we record a rank-trace Welch-type lower bound for biorthogonal linear readouts: for $F \gg d$, the worst-case off-diagonal cross-talk of any unit-diagonal linear readout is $\Omega(d^{-1/2})$, and the bound is tight on average for unit-norm tight frames. At quadratic feature load $F=d^2$, random-support threshold recovery succeeds for sparsities $s=O(d/\log d)$, while linear readouts still incur $\Omega(s/d)$ average per-coordinate squared error on Bernoulli sparse states. Matching the Welch floor against the published tolerance of the H\"anni correction layer explains the $d^{3/2}$ scale as a compatibility threshold for that template, not a universal upper bound. Robust nonlinear reset beyond the H\"anni template is left open.

Comment: Separates linear-readout error limits from thresholded recovery capacity at fixed representation width.

Topic Match: Closest to neural computation mechanisms; the results concern idealized recursive templates rather than computation demonstrated in trained language models.

Relevance: 5 Novelty: 7

10. Attention Is Where You Attack

ArXiv ID: 2605.00236

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Aviral Srivastava, Sourav Panda

Abstract: Safety-aligned large language models rely on RLHF and instruction tuning to refuse harmful requests, yet the internal mechanisms implementing safety behavior remain poorly understood. We introduce the Attention Redistribution Attack (ARA), a white-box adversarial attack that identifies safety-critical attention heads and crafts nonsemantic adversarial tokens that redirect attention away from safety-relevant positions. Unlike prior jailbreak methods operating at the semantic or output-logit level, ARA targets the geometry of softmax attention on the probability simplex using Gumbel-softmax optimization over targeted heads. Across LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct, Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.1, and Gemma-2-9B-it, ARA bypasses safety alignment with as few as 5 tokens and 500 optimization steps, achieving 36% ASR on Mistral-7B and 30% on LLaMA-3 against 200 HarmBench prompts, while Gemma-2 remains at 1%. Our principal mechanistic finding is a dissociation between ablation and redistribution: zeroing out the top-ranked safety heads produces at most 1 flip among 39 to 50 baseline refusals, while ARA targeting the corresponding safety-heavy layers flips 72/200 prompts on Mistral-7B and 60/200 on LLaMA-3. This suggests that safety is not localized in these heads as removable components, but emerges from the attention routing they perform. Removing a head allows compensation through the residual stream, while redirecting its attention propagates a corrupted signal downstream.

Comment: Uses ablation and attention-redistribution interventions to distinguish head importance from routing effects.

Topic Match: Attention mechanisms are the closest topic; the central subject is safety jailbreaks.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

11. Odysseus: Scaling VLMs to 100+ Turn Decision-Making in Games via Reinforcement Learning

ArXiv ID: 2605.00347

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Chengshuai Shi, Wenzhe Li, Xinran Liang, Yizhou Lu, Wenjia Yang, Ruirong Feng, Seth Karten, Ziran Yang, Zihan Ding, Gabriel Sarch, Danqi Chen, Karthik Narasimhan, Chi Jin

Abstract: Given the rapidly growing capabilities of vision-language models (VLMs), extending them to interactive decision-making tasks such as video games has emerged as a promising frontier. However, existing approaches either rely on large-scale supervised fine-tuning (SFT) on human trajectories or apply reinforcement learning (RL) only in relatively short-horizon settings (typically around 20--30 turns). In this work, we study RL-based training of VLMs for long-horizon decision-making in Super Mario Land, a visually grounded environment requiring 100+ turns of interaction with coordinated perception, reasoning, and action. We begin with a systematic investigation of key algorithmic components and propose an adapted variant of PPO with a lightweight turn-level critic, which substantially improves training stability and sample efficiency over critic-free methods such as GRPO and Reinforce++. We further show that pretrained VLMs provide strong action priors, significantly improving sample efficiency during RL training and reducing the need for manual design choices such as action engineering, compared to classical deep RL trained from scratch. Building on these insights, we introduce Odysseus, an open training framework for VLM agents, achieving substantial gains across multiple levels of the game and at least 3 times average game progresses than frontier models. Moreover, the trained models exhibit consistent improvements under both in-game and cross-game generalization settings, while maintaining general-domain capabilities. Overall, our results identify key ingredients for making RL stable and effective in long-horizon, multi-modal settings, and provide practical guidance for developing VLMs as embodied agents.

Comment: Studies how a turn-level critic stabilizes long-horizon reinforcement learning for VLM policies.

Topic Match: Closest to optimization stability, with the contribution centered on post-training VLM agents for games.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 6

12. Probe-Geometry Alignment: Erasing the Cross-Sequence Memorization Signature Below Chance

ArXiv ID: 2605.01699

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Anamika Paul Rupa, Anietie Andy

Abstract: Recent attacks show that behavioural unlearning of large language models leaves internal traces recoverable by adversarial probes. We characterise where this retention lives and show it can be surgically removed without measurable capability cost. Our central protocol is a leave-one-out cross-sequence probe that tests whether a memorisation signature generalises across held-out sequences. The signature is real and consistent across scale: memorisation-specific gaps of +0.32, +0.19, +0.30 on Pythia-70M, GPT-2 medium, and Mistral-7B; on Pythia-70M, the random-initialisation control collapses to -0.04 at the deepest layer where the pretrained signature peaks. The probe direction is causally separable from recall -- projecting it out collapses the signature locally (+0.44 -> -0.19) while behavioural recall barely changes -- and a probe trained on naturally memorised content does not classify fine-tuning-injected secrets, marking two representationally distinct regimes. We then introduce probe-geometry alignment (PGA), a surgical erasure that aligns activations along the probe's live readout direction at each depth. PGA drives the cross-sequence probe below random chance at all four scales tested (toy depth-4: 0.17; Pythia-70M: 0.07; Mistral-7B: 0.45; GPT-2 medium: 0.06 via MD-PGA k=2) and remains robust to six adversarial probe variants. Against a re-fitting attacker who trains a fresh probe on PGA-treated activations, we extend PGA adversarially, defeating the re-fit probe at every memorisation-relevant depth while preserving five zero-shot capability benchmarks within 2.8 percentage points per task (mean {\Delta}acc = +0.2pp). The cross-sequence signature is a real, causally separable, regime-specific property of pretrained representations -- removable below chance with a single rank-one intervention per depth at no measurable capability cost.

Comment: Uses rank-one interventions to separate probe-accessible memorization signatures from behavioral recall.

Topic Match: Closest to architecture_training through representation interventions, but the core subject is unlearning.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

13. A Theory of Generalization in Deep Learning

ArXiv ID: 2605.01172

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Elon Litman, Gabe Guo

Abstract: We present a non-asymptotic theory of generalization in deep learning where the empirical neural tangent kernel partitions the output space. In directions corresponding to signal, error dissipates rapidly; in the vast orthogonal dimensions corresponding to noise, the kernel's near-zero eigenvalues trap residual error in a test-invisible reservoir. Within the signal channel, minibatch SGD ensures that coherent population signal accumulates via fast linear drift, while idiosyncratic memorization is suppressed into a slow, diffusive random walk. We prove generalization survives even when the kernel evolves $\mathcal{O}(1)$ in operator norm, the full feature-learning regime. This theory naturally explains disparate phenomena in deep learning theory, such as benign overfitting, double descent, implicit bias, and grokking. Lastly, we derive an exact population-risk objective from a single training run with no validation data, for any architecture, loss, or optimizer, and prove that it measures precisely the noise in the signal channel. This objective reduces in practice to an SNR preconditioner on top of Adam, adding one state vector at no extra cost; it accelerates grokking by $5 \times$, suppresses memorization in PINNs and implicit neural representations, and improves DPO fine-tuning under noisy preferences while staying $3 \times$ closer to the reference policy.

Comment: Claims an exact population-risk objective from one training run without validation data.

Topic Match: Closest to training dynamics; the core is broad generalization and stochastic-gradient theory, without a language-model pretraining demonstration.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 9

14. PACE: Parameter Change for Unsupervised Environment Design

ArXiv ID: 2605.01358

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Fang Yuan, Quanjun Yin, Siqi Shen, Yuxiang Xie, Junqiang Yang, Long Qin, Junjie Zeng, Qinglun Li

Abstract: Unsupervised Environment Design (UED) offers a promising paradigm for improving reinforcement learning generalization by adaptively shaping training environments, but it requires reliable environment evaluation to remain effective. However, existing UED methods evaluate environments using indirect proxy signals such as regret, value-based errors, or Monte Carlo, which suffer from bias, high variance, or substantial computational overhead and fail to reflect agent realized learning progress. To address these limitations, we propose Parameter Change Environment Design (PACE), which evaluates an environment through the policy parameter change induced by training on that environment, directly grounding environment selection in realized learning progress. Specifically, PACE assigns environment value using a first-order approximation of the policy optimization objective, where the improvement induced by an environment is proportional to the squared L2 norm of the corresponding parameter update, enabling low-variance and computation-efficient evaluation without additional rollouts. Experiments on MiniGrid and Craftax show that PACE consistently outperforms established UED baselines, achieving higher IQM and smaller Optimality Gap on OOD evaluations, including an IQM of 96.4% and an Optimality Gap of 17.2% on MiniGrid.

Comment: Uses the squared parameter-update norm as a curriculum signal for realized learning progress.

Topic Match: Closest to training dynamics through update-based curricula; the trained systems are reinforcement-learning policies.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

15. Minimal, Local, Causal Explanations for Jailbreak Success in Large Language Models

ArXiv ID: 2605.00123

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Shubham Kumar, Narendra Ahuja

Abstract: Safety trained large language models (LLMs) can often be induced to answer harmful requests through jailbreak prompts. Because we lack a robust understanding of why LLMs are susceptible to jailbreaks, future frontier models operating more autonomously in higher-stakes settings may similarly be vulnerable to such attacks. Prior work has studied jailbreak success by examining the model's intermediate representations, identifying directions in this space that causally encode concepts like harmfulness and refusal. Then, they globally explain all jailbreak attacks as attempting to reduce or strengthen these concepts (e.g., reduce harmfulness). However, different jailbreak strategies may succeed by strengthening or suppressing different intermediate concepts, and the same jailbreak strategy may not work for different harmful request categories (e.g., violence vs. cyberattack); thus, we seek to give a local explanation -- i.e., why did this specific jailbreak succeed? To address this gap, we introduce LOCA, a method that gives Local, CAusal explanations of jailbreak success by identifying a minimal set of interpretable, intermediate representation changes that causally induce model refusal on an otherwise successful jailbreak request. We evaluate LOCA on harmful original-jailbreak pairs from a large jailbreak benchmark across Gemma and Llama chat models, comparing against prior methods adapted to this setting. LOCA can successfully induce refusal by making, on average, six interpretable changes; prior work routinely fails to achieve refusal even after 20 changes. LOCA is a step toward mechanistic, local explanations of jailbreak success in LLMs. Code to be released.

Comment: Causal representation edits isolate why individual jailbreaks bypass refusal.

Topic Match: Representation interventions are closest to architecture analysis; the core subject is jailbreak safety.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

16. TRAP: Tail-aware Ranking Attack for World-Model Planning

ArXiv ID: 2605.01950

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Siyuan Duan, Ke Zhang, Xizhao Luo

Abstract: World models enable long-horizon planning by internally generating and evaluating imagined trajectories, making them a promising foundation for generalist agents. However, this imagination-driven decision process also introduces new security risks. Existing backdoor attacks typically aim to manipulate local features, one-step predictions, or instantaneous policy outputs. While such objectives may suffice for weaker reactive models, they are often ineffective against world models, where the learned dynamics prior and planning process can absorb or wash out the effects of shallow perturbations. More importantly, we find that world models exhibit a distinct backdoor vulnerability rooted in the long-tailed ranking structure of imagined trajectories, where disrupting the ordering of a few decision-critical trajectories can systematically hijack planning. To exploit this vulnerability, we propose TRAP, a backdoor attack framework for world models that targets imagined trajectory ranking. TRAP combines a tail-aware ranking loss to focus optimization on decision-critical trajectories with dual gating mechanisms that stabilize optimization and regulate when and where the attack penalty is applied. Under trigger conditions, TRAP alters the relative ranking of imagined trajectories to redirect planning outcomes, while largely maintaining the normal ranking structure on clean inputs. Experiments on DreamerV3 and TD-MPC2 across diverse tasks show that TRAP consistently induces sustained behavioral deviations and significant performance degradation, highlighting the need for dedicated security evaluation of world-model-based agents.

Comment: Targets the ranking of decision-critical imagined trajectories with a tail-weighted training loss.

Topic Match: Closest to training-objective design; its core subject is attacks on world-model planning.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

17. Barren Plateaus as Destructive Interference: A Diagnostic Framework and Implications for Structured Ansatzes

ArXiv ID: 2605.01319

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Pilsung Kang

Abstract: Barren plateaus (BPs) are usually described by the exponential suppression of gradient variance, but the mechanism by which gradient signal disappears remains unclear. We show that this phenomenon can be understood as destructive interference among termwise gradient contributions. To make this perspective operational, we introduce a diagnostic framework based on the cancellation ratio $R_k$, the effective term count $N_{\mathrm{eff},k}$, and the interference-quality measure $B_{\mathrm{eff},k}=R_k\sqrt{N_{\mathrm{eff},k}}$. Under a random-sign model, $B_{\mathrm{eff},k}$ remains near a stable baseline, defining a random-sign cancellation regime. For the transverse-field Ising model (TFIM), we find that the hardware-efficient ansatz (HEA) remains close to this regime across system sizes and depths, whereas the Hamiltonian variational ansatz (HVA) systematically escapes it. In particular, HVA exhibits larger $B_{\mathrm{eff},k}$ not merely because $N_{\mathrm{eff},k}$ is larger, but because $R_k$ also remains systematically larger despite the broader term participation. This pattern indicates improved sign organization rather than simple term suppression. We further establish an exact identity that connects the proposed interference diagnostics directly to the standard variance-based theory of BPs. These results position destructive interference as a mechanistic interpretation of BP-like behavior in the regimes studied here, but they do not imply that BPs and destructive interference are universally interchangeable across all architectures and settings.

Comment: Uses a random-sign baseline to distinguish gradient cancellation from systematic sign organization.

Topic Match: Closest to gradient dynamics; the analysis concerns quantum variational circuits.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 8

18. Hyperspherical Forward-Forward with Prototypical Representations

ArXiv ID: 2605.00082

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Shalini Sarode, Brian Moser, Joachim Folz, Federico Raue, Tobias Nauen, Stanislav Frolov, Andreas Dengel

Abstract: The Forward-Forward (FF) algorithm presents a compelling, bio-inspired alternative to backpropagation. However, while efficient in training, it has a computationally prohibitive inference process that requires a separate forward pass for every class that is evaluated. In this work, we introduce the Hyperspherical Forward-Forward (HFF), a novel reformulation that resolves this critical bottleneck. Our core innovation is to reframe the local objective of each layer from a binary goodness-of-fit task to a direct multi-class classification problem within a hyperspherical feature space. We achieve this by learning a set of class-specific, unit-norm prototypes that act as geometric anchors and implicit negatives. This architectural innovation preserves the benefits of local training while enabling weight update and inference in a single forward pass, making it >40x faster than the original FF algorithm. Our method is simple to implement, scales effectively to modern convolutional architectures, and achieves superior accuracy on standard image classification benchmarks, closing the gap with backpropagation. Most notably, we are among the first greedy local-learning methods to report over 25% top-1 accuracy on ImageNet-1k, and 65.96% with transfer learning.

Comment: Reformulates local Forward-Forward training around hyperspherical class prototypes.

Topic Match: Closest to local learning-rule design; evaluation concerns convolutional image classifiers.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

19. Geometric and Spectral Alignment for Deep Neural Network I

ArXiv ID: 2605.02108

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Ziran Liu, Wei Wang, Jinhao Wang, Pengcheng Wang, Xinyi Sui, Cihan Ruan, Nam Ling, Wei Jiang

Abstract: Deep residual architectures are modeled as products of near-identity Jacobians. This paper proves deterministic quotient-geometric estimates for singular spectra of Frobenius-normalized layer factors, emphasizing a normalized top-radial Cartan coordinate and fitted power-law chart. Full-rank factors are mapped from $\mathrm{GL}(d)$ to the positive cone by $A\mapsto A^\top A$, then to ordered eigenvalue data. Under Frobenius normalization, exact power-law spectra form a trace-normalized Cartan orbit. This orbit is a Gibbs family on ranks, a Fisher information line, and a Bures--Wasserstein curve with line element $d/4$ times Fisher information. The main rigidity theorem is a slack-aware margin inequality: interface radial amplitude, non-backtracking slack, and signed residual variation control displacement of the fitted Cartan coordinate. In the exact-chart zero-slack case, a depth-$L$ budget gives exponent drift of order $(\log M)/L$; generally, slack and residual increments augment the bound. We separate scalar top-radial from full-Cartan spectral control, which also needs Bures/Hellinger residual variation. We prove approximate-power-law and metric-chart versions, converse lower bounds, Fisher--KL/Bures action estimates, and near-identity expansions for normalized residual chains. Near-identity results verify transport budgets; chart quality remains measurable. Effective rank is a spectral-energy quantile, giving finite-width power-law tail bounds and robust rank-window transition estimates. Empirical static-weight exponent profiles serve as diagnostics; full verification also requires interface budgets, slacks, and residuals for the same operator chain.

Comment: Bounds depth-dependent spectral drift using Jacobian-interface budgets and residual slack.

Topic Match: Closest to residual-network dynamics; the abstract presents geometric bounds without a language-model training setting.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

20. Diffusion Operator Geometry of Feedforward Representations

ArXiv ID: 2605.01107

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Kanishka Reddy

Abstract: Neural networks transform data through learned representations whose geometry affects separation, contraction, and generalization. Recent work studies this geometry using discrete curvature on neighborhood graphs, suggesting Ricci-flow-like behavior across layers. We develop a smooth operator-theoretic alternative for feedforward representation snapshots. Each feature cloud induces a Gaussian-kernel diffusion Markov operator, and transport, spectral, label-boundary, and local-scale observables are derived from this single object via Bakry-Emery $\Gamma$-calculus. In a balanced Gaussian class-conditional snapshot model with shared covariance, the population operator has closed-form class affinities, leakage, and coarse spectra, all controlled by pairwise regularized Mahalanobis separations $c_\varepsilon^{(a,b)}$. We also prove that the resulting operator observables vary smoothly under feature perturbations, while hard neighborhood-graph diagnostics can change discontinuously. Synthetic experiments validate the closed-form Gaussian bridge, while learned MNIST experiments show that the same operator observables track training, width, and perturbation stability. Together, these results give a stable operator-geometric framework for analyzing feedforward representation geometry.

Comment: Provides perturbation-stable representation diagnostics by replacing neighborhood graphs with diffusion operators.

Topic Match: Closest to representation geometry; the framework and demonstrations concern synthetic feature clouds and MNIST, without language-model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

21. Stable GFlowNets with Probabilistic Guarantees

ArXiv ID: 2605.01729

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Zengxiang Lei, Ananth Shreekumar, Jonathan Rosenthal, Ruoyu Song, Alvaro A. Cardenas, Daniel J. Fremont, Dongyan Xu, Satish Ukkusuri, Z. Berkay Celik

Abstract: Generative Flow Networks (GFlowNets) learn to sample states proportional to an unnormalized reward. Despite their theoretical promise, practical training is often unstable, exhibiting severe loss spikes and mode collapse. To tackle this, we first assess the sensitivity of GFlowNet objectives, demonstrating that a small Total Variation (TV) distance between the learned and target distributions does not preclude unbounded training loss. Motivated by this mismatch, we establish converse guarantees by deriving loss-to-TV bounds that certify global fidelity from bounded trajectory balance losses. Lastly, we propose Stable GFlowNets, an algorithm that leverages our theoretical results to stabilize training, and empirically demonstrate improved training behavior and superior distributional fidelity.

Comment: Connects bounded trajectory-balance loss to distributional fidelity to guide stable training.

Topic Match: Closest to optimization stability; the trained object is a reward-proportional GFlowNet with no stated language-model setting.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

22. How Label Imbalance Shapes Geometry: A General Spectral Analysis of Multi-Label Neural Collapse

ArXiv ID: 2605.01897

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Xiaoxuan Ma, Yixuan Yang, Song Li, Xiangyun Hui

Abstract: This work investigates the phenomenon of Neural Collapse (NC) in multi-label classification, extending its conceptual framework from multi-class learning to general correlated and imbalanced multi-label settings. Although recent studies have identified a ''tag-wise averaging'' structure for multi-label features, this view relies on implicit assumptions of label balance and combinatorial symmetry. Consequently, it fails to account for the geometrical distortions caused by intrinsic label correlations and data imbalance, which are common in practice. We resolve the multiplicity-one imbalance conjecture raised by Li et al. (2024), showing that higher-multiplicity prototypes obey a class-frequency-weighted synthesis rule rather than uniform averaging. To address this, we propose a rigorous spectral-control framework to analyze the terminal phase of multi-label learning under general imbalanced conditions. We introduce the label covariance spectrum $\kappa_m$, a scalar controlling the distribution-dependent lower-bound geometry, derived from the second-order moment matrix of the label distribution. Contrary to the averaging perspective, our analysis reveals that the centered label covariance spectrum controls the stability of terminal geometry by quantifying the weakest centered inter-class contrast directions. We prove that the classical Tag-wise Averaging emerges only as a special case under perfect orthogonality. Numerical experiments on synthetic distributions validate our theoretical bounds. This work resolves the scaled-average aspect of the imbalance conjecture and establishes a unifying theoretical framework that extends Neural Collapse to complex, imbalanced multi-label settings.

Comment: Derives how label covariance and class frequency determine terminal representation geometry.

Topic Match: Closest to representation dynamics; the core theory concerns multi-label classification rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

23. Augmented Lagrangian Multiplier Network for State-wise Safety in Reinforcement Learning

ArXiv ID: 2605.00667

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Jiaming Zhang, Yujie Yang, Yao Lyu, Shengbo Eben Li, Liping Zhang

Abstract: Safety is a primary challenge in real-world reinforcement learning (RL). Formulating safety requirements as state-wise constraints has become a prominent paradigm. Handling state-wise constraints with the Lagrangian method requires a distinct multiplier for every state, necessitating neural networks to approximate them as a multiplier network. However, applying standard dual gradient ascent to multiplier networks induces severe training oscillations. This is because the inherent instability of dual ascent is exacerbated by network generalization -- local overshoots and delayed updates propagate to adjacent states, further amplifying policy fluctuations. Existing stabilization techniques are designed for scalar multipliers, which are inadequate for state-dependent multiplier networks. To address this challenge, we propose an augmented Lagrangian multiplier network (ALaM) framework for stable learning of state-wise multipliers. ALaM consists of two key components. First, a quadratic penalty is introduced into the augmented Lagrangian to compensate for delayed multiplier updates and establish the local convexity near the optimum, thereby mitigating policy oscillations. Second, the multiplier network is trained via supervised regression toward a dual target, which stabilizes training and promotes convergence. Theoretically, we show that ALaM guarantees multiplier convergence and thus recovers the optimal policy of the constrained problem. Building on this framework, we integrate soft actor-critic (SAC) with ALaM to develop the SAC-ALaM algorithm. Experiments demonstrate that SAC-ALaM outperforms state-of-the-art safe RL baselines in both safety and return, while also stabilizing training dynamics and learning well-calibrated multipliers for risk identification.

Comment: Stabilizes multiplier-network optimization with augmented penalties and supervised dual targets.

Topic Match: Closest to optimization stability; the multiplier network belongs to constrained reinforcement learning.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

24. Scalable Learning in Structured Recurrent Spiking Neural Networks without Backpropagation

ArXiv ID: 2605.00402

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Bo Tang, Weiwei Xie

Abstract: Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) provide a promising framework for energy-efficient and biologically grounded computation; however, scalable learning in deep recurrent architectures with sparse connectivity remains a major challenge. In this work, we propose a structured multi-layer recurrent SNN architecture composed of locally dense recurrent layers augmented with sparse small-world long-range projections to a readout population. The long-range connectivity is largely fixed, preserving routing efficiency and hardware scalability, while synaptic adaptation is performed using strictly local plasticity mechanisms. To enable supervised learning without backpropagation or surrogate gradients, we introduce a biologically motivated learning framework that combines: (i) population-based winner-take-all (WTA) teaching signals at the output layer, (ii) fixed random broadcast alignment feedback pathways, and (iii) low-dimensional modulatory neuron populations that gate synaptic updates through three-factor learning rules with eligibility traces. This design supports deep recurrent computation with sparse global communication and purely local synaptic updates. We analyze the algorithmic properties, computational complexity, and hardware feasibility of the proposed approach, and demonstrate stable learning and competitive performance on benchmark classification tasks. The results highlight the potential of structured recurrence and neuromodulatory learning to enable scalable, hardware-compatible SNN training beyond gradient-based methods.

Comment: Trains recurrent spiking layers with local three-factor plasticity and fixed feedback without backpropagation.

Topic Match: Closest to architectural and learning-rule design; the trained models are spiking classifiers.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 7

25. Online Generalised Predictive Coding

ArXiv ID: 2605.02675

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Mehran H. Z. Bazargani, Szymon Urbas, Adeel Razi, Thomas Brendan Murphy, Karl Friston

Abstract: This paper introduces an extension of generalised filtering for online applications. Generalised filtering refers to data assimilation schemes that jointly infer latent states, learn unknown model parameters, and estimate uncertainty in an integrated framework -- e.g., estimate state and observation noise -- at the same time (i.e., triple estimation). This framework appears across disciplines under different names, including variational Kalman-Bucy filtering in engineering, generalised predictive coding in neuroscience, and Dynamic Expectation Maximisation (DEM) in time-series analysis. Here, we specialise DEM for ``online'' data assimilation, through a separation of temporal scales. We describe the variational principles and procedures that allow one to assimilate data in a way that allows for a slow updating of parameters and precisions, which contextualise fast Bayesian belief updating about the dynamic hidden states. Using numerical studies, we demonstrate the validity of online DEM (ODEM) using a non-linear -- and potentially chaotic -- generative model, to show that the ODEM scheme can track the latent states of the generative process, even when its functional form differs fundamentally from the dynamics of the generative model. Framed from a neuro-mimetic predictive coding perspective, ODEM offers a biologically inspired solution to online inference, learning, and uncertainty estimation in dynamic environments.

Comment: Separates fast latent-state inference from slower parameter and uncertainty updates.

Topic Match: Closest to learning dynamics through timescale separation; the core subject is variational state estimation.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 6

Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible (3)

1. Prescriptive Scaling Laws for Data Constrained Training

ArXiv ID: 2605.01640

Primary Topic: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible

Authors: Justin Lovelace, Christian Belardi, Srivatsa Kundurthy, Shriya Sudhakar, Kilian Q. Weinberger

Abstract: Training compute is increasingly outpacing the availability of high-quality data. This shifts the central challenge from optimal compute allocation to extracting maximum value from limited data. The widely adopted Chinchilla scaling law assumes every training token is unique. This limits its ability to guide pretraining decisions in data-constrained regimes. We model the excess loss under repetition with a simple additive overfitting penalty and find that it accurately describes model behavior. Our scaling law yields qualitatively new compute-optimal allocation advice. Beyond a point, further repetition is counterproductive and compute is better spent on model capacity. We show that following our law's recommended configuration improves performance in data-constrained regimes. Finally, because our one-parameter form isolates overfitting in a single coefficient, it enables direct comparison across training configurations. As a case study, we show that strong weight decay ($\lambda=1.0$) reduces this coefficient by approximately 70%, providing a scaling-law explanation for recent findings that optimal weight decay in data-constrained regimes is an order of magnitude larger than standard practice.

Comment: Derives how to allocate fixed-data pretraining compute between model capacity and repeated tokens.

Topic Match: Provides scaling laws that directly configure model capacity, token repetition, and regularization under a fixed data supply.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 7

2. Bringing Order to Asynchronous SGD: Towards Optimality under Data-Dependent Delays with Momentum

ArXiv ID: 2605.02043

Primary Topic: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible

Authors: Tehila Dahan, Roie Reshef, Sharon Goldstein, Kfir Y. Levy

Abstract: Asynchronous stochastic gradient descent (SGD) enables scalable distributed training but suffers from gradient staleness. Existing mitigation strategies, such as delay-adaptive learning rates and staleness-aware filtering, typically attenuate or discard delayed gradients, introducing systematic bias: updates from simpler or faster-to-process samples are overrepresented, while gradients from more complex samples are delayed or suppressed. In contrast, prior approaches to data-dependent delays rely on a Lipschitz assumption that yields suboptimal rates or leave the smooth, convex case unaddressed. We propose a momentum-based asynchronous framework designed to preserve information from delayed gradients while mitigating the effects of staleness. We establish the first optimal convergence rates for data-dependent delays in both convex and non-convex smooth setups, providing a new result for asynchronous optimization under standard assumptions. Additionally, we derive robust learning-rate schedules that simplify hyperparameter tuning in practice.

Comment: Preserves delayed-gradient contributions while correcting data-dependent staleness with momentum.

Topic Match: Closest to distributed optimization, but the contribution is general SGD convergence theory without a stated language-model training setting.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

3. Breaking the Computational Barrier: Provably Efficient Actor-Critic for Low-Rank MDPs

ArXiv ID: 2605.01242

Primary Topic: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible

Authors: Ruiquan Huang, Donghao Li, Yingbin Liang, Jing Yang

Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) is a fundamental framework for sequential decision-making, in which an agent learns an optimal policy through interactions with an unknown environment. In settings with function approximation, many existing RL algorithms achieve favorable sample complexity, but often rely on computationally intractable oracles. In this paper, we use supervised learning as a computational proxy to establish a clear hierarchy of commonly adopted RL oracles under low-rank Markov Decision Processes (MDPs). This hierarchy shows that policy evaluation is the most computationally efficient oracle, provided that supervised learning can be efficiently solved. Motivated by this observation, we propose a novel optimistic actor-critic algorithm that relies solely on the policy evaluation oracle. We prove that our algorithm outperforms the existing sample complexity guarantees for low-rank MDPs while avoiding computationally expensive planning or optimization oracles commonly assumed in prior works. We further extend our theoretical results to approximately low-rank MDPs and demonstrate that this setting captures a broad class of real-world environments. Finally, we validate our theoretical results with experiments on several standard Gym environments.

Comment: Removes expensive planning oracles from low-rank actor-critic learning by relying on policy evaluation.

Topic Match: Closest to algorithms that make training computationally feasible; the subject is low-rank reinforcement learning.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 8

MoE Where It Changes the Design Space (1)

1. Boundary Mass and the Soft-to-Hard Limit in Mixture-of-Experts

ArXiv ID: 2605.02124

Primary Topic: MoE Where It Changes the Design Space

Authors: Reza Rastegar

Abstract: Softmax-routed mixture-of-experts models approach hard routing as the temperature tends to zero, but this limit is singular near routing ties. This paper studies that singularity at the population level for squared-loss MoE regression. The central object is the \emph{boundary mass}, namely the probability that the top two router scores are separated by only a small margin. Under smoothness and transversality assumptions on the router and input law, we prove coarea/tube estimates showing that this mass is linear in the slab width, with leading constant given by a surface integral over the routing interface in the binary case. These estimates yield quantitative soft-to-hard risk bounds and, under compactness and uniform margin control, $\Gamma$-convergence of the soft objectives to the hard-routing objective. The main conclusion is that the zero-temperature limit is controlled by a thin geometric layer around routing interfaces, not by the full input space. We then use this geometric core in two more model-dependent directions. In a teacher--student setting, we prove a conditional landscape-transfer principle showing that, when the profiled hard-routing problem has favorable identifiability and curvature and the relevant derivatives transfer at boundary-layer scale, small-temperature soft routing inherits approximate teacher recovery and strict-saddle behavior away from teacher-equivalent partitions. We also give a reduced two-expert Gaussian calculation that illustrates a local symmetry-breaking mechanism aligned with the teacher separator.

Comment: Bounds the soft-to-hard routing gap through probability mass near router ties.

Topic Match: Routing-limit geometry is the closest topic; the actual setting is squared-loss MoE regression, without a language-model training contribution.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (5)

1. Activation Compression in LLMs: Theoretical Analysis and Efficient Algorithm

ArXiv ID: 2605.01255

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Wen-Da Wei, Han-Bin Fang, Yang-Di Liu, Jiang-Xin Shi, James Kwok, Yu-Feng Li

Abstract: Training large language models (LLMs) is highly memory-intensive, as training must store not only weights and optimizer states but also intermediate activations for backpropagation. While existing memory-efficient methods largely focus on gradients and optimizer states, activation compression is less well established due to the lack of LLM-tailored theory and guarantees. In this work, we develop a theoretical framework showing that activation compression is safe for linear operators when activation compression is unbiased, but problematic for nonlinear ones. We further derive gradient variance bound and establish convergence guarantees for applying activation compression to all linear operators under the standard $L$-smoothness assumption, showing that it does not change the convergence rate. Guided by the theory, we propose an activation-gradient co-compression method that reuses low-rank activation factors to compress linear-layer gradients without extra computation or additional gradient error. We conduct extensive experiments on Qwen and LLaMA models using a pretraining benchmark and multiple fine-tuning benchmarks to validate our theory and demonstrate competitive performance of our method in both accuracy and compression efficiency. We provide our code in the supplementary material for reproducibility.

Comment: Reuses low-rank activation factors for gradient compression without additional gradient error.

Topic Match: The core mechanism reduces training-state memory by coupling activation and gradient compression while controlling its optimization effects.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 8

2. SAGA: Workflow-Atomic Scheduling for AI Agent Inference on GPU Clusters

ArXiv ID: 2605.00528

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Dongxin Guo, Jikun Wu, Siu Ming Yiu

Abstract: AI agents execute tens to hundreds of chained LLM calls per task, yet GPU schedulers treat each call as independent, discarding gigabytes of intermediate state between steps and inflating end-to-end latency by 3-8x. We argue that this request-level abstraction is fundamentally mismatched to compound AI workloads, and propose a shift to program-level scheduling: treating the entire agent workflow (not individual inference calls) as the first-class schedulable unit. We present SAGA, a distributed scheduler that implements this abstraction through three mechanisms: (1) Agent Execution Graphs that capture workflow structure to predict KV cache reuse across tool-call boundaries, achieving within 1.31x of B\'el\'ady's optimal offline policy; (2) session-affinity batching with work stealing that co-locates correlated requests while maintaining global load balance; and (3) Agent Fair Share, a task-completion-time fairness metric with provable bounded-deviation guarantees. On a 64-GPU cluster serving SWE-bench coding agents and WebArena browser tasks, SAGA reduces task completion time by 1.64x (geometric mean, p < 0.001) over vLLM v0.15.1 with prefix caching and affinity routing, while improving GPU memory utilization by 1.22x and achieving 99.2% SLO attainment under multi-tenant interference. These latency gains come at a quantified cost: approximately 30% lower peak throughput than throughput-optimal batch scheduling, a tradeoff appropriate for the latency-sensitive interactive deployments that dominate compound AI usage. Our results demonstrate that workflow-aware scheduling is essential for efficient compound AI serving.

Comment: Preserves cross-call KV-cache reuse by scheduling complete agent workflows.

Topic Match: Closest to cache efficiency; the contribution improves serving latency through scheduling.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 7

3. LEAP: Layer-wise Exit-Aware Pretraining for Efficient Transformer Inference

ArXiv ID: 2605.01058

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Shashank Kapadia, Deep Naryan Mishra, Sujal Reddy Alugubelli, Haoan Wang, Saipraveen Vabbilisetty, Rishi Bhatia, Anupriya Sharma

Abstract: Layer-aligned distillation and convergence-based early exit represent two predominant computational efficiency paradigms for transformer inference; yet we establish that they exhibit systematic incompatibility under standard deployment conditions for convergence-based early exit. Distillation objectives that align intermediate student layers to teacher representations suppress the representational convergence that early-exit mechanisms exploit, rendering such mechanisms ineffective on distilled models. We introduce LEAP (Layer-wise Exit-Aware Pretraining), an auxiliary training objective that reconciles this incompatibility. LEAP requires no architectural modifications; it augments standard distillation with a single constraint ensuring intermediate layers approximate final-layer representations. LEAP-MiniLM achieves 1.61$\times$ measured wall-clock speedup (batch=1, NVIDIA L4) at $\theta$=0.95, with 91.9% of samples exiting by layer 7 and 1.80$\times$ theoretical layer reduction, where standard distilled models achieve zero effective speedup. We validate across sentence similarity (STS-B: 0.760 $\pm$ 0.006) and retrieval benchmarks (BEIR), providing operational guidance including latency measurements, decision thresholds, and deployment criteria.

Comment: Adds a layer-alignment objective that restores early exit in distilled encoders.

Topic Match: Closest to efficiency; its central payoff is inference early exit for distilled sentence encoders.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 5

4. DurableUn: Quantization-Induced Recovery Attacks in Machine Unlearning

ArXiv ID: 2605.02196

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Abdullah Ahmad Khan, Ferdous Sohel

Abstract: Machine unlearning aims to remove specified training data to satisfy privacy regulations such as GDPR. However, existing evaluations assume identical precision at unlearning and deployment, overlooking that production LLMs are deployed at low-bit precision. We show that INT4 quantization systematically restores forgotten content even when models pass compliance audits at bfloat16 (BF16), we term this the quantization recovery attack (QRA). We conduct the first systematic study of unlearning robustness under adapter-space INT4 quantization in the NF4+LoRA regime, evaluating seven methods on LLaMA-3-8B-Instruct across TOFU, MUSE-News, and WikiBio-WPU. INT8 is benign; INT4 induces recovery of up to 22x, worsening with dataset difficulty. We identify the FA-RA-Q-INT4 trilemma: no method simultaneously achieves strong forgetting, high utility, and quantization robustness. A dense Pareto sweep reveals a sharp phase transition once robustness is achieved, retaining accuracy collapses regardless of further tuning. To address this, we propose DURABLEUN-SAF (Sharpness-Aware Forgetting), a quantization-aware objective using Straight-Through Estimator gradients through INT4 rounding. DURABLEUN-SAF is the only method to achieve a stable empirical (0.047, {BF16, INT8, INT4})- durability certificate: Q-INT4= 0.043 +- 0.002, cert rate= 3/3, versus SalUn's cert rate= 1/3 at its own published hyperparameters. We call for Q-INT4 to be adopted as a standard evaluation metric alongside FA and RA.

Comment: Shows that INT4 rounding can restore content suppressed by unlearning, motivating precision-aware optimization.

Topic Match: Quantization effects are the closest topic; the core contribution concerns unlearning robustness under deployment precision changes.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

5. BWLA: Breaking the Barrier of W1AX Post-Training Quantization for LLMs

ArXiv ID: 2605.00422

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Zhixiong Zhao, Zukang Xu, Dawei Yang

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have driven major progress in NLP, yet their substantial memory and compute demands still hinder practical deployment. Binarization can compress weights to 1 bit, fundamentally lowering compute and bandwidth cost. However, existing methods cannot address activation heavy tails and thus must keep activations in high precision, preventing true end-to-end acceleration. To overcome this limitation, we propose BWLA (Binarized Weights and Low-bit Activations), the first post-training quantization framework that preserves high accuracy while achieving 1-bit weight quantization together with low-bit activations (e.g., 6 bits). The Orthogonal-Kronecker Transformation (OKT) learns an orthogonal mapping via EM minimization, converting unimodal weights into symmetric bimodal forms while suppressing activation tails and incoherence. The Proximal SVD Projection (PSP) then performs lightweight low-rank refinement through proximal SVD projection, further enhancing quantizability with minimal overhead. On Qwen3-32B, BWLA reaches a Wikitext2 perplexity of 11.92 under 6-bit activations (vs. 38 from SOTA), improves five zero-shot tasks by more than 70%, and delivers 3.26 times inference speedup, demonstrating strong potential for real-world LLM compression and acceleration.

Comment: Jointly reshapes weight and activation distributions to permit 1-bit weights with 6-bit activations.

Topic Match: Compression is the nearest fit; the core contribution is post-training quantization, an explicit subject exclusion.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 7

Paper Selection Prompt

System Prompt

You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.

User Prompt

Relevant Topics

This is a training-side feed for someone who builds and modifies model internals. The centre of gravity is what a frontier model is made of and how it is trained: architecture, training dynamics, and the decisions a lab actually made. MoE is still in scope, but only when the contribution changes the design space, not when it tunes an existing MoE.

Keep a paper when its CORE CONTRIBUTION falls in one of the five topics below. Filter it when the topic is merely the setting for a downstream application, a benchmark, or a product result.

THE SUBJECT IS LANGUAGE-MODEL TRAINING. Every topic below is scoped to it. A technique named in one of them -- decentralised or asynchronous training, discrete diffusion, byte-level modelling, 1-bit weights, mixture-of-experts -- earns nothing when the model being trained is an image generator, a recommender, a scientific surrogate, or a vision classifier. Match on what is being trained, not on the vocabulary in the abstract.

THE ONE QUESTION THAT DECIDES A HIGH SCORE, asked before the topic list:

Does this paper REMOVE or REPLACE a component that everyone downstream inherits without thinking, or DECOUPLE two quantities the field currently conflates -- and does it say which end is held fixed while the other moves?

A paper that ADDS a mechanism on top of existing primitives is ordinary work, however good the numbers. A paper that takes one away, or splits one knob into two, is the reason this feed exists. Papers whose gains are CONDITIONAL (only above some batch size, only in one budget regime, only with an extra training stage) are ordinary work too, even when the mechanism is new: a conditional win is a new knob, not a removed one.

1. Frontier Model Releases and Technical Reports (primary) - Keep: model and technical reports that DISCLOSE architecture or training decisions -- layer and attention design, normalization and residual choices, hybrid attention/state-space stacks, sparsity and expert layout, tokenizer and vocabulary decisions, data mixture and curriculum, optimizer and schedule, precision and numerics, stability fixes and what broke; open-weight releases whose report explains a choice rather than only reporting it. - Filter: releases that are a scorecard -- benchmark tables, a capability announcement, a product or API launch, or a report that names its recipe without saying why it was chosen. A frontier name in the title earns nothing on its own.

2. Architecture and Training Dynamics (primary) - Keep: new or analysed architectural mechanisms (attention variants, normalization and residual design, state-space and recurrent sequence modelling, positional schemes, dynamic or modular computation, tokenizer-free and byte-level or learned-chunking stacks, non-autoregressive and discrete-diffusion generation); optimizers, preconditioners, and parameterisations, especially hyperparameter transfer across scale; training-dynamics and stability analysis that explains why large models train the way they do; work that removes a standard component (normalization, weight decay, positional encoding, the tokenizer, left-to-right decoding) and shows the model still trains. - Filter: applying an existing architecture to a new task or benchmark with no mechanistic insight; an architectural tweak evaluated only at toy scale with no account of what it costs.

3. Large-Scale Training Systems - Keep: distributed training ALGORITHMS that change what is possible, not only what is fast -- asynchronous, low-communication and decentralised optimisation, sharding and parallelism schemes with a new invariant, numerics and low-precision training (FP8, FP4, ternary and 1-bit) when the claim is about training stability rather than a kernel; scaling-law work that informs how a run is configured, including data-constrained and repeated-data regimes and critical batch size. - Filter: kernel engineering, communication scheduling, overlap, caching, serving and inference throughput. This is a real exclusion, not a soft one: work whose contribution is "the same model, faster" belongs to someone else's feed even when it is excellent and even when it is about MoE.

4. MoE Where It Changes the Design Space - Keep: routing that is newly differentiable or newly stable; the training/inference router gap; expert collapse and what actually prevents it; expert granularity, shared experts and layout when a new axis is opened rather than tuned; dense-to-MoE conversion; MoE scaling laws that fix one quantity and vary another; analyses that carry a criterion which could have failed (a random-guess baseline, an ablation with a predicted sign) rather than similarity heatmaps. - Filter: MoE SYSTEMS and inference work (expert parallelism, all-to-all schedules, grouped GEMM, offload, prefetching, capacity and scheduling tricks, compression for serving); MoE surveys; papers that train on top of a MoE without a routing, balancing, stability, or structural contribution; "mixture of experts" in the classical ensemble or recommender sense. - The exclusion above is about MAKING MoE RUN FASTER, and it does not reach routing and expert design. A paper on how tokens are assigned to experts, how experts specialise, how balance is enforced, or how a dense model becomes sparse stays fully in scope and scores on its merits, even when the mechanism is a small one.

5. Efficiency and Compression When the Mechanism Is New - Keep: quantization, sparsity, pruning and low-rank work whose mechanism is new and whose gain is unconditional; compression that changes what can be trained, not only what can be served; attribution of a model's behaviour to its data. - Filter: tuned variants of standard efficiency methods; deployment and serving engineering; anything whose headline is a compression ratio with no account of what was given up.

Also keep, even though they read like evaluation work, because the field has no one checking them: - benchmark validity itself: contamination, saturation, LLM-as-judge reliability, whether a benchmark measures what it claims. A paper AUDITING a benchmark is in scope; a paper PROPOSING one is not.

Subjects He Has Never Once Kept

Measured, not guessed. Over nine months where he was actively curating, 4953 papers passed this filter and 274 made his list -- a keep rate of 5.2%. Each subject below appeared in the rejected pile the number of times shown and appeared ZERO times in his entire 508-entry list.

Filter a paper whose CORE SUBJECT is one of these. The count is the evidence; where a paper only mentions the term in passing while contributing somewhere in the five topics above, keep it.

variational methods and inference (52) unlearning (41) long-context methods (40) neural operators (35) time series (35) vision transformers (35) parameter-efficient fine-tuning (28) stochastic gradient analysis (21) LLM safety (20) LLM reasoning as a subject (20) hallucination (20) sequence modelling as a subject (19) differential equations (19) spiking neural networks (17) post-training quantization (16) mechanistic interpretability as a framing (15) test-time scaling (13)

Two more he kept exactly once each, so suppress rather than drop: graph neural networks (1 of 42), knowledge distillation (1 of 39).

Do NOT extend this list by analogy. Four subjects that look like they belong here were checked and do not: diffusion models (8.1% kept), prompting (10.0%), benchmarks (9.1%) and neural architecture search (13.3%) all sit ABOVE his 5.2% base rate.

Note the one distinction that matters: he rejects papers FRAMED as interpretability, while analysis of how a trained model's computation is organised is among his highest-rated work. The subject is the framing, not the act of analysing.

Leave these to the hotspot digest unless the core contribution clearly falls in one of the five topics above: - agent, tooling, and RAG launches, and agent framework papers - new benchmarks, leaderboards, and evaluation-only papers - interpretability that stops at cataloguing features, with nothing said about the mechanism that produced them. Analysis of how a trained model's computation is organised -- what drives expert selection, what a circuit computes, how representations reorganise across training -- is IN scope, not here. - memory mechanisms and agent memory systems - world models, exploration, and reinforcement learning - alignment and post-training (RLHF, DPO, GRPO, RFT, instruction tuning), EXCEPT where the subject is how post-training destabilises the architecture itself - downstream applications in medical imaging, segmentation, 3D vision, video understanding, information retrieval, summarization, recommendation, machine translation, speech recognition, time series, knowledge graphs, and similar domains

Scoring Criteria

Score five independent axes from 1 to 10: Relevance, Novelty, Evidence, Load, Proximity.

They answer different questions and must not be collapsed. Relevance: is this the kind of work this feed is for. Evidence: did the paper earn its claim. Load: what does it cost to get the usable result out. Proximity: how close is it to what the reader is working on right now (see Active Lines below).

Novelty is scored for continuity with the archive and for the hotspot spotlight cutoffs, and it does NOT order the feed. Measured against 274 hand-tiered papers it carried no signal at all: papers scoring 8 or more were his must-reads exactly as often as papers scoring 5 or less, both at the pool's base rate. Every abstract claims novelty, so the axis measures the claiming rather than the work. Score it honestly and do not let it influence the other four.

A strong claim with thin evidence is a worse read than a modest claim that holds. Score each axis on its own; do not let a high one pull up a low one.

Relevance Scoring

• 9-10: directly centered on the target topics; highest when the core contribution is clearly within them and the paper is about how a model is BUILT or TRAINED.
• 7-8: substantially related, but partly peripheral or focused on a narrower aspect.
• 5-6: touches the target topics, but the main contribution is elsewhere.
• 3-4: largely outside the target topics, often application-focused or domain-specific.
• 1-2: unrelated.

Important: Daily buzz, a frontier lab's name, or a large headline number is not enough for a high Relevance score. A model release scores high only when the report explains an architecture or training decision; a release that only reports results is hotspot material, not this feed.

Work whose contribution is "the same model, faster" -- kernels, communication schedules, overlap, caching, serving -- caps at Relevance 5 even when it is excellent and even when it is about MoE. Making a known design run faster is a different job from changing the design.

That cap is about SPEED, not about size. Compression that is lossless, or that changes what can be trained or held in memory at all rather than how quickly it runs, is not capped: it changes what is possible, which is the thing this feed is for.

Analysis of how a trained model's computation is actually organised -- what a circuit computes, what drives expert selection, how representations reorganise over training -- IS in scope and scores like any other work on mechanism. Only interpretability that stops at describing features, with nothing said about the mechanism that produced them, drops out of the feed.

Novelty Scoring

Novelty means a change to the design space, not a change to a number. Score against this ladder:

• 9-10: removes or replaces a component the whole field inherits without thinking (normalization, weight decay, the tokenizer, positional encoding, left-to-right decoding, the standard optimizer, a numerical format), or decouples two quantities everyone conflates -- AND states which end is held fixed while the other moves. The claim is unconditional: it does not require a particular scale, budget regime, or extra stage. An ANALYSIS paper reaches this band when it settles a mechanism-level question with a criterion that could have come out the other way.
• 7-8: a substantial new mechanism, or a decoupling whose gain is real but CONDITIONAL (holds above some batch size, in one budget band, or with an added training phase). A conditional win is a new knob, not a removed one, and belongs here rather than above.
• 5-6: meaningful but incremental extension or refinement of an existing primitive; a tuned variant; a well-executed combination of known parts.
• 3-4: minor, narrow, or mostly engineering or domain-specific improvement; a survey or overview, however thorough.
• 1-2: little originality; mainly standard application of existing methods.

Score the claim as the paper states it here. Whether the paper supports that claim is Evidence, and it is scored separately -- do not discount Novelty for weak experiments, and do not raise it because the framing is confident. Phrases like "we remove", "without X", "holding Y fixed" are what the paper SAYS; they earn a high Novelty only if the thing named really is a component the field inherits by default, not a component this paper introduced two sentences earlier.

Evidence Scoring

Does the demonstration reach as far as the claim?

• 9-10: shown at the scale and breadth the claim asserts -- language-model pretraining at billion-parameter or hundred-billion-token scale, or across several model families, sizes, or domains -- with ablations that isolate the named mechanism and could have failed.
• 7-8: one credible setting that matches the claim's stated scope, with the baselines a skeptic would ask for.
• 5-6: a single small setting, or a claim stated more broadly than the demonstration reaches.
• 3-4: the claim is about transformers or language models in general, but the demonstration lives in one narrow domain or one small benchmark -- image classification alone, a single toy task, one dataset; or the comparisons a reader needs in order to believe it are missing.
• 1-2: the central claim is asserted, illustrated, or supported only by plots that could not have come out the other way.

A structural claim demonstrated only outside the setting it claims is capped at 4, however striking the claim. "We removed a component everyone uses" shown only on small vision models is a result about small vision models.

When the abstract names no scale, no dataset, and no baseline at all, score exactly 5. Do not infer rigor from confident writing. Unstated is not the same as strong, and two thirds of abstracts say nothing here: guessing on those was measured to make this axis worse.

Adjustments: subtract 1 when no code is released and the procedure is not reproducible from the paper alone; subtract 1 when the method's cost grows in the number of components it adds (one loss per pair of experts, one module per domain) and the paper does not account for that growth; add 1 when the paper states its own limitation precisely enough that a reader could design the experiment that breaks it.

Load Scoring

What does it cost to get the usable result out? This is about the reader's effort, not quality.

• 9-10: the result cannot be taken without following the derivation -- a new theoretical framework, unfamiliar mathematical machinery, or a proof that IS the contribution.
• 7-8: substantial theory or an involved formalism, but the operational result is stated plainly somewhere.
• 4-6: ordinary methods paper; the recipe is legible from the paper's own description.
• 1-3: the takeaway is a single decision or number a reader can act on immediately.

A high Load is not a criticism. It only says the paper is a project rather than a read.

Proximity Scoring

How close is this to the Active Lines stated below? This axis is about the reader, not the paper, and a paper can be excellent and distant at the same time.

• 9-10: squarely on a centre line -- the paper's core contribution is the thing the reader is working on, and a result here changes what they would do next.
• 7-8: on a centre line but from a direction they are not working from, or on an adjacent line where the result carries over directly.
• 5-6: adjacent: same stack, different layer; they would want to know it happened.
• 3-4: far: recognisable as the same field, but nothing here reaches their work.
• 1-2: another area entirely.

Judge distance from the reader's stated centre, NOT from whatever is currently prominent in the field. A paper everyone is discussing is not thereby close.

Topic Registry

Use exactly one PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID chosen from the stable topic IDs below. - frontier_models: Frontier Model Releases and Technical Reports - Frontier model and technical reports that disclose an architecture or training decision: layer and attention design, normalization and residual choices, hybrid stacks, sparsity layout, tokenizer and data mixture, optimizer and schedule, precision, and the stability problems that had to be solved. - architecture_training: Architecture and Training Dynamics - Architectural and optimisation mechanisms, and the training dynamics that explain them: attention and normalization design, positional schemes, state-space and recurrent stacks, tokenizer-free and learned-chunking models, non-autoregressive and discrete-diffusion generation, optimizers and parameterisations including hyperparameter transfer across scale, and work that removes a standard component and shows the model still trains. - training_systems: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible - Distributed training algorithms that change what can be trained rather than how fast it runs: asynchronous, low-communication and decentralised optimisation, parallelism schemes with a new invariant, low-precision and 1-bit training when the claim is stability, and scaling laws including data-constrained regimes and critical batch size. - moe_training: MoE Where It Changes the Design Space - Mixture-of-Experts work that opens or closes a design axis: differentiable and stable routing, the training/inference router gap, expert collapse, granularity and layout as a new axis, dense-to-MoE conversion, and MoE scaling laws that fix one quantity and vary another. MoE systems and inference work is out. - efficiency_scaling: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training - Compression, sparsity, quantization, pruning, low-rank and memory or cache efficiency whose mechanism is new and whose gain is unconditional.

Papers

[PAPER LIST HERE]

Instructions

Respond in JSONL. Output exactly one JSON object per paper, one per line:

{"ARXIVID":"...","COMMENT":"...","RELEVANCE":0,"NOVELTY":0,"EVIDENCE":0,"LOAD":0,"PROXIMITY":0,"PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID":"...","MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS":[],"TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT":"...","HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS":[],"HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT":"..."}

Rules: - ARXIVID: the arXiv ID. - COMMENT: identify the single strongest matching criterion. Be brief and specific. Do not rely on generic phrases like "language modeling" or "advancement". Do not mention non-matching criteria. - RELEVANCE: integer from 1 to 10. - NOVELTY: integer from 1 to 10, scoring the claim as stated. - EVIDENCE: integer from 1 to 10, scoring whether the demonstration reaches as far as the claim. - LOAD: integer from 1 to 10, scoring what it costs the reader to extract the usable result. - PROXIMITY: integer from 1 to 10, scoring distance from the stated Active Lines. - PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID: exactly one stable topic ID from the allowed topic registry. - MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS: zero or more stable topic IDs from the same allowed set. Include PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID when there are multiple matches. - TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT: briefly explain why the primary topic is the best fit. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS: zero or more tags from this exact set only: daily_hot, new_frontier. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT: briefly explain why the paper belongs in the daily hotspot paper feed when HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS is non-empty; otherwise use an empty string. - Use HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS sparingly. Most papers should return []. - daily_hot means the paper feels broadly important to the day and belongs in the daily hotspot paper section even if it is not part of the personalized foundational reading list. - new_frontier means the paper appears to open a genuinely new direction, paradigm, or field, even if the work is still early. - Do not output markdown, code fences, or any extra text.