Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2026-04-16

_{Papers on this page were re-scored with local agent CLI; the usage above is from the original run.}

Topic Coverage:

Table of contents by topic:

Architecture and Training Dynamics (20)

1. (How) Learning Rates Regulate Catastrophic Overtraining Authors: Mark Rofin, Aditya Varre, Nicolas Flammarion

2. Latent Planning Emerges with Scale Authors: Michael Hanna, Emmanuel Ameisen

3. Numerical Instability and Chaos: Quantifying the Unpredictability of Large Language Models Authors: Chashi Mahiul Islam, Alan Villarreal, Mao Nishino, Shaeke Salman, Xiuwen Liu

4. Better and Worse with Scale: How Contextual Entrainment Diverges with Model Size Authors: Dikshant Kukreja (IIIT Delhi, India), Kshitij Sah (IIIT Delhi, India), Gautam Gupta (IIIT Delhi, India), Avinash Anand (Singapore Institute of Technology), Rajiv Ratn Shah (IIIT Delhi, India), Zhengkui Wang (Singapore Institute of Technology), Aik Beng Ng (NVIDIA), Erik Cambria (Nanyang Technological University)

5. Lightning OPD: Efficient Post-Training for Large Reasoning Models with Offline On-Policy Distillation Authors: Yecheng Wu, Song Han, Hai Cai

6. Momentum Further Constrains Sharpness at the Edge of Stochastic Stability Authors: Arseniy Andreyev, Advikar Ananthkumar, Marc Walden, Tomaso Poggio, Pierfrancesco Beneventano

7. C-voting: Confidence-Based Test-Time Voting without Explicit Energy Functions Authors: Kenji Kubo, Shunsuke Kamiya, Masanori Koyama, Kohei Hayashi, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo

8. Design Conditions for Intra-Group Learning of Sequence-Level Rewards: Token Gradient Cancellation Authors: Fei Ding, Yongkang Zhang, youwei wang, Zijian Zeng

9. Gradient Descent's Last Iterate is Often (slightly) Suboptimal Authors: Guy Kornowski, Ohad Shamir

10. Beyond State Consistency: Behavior Consistency in Text-Based World Models Authors: Youling Huang, Guanqiao Chen, Junchi Yao, Lu Wang, Fangkai Yang, Chao Du, ChenZhuo Zhao, Pu Zhao, Qingwei Lin, Saravan Rajmohan, Dongmei Zhang

11. RePAIR: Interactive Machine Unlearning through Prompt-Aware Model Repair Authors: Jagadeesh Rachapudi, Pranav Singh, Ritali Vatsi, Praful Hambarde, Amit Shukla

12. From Order to Distribution: A Spectral Characterization of Forgetting in Continual Learning Authors: Zonghuan Xu, Xingjun Ma

13. Learning Inference Concurrency in DynamicGate MLP Structural and Mathematical Justification Authors: Yongil Choi

14. A Mechanistic Analysis of Sim-and-Real Co-Training in Generative Robot Policies Authors: Yu Lei, Minghuan Liu, Abhiram Maddukuri, Zhenyu Jiang, Yuke Zhu

15. Loop Corrections to the Training and Generalization Errors of Random Feature Models Authors: Taeyoung Kim

16. Algorithmic Analysis of Dense Associative Memory: Finite-Size Guarantees and Adversarial Robustness Authors: Madhava Gaikwad

17. A Complete Symmetry Classification of Shallow ReLU Networks Authors: Pranavkrishnan Ramakrishnan

18. Identifiability of Potentially Degenerate Gaussian Mixture Models With Piecewise Affine Mixing Authors: Danru Xu, S\'ebastien Lachapelle, Sara Magliacane

19. Provably Efficient Offline-to-Online Value Adaptation with General Function Approximation Authors: Shangzhe Li, Weitong Zhang

20. Golden Handcuffs make safer AI agents Authors: Aram Ebtekar, Michael K. Cohen

Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible (2)

1. ResBM: Residual Bottleneck Models for Low-Bandwidth Pipeline Parallelism Authors: Alan Aboudib, Rodrigo Lopez Portillo A., Kalei Brady, Steffen Cruz

2. Event Tensor: A Unified Abstraction for Compiling Dynamic Megakernel Authors: Hongyi Jin, Bohan Hou, Guanjie Wang, Ruihang Lai, Jinqi Chen, Zihao Ye, Yaxing Cai, Yixin Dong, Xinhao Cheng, Zhihao Zhang, Yilong Zhao, Yingyi Huang, Lijie Yang, Jinchen Jiang, Gabriele Oliaro, Jianan Ji, Xupeng Miao, Vinod Grover, Todd C. Mowry, Zhihao Jia, Tianqi Chen

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (5)

1. KV Packet: Recomputation-Free Context-Independent KV Caching for LLMs Authors: Chuangtao Chen, Grace Li Zhang, Xunzhao Yin, Cheng Zhuo, Bing Li, Ulf Schlichtmann

2. OSC: Hardware Efficient W4A4 Quantization via Outlier Separation in Channel Dimension Authors: Zhiyuan Zhang, Yanzhao Li, Zhiqiang Zou, Bai Du, Yupeng Sun, Hui Dong, Hui Wang

3. Cooperative Memory Paging with Keyword Bookmarks for Long-Horizon LLM Conversations Authors: Ziyang Liu

4. Chain-of-Models Pre-Training: Rethinking Training Acceleration of Vision Foundation Models Authors: Jiawei Fan, Shigeng Wang, Chao Li, Xiaolong Liu, Anbang Yao

5. Hardware-Efficient Neuro-Symbolic Networks with the Exp-Minus-Log Operator Authors: Eymen Ipek

Architecture and Training Dynamics (20)

1. (How) Learning Rates Regulate Catastrophic Overtraining

ArXiv ID: 2604.13627

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Mark Rofin, Aditya Varre, Nicolas Flammarion

Abstract: Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) is a common first stage of LLM post-training, teaching the model to follow instructions and shaping its behavior as a helpful assistant. At the same time, SFT may harm the fundamental capabilities of an LLM, particularly after long pretraining: a phenomenon known as catastrophic overtraining (Springer et al., 2025). To understand overtraining, we first investigate catastrophic forgetting in finetuning through the lens of implicit regularization of the learning rate. For models trained to the same SFT loss, we identify how the learning rate mediates optimization: finetuning with large and small steps converges to qualitatively different models. Next, we link forgetting to overtraining: learning rate decay increases the sharpness of the pretrained model, which in turn exacerbates catastrophic forgetting during SFT, leading to overtraining. Our findings paint a picture of the overtraining mechanism in LLMs and broadly contribute to the understanding of the interplay between optimization dynamics during pretraining and finetuning.

Comment: Holds SFT loss fixed to isolate how learning rate and pretrained sharpness drive catastrophic forgetting.

Topic Match: Connects pretraining schedules and optimization geometry to subsequent fine-tuning instability.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 9

2. Latent Planning Emerges with Scale

ArXiv ID: 2604.12493

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Michael Hanna, Emmanuel Ameisen

Abstract: LLMs can perform seemingly planning-intensive tasks, like writing coherent stories or functioning code, without explicitly verbalizing a plan; however, the extent to which they implicitly plan is unknown. In this paper, we define latent planning as occurring when LLMs possess internal planning representations that (1) cause the generation of a specific future token or concept, and (2) shape preceding context to license said future token or concept. We study the Qwen-3 family (0.6B-14B) on simple planning tasks, finding that latent planning ability increases with scale. Models that plan possess features that represent a planned-for word like "accountant", and cause them to output "an" rather than "a"; moreover, even the less-successful Qwen-3 4B-8B have nascent planning mechanisms. On the more complex task of completing rhyming couplets, we find that models often identify a rhyme ahead of time, but even large models seldom plan far ahead. However, we can elicit some planning that increases with scale when steering models towards planned words in prose. In sum, we offer a framework for measuring planning and mechanistic evidence of how models' planning abilities grow with scale.

Comment: Causal tests ask whether future-word representations also change the preceding tokens that license those words.

Topic Match: The contribution tests what internal representations compute during generation, across Qwen3 sizes, with explicit limits on longer-range planning.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 9

3. Numerical Instability and Chaos: Quantifying the Unpredictability of Large Language Models

ArXiv ID: 2604.13206

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Chashi Mahiul Islam, Alan Villarreal, Mao Nishino, Shaeke Salman, Xiuwen Liu

Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into agentic workflows, their unpredictability stemming from numerical instability has emerged as a critical reliability issue. While recent studies have demonstrated the significant downstream effects of these instabilities, the root causes and underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. In this paper, we present a rigorous analysis of how unpredictability is rooted in the finite numerical precision of floating-point representations, tracking how rounding errors propagate, amplify, or dissipate through Transformer computation layers. Specifically, we identify a chaotic "avalanche effect" in the early layers, where minor perturbations trigger binary outcomes: either rapid amplification or complete attenuation. Beyond specific error instances, we demonstrate that LLMs exhibit universal, scale-dependent chaotic behaviors characterized by three distinct regimes: 1) a stable regime, where perturbations fall below an input-dependent threshold and vanish, resulting in constant outputs; 2) a chaotic regime, where rounding errors dominate and drive output divergence; and 3) a signal-dominated regime, where true input variations override numerical noise. We validate these findings extensively across multiple datasets and model architectures.

Comment: Identifies layerwise rounding-error amplification and perturbation thresholds separating stable, chaotic, and signal-dominated computation.

Topic Match: Explains numerical behavior inside Transformer layers; the contribution is a computational mechanism rather than an agent application.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 8

4. Better and Worse with Scale: How Contextual Entrainment Diverges with Model Size

ArXiv ID: 2604.13275

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Dikshant Kukreja (IIIT Delhi, India), Kshitij Sah (IIIT Delhi, India), Gautam Gupta (IIIT Delhi, India), Avinash Anand (Singapore Institute of Technology), Rajiv Ratn Shah (IIIT Delhi, India), Zhengkui Wang (Singapore Institute of Technology), Aik Beng Ng (NVIDIA), Erik Cambria (Nanyang Technological University)

Abstract: Larger language models become simultaneously better and worse at handling contextual information -- better at ignoring false claims, worse at ignoring irrelevant tokens. We formalize this apparent paradox through the first scaling laws for contextual entrainment, the tendency of models to favor tokens that appeared in context regardless of relevance. Analyzing the Cerebras-GPT (111M-13B) and Pythia (410M-12B) model families, we find entrainment follows predictable power-law scaling, but with opposite trends depending on context type: semantic contexts show decreasing entrainment with scale, while non-semantic contexts show increasing entrainment. Concretely, the largest models are four times more resistant to counterfactual misinformation than the smallest, yet simultaneously twice as prone to copying arbitrary tokens. These diverging trends, which replicate across model families, suggest that semantic filtering and mechanical copying are functionally distinct behaviors that scale in opposition -- scaling alone does not resolve context sensitivity, it reshapes it.

Comment: Two model families exhibit opposite size trends for semantic filtering and arbitrary-token copying.

Topic Match: Closest to model-mechanism analysis, but the contribution establishes behavioural scaling trends without identifying the computation or training process producing them.

Relevance: 5 Novelty: 7

5. Lightning OPD: Efficient Post-Training for Large Reasoning Models with Offline On-Policy Distillation

ArXiv ID: 2604.13010

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Yecheng Wu, Song Han, Hai Cai

Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) has emerged as an efficient post-training paradigm for large language models. However, standard OPD requires a live teacher inference server throughout training, resulting in substantial infrastructure overhead. In this work, we investigate whether on-policy distillation can be performed offline. A natural approach is to precompute teacher log-probabilities once over SFT rollouts and reuse them during training. In practice, however, this offline variant fails to reliably match the performance of standard OPD. To understand this discrepancy, we identify a previously overlooked condition that is critical for any OPD pipeline, which we term teacher consistency. This condition requires that the same teacher model be used for both supervised fine-tuning and OPD. We show that violating teacher consistency introduces an irreducible gradient bias, causing both offline and online OPD to converge to a suboptimal fixed point regardless of training duration. Building on this insight, we propose Lightning OPD, an offline on-policy distillation framework that enforces teacher consistency by precomputing teacher log-probabilities over SFT rollouts. This design eliminates the need for a live teacher server entirely. We further show that, under teacher consistency, Lightning OPD shares the same optimum as standard OPD, with bounded gradient discrepancy and an implicit regularization effect that helps prevent policy drift. Extensive experiments on mathematical reasoning and code generation demonstrate that Lightning OPD achieves state-of-the-art performance with significantly improved efficiency. Starting from an SFT-initialized Qwen3-8B-Base model, Lightning OPD reaches 69.9% on AIME 2024 in just 30 GPU hours, achieving a 4.0x speedup over standard OPD and substantially lowering the barrier to entry for academic research on LLM post-training.

Comment: Matching the SFT and distillation teachers removes the claimed persistent gradient bias and enables offline teacher targets.

Topic Match: Teacher consistency is an optimization condition; the core contribution remains post-training distillation for reasoning models.

Relevance: 5 Novelty: 7

6. Momentum Further Constrains Sharpness at the Edge of Stochastic Stability

ArXiv ID: 2604.14108

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Arseniy Andreyev, Advikar Ananthkumar, Marc Walden, Tomaso Poggio, Pierfrancesco Beneventano

Abstract: Recent work suggests that (stochastic) gradient descent self-organizes near an instability boundary, shaping both optimization and the solutions found. Momentum and mini-batch gradients are widely used in practical deep learning optimization, but it remains unclear whether they operate in a comparable regime of instability. We demonstrate that SGD with momentum exhibits an Edge of Stochastic Stability (EoSS)-like regime with batch-size-dependent behavior that cannot be explained by a single momentum-adjusted stability threshold. Batch Sharpness (the expected directional mini-batch curvature) stabilizes in two distinct regimes: at small batch sizes it converges to a lower plateau $2(1-\beta)/\eta$, reflecting amplification of stochastic fluctuations by momentum and favoring flatter regions than vanilla SGD; at large batch sizes it converges to a higher plateau $2(1+\beta)/\eta$, where momentum recovers its classical stabilizing effect and favors sharper regions consistent with full-batch dynamics. We further show that this aligns with linear stability thresholds and discuss the implications for hyperparameter tuning and coupling.

Comment: Momentum produces two batch-dependent curvature thresholds with opposite implications for stability and sharpness.

Topic Match: Closest to optimisation dynamics, but the core subject is general stochastic-gradient analysis without a language-model training setting.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 8

7. C-voting: Confidence-Based Test-Time Voting without Explicit Energy Functions

ArXiv ID: 2604.13521

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Kenji Kubo, Shunsuke Kamiya, Masanori Koyama, Kohei Hayashi, Yusuke Iwasawa, Yutaka Matsuo

Abstract: Neural network models with latent recurrent processing, where identical layers are recursively applied to the latent state, have gained attention as promising models for performing reasoning tasks. A strength of such models is that they enable test-time scaling, where the models can enhance their performance in the test phase without additional training. Models such as the Hierarchical Reasoning Model (HRM) and Artificial Kuramoto Oscillatory Neurons (AKOrN) can facilitate deeper reasoning by increasing the number of recurrent steps, thereby enabling the completion of challenging tasks, including Sudoku, Maze solving, and AGI benchmarks. In this work, we introduce confidence-based voting (C-voting), a test-time scaling strategy designed for recurrent models with multiple latent candidate trajectories. Initializing the latent state with multiple candidates using random variables, C-voting selects the one maximizing the average of top-1 probabilities of the predictions, reflecting the model's confidence. Additionally, it yields 4.9% higher accuracy on Sudoku-hard than the energy-based voting strategy, which is specific to models with explicit energy functions. An essential advantage of C-voting is its applicability: it can be applied to recurrent models without requiring an explicit energy function. Finally, we introduce a simple attention-based recurrent model with randomized initial values named ItrSA++, and demonstrate that when combined with C-voting, it outperforms HRM on Sudoku-extreme (95.2% vs. 55.0%) and Maze (78.6% vs. 74.5%) tasks.

Comment: Confidence-based trajectory selection removes the need for an explicit energy score in recurrent-model voting.

Topic Match: Closest to recurrent computation, but the contribution is test-time voting for puzzle-solving models rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 5

8. Design Conditions for Intra-Group Learning of Sequence-Level Rewards: Token Gradient Cancellation

ArXiv ID: 2604.13088

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Fei Ding, Yongkang Zhang, youwei wang, Zijian Zeng

Abstract: In sparse termination rewards, intra-group comparisons have become the dominant paradigm for fine-tuning reasoning models via reinforcement learning. However, long-term training often leads to issues like ineffective update accumulation (learning tax), solution probability drift, and entropy collapse. This paper presents a necessary condition for algorithm design from a token-level credit assignment perspective: to prevent reward-irrelevant drift, intra-group objectives must maintain gradient exchangeability across token updates, enabling gradient cancellation on weak-credit/high-frequency tokens. We show that two common mechanisms disrupting exchangeability make "non-cancellation" a structural norm. Based on this, we propose minimal intra-group transformations to restore or approximate the cancellation structure in the shared token space. Experimental results demonstrate that these transformations stabilize training, improve sample efficiency, and enhance final performance, validating the value of this design condition.

Comment: Derives gradient-exchangeability conditions that cancel weak-credit token updates and limit reward-irrelevant drift.

Topic Match: Closest to optimization dynamics, but the contribution concerns RL fine-tuning objectives rather than post-training damage to architectural components.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 7

9. Gradient Descent's Last Iterate is Often (slightly) Suboptimal

ArXiv ID: 2604.13870

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Guy Kornowski, Ohad Shamir

Abstract: We consider the well-studied setting of minimizing a convex Lipschitz function using either gradient descent (GD) or its stochastic variant (SGD), and examine the last iterate convergence. By now, it is known that standard stepsize choices lead to a last iterate convergence rate of $\log T/\sqrt{T}$ after $T$ steps. A breakthrough result of Jain et al. [2019] recovered the optimal $1/\sqrt{T}$ rate by constructing a non-standard stepsize sequence. However, this sequence requires choosing $T$ in advance, as opposed to common stepsize schedules which apply for any time horizon. Moreover, Jain et al. conjectured that without prior knowledge of $T$, no stepsize sequence can ensure the optimal error for SGD's last iterate, a claim which so far remained unproven. We prove this conjecture, and in fact show that even in the noiseless case of GD, it is impossible to avoid an excess poly-log factor in $T$ when considering an anytime last iterate guarantee. Our proof further suggests that such (slightly) suboptimal stopping times are unavoidably common.

Comment: An impossibility theorem rules out optimal anytime convergence guarantees for gradient descent's final iterate.

Topic Match: Closest to optimiser theory, but the core is general convex optimisation and stochastic-gradient analysis rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 8

10. Beyond State Consistency: Behavior Consistency in Text-Based World Models

ArXiv ID: 2604.13824

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Youling Huang, Guanqiao Chen, Junchi Yao, Lu Wang, Fangkai Yang, Chao Du, ChenZhuo Zhao, Pu Zhao, Qingwei Lin, Saravan Rajmohan, Dongmei Zhang

Abstract: World models have been emerging as critical components for assessing the consequences of actions generated by interactive agents in online planning and offline evaluation. In text-based environments, world models are typically evaluated and trained with single-step metrics such as Exact Match, aiming to improve the similarity between predicted and real-world states, but such metrics have been shown to be insufficient for capturing actual agent behavior. To address this issue, we introduce a new behavior-aligned training paradigm aimed at improving the functional consistency between the world model and the real environment. This paradigm focuses on optimizing a tractable step-level metric named Behavior Consistency Reward (BehR), which measures how much the likelihood of a logged next action changes between the real state and the world-model-predicted state under a frozen Reference Agent. Experiments on WebShop and TextWorld show that BehR-based training improves long-term alignment in several settings, with the clearest gains in WebShop and less movement in near-ceiling regimes, while preserving or improving single-step prediction quality in three of four settings. World models trained with BehR also achieve lower false positives in offline surrogate evaluation and show modest but encouraging gains in inference-time lookahead planning.

Comment: Behavior-aligned training rewards preserve next-action likelihood across predicted and real environment states.

Topic Match: Training-objective design is the nearest category; the core subject is text world models for agents.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

11. RePAIR: Interactive Machine Unlearning through Prompt-Aware Model Repair

ArXiv ID: 2604.12820

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Jagadeesh Rachapudi, Pranav Singh, Ritali Vatsi, Praful Hambarde, Amit Shukla

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) inherently absorb harmful knowledge, misinformation, and personal data during pretraining on large-scale web corpora, with no native mechanism for selective removal. While machine unlearning offers a principled solution, existing approaches are provider-centric, requiring retraining pipelines, curated retain datasets, and direct intervention by model service providers (MSPs), thereby excluding end users from controlling their own data. We introduce Interactive Machine Unlearning (IMU), a new paradigm in which users can instruct LLMs to forget targeted knowledge through natural language at inference time. To realize IMU, we propose RePAIR, a prompt-aware model repair framework comprising (i) a watchdog model for unlearning intent detection, (ii) a surgeon model for generating repair procedures, and (iii) a patient model whose parameters are updated autonomously. At the core of RePAIR, we develop Steering Through Activation Manipulation with PseudoInverse (STAMP), a training-free, single-sample unlearning method that redirects MLP activations toward a refusal subspace via closed-form pseudoinverse updates. Its low-rank variant reduces computational complexity from O(d^3) to O(r^3 + r^2 * d), enabling efficient on-device unlearning with up to ~3x speedup over training-based baselines. Extensive experiments across harmful knowledge suppression, misinformation correction, and personal data erasure demonstrate that RePAIR achieves near-zero forget scores (Acc_f = 0.00, F-RL = 0.00) while preserving model utility (Acc_r up to 84.47, R-RL up to 0.88), outperforming six state-of-the-art baselines. These results establish RePAIR as an effective and practical framework for user-driven model editing, advancing transparent and on-device control over learned knowledge, with potential extensions to multimodal foundation models.

Comment: Closed-form pseudoinverse updates steer selected MLP activations toward a refusal subspace.

Topic Match: Weight-update mechanisms are the nearest architectural connection, but selective unlearning is the core subject.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

12. From Order to Distribution: A Spectral Characterization of Forgetting in Continual Learning

ArXiv ID: 2604.13460

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Zonghuan Xu, Xingjun Ma

Abstract: A central challenge in continual learning is forgetting, the loss of performance on previously learned tasks induced by sequential adaptation to new ones. While forgetting has been extensively studied empirically, rigorous theoretical characterizations remain limited. A notable step in this direction is \citet{evron2022catastrophic}, which analyzes forgetting under random orderings of a fixed task collection in overparameterized linear regression. We shift the perspective from order to distribution. Rather than asking how a fixed task collection behaves under random orderings, we study an exact-fit linear regime in which tasks are sampled i.i.d.\ from a task distribution~$\Pi$, and ask how the generating distribution itself governs forgetting. In this setting, we derive an exact operator identity for the forgetting quantity, revealing a recursive spectral structure. Building on this identity, we establish an unconditional upper bound, identify the leading asymptotic term, and, in generic nondegenerate cases, characterize the convergence rate up to constants. We further relate this rate to geometric properties of the task distribution, clarifying what drives slow or fast forgetting in this model.

Comment: Characterizes forgetting through an exact spectral operator determined by the task-generating distribution.

Topic Match: Closest to training dynamics, but the theorem concerns continual exact-fit linear regression rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

13. Learning Inference Concurrency in DynamicGate MLP Structural and Mathematical Justification

ArXiv ID: 2604.13546

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Yongil Choi

Abstract: Conventional neural networks strictly separate learning and inference because if parameters are updated during inference, outputs become unstable and even the inference function itself is not well defined [1, 2, 3]. This paper shows that DynamicGate MLP structurally permits learning inference concurrency [4, 5]. The key idea is to separate routing (gating) parameters from representation (prediction) parameters, so that the gate can be adapted online while inference stability is preserved, or weights can be selectively updated only within the inactive subspace [4, 5, 6, 7]. We mathematically formalize sufficient conditions for concurrency and show that even under asynchronous or partial updates, the inference output at each time step can always be interpreted as a forward computation of a valid model snapshot [8, 9, 10]. This suggests that DynamicGate MLP can serve as a practical foundation for online adaptive and on device learning systems [11, 12].

Comment: Separating routing and prediction parameters permits snapshot-consistent outputs during restricted asynchronous updates.

Topic Match: Architectural update invariants are the nearest fit, but the proposal concerns generic online MLP adaptation without a language-model training demonstration.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

14. A Mechanistic Analysis of Sim-and-Real Co-Training in Generative Robot Policies

ArXiv ID: 2604.13645

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Yu Lei, Minghuan Liu, Abhiram Maddukuri, Zhenyu Jiang, Yuke Zhu

Abstract: Co-training, which combines limited in-domain real-world data with abundant surrogate data such as simulation or cross-embodiment robot data, is widely used for training generative robot policies. Despite its empirical success, the mechanisms that determine when and why co-training is effective remain poorly understood. We investigate the mechanism of sim-and-real co-training through theoretical analysis and empirical study, and identify two intrinsic effects governing performance. The first, \textbf{structured representation alignment"}, reflects a balance between cross-domain representation alignment and domain discernibility, and plays a primary role in downstream performance. The second, the \textbf{importance reweighting effect"}, arises from domain-dependent modulation of action weighting and operates at a secondary level. We validate these effects with controlled experiments on a toy model and extensive sim-and-sim and sim-and-real robot manipulation experiments. Our analysis offers a unified interpretation of recent co-training techniques and motivates a simple method that consistently improves upon prior approaches. More broadly, our aim is to examine the inner workings of co-training and to facilitate research in this direction.

Comment: Controlled experiments separate representation alignment from importance reweighting as mechanisms of joint-data training.

Topic Match: The mechanism concerns training dynamics, but the models being trained are generative robot policies.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

15. Loop Corrections to the Training and Generalization Errors of Random Feature Models

ArXiv ID: 2604.12827

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Taeyoung Kim

Abstract: We investigate random feature models in which neural networks sampled from a prescribed initialization ensemble are frozen and used as random features, with only the readout weights optimized. Adopting a statistical-physics viewpoint, we study the training, test, and generalization errors beyond the mean-kernel approximation. Since the predictor is a nonlinear functional of the induced random kernel, the ensemble-averaged errors depend not only on the mean kernel but also on higher-order fluctuation statistics. Within an effective field-theoretic framework, these finite-width contributions naturally appear as loop corrections. We derive the loop corrections to the training, test, and generalization errors, obtain their scaling laws, and support the theory with experimental verification.

Comment: Finite-width kernel fluctuations yield calculable corrections to training and generalisation errors.

Topic Match: Closest to training theory, but the contribution analyses frozen random features with trained readouts rather than language-model optimisation.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

16. Algorithmic Analysis of Dense Associative Memory: Finite-Size Guarantees and Adversarial Robustness

ArXiv ID: 2604.12811

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Madhava Gaikwad

Abstract: Dense Associative Memory (DAM) generalizes Hopfield networks through higher-order interactions and achieves storage capacity that scales as $O(N^{n-1})$ under suitable pattern separation conditions. Existing dynamical analyses primarily study the thermodynamic limit $N\to\infty$ with randomly sampled patterns and therefore do not provide finite-size guarantees or explicit convergence rates. We develop an algorithmic analysis of DAM retrieval dynamics that yields finite-$N$ guarantees under explicit, verifiable pattern conditions. Under a separation assumption and a bounded-interference condition at high loading, we prove geometric convergence of asynchronous retrieval dynamics, which implies $O(\log N)$ convergence time once the trajectory enters the basin of attraction. We further establish adversarial robustness bounds expressed through an explicit margin condition that quantifies the number of corrupted bits tolerable per sweep, and derive capacity guarantees that scale as $\Theta(N^{n-1})$ up to polylogarithmic factors in the worst case, while recovering the classical $\Theta(N^{n-1})$ scaling for random pattern ensembles. Finally, we show that DAM retrieval dynamics admit a potential-game interpretation that ensures convergence to pure Nash equilibria under asynchronous updates. Complete proofs are provided in the appendices, together with preliminary experiments that illustrate the predicted convergence, robustness, and capacity scaling behavior.

Comment: Finite-size guarantees connect associative-memory retrieval convergence and robustness to explicit pattern conditions.

Topic Match: Closest to recurrent computation theory, but the subject is associative-memory retrieval rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

17. A Complete Symmetry Classification of Shallow ReLU Networks

ArXiv ID: 2604.14037

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Pranavkrishnan Ramakrishnan

Abstract: Parameter space is not function space for neural network architectures. This fact, investigated as early as the 1990s under terms such as reverse engineering," orparameter identifiability", has led to the natural question of parameter space symmetries\textemdash the study of distinct parameters in neural architectures which realize the same function. Indeed, the quotient space obtained by identifying parameters giving rise to the same function, called the \textit{neuromanifold}, has been shown in some cases to have rich geometric properties, impacting optimization dynamics. Thus far, techniques towards complete classifications have required the analyticity of the activation function, notably excising the important case of ReLU. Here, in contrast, we exploit the non-differentiability of the ReLU activation to provide a complete classification of the symmetries in the shallow case.

Comment: A complete symmetry classification identifies parameter settings that implement the same shallow ReLU function.

Topic Match: Closest to architectural parameterisation theory, but the result concerns shallow ReLU networks rather than language-model layers or training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 8

18. Identifiability of Potentially Degenerate Gaussian Mixture Models With Piecewise Affine Mixing

ArXiv ID: 2604.13218

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Danru Xu, S\'ebastien Lachapelle, Sara Magliacane

Abstract: Causal representation learning (CRL) aims to identify the underlying latent variables from high-dimensional observations, even when variables are dependent with each other. We study this problem for latent variables that follow a potentially degenerate Gaussian mixture distribution and that are only observed through the transformation via a piecewise affine mixing function. We provide a series of progressively stronger identifiability results for this challenging setting in which the probability density functions are ill-defined because of the potential degeneracy. For identifiability up to permutation and scaling, we leverage a sparsity regularization on the learned representation. Based on our theoretical results, we propose a two-stage method to estimate the latent variables by enforcing sparsity and Gaussianity in the learned representations. Experiments on synthetic and image data highlight our method's effectiveness in recovering the ground-truth latent variables.

Comment: Establishes latent-variable identifiability under degenerate Gaussian mixtures using sparsity and piecewise-affine mixing.

Topic Match: Closest to representation theory; Gaussian mixtures describe latent distributions here, not language-model expert architectures.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 7

19. Provably Efficient Offline-to-Online Value Adaptation with General Function Approximation

ArXiv ID: 2604.13966

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Shangzhe Li, Weitong Zhang

Abstract: We study value adaptation in offline-to-online reinforcement learning under general function approximation. Starting from an imperfect offline pretrained $Q$-function, the learner aims to adapt it to the target environment using only a limited amount of online interaction. We first characterize the difficulty of this setting by establishing a minimax lower bound, showing that even when the pretrained $Q$-function is close to optimal $Q^\star$, online adaptation can be no more efficient than pure online RL on certain hard instances. On the positive side, under a novel structural condition on the offline-pretrained value functions, we propose O2O-LSVI, an adaptation algorithm with problem-dependent sample complexity that provably improves over pure online RL. Finally, we complement our theory with neural-network experiments that demonstrate the practical effectiveness of the proposed method.

Comment: A structural condition determines when a pretrained value function reduces subsequent learning sample complexity.

Topic Match: Closest to learning-algorithm analysis, but the subject is value-function adaptation in reinforcement learning.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 7

20. Golden Handcuffs make safer AI agents

ArXiv ID: 2604.13609

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Aram Ebtekar, Michael K. Cohen

Abstract: Reinforcement learners can attain high reward through novel unintended strategies. We study a Bayesian mitigation for general environments: we expand the agent's subjective reward range to include a large negative value $-L$, while the true environment's rewards lie in $[0,1]$. After observing consistently high rewards, the Bayesian policy becomes risk-averse to novel schemes that plausibly lead to $-L$. We design a simple override mechanism that yields control to a safe mentor whenever the predicted value drops below a fixed threshold. We prove two properties of the resulting agent: (i) Capability: using mentor-guided exploration with vanishing frequency, the agent attains sublinear regret against its best mentor. (ii) Safety: no decidable low-complexity predicate is triggered by the optimizing policy before it is triggered by a mentor.

Comment: A widened subjective reward range and mentor override produce risk-averse exploration with formal guarantees.

Topic Match: Learning dynamics are the nearest category, but the core contribution concerns Bayesian RL safety and exploration.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 6

Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible (2)

1. ResBM: Residual Bottleneck Models for Low-Bandwidth Pipeline Parallelism

ArXiv ID: 2604.11947

Primary Topic: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible

Also Matches: Architecture and Training Dynamics, Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Alan Aboudib, Rodrigo Lopez Portillo A., Kalei Brady, Steffen Cruz

Abstract: Unlocking large-scale low-bandwidth decentralized training has the potential to utilize otherwise untapped compute resources. In centralized settings, large-scale multi-node training is primarily enabled by data and pipeline parallelism, two techniques that require ultra-high-bandwidth communication. While efficient methods now exist for decentralized data parallelism, pipeline parallelism remains the primary challenge. Recent efforts, such as Subspace Models (SM), have claimed up to 100x activation compression but rely on complex constrained optimization and diverge from true end-to-end training. In this paper, we propose a different approach, based on an architecture designed from the ground up to be native to low-bandwidth communication environments while still applicable to any standard transformer-based architecture. We call this architecture the Residual Bottleneck Model or ResBM, it introduces a residual encoder-decoder bottleneck module across pipeline boundaries that can be trained end-to-end as part of the model's parameters while preserving an explicit low-rank identity path. We show that ResBMs achieve state-of-the-art 128x activation compression without significant loss in convergence rates and without significant memory or compute overhead.

Comment: Trainable residual bottlenecks preserve a low-rank identity path while compressing activations across pipeline boundaries.

Topic Match: Architectural activation compression enables end-to-end pipeline training under low bandwidth, changing training feasibility.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 7

2. Event Tensor: A Unified Abstraction for Compiling Dynamic Megakernel

ArXiv ID: 2604.13327

Primary Topic: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible

Authors: Hongyi Jin, Bohan Hou, Guanjie Wang, Ruihang Lai, Jinqi Chen, Zihao Ye, Yaxing Cai, Yixin Dong, Xinhao Cheng, Zhihao Zhang, Yilong Zhao, Yingyi Huang, Lijie Yang, Jinchen Jiang, Gabriele Oliaro, Jianan Ji, Xupeng Miao, Vinod Grover, Todd C. Mowry, Zhihao Jia, Tianqi Chen

Abstract: Modern GPU workloads, especially large language model (LLM) inference, suffer from kernel launch overheads and coarse synchronization that limit inter-kernel parallelism. Recent megakernel techniques fuse multiple operators into a single persistent kernel to eliminate launch gaps and expose inter-kernel parallelism, but struggle to handle dynamic shapes and data-dependent computation in real workloads. We present Event Tensor, a unified compiler abstraction for dynamic megakernels. Event Tensor encodes dependencies between tiled tasks, and enables first-class support for both shape and data-dependent dynamism. Built atop this abstraction, our Event Tensor Compiler (ETC) applies static and dynamic scheduling transformations to generate high-performance persistent kernels. Evaluations show that ETC achieves state-of-the-art LLM serving latency while significantly reducing system warmup overhead.

Comment: A dependency abstraction represents dynamic computation inside persistent GPU kernels.

Topic Match: Systems is the closest category, but the contribution is inference compilation and serving latency rather than a training algorithm.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 6

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (5)

1. KV Packet: Recomputation-Free Context-Independent KV Caching for LLMs

ArXiv ID: 2604.13226

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Chuangtao Chen, Grace Li Zhang, Xunzhao Yin, Cheng Zhuo, Bing Li, Ulf Schlichtmann

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) rely heavily on Key-Value (KV) caching to minimize inference latency. However, standard KV caches are context-dependent: reusing a cached document in a new context requires recomputing KV states to account for shifts in attention distribution. Existing solutions such as CacheBlend, EPIC, and SAM-KV mitigate this issue by selectively recomputing a subset of tokens; however, they still incur non-negligible computational overhead (FLOPs) and increased Time-to-First-Token (TTFT) latency. In this paper, we propose KV Packet, a recomputation-free cache reuse framework that treats cached documents as immutable ``packets'' wrapped in light-weight trainable soft-token adapters, which are trained via self-supervised distillation to bridge context discontinuities. Experiments on Llama-3.1 and Qwen2.5 demonstrate that the proposed KV Packet method achieves near-zero FLOPs and lower TTFT than recomputation-based baselines, while retaining F1 scores comparable to those of the full recomputation baseline.

Comment: Trained packet adapters eliminate KV recomputation when cached documents are reused in new contexts.

Topic Match: Cache reuse is closest to efficiency; the gains concern inference prefill and require an adapter-distillation stage.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 7

2. OSC: Hardware Efficient W4A4 Quantization via Outlier Separation in Channel Dimension

ArXiv ID: 2604.12782

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Zhiyuan Zhang, Yanzhao Li, Zhiqiang Zou, Bai Du, Yupeng Sun, Hui Dong, Hui Wang

Abstract: While 4-bit quantization is essential for high-throughput deployment of Large Language Models, activation outliers often lead to significant accuracy degradation due to the restricted dynamic range of low-bit formats. In this paper, we systematically investigate the spatial distribution of outliers and demonstrate a token-persistent structural clustering effect, where high-magnitude outliers consistently occupy fixed channels across tokens. Building on this insight, we propose OSC, a hardware-efficient framework for outlier suppression. During inference, OSC executes a dual-path computation consisting of a low-precision 4-bit General Matrix Multiplication (GEMM) path and a high-precision 16-bit branch GEMM path. Specifically, OSC uses an offline group-wise strategy to identify the channels where outliers are located and then performs structured sub-tensor extraction to coalesce these scattered activation channels into a compact dense tensor online. This mechanism implements outlier protection through regularized and high-throughput GEMM operations, achieving a seamless fit with modern 4-bit micro-scaling hardware. Furthermore, for the inputs of W2 where outlier clustering is less pronounced, we integrate a fallback strategy to FP8. Evaluation on Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-30B restricts the average accuracy drop to 2.19 and 1.12 points, respectively. Notably, OSC is highly hardware-friendly, achieving a peak speedup of 1.78x over the W8A8 GEMM baseline on a modern AI accelerator.

Comment: Channel-wise outlier separation confines high precision to a compact branch of W4A4 inference.

Topic Match: Mixed-precision compression is the closest category; the contribution is post-training quantization and accelerator execution.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 5

3. Cooperative Memory Paging with Keyword Bookmarks for Long-Horizon LLM Conversations

ArXiv ID: 2604.12376

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Ziyang Liu

Abstract: When LLM conversations grow beyond the context window, old content must be evicted -- but how does the model recover it when needed? We propose cooperative paging: evicted segments are replaced with minimal keyword bookmarks ([pN:keywords], ~8-24 tokens each), and the model is given a recall() tool to retrieve full content on demand. On the LoCoMo benchmark (10 real multi-session conversations, 300+ turns), cooperative paging achieves the highest answer quality among six methods -- outperforming truncation, BM25, word-overlap retrieval, a search-tool baseline, and full context -- on four models (GPT-4o-mini, DeepSeek-v3.2, Claude Haiku, GLM-5), confirmed by four independent LLM judges ($p=0.017$, paired bootstrap). We then study the paging design space with a 5x4 ablation over boundary strategies and eviction policies (3,176 synthetic probes, 1,600 LoCoMo probes). Key findings: (1) coarse fixed-size pages (fixed_20) reach 96.7% while content-aware topic_shift collapses to 56.7%; (2) eviction policy choice is data-dependent (FIFO best on synthetic, LFU on LoCoMo); (3) two bookmark generation strategies improve over the heuristic baseline (+4.4 and +8.7 E2E points); (4) the remaining bottleneck is bookmark discrimination -- the model triggers recall() 96% of the time but selects the correct page only 57% when bookmarks are insufficiently distinctive. Keyword specificity alone accounts for a 25 percentage point accuracy difference.

Comment: Keyword bookmarks preserve retrieval handles for evicted conversation segments.

Topic Match: Memory efficiency is the closest category, but the contribution is conversation paging and retrieval rather than model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 5

4. Chain-of-Models Pre-Training: Rethinking Training Acceleration of Vision Foundation Models

ArXiv ID: 2604.12391

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Jiawei Fan, Shigeng Wang, Chao Li, Xiaolong Liu, Anbang Yao

Abstract: In this paper, we present Chain-of-Models Pre-Training (CoM-PT), a novel performance-lossless training acceleration method for vision foundation models (VFMs). This approach fundamentally differs from existing acceleration methods in its core motivation: rather than optimizing each model individually, CoM-PT is designed to accelerate the training pipeline at the model family level, scaling efficiently as the model family expands. Specifically, CoM-PT establishes a pre-training sequence for the model family, arranged in ascending order of model size, called model chain. In this chain, only the smallest model undergoes standard individual pre-training, while the other models are efficiently trained through sequential inverse knowledge transfer from their smaller predecessors by jointly reusing the knowledge in the parameter space and the feature space. As a result, CoM-PT enables all models to achieve performance that is mostly superior to standard individual training while significantly reducing training cost, and this is extensively validated across 45 datasets spanning zero-shot and fine-tuning tasks. Notably, its efficient scaling property yields a remarkable phenomenon: training more models even results in higher efficiency. For instance, when pre-training on CC3M: i) given ViT-L as the largest model, progressively prepending smaller models to the model chain reduces computational complexity by up to 72%; ii) within a fixed model size range, as the VFM family scales across 3, 4, and 7 models, the acceleration ratio of CoM-PT exhibits a striking leap: from 4.13X to 5.68X and 7.09X. Since CoM-PT is naturally agnostic to specific pre-training paradigms, we open-source the code to spur further extensions in more computationally intensive scenarios, such as large language model pre-training.

Comment: Sequential reuse of smaller models reduces the total pretraining cost of a model family.

Topic Match: Training efficiency is the closest category, but the demonstrated contribution accelerates vision-model pretraining through knowledge transfer.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

5. Hardware-Efficient Neuro-Symbolic Networks with the Exp-Minus-Log Operator

ArXiv ID: 2604.13871

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Eymen Ipek

Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) deliver state-of-the-art accuracy on regression and classification tasks, yet two structural deficits persistently obstruct their deployment in safety-critical, resource-constrained settings: (i) opacity of the learned function, which precludes formal verification, and (ii) reliance on heterogeneous, library-bound activation functions that inflate latency and silicon area on edge hardware. The recently introduced Exp-Minus-Log (EML) Sheffer operator, eml(x, y) = exp(x) - ln(y), was shown by Odrzywolek (2026) to be sufficient - together with the constant 1 - to express every standard elementary function as a binary tree of identical nodes. We propose to embed EML primitives inside conventional DNN architectures, yielding a hybrid DNN-EML model in which the trunk learns distributed representations and the head is a depth-bounded, weight-sparse EML tree whose snapped weights collapse to closed-form symbolic sub-expressions. We derive the forward equations, prove computational-cost bounds, analyse inference and training acceleration relative to multilayer perceptrons (MLPs) and physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), and quantify the trade-offs for FPGA/analog deployment. We argue that the DNN-EML pairing closes a literature gap: prior neuro-symbolic and equation-learner approaches (EQL, KAN, AI-Feynman) work with heterogeneous primitive sets and do not exploit a single hardware-realisable Sheffer element. A balanced assessment shows that EML is unlikely to accelerate training, and on commodity CPU/GPU it is also unlikely to accelerate inference; however, on a custom EML cell (FPGA logic block or analog circuit) the asymptotic latency advantage can reach an order of magnitude with simultaneous gain in interpretability and formal-verification tractability.

Comment: A single exp-minus-log primitive replaces heterogeneous operations within a symbolic network head.

Topic Match: Closest to efficiency mechanisms, but the proposed gains concern custom hardware for generic symbolic networks rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

Paper Selection Prompt

System Prompt

You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.

User Prompt

Relevant Topics

This is a training-side feed for someone who builds and modifies model internals. The centre of gravity is what a frontier model is made of and how it is trained: architecture, training dynamics, and the decisions a lab actually made. MoE is still in scope, but only when the contribution changes the design space, not when it tunes an existing MoE.

Keep a paper when its CORE CONTRIBUTION falls in one of the five topics below. Filter it when the topic is merely the setting for a downstream application, a benchmark, or a product result.

THE SUBJECT IS LANGUAGE-MODEL TRAINING. Every topic below is scoped to it. A technique named in one of them -- decentralised or asynchronous training, discrete diffusion, byte-level modelling, 1-bit weights, mixture-of-experts -- earns nothing when the model being trained is an image generator, a recommender, a scientific surrogate, or a vision classifier. Match on what is being trained, not on the vocabulary in the abstract.

THE ONE QUESTION THAT DECIDES A HIGH SCORE, asked before the topic list:

Does this paper REMOVE or REPLACE a component that everyone downstream inherits without thinking, or DECOUPLE two quantities the field currently conflates -- and does it say which end is held fixed while the other moves?

A paper that ADDS a mechanism on top of existing primitives is ordinary work, however good the numbers. A paper that takes one away, or splits one knob into two, is the reason this feed exists. Papers whose gains are CONDITIONAL (only above some batch size, only in one budget regime, only with an extra training stage) are ordinary work too, even when the mechanism is new: a conditional win is a new knob, not a removed one.

1. Frontier Model Releases and Technical Reports (primary) - Keep: model and technical reports that DISCLOSE architecture or training decisions -- layer and attention design, normalization and residual choices, hybrid attention/state-space stacks, sparsity and expert layout, tokenizer and vocabulary decisions, data mixture and curriculum, optimizer and schedule, precision and numerics, stability fixes and what broke; open-weight releases whose report explains a choice rather than only reporting it. - Filter: releases that are a scorecard -- benchmark tables, a capability announcement, a product or API launch, or a report that names its recipe without saying why it was chosen. A frontier name in the title earns nothing on its own.

2. Architecture and Training Dynamics (primary) - Keep: new or analysed architectural mechanisms (attention variants, normalization and residual design, state-space and recurrent sequence modelling, positional schemes, dynamic or modular computation, tokenizer-free and byte-level or learned-chunking stacks, non-autoregressive and discrete-diffusion generation); optimizers, preconditioners, and parameterisations, especially hyperparameter transfer across scale; training-dynamics and stability analysis that explains why large models train the way they do; work that removes a standard component (normalization, weight decay, positional encoding, the tokenizer, left-to-right decoding) and shows the model still trains. - Filter: applying an existing architecture to a new task or benchmark with no mechanistic insight; an architectural tweak evaluated only at toy scale with no account of what it costs.

3. Large-Scale Training Systems - Keep: distributed training ALGORITHMS that change what is possible, not only what is fast -- asynchronous, low-communication and decentralised optimisation, sharding and parallelism schemes with a new invariant, numerics and low-precision training (FP8, FP4, ternary and 1-bit) when the claim is about training stability rather than a kernel; scaling-law work that informs how a run is configured, including data-constrained and repeated-data regimes and critical batch size. - Filter: kernel engineering, communication scheduling, overlap, caching, serving and inference throughput. This is a real exclusion, not a soft one: work whose contribution is "the same model, faster" belongs to someone else's feed even when it is excellent and even when it is about MoE.

4. MoE Where It Changes the Design Space - Keep: routing that is newly differentiable or newly stable; the training/inference router gap; expert collapse and what actually prevents it; expert granularity, shared experts and layout when a new axis is opened rather than tuned; dense-to-MoE conversion; MoE scaling laws that fix one quantity and vary another; analyses that carry a criterion which could have failed (a random-guess baseline, an ablation with a predicted sign) rather than similarity heatmaps. - Filter: MoE SYSTEMS and inference work (expert parallelism, all-to-all schedules, grouped GEMM, offload, prefetching, capacity and scheduling tricks, compression for serving); MoE surveys; papers that train on top of a MoE without a routing, balancing, stability, or structural contribution; "mixture of experts" in the classical ensemble or recommender sense. - The exclusion above is about MAKING MoE RUN FASTER, and it does not reach routing and expert design. A paper on how tokens are assigned to experts, how experts specialise, how balance is enforced, or how a dense model becomes sparse stays fully in scope and scores on its merits, even when the mechanism is a small one.

5. Efficiency and Compression When the Mechanism Is New - Keep: quantization, sparsity, pruning and low-rank work whose mechanism is new and whose gain is unconditional; compression that changes what can be trained, not only what can be served; attribution of a model's behaviour to its data. - Filter: tuned variants of standard efficiency methods; deployment and serving engineering; anything whose headline is a compression ratio with no account of what was given up.

Also keep, even though they read like evaluation work, because the field has no one checking them: - benchmark validity itself: contamination, saturation, LLM-as-judge reliability, whether a benchmark measures what it claims. A paper AUDITING a benchmark is in scope; a paper PROPOSING one is not.

Subjects He Has Never Once Kept

Measured, not guessed. Over nine months where he was actively curating, 4953 papers passed this filter and 274 made his list -- a keep rate of 5.2%. Each subject below appeared in the rejected pile the number of times shown and appeared ZERO times in his entire 508-entry list.

Filter a paper whose CORE SUBJECT is one of these. The count is the evidence; where a paper only mentions the term in passing while contributing somewhere in the five topics above, keep it.

variational methods and inference (52) unlearning (41) long-context methods (40) neural operators (35) time series (35) vision transformers (35) parameter-efficient fine-tuning (28) stochastic gradient analysis (21) LLM safety (20) LLM reasoning as a subject (20) hallucination (20) sequence modelling as a subject (19) differential equations (19) spiking neural networks (17) post-training quantization (16) mechanistic interpretability as a framing (15) test-time scaling (13)

Two more he kept exactly once each, so suppress rather than drop: graph neural networks (1 of 42), knowledge distillation (1 of 39).

Do NOT extend this list by analogy. Four subjects that look like they belong here were checked and do not: diffusion models (8.1% kept), prompting (10.0%), benchmarks (9.1%) and neural architecture search (13.3%) all sit ABOVE his 5.2% base rate.

Note the one distinction that matters: he rejects papers FRAMED as interpretability, while analysis of how a trained model's computation is organised is among his highest-rated work. The subject is the framing, not the act of analysing.

Leave these to the hotspot digest unless the core contribution clearly falls in one of the five topics above: - agent, tooling, and RAG launches, and agent framework papers - new benchmarks, leaderboards, and evaluation-only papers - interpretability that stops at cataloguing features, with nothing said about the mechanism that produced them. Analysis of how a trained model's computation is organised -- what drives expert selection, what a circuit computes, how representations reorganise across training -- is IN scope, not here. - memory mechanisms and agent memory systems - world models, exploration, and reinforcement learning - alignment and post-training (RLHF, DPO, GRPO, RFT, instruction tuning), EXCEPT where the subject is how post-training destabilises the architecture itself - downstream applications in medical imaging, segmentation, 3D vision, video understanding, information retrieval, summarization, recommendation, machine translation, speech recognition, time series, knowledge graphs, and similar domains

Scoring Criteria

Score five independent axes from 1 to 10: Relevance, Novelty, Evidence, Load, Proximity.

They answer different questions and must not be collapsed. Relevance: is this the kind of work this feed is for. Evidence: did the paper earn its claim. Load: what does it cost to get the usable result out. Proximity: how close is it to what the reader is working on right now (see Active Lines below).

Novelty is scored for continuity with the archive and for the hotspot spotlight cutoffs, and it does NOT order the feed. Measured against 274 hand-tiered papers it carried no signal at all: papers scoring 8 or more were his must-reads exactly as often as papers scoring 5 or less, both at the pool's base rate. Every abstract claims novelty, so the axis measures the claiming rather than the work. Score it honestly and do not let it influence the other four.

A strong claim with thin evidence is a worse read than a modest claim that holds. Score each axis on its own; do not let a high one pull up a low one.

Relevance Scoring

• 9-10: directly centered on the target topics; highest when the core contribution is clearly within them and the paper is about how a model is BUILT or TRAINED.
• 7-8: substantially related, but partly peripheral or focused on a narrower aspect.
• 5-6: touches the target topics, but the main contribution is elsewhere.
• 3-4: largely outside the target topics, often application-focused or domain-specific.
• 1-2: unrelated.

Important: Daily buzz, a frontier lab's name, or a large headline number is not enough for a high Relevance score. A model release scores high only when the report explains an architecture or training decision; a release that only reports results is hotspot material, not this feed.

Work whose contribution is "the same model, faster" -- kernels, communication schedules, overlap, caching, serving -- caps at Relevance 5 even when it is excellent and even when it is about MoE. Making a known design run faster is a different job from changing the design.

That cap is about SPEED, not about size. Compression that is lossless, or that changes what can be trained or held in memory at all rather than how quickly it runs, is not capped: it changes what is possible, which is the thing this feed is for.

Analysis of how a trained model's computation is actually organised -- what a circuit computes, what drives expert selection, how representations reorganise over training -- IS in scope and scores like any other work on mechanism. Only interpretability that stops at describing features, with nothing said about the mechanism that produced them, drops out of the feed.

Novelty Scoring

Novelty means a change to the design space, not a change to a number. Score against this ladder:

• 9-10: removes or replaces a component the whole field inherits without thinking (normalization, weight decay, the tokenizer, positional encoding, left-to-right decoding, the standard optimizer, a numerical format), or decouples two quantities everyone conflates -- AND states which end is held fixed while the other moves. The claim is unconditional: it does not require a particular scale, budget regime, or extra stage. An ANALYSIS paper reaches this band when it settles a mechanism-level question with a criterion that could have come out the other way.
• 7-8: a substantial new mechanism, or a decoupling whose gain is real but CONDITIONAL (holds above some batch size, in one budget band, or with an added training phase). A conditional win is a new knob, not a removed one, and belongs here rather than above.
• 5-6: meaningful but incremental extension or refinement of an existing primitive; a tuned variant; a well-executed combination of known parts.
• 3-4: minor, narrow, or mostly engineering or domain-specific improvement; a survey or overview, however thorough.
• 1-2: little originality; mainly standard application of existing methods.

Score the claim as the paper states it here. Whether the paper supports that claim is Evidence, and it is scored separately -- do not discount Novelty for weak experiments, and do not raise it because the framing is confident. Phrases like "we remove", "without X", "holding Y fixed" are what the paper SAYS; they earn a high Novelty only if the thing named really is a component the field inherits by default, not a component this paper introduced two sentences earlier.

Evidence Scoring

Does the demonstration reach as far as the claim?

• 9-10: shown at the scale and breadth the claim asserts -- language-model pretraining at billion-parameter or hundred-billion-token scale, or across several model families, sizes, or domains -- with ablations that isolate the named mechanism and could have failed.
• 7-8: one credible setting that matches the claim's stated scope, with the baselines a skeptic would ask for.
• 5-6: a single small setting, or a claim stated more broadly than the demonstration reaches.
• 3-4: the claim is about transformers or language models in general, but the demonstration lives in one narrow domain or one small benchmark -- image classification alone, a single toy task, one dataset; or the comparisons a reader needs in order to believe it are missing.
• 1-2: the central claim is asserted, illustrated, or supported only by plots that could not have come out the other way.

A structural claim demonstrated only outside the setting it claims is capped at 4, however striking the claim. "We removed a component everyone uses" shown only on small vision models is a result about small vision models.

When the abstract names no scale, no dataset, and no baseline at all, score exactly 5. Do not infer rigor from confident writing. Unstated is not the same as strong, and two thirds of abstracts say nothing here: guessing on those was measured to make this axis worse.

Adjustments: subtract 1 when no code is released and the procedure is not reproducible from the paper alone; subtract 1 when the method's cost grows in the number of components it adds (one loss per pair of experts, one module per domain) and the paper does not account for that growth; add 1 when the paper states its own limitation precisely enough that a reader could design the experiment that breaks it.

Load Scoring

What does it cost to get the usable result out? This is about the reader's effort, not quality.

• 9-10: the result cannot be taken without following the derivation -- a new theoretical framework, unfamiliar mathematical machinery, or a proof that IS the contribution.
• 7-8: substantial theory or an involved formalism, but the operational result is stated plainly somewhere.
• 4-6: ordinary methods paper; the recipe is legible from the paper's own description.
• 1-3: the takeaway is a single decision or number a reader can act on immediately.

A high Load is not a criticism. It only says the paper is a project rather than a read.

Proximity Scoring

How close is this to the Active Lines stated below? This axis is about the reader, not the paper, and a paper can be excellent and distant at the same time.

• 9-10: squarely on a centre line -- the paper's core contribution is the thing the reader is working on, and a result here changes what they would do next.
• 7-8: on a centre line but from a direction they are not working from, or on an adjacent line where the result carries over directly.
• 5-6: adjacent: same stack, different layer; they would want to know it happened.
• 3-4: far: recognisable as the same field, but nothing here reaches their work.
• 1-2: another area entirely.

Judge distance from the reader's stated centre, NOT from whatever is currently prominent in the field. A paper everyone is discussing is not thereby close.

Topic Registry

Use exactly one PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID chosen from the stable topic IDs below. - frontier_models: Frontier Model Releases and Technical Reports - Frontier model and technical reports that disclose an architecture or training decision: layer and attention design, normalization and residual choices, hybrid stacks, sparsity layout, tokenizer and data mixture, optimizer and schedule, precision, and the stability problems that had to be solved. - architecture_training: Architecture and Training Dynamics - Architectural and optimisation mechanisms, and the training dynamics that explain them: attention and normalization design, positional schemes, state-space and recurrent stacks, tokenizer-free and learned-chunking models, non-autoregressive and discrete-diffusion generation, optimizers and parameterisations including hyperparameter transfer across scale, and work that removes a standard component and shows the model still trains. - training_systems: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible - Distributed training algorithms that change what can be trained rather than how fast it runs: asynchronous, low-communication and decentralised optimisation, parallelism schemes with a new invariant, low-precision and 1-bit training when the claim is stability, and scaling laws including data-constrained regimes and critical batch size. - moe_training: MoE Where It Changes the Design Space - Mixture-of-Experts work that opens or closes a design axis: differentiable and stable routing, the training/inference router gap, expert collapse, granularity and layout as a new axis, dense-to-MoE conversion, and MoE scaling laws that fix one quantity and vary another. MoE systems and inference work is out. - efficiency_scaling: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training - Compression, sparsity, quantization, pruning, low-rank and memory or cache efficiency whose mechanism is new and whose gain is unconditional.

Papers

[PAPER LIST HERE]

Instructions

Respond in JSONL. Output exactly one JSON object per paper, one per line:

{"ARXIVID":"...","COMMENT":"...","RELEVANCE":0,"NOVELTY":0,"EVIDENCE":0,"LOAD":0,"PROXIMITY":0,"PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID":"...","MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS":[],"TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT":"...","HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS":[],"HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT":"..."}

Rules: - ARXIVID: the arXiv ID. - COMMENT: identify the single strongest matching criterion. Be brief and specific. Do not rely on generic phrases like "language modeling" or "advancement". Do not mention non-matching criteria. - RELEVANCE: integer from 1 to 10. - NOVELTY: integer from 1 to 10, scoring the claim as stated. - EVIDENCE: integer from 1 to 10, scoring whether the demonstration reaches as far as the claim. - LOAD: integer from 1 to 10, scoring what it costs the reader to extract the usable result. - PROXIMITY: integer from 1 to 10, scoring distance from the stated Active Lines. - PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID: exactly one stable topic ID from the allowed topic registry. - MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS: zero or more stable topic IDs from the same allowed set. Include PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID when there are multiple matches. - TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT: briefly explain why the primary topic is the best fit. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS: zero or more tags from this exact set only: daily_hot, new_frontier. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT: briefly explain why the paper belongs in the daily hotspot paper feed when HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS is non-empty; otherwise use an empty string. - Use HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS sparingly. Most papers should return []. - daily_hot means the paper feels broadly important to the day and belongs in the daily hotspot paper section even if it is not part of the personalized foundational reading list. - new_frontier means the paper appears to open a genuinely new direction, paradigm, or field, even if the work is still early. - Do not output markdown, code fences, or any extra text.