Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2026-04-15

_{Papers on this page were re-scored with local agent CLI; the usage above is from the original run.}

Topic Coverage:

Table of contents by topic:

Architecture and Training Dynamics (12)

1. Latent Planning Emerges with Scale Authors: Michael Hanna, Emmanuel Ameisen

2. Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipe Authors: Yaxuan Li, Yuxin Zuo, Bingxiang He, Jinqian Zhang, Chaojun Xiao, Cheng Qian, Tianyu Yu, Huan-ang Gao, Wenkai Yang, Zhiyuan Liu, Ning Ding

3. VideoFlexTok: Flexible-Length Coarse-to-Fine Video Tokenization Authors: Andrei Atanov, Jesse Allardice, Roman Bachmann, O\u{g}uzhan Fatih Kar, R Devon Hjelm, David Griffiths, Peter Fu, Afshin Dehghan, Amir Zamir

4. Drawing on Memory: Dual-Trace Encoding Improves Cross-Session Recall in LLM Agents Authors: Benjamin Stern, Peter Nadel

5. SubFlow: Sub-mode Conditioned Flow Matching for Diverse One-Step Generation Authors: Yexiong Lin, Jia Shi, Shanshan Ye, Wanyu Wang, Yu Yao, Tongliang Liu

6. A Bayesian Perspective on the Role of Epistemic Uncertainty for Delayed Generalization in In-Context Learning Authors: Abdessamed Qchohi, Simone Rossi

7. M$^\star$: Every Task Deserves Its Own Memory Harness Authors: Wenbo Pan, Shujie Liu, Xiangyang Zhou, Shiwei Zhang, Wanlu Shi, Mirror Xu, Xiaohua Jia

8. Understanding and Improving Continuous Adversarial Training for LLMs via In-context Learning Theory Authors: Shaopeng Fu, Di Wang

9. Robust Optimization for Mitigating Reward Hacking with Correlated Proxies Authors: Zixuan Liu, Xiaolin Sun, Zizhan Zheng

10. Loop Corrections to the Training and Generalization Errors of Random Feature Models Authors: Taeyoung Kim

11. Algorithmic Analysis of Dense Associative Memory: Finite-Size Guarantees and Adversarial Robustness Authors: Madhava Gaikwad

12. Information-Geometric Decomposition of Generalization Error in Unsupervised Learning Authors: Gilhan Kim

Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible (2)

1. PipeLive: Efficient Live In-place Pipeline Parallelism Reconfiguration for Dynamic LLM Serving Authors: Xu Bai, Muhammed Tawfiqul Islam, Chen Wang, Adel N. Toosi

2. Decentralized Learning via Random Walk with Jumps Authors: Zonghong Liu, Matthew Dwyer, Salim El Rouayheb

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (7)

1. LoSA: Locality Aware Sparse Attention for Block-Wise Diffusion Language Models Authors: Haocheng Xi, Harman Singh, Yuezhou Hu, Coleman Hooper, Rishabh Tiwari, Aditya Tomar, Minjae Lee, Wonjun Kang, Michael Mahoney, Chenfeng Xu, Kurt Keutzer, Amir Gholami

2. OSC: Hardware Efficient W4A4 Quantization via Outlier Separation in Channel Dimension Authors: Zhiyuan Zhang, Yanzhao Li, Zhiqiang Zou, Bai Du, Yupeng Sun, Hui Dong, Hui Wang

3. Cooperative Memory Paging with Keyword Bookmarks for Long-Horizon LLM Conversations Authors: Ziyang Liu

4. Chain-of-Models Pre-Training: Rethinking Training Acceleration of Vision Foundation Models Authors: Jiawei Fan, Shigeng Wang, Chao Li, Xiaolong Liu, Anbang Yao

5. When to Forget: A Memory Governance Primitive Authors: Baris Simsek

6. ProbeLogits: Kernel-Level LLM Inference Primitives for AI-Native Operating Systems Authors: Daeyeon Son

7. Aethon: A Reference-Based Replication Primitive for Constant-Time Instantiation of Stateful AI Agents Authors: Swanand Rao, Kiran Kashalkar, Parvathi Somashekar, Priya Krishnan

Architecture and Training Dynamics (12)

1. Latent Planning Emerges with Scale

ArXiv ID: 2604.12493

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Michael Hanna, Emmanuel Ameisen

Abstract: LLMs can perform seemingly planning-intensive tasks, like writing coherent stories or functioning code, without explicitly verbalizing a plan; however, the extent to which they implicitly plan is unknown. In this paper, we define latent planning as occurring when LLMs possess internal planning representations that (1) cause the generation of a specific future token or concept, and (2) shape preceding context to license said future token or concept. We study the Qwen-3 family (0.6B-14B) on simple planning tasks, finding that latent planning ability increases with scale. Models that plan possess features that represent a planned-for word like "accountant", and cause them to output "an" rather than "a"; moreover, even the less-successful Qwen-3 4B-8B have nascent planning mechanisms. On the more complex task of completing rhyming couplets, we find that models often identify a rhyme ahead of time, but even large models seldom plan far ahead. However, we can elicit some planning that increases with scale when steering models towards planned words in prose. In sum, we offer a framework for measuring planning and mechanistic evidence of how models' planning abilities grow with scale.

Comment: Causal tests ask whether future-word representations also change the preceding tokens that license those words.

Topic Match: The contribution tests what internal representations compute during generation, across Qwen3 sizes, with explicit limits on longer-range planning.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 9

2. Rethinking On-Policy Distillation of Large Language Models: Phenomenology, Mechanism, and Recipe

ArXiv ID: 2604.13016

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Yaxuan Li, Yuxin Zuo, Bingxiang He, Jinqian Zhang, Chaojun Xiao, Cheng Qian, Tianyu Yu, Huan-ang Gao, Wenkai Yang, Zhiyuan Liu, Ning Ding

Abstract: On-policy distillation (OPD) has become a core technique in the post-training of large language models, yet its training dynamics remain poorly understood. This paper provides a systematic investigation of OPD dynamics and mechanisms. We first identify that two conditions govern whether OPD succeeds or fails: (i) the student and teacher should share compatible thinking patterns; and (ii) even with consistent thinking patterns and higher scores, the teacher must offer genuinely new capabilities beyond what the student has seen during training. We validate these findings through weak-to-strong reverse distillation, showing that same-family 1.5B and 7B teachers are distributionally indistinguishable from the student's perspective. Probing into the token-level mechanism, we show that successful OPD is characterized by progressive alignment on high-probability tokens at student-visited states, a small shared token set that concentrates most of the probability mass (97%-99%). We further propose two practical strategies to recover failing OPD: off-policy cold start and teacher-aligned prompt selection. Finally, we show that OPD's apparent free lunch of dense token-level reward comes at a cost, raising the question of whether OPD can scale to long-horizon distillation.

Comment: Identifies teacher-student distribution compatibility and new teacher capabilities as conditions for successful on-policy distillation.

Topic Match: The work analyzes training dynamics, but its core subject is post-training distillation rather than architectural destabilization.

Relevance: 5 Novelty: 7

3. VideoFlexTok: Flexible-Length Coarse-to-Fine Video Tokenization

ArXiv ID: 2604.12887

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Andrei Atanov, Jesse Allardice, Roman Bachmann, O\u{g}uzhan Fatih Kar, R Devon Hjelm, David Griffiths, Peter Fu, Afshin Dehghan, Amir Zamir

Abstract: Visual tokenizers map high-dimensional raw pixels into a compressed representation for downstream modeling. Beyond compression, tokenizers dictate what information is preserved and how it is organized. A de facto standard approach to video tokenization is to represent a video as a spatiotemporal 3D grid of tokens, each capturing the corresponding local information in the original signal. This requires the downstream model that consumes the tokens, e.g., a text-to-video model, to learn to predict all low-level details "pixel-by-pixel" irrespective of the video's inherent complexity, leading to high learning complexity. We present VideoFlexTok, which represents videos with a variable-length sequence of tokens structured in a coarse-to-fine manner -- where the first tokens (emergently) capture abstract information, such as semantics and motion, and later tokens add fine-grained details. The generative flow decoder enables realistic video reconstructions from any token count. This representation structure allows adapting the token count according to downstream needs and encoding videos longer than the baselines with the same budget. We evaluate VideoFlexTok on class- and text-to-video generative tasks and show that it leads to more efficient training compared to 3D grid tokens, e.g., achieving comparable generation quality (gFVD and ViCLIP Score) with a 5x smaller model (1.1B vs 5.2B). Finally, we demonstrate how VideoFlexTok can enable long video generation without prohibitive computational cost by training a text-to-video model on 10-second 81-frame videos with only 672 tokens, 8x fewer than a comparable 3D grid tokenizer.

Comment: Replaces fixed video token grids with variable-length sequences whose early tokens capture coarse structure.

Topic Match: Learned tokenization is closest to architecture_training, but the tokenizer and downstream training concern video generation.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

4. Drawing on Memory: Dual-Trace Encoding Improves Cross-Session Recall in LLM Agents

ArXiv ID: 2604.12948

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Benjamin Stern, Peter Nadel

Abstract: LLM agents with persistent memory store information as flat factual records, providing little context for temporal reasoning, change tracking, or cross-session aggregation. Inspired by the drawing effect [3], we introduce dual-trace memory encoding. In this method, each stored fact is paired with a concrete scene trace, a narrative reconstruction of the moment and context in which the information was learned. The agent is forced to commit to specific contextual details during encoding, creating richer, more distinctive memory traces. Using the LongMemEval-S benchmark (4,575 sessions, 100 recall questions), we compare dual-trace encoding against a fact-only control with matched coverage and format over 99 shared questions. Dual-trace achieves 73.7% overall accuracy versus 53.5%, a +20.2 percentage point (pp) gain (95% CI: [+12.1, +29.3], bootstrap p < 0.0001). Gains concentrate in temporal reasoning (+40pp), knowledge-update tracking (+25pp), and multi-session aggregation (+30pp), with no benefit for single-session retrieval, consistent with encoding specificity theory [8]. Token analysis shows dual-trace encoding achieves this gain at no additional cost. We additionally sketch an architectural design for adapting dual-trace encoding to coding agents, with preliminary pilot validation.

Comment: Pairs stored facts with contextual scene traces to improve cross-session recall.

Topic Match: Representation design is the nearest connection, but the intervention changes external agent memory records rather than model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

5. SubFlow: Sub-mode Conditioned Flow Matching for Diverse One-Step Generation

ArXiv ID: 2604.12273

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Yexiong Lin, Jia Shi, Shanshan Ye, Wanyu Wang, Yu Yao, Tongliang Liu

Abstract: Flow matching has emerged as a powerful generative framework, with recent few-step methods achieving remarkable inference acceleration. However, we identify a critical yet overlooked limitation: these models suffer from severe diversity degradation, concentrating samples on dominant modes while neglecting rare but valid variations of the target distribution. We trace this degradation to averaging distortion: when trained with MSE objectives, class-conditional flows learn a frequency-weighted mean over intra-class sub-modes, causing the model to over-represent high-density modes while systematically neglecting low-density ones. To address this, we propose SubFlow, Sub-mode Conditioned Flow Matching, which eliminates averaging distortion by decomposing each class into fine-grained sub-modes via semantic clustering and conditioning the flow on sub-mode indices. Each conditioned sub-distribution is approximately unimodal, so the learned flow accurately targets individual modes with no averaging distortion, restoring full mode coverage in a single inference step. Crucially, SubFlow is entirely plug-and-play: it integrates seamlessly into existing one-step models such as MeanFlow and Shortcut Models without any architectural modifications. Extensive experiments on ImageNet-256 demonstrate that SubFlow yields substantial gains in generation diversity (Recall) while maintaining competitive image quality (FID), confirming its broad applicability across different one-step generation frameworks. Project page: https://yexionglin.github.io/subflow.

Comment: Conditions one-step flow matching on semantic sub-modes to reduce MSE-induced averaging across modes.

Topic Match: Generative training mechanisms are closest to architecture_training, but the models generate images rather than language.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

6. A Bayesian Perspective on the Role of Epistemic Uncertainty for Delayed Generalization in In-Context Learning

ArXiv ID: 2604.12434

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Abdessamed Qchohi, Simone Rossi

Abstract: In-context learning enables transformers to adapt to new tasks from a few examples at inference time, while grokking highlights that this generalization can emerge abruptly only after prolonged training. We study task generalization and grokking in in-context learning using a Bayesian perspective, asking what enables the delayed transition from memorization to generalization. Concretely, we consider modular arithmetic tasks in which a transformer must infer a latent linear function solely from in-context examples and analyze how predictive uncertainty evolves during training. We combine approximate Bayesian techniques to estimate the posterior distribution and we study how uncertainty behaves across training and under changes in task diversity, context length, and context noise. We find that epistemic uncertainty collapses sharply when the model groks, making uncertainty a practical label-free diagnostic of generalization in transformers. Additionally, we provide theoretical support with a simplified Bayesian linear model, showing that asymptotically both delayed generalization and uncertainty peaks arise from the same underlying spectral mechanism, which links grokking time to uncertainty dynamics.

Comment: Links delayed generalization and epistemic-uncertainty peaks to a shared spectral mechanism.

Topic Match: Grokking concerns training dynamics, but the demonstration remains in modular-arithmetic ICL and a simplified Bayesian linear model.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 7

7. M$^\star$: Every Task Deserves Its Own Memory Harness

ArXiv ID: 2604.11811

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Wenbo Pan, Shujie Liu, Xiangyang Zhou, Shiwei Zhang, Wanlu Shi, Mirror Xu, Xiaohua Jia

Abstract: Large language model agents rely on specialized memory systems to accumulate and reuse knowledge during extended interactions. Recent architectures typically adopt a fixed memory design tailored to specific domains, such as semantic retrieval for conversations or skills reused for coding. However, a memory system optimized for one purpose frequently fails to transfer to others. To address this limitation, we introduce M$^\star$, a method that automatically discovers task-optimized memory harnesses through executable program evolution. Specifically, M$^\star$ models an agent memory system as a memory program written in Python. This program encapsulates the data Schema, the storage Logic, and the agent workflow Instructions. We optimize these components jointly using a reflective code evolution method; this approach employs a population-based search strategy and analyzes evaluation failures to iteratively refine the candidate programs. We evaluate M$^\star$ on four distinct benchmarks spanning conversation, embodied planning, and expert reasoning. Our results demonstrate that M$^\star$ improves performance over existing fixed-memory baselines robustly across all evaluated tasks. Furthermore, the evolved memory programs exhibit structurally distinct processing mechanisms for each domain. This finding indicates that specializing the memory mechanism for a given task explores a broad design space and provides a superior solution compared to general-purpose memory paradigms.

Comment: Jointly evolves memory schemas, storage logic, and workflow instructions for each task.

Topic Match: Architecture is the nearest registry label, but the contribution concerns agent memory programs rather than model internals or training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

8. Understanding and Improving Continuous Adversarial Training for LLMs via In-context Learning Theory

ArXiv ID: 2604.12817

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Shaopeng Fu, Di Wang

Abstract: Adversarial training (AT) is an effective defense for large language models (LLMs) against jailbreak attacks, but performing AT on LLMs is costly. To improve the efficiency of AT for LLMs, recent studies propose continuous AT (CAT) that searches for adversarial inputs within the continuous embedding space of LLMs during AT. While CAT has achieved empirical success, its underlying mechanism, i.e., why adversarial perturbations in the embedding space can help LLMs defend against jailbreak prompts synthesized in the input token space, remains unknown. This paper presents the first theoretical analysis of CAT on LLMs based on in-context learning (ICL) theory. For linear transformers trained with adversarial examples from the embedding space on in-context linear regression tasks, we prove a robust generalization bound that has a negative correlation with the perturbation radius in the embedding space. This clearly explains why CAT can defend against jailbreak prompts from the LLM's token space. Further, the robust bound shows that the robustness of an adversarially trained LLM is closely related to the singular values of its embedding matrix. Based on this, we propose to improve LLM CAT by introducing an additional regularization term, which depends on singular values of the LLM's embedding matrix, into the objective function of CAT. Experiments on real-world LLMs demonstrate that our method can help LLMs achieve a better jailbreak robustness-utility tradeoff. The code is available at https://github.com/fshp971/continuous-adv-icl.

Comment: Connects adversarial robustness to embedding singular values and derives a corresponding regularizer.

Topic Match: Embedding regularization is the nearest training mechanism, but the core contribution is jailbreak defense.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 6

9. Robust Optimization for Mitigating Reward Hacking with Correlated Proxies

ArXiv ID: 2604.12086

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Zixuan Liu, Xiaolin Sun, Zizhan Zheng

Abstract: Designing robust reinforcement learning (RL) agents in the presence of imperfect reward signals remains a core challenge. In practice, agents are often trained with proxy rewards that only approximate the true objective, leaving them vulnerable to reward hacking, where high proxy returns arise from unintended or exploitative behaviors. Recent work formalizes this issue using r-correlation between proxy and true rewards, but existing methods like occupancy-regularized policy optimization (ORPO) optimize against a fixed proxy and do not provide strong guarantees against broader classes of correlated proxies. In this work, we formulate reward hacking as a robust policy optimization problem over the space of all r-correlated proxy rewards. We derive a tractable max-min formulation, where the agent maximizes performance under the worst-case proxy consistent with the correlation constraint. We further show that when the reward is a linear function of known features, our approach can be adapted to incorporate this prior knowledge, yielding both improved policies and interpretable worst-case rewards. Experiments across several environments show that our algorithms consistently outperform ORPO in worst-case returns, and offer improved robustness and stability across different levels of proxy-true reward correlation. These results show that our approach provides both robustness and transparency in settings where reward design is inherently uncertain. The code is available at https://github.com/ZixuanLiu4869/reward_hacking.

Comment: Optimizes policies against the worst reward proxy satisfying an explicit correlation constraint.

Topic Match: Objective design is nearest to architecture_training, but the core subject is reward robustness in reinforcement learning.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

10. Loop Corrections to the Training and Generalization Errors of Random Feature Models

ArXiv ID: 2604.12827

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Taeyoung Kim

Abstract: We investigate random feature models in which neural networks sampled from a prescribed initialization ensemble are frozen and used as random features, with only the readout weights optimized. Adopting a statistical-physics viewpoint, we study the training, test, and generalization errors beyond the mean-kernel approximation. Since the predictor is a nonlinear functional of the induced random kernel, the ensemble-averaged errors depend not only on the mean kernel but also on higher-order fluctuation statistics. Within an effective field-theoretic framework, these finite-width contributions naturally appear as loop corrections. We derive the loop corrections to the training, test, and generalization errors, obtain their scaling laws, and support the theory with experimental verification.

Comment: Finite-width kernel fluctuations yield calculable corrections to training and generalisation errors.

Topic Match: Closest to training theory, but the contribution analyses frozen random features with trained readouts rather than language-model optimisation.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

11. Algorithmic Analysis of Dense Associative Memory: Finite-Size Guarantees and Adversarial Robustness

ArXiv ID: 2604.12811

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Madhava Gaikwad

Abstract: Dense Associative Memory (DAM) generalizes Hopfield networks through higher-order interactions and achieves storage capacity that scales as $O(N^{n-1})$ under suitable pattern separation conditions. Existing dynamical analyses primarily study the thermodynamic limit $N\to\infty$ with randomly sampled patterns and therefore do not provide finite-size guarantees or explicit convergence rates. We develop an algorithmic analysis of DAM retrieval dynamics that yields finite-$N$ guarantees under explicit, verifiable pattern conditions. Under a separation assumption and a bounded-interference condition at high loading, we prove geometric convergence of asynchronous retrieval dynamics, which implies $O(\log N)$ convergence time once the trajectory enters the basin of attraction. We further establish adversarial robustness bounds expressed through an explicit margin condition that quantifies the number of corrupted bits tolerable per sweep, and derive capacity guarantees that scale as $\Theta(N^{n-1})$ up to polylogarithmic factors in the worst case, while recovering the classical $\Theta(N^{n-1})$ scaling for random pattern ensembles. Finally, we show that DAM retrieval dynamics admit a potential-game interpretation that ensures convergence to pure Nash equilibria under asynchronous updates. Complete proofs are provided in the appendices, together with preliminary experiments that illustrate the predicted convergence, robustness, and capacity scaling behavior.

Comment: Finite-size guarantees connect associative-memory retrieval convergence and robustness to explicit pattern conditions.

Topic Match: Closest to recurrent computation theory, but the subject is associative-memory retrieval rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

12. Information-Geometric Decomposition of Generalization Error in Unsupervised Learning

ArXiv ID: 2604.12340

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Gilhan Kim

Abstract: We decompose the Kullback--Leibler generalization error (GE) -- the expected KL divergence from the data distribution to the trained model -- of unsupervised learning into three non-negative components: model error, data bias, and variance. The decomposition is exact for any e-flat model class and follows from two identities of information geometry: the generalized Pythagorean theorem and a dual e-mixture variance identity. As an analytically tractable demonstration, we apply the framework to $\epsilon$-PCA, a regularized principal component analysis in which the empirical covariance is truncated at rank $N_K$ and discarded directions are pinned at a fixed noise floor $\epsilon$. Although rank-constrained $\epsilon$-PCA is not itself e-flat, it admits a technical reformulation with the same total GE on isotropic Gaussian data, under which each component of the decomposition takes closed form. The optimal rank emerges as the cutoff $\lambda_{\mathrm{cut}}^{} = \epsilon$ -- the model retains exactly those empirical eigenvalues exceeding the noise floor -- with the cutoff reflecting a marginal-rate balance between model-error gain and data-bias cost. A boundary comparison further yields a three-regime phase diagram -- retain-all, interior, and collapse -- separated by the lower Marchenko--Pastur edge and an analytically computable collapse threshold $\epsilon_{}(\alpha)$, where $\alpha$ is the dimension-to-sample-size ratio. All claims are verified numerically.

Comment: Exactly decomposes KL generalization error and derives a rank-selection cutoff for regularized PCA.

Topic Match: Statistical generalization theory is the closest topic, but the concrete application is Gaussian PCA rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible (2)

1. PipeLive: Efficient Live In-place Pipeline Parallelism Reconfiguration for Dynamic LLM Serving

ArXiv ID: 2604.12171

Primary Topic: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible

Authors: Xu Bai, Muhammed Tawfiqul Islam, Chen Wang, Adel N. Toosi

Abstract: Pipeline parallelism (PP) is widely used to partition layers of large language models (LLMs) across GPUs, enabling scalable inference for large models. However, existing systems rely on static PP configurations that fail to adapt to dynamic settings, such as serverless platforms and heterogeneous GPU environments. Reconfiguring PP by stopping and redeploying service incurs prohibitive downtime, so reconfiguration must instead proceed live and in place, without interrupting inference. However, live in-place PP reconfiguration is fundamentally challenging. GPUs are already saturated with model weights and KV cache, leaving little room for new layer placements and necessitating KV cache resizing, at odds with systems like vLLM that preallocate for throughput. Moreover, maintaining KV consistency during execution is difficult: stop-and-copy introduces large pauses, while background synchronization risks inconsistency as states evolve. We present PipeLive, which enables live in-place PP reconfiguration with minimal disruption. PipeLive introduces a redesigned KV cache layout together with a co-designed extension to PageAttention, forming a unified mechanism for live KV resizing. It further adopts an incremental KV patching mechanism, inspired by live virtual machine migration, to synchronize KV states between source and target configurations and identify a safe switch point. PipeLive achieves a 2.5X reduction in time-to-first-token (TTFT) without KV cache overflow compared to disabling KV resizing. Furthermore, compared to a variant without KV patching, it reduces reconfiguration overhead from seconds to under 10ms, and improves TTFT and time-per-output-token (TPOT) by up to 54.7% and 14.7%, respectively.

Comment: Maintains KV consistency while resizing caches and moving pipeline layers during live reconfiguration.

Topic Match: Pipeline parallelism is closest to training_systems, but this is a serving reconfiguration system.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 6

2. Decentralized Learning via Random Walk with Jumps

ArXiv ID: 2604.12260

Primary Topic: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible

Authors: Zonghong Liu, Matthew Dwyer, Salim El Rouayheb

Abstract: We study decentralized learning over networks where data are distributed across nodes without a central coordinator. Random walk learning is a token-based approach in which a single model is propagated across the network and updated at each visited node using local data, thereby incurring low communication and computational overheads. In weighted random-walk learning, the transition matrix is designed to achieve a desired sampling distribution, thereby speeding up convergence under data heterogeneity. We show that implementing weighted sampling via the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm can lead to a previously unexplored phenomenon we term entrapment. The random walk may become trapped in a small region of the network, resulting in highly correlated updates and severely degraded convergence. To address this issue, we propose Metropolis-Hastings with Levy jumps, which introduces occasional long-range transitions to restore exploration while respecting local information constraints. We establish a convergence rate that explicitly characterizes the roles of data heterogeneity, network spectral gap, and jump probability, and demonstrate through experiments that MHLJ effectively eliminates entrapment and significantly speeds up decentralized learning.

Comment: Adds long-range jumps to prevent correlated-update entrapment in decentralized random-walk optimization.

Topic Match: Decentralized optimization is the closest topic, but the abstract establishes no language-model training setting.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 6

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (7)

1. LoSA: Locality Aware Sparse Attention for Block-Wise Diffusion Language Models

ArXiv ID: 2604.12056

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Haocheng Xi, Harman Singh, Yuezhou Hu, Coleman Hooper, Rishabh Tiwari, Aditya Tomar, Minjae Lee, Wonjun Kang, Michael Mahoney, Chenfeng Xu, Kurt Keutzer, Amir Gholami

Abstract: Block-wise diffusion language models (DLMs) generate multiple tokens in any order, offering a promising alternative to the autoregressive decoding pipeline. However, they still remain bottlenecked by memory-bound attention in long-context scenarios. Naive sparse attention fails on DLMs due to a KV Inflation problem, where different queries select different prefix positions, making the union of accessed KV pages large. To address this, we observe that between consecutive denoising steps, only a small fraction of active tokens exhibit significant hidden-state changes, while the majority of stable tokens remain nearly constant. Based on this insight, we propose LOSA (Locality-aware Sparse Attention), which reuses cached prefix-attention results for stable tokens and applies sparse attention only to active tokens. This substantially shrinks the number of KV indices that must be loaded, yielding both higher speedup and higher accuracy. Across multiple block-wise DLMs and benchmarks, LOSA preserves near-dense accuracy while significantly improving efficiency, achieving up to +9 points in average accuracy at aggressive sparsity levels while maintaining 1.54x lower attention density. It also achieves up to 4.14x attention speedup on RTX A6000 GPUs, demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Comment: Reuses prefix-attention outputs for stable denoising tokens to reduce the KV working set.

Topic Match: Sparse attention and cache reuse fit the efficiency label most closely, but the contribution accelerates inference in existing diffusion models.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 6

2. OSC: Hardware Efficient W4A4 Quantization via Outlier Separation in Channel Dimension

ArXiv ID: 2604.12782

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Zhiyuan Zhang, Yanzhao Li, Zhiqiang Zou, Bai Du, Yupeng Sun, Hui Dong, Hui Wang

Abstract: While 4-bit quantization is essential for high-throughput deployment of Large Language Models, activation outliers often lead to significant accuracy degradation due to the restricted dynamic range of low-bit formats. In this paper, we systematically investigate the spatial distribution of outliers and demonstrate a token-persistent structural clustering effect, where high-magnitude outliers consistently occupy fixed channels across tokens. Building on this insight, we propose OSC, a hardware-efficient framework for outlier suppression. During inference, OSC executes a dual-path computation consisting of a low-precision 4-bit General Matrix Multiplication (GEMM) path and a high-precision 16-bit branch GEMM path. Specifically, OSC uses an offline group-wise strategy to identify the channels where outliers are located and then performs structured sub-tensor extraction to coalesce these scattered activation channels into a compact dense tensor online. This mechanism implements outlier protection through regularized and high-throughput GEMM operations, achieving a seamless fit with modern 4-bit micro-scaling hardware. Furthermore, for the inputs of W2 where outlier clustering is less pronounced, we integrate a fallback strategy to FP8. Evaluation on Qwen3-8B and Qwen3-30B restricts the average accuracy drop to 2.19 and 1.12 points, respectively. Notably, OSC is highly hardware-friendly, achieving a peak speedup of 1.78x over the W8A8 GEMM baseline on a modern AI accelerator.

Comment: Channel-wise outlier separation confines high precision to a compact branch of W4A4 inference.

Topic Match: Mixed-precision compression is the closest category; the contribution is post-training quantization and accelerator execution.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 5

3. Cooperative Memory Paging with Keyword Bookmarks for Long-Horizon LLM Conversations

ArXiv ID: 2604.12376

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Ziyang Liu

Abstract: When LLM conversations grow beyond the context window, old content must be evicted -- but how does the model recover it when needed? We propose cooperative paging: evicted segments are replaced with minimal keyword bookmarks ([pN:keywords], ~8-24 tokens each), and the model is given a recall() tool to retrieve full content on demand. On the LoCoMo benchmark (10 real multi-session conversations, 300+ turns), cooperative paging achieves the highest answer quality among six methods -- outperforming truncation, BM25, word-overlap retrieval, a search-tool baseline, and full context -- on four models (GPT-4o-mini, DeepSeek-v3.2, Claude Haiku, GLM-5), confirmed by four independent LLM judges ($p=0.017$, paired bootstrap). We then study the paging design space with a 5x4 ablation over boundary strategies and eviction policies (3,176 synthetic probes, 1,600 LoCoMo probes). Key findings: (1) coarse fixed-size pages (fixed_20) reach 96.7% while content-aware topic_shift collapses to 56.7%; (2) eviction policy choice is data-dependent (FIFO best on synthetic, LFU on LoCoMo); (3) two bookmark generation strategies improve over the heuristic baseline (+4.4 and +8.7 E2E points); (4) the remaining bottleneck is bookmark discrimination -- the model triggers recall() 96% of the time but selects the correct page only 57% when bookmarks are insufficiently distinctive. Keyword specificity alone accounts for a 25 percentage point accuracy difference.

Comment: Keyword bookmarks preserve retrieval handles for evicted conversation segments.

Topic Match: Memory efficiency is the closest category, but the contribution is conversation paging and retrieval rather than model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 5

4. Chain-of-Models Pre-Training: Rethinking Training Acceleration of Vision Foundation Models

ArXiv ID: 2604.12391

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Jiawei Fan, Shigeng Wang, Chao Li, Xiaolong Liu, Anbang Yao

Abstract: In this paper, we present Chain-of-Models Pre-Training (CoM-PT), a novel performance-lossless training acceleration method for vision foundation models (VFMs). This approach fundamentally differs from existing acceleration methods in its core motivation: rather than optimizing each model individually, CoM-PT is designed to accelerate the training pipeline at the model family level, scaling efficiently as the model family expands. Specifically, CoM-PT establishes a pre-training sequence for the model family, arranged in ascending order of model size, called model chain. In this chain, only the smallest model undergoes standard individual pre-training, while the other models are efficiently trained through sequential inverse knowledge transfer from their smaller predecessors by jointly reusing the knowledge in the parameter space and the feature space. As a result, CoM-PT enables all models to achieve performance that is mostly superior to standard individual training while significantly reducing training cost, and this is extensively validated across 45 datasets spanning zero-shot and fine-tuning tasks. Notably, its efficient scaling property yields a remarkable phenomenon: training more models even results in higher efficiency. For instance, when pre-training on CC3M: i) given ViT-L as the largest model, progressively prepending smaller models to the model chain reduces computational complexity by up to 72%; ii) within a fixed model size range, as the VFM family scales across 3, 4, and 7 models, the acceleration ratio of CoM-PT exhibits a striking leap: from 4.13X to 5.68X and 7.09X. Since CoM-PT is naturally agnostic to specific pre-training paradigms, we open-source the code to spur further extensions in more computationally intensive scenarios, such as large language model pre-training.

Comment: Sequential reuse of smaller models reduces the total pretraining cost of a model family.

Topic Match: Training efficiency is the closest category, but the demonstrated contribution accelerates vision-model pretraining through knowledge transfer.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

5. When to Forget: A Memory Governance Primitive

ArXiv ID: 2604.12007

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Baris Simsek

Abstract: Agent memory systems accumulate experience but currently lack a principled operational metric for memory quality governance -- deciding which memories to trust, suppress, or deprecate as the agent's task distribution shifts. Write-time importance scores are static; dynamic management systems use LLM judgment or structural heuristics rather than outcome feedback. This paper proposes Memory Worth (MW): a two-counter per-memory signal that tracks how often a memory co-occurs with successful versus failed outcomes, providing a lightweight, theoretically grounded foundation for staleness detection, retrieval suppression, and deprecation decisions. We prove that MW converges almost surely to the conditional success probability p+(m) = Pr[y_t = +1 | m in M_t] -- the probability of task success given that memory m is retrieved -- under a stationary retrieval regime with a minimum exploration condition. Importantly, p+(m) is an associational quantity, not a causal one: it measures outcome co-occurrence rather than causal contribution. We argue this is still a useful operational signal for memory governance, and we validate it empirically in a controlled synthetic environment where ground-truth utility is known: after 10,000 episodes, the Spearman rank-correlation between Memory Worth and true utilities reaches rho = 0.89 +/- 0.02 across 20 independent seeds, compared to rho = 0.00 for systems that never update their assessments. A retrieval-realistic micro-experiment with real text and neural embedding retrieval (all-MiniLM-L6-v2) further shows stale memories crossing the low-value threshold (MW = 0.17) while specialist memories remain high-value (MW = 0.77) across 3,000 episodes. The estimator requires only two scalar counters per memory unit and can be added to architectures that already log retrievals and episode outcomes.

Comment: Estimates success frequency conditional on retrieving a memory to guide its suppression or deprecation.

Topic Match: Memory selection and pruning provide the closest connection, but the contribution governs external agent memory rather than model parameters or training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 5

6. ProbeLogits: Kernel-Level LLM Inference Primitives for AI-Native Operating Systems

ArXiv ID: 2604.11943

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Daeyeon Son

Abstract: An OS kernel that runs LLM inference internally can read logit distributions before any text is generated -- and act on them as a governance primitive. I present ProbeLogits, a kernel-level operation that performs a single forward pass and reads specific token logits to classify agent actions as safe or dangerous, with zero learned parameters. On a 260-prompt OS action benchmark (9 categories including adversarial attacks), ProbeLogits achieves F1=0.980, Precision=1.000, and Recall=0.960 using a general-purpose 7B model at 4-bit quantization. On ToxicChat (1,000 human-annotated real conversations), it achieves F1=0.790 at default calibration strength $\alpha$=1.0, improving to F1=0.837 at $\alpha$=0.5 -- 89% of Llama Guard 3's F1~0.939 with zero learned parameters. A key design contribution is the calibration strength $\alpha$, which serves as a deployment-time policy knob rather than a learned hyperparameter. By adjusting $\alpha$, the OS can enforce strict policies for privileged operations ($\alpha \geq 0.8$, maximizing recall) or relaxed policies for conversational agents ($\alpha$=0.5, maximizing precision). Contextual calibration improves accuracy from 64.8% to 97.3% on the custom benchmark. I implement ProbeLogits within Anima OS, a bare-metal x86_64 OS written in 80,400 lines of Rust. Because agent actions must pass through kernel-mediated host functions, ProbeLogits enforcement operates below the WASM sandbox boundary, making it significantly harder to circumvent than application-layer classifiers. Each classification costs 65ms on 7B -- fast enough for per-action governance. I also show that treating KV cache as process state enables checkpoint, restore, and fork operations analogous to traditional process management. To my knowledge, no prior system exposes LLM logit vectors as OS-level governance primitives.

Comment: Uses calibrated token logits as a classifier requiring no additional training for kernel-mediated agent actions.

Topic Match: Avoiding an additional trained classifier is the closest efficiency connection, but the contribution is operating-system safety enforcement.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 4

7. Aethon: A Reference-Based Replication Primitive for Constant-Time Instantiation of Stateful AI Agents

ArXiv ID: 2604.12129

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Swanand Rao, Kiran Kashalkar, Parvathi Somashekar, Priya Krishnan

Abstract: The transition from stateless model inference to stateful agentic execution is reshaping the systems assumptions underlying modern AI infrastructure. While large language models have made persistent, tool-using, and collaborative agents technically viable, existing runtime architectures remain constrained by materialization-heavy instantiation models that impose significant latency and memory overhead. This paper introduces Aethon, a reference-based replication primitive for near-constant-time instantiation of stateful AI agents. Rather than reconstructing agents as fully materialized objects, Aethon represents each instance as a compositional view over stable definitions, layered memory, and local contextual overlays. By shifting instantiation from duplication to reference, Aethon decouples creation cost from inherited structure. We present the conceptual framework, system architecture, and memory model underlying Aethon, including layered inheritance and copy-on-write semantics. We analyze its implications for complexity, scalability, multi-agent orchestration, and enterprise governance. We argue that reference-based instantiation is not merely an optimization, but a more appropriate systems abstraction for production-scale agentic software. Aethon points toward a new class of AI infrastructure in which agents become lightweight, composable execution identities that can be spawned, specialized, and governed at scale.

Comment: Uses references and copy-on-write overlays to separate agent creation cost from inherited state size.

Topic Match: Memory sharing is nearest to efficiency_scaling, but this is an agent-runtime abstraction rather than model compression or training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 4

Paper Selection Prompt

System Prompt

You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.

User Prompt

Relevant Topics

This is a training-side feed for someone who builds and modifies model internals. The centre of gravity is what a frontier model is made of and how it is trained: architecture, training dynamics, and the decisions a lab actually made. MoE is still in scope, but only when the contribution changes the design space, not when it tunes an existing MoE.

Keep a paper when its CORE CONTRIBUTION falls in one of the five topics below. Filter it when the topic is merely the setting for a downstream application, a benchmark, or a product result.

THE SUBJECT IS LANGUAGE-MODEL TRAINING. Every topic below is scoped to it. A technique named in one of them -- decentralised or asynchronous training, discrete diffusion, byte-level modelling, 1-bit weights, mixture-of-experts -- earns nothing when the model being trained is an image generator, a recommender, a scientific surrogate, or a vision classifier. Match on what is being trained, not on the vocabulary in the abstract.

THE ONE QUESTION THAT DECIDES A HIGH SCORE, asked before the topic list:

Does this paper REMOVE or REPLACE a component that everyone downstream inherits without thinking, or DECOUPLE two quantities the field currently conflates -- and does it say which end is held fixed while the other moves?

A paper that ADDS a mechanism on top of existing primitives is ordinary work, however good the numbers. A paper that takes one away, or splits one knob into two, is the reason this feed exists. Papers whose gains are CONDITIONAL (only above some batch size, only in one budget regime, only with an extra training stage) are ordinary work too, even when the mechanism is new: a conditional win is a new knob, not a removed one.

1. Frontier Model Releases and Technical Reports (primary) - Keep: model and technical reports that DISCLOSE architecture or training decisions -- layer and attention design, normalization and residual choices, hybrid attention/state-space stacks, sparsity and expert layout, tokenizer and vocabulary decisions, data mixture and curriculum, optimizer and schedule, precision and numerics, stability fixes and what broke; open-weight releases whose report explains a choice rather than only reporting it. - Filter: releases that are a scorecard -- benchmark tables, a capability announcement, a product or API launch, or a report that names its recipe without saying why it was chosen. A frontier name in the title earns nothing on its own.

2. Architecture and Training Dynamics (primary) - Keep: new or analysed architectural mechanisms (attention variants, normalization and residual design, state-space and recurrent sequence modelling, positional schemes, dynamic or modular computation, tokenizer-free and byte-level or learned-chunking stacks, non-autoregressive and discrete-diffusion generation); optimizers, preconditioners, and parameterisations, especially hyperparameter transfer across scale; training-dynamics and stability analysis that explains why large models train the way they do; work that removes a standard component (normalization, weight decay, positional encoding, the tokenizer, left-to-right decoding) and shows the model still trains. - Filter: applying an existing architecture to a new task or benchmark with no mechanistic insight; an architectural tweak evaluated only at toy scale with no account of what it costs.

3. Large-Scale Training Systems - Keep: distributed training ALGORITHMS that change what is possible, not only what is fast -- asynchronous, low-communication and decentralised optimisation, sharding and parallelism schemes with a new invariant, numerics and low-precision training (FP8, FP4, ternary and 1-bit) when the claim is about training stability rather than a kernel; scaling-law work that informs how a run is configured, including data-constrained and repeated-data regimes and critical batch size. - Filter: kernel engineering, communication scheduling, overlap, caching, serving and inference throughput. This is a real exclusion, not a soft one: work whose contribution is "the same model, faster" belongs to someone else's feed even when it is excellent and even when it is about MoE.

4. MoE Where It Changes the Design Space - Keep: routing that is newly differentiable or newly stable; the training/inference router gap; expert collapse and what actually prevents it; expert granularity, shared experts and layout when a new axis is opened rather than tuned; dense-to-MoE conversion; MoE scaling laws that fix one quantity and vary another; analyses that carry a criterion which could have failed (a random-guess baseline, an ablation with a predicted sign) rather than similarity heatmaps. - Filter: MoE SYSTEMS and inference work (expert parallelism, all-to-all schedules, grouped GEMM, offload, prefetching, capacity and scheduling tricks, compression for serving); MoE surveys; papers that train on top of a MoE without a routing, balancing, stability, or structural contribution; "mixture of experts" in the classical ensemble or recommender sense. - The exclusion above is about MAKING MoE RUN FASTER, and it does not reach routing and expert design. A paper on how tokens are assigned to experts, how experts specialise, how balance is enforced, or how a dense model becomes sparse stays fully in scope and scores on its merits, even when the mechanism is a small one.

5. Efficiency and Compression When the Mechanism Is New - Keep: quantization, sparsity, pruning and low-rank work whose mechanism is new and whose gain is unconditional; compression that changes what can be trained, not only what can be served; attribution of a model's behaviour to its data. - Filter: tuned variants of standard efficiency methods; deployment and serving engineering; anything whose headline is a compression ratio with no account of what was given up.

Also keep, even though they read like evaluation work, because the field has no one checking them: - benchmark validity itself: contamination, saturation, LLM-as-judge reliability, whether a benchmark measures what it claims. A paper AUDITING a benchmark is in scope; a paper PROPOSING one is not.

Subjects He Has Never Once Kept

Measured, not guessed. Over nine months where he was actively curating, 4953 papers passed this filter and 274 made his list -- a keep rate of 5.2%. Each subject below appeared in the rejected pile the number of times shown and appeared ZERO times in his entire 508-entry list.

Filter a paper whose CORE SUBJECT is one of these. The count is the evidence; where a paper only mentions the term in passing while contributing somewhere in the five topics above, keep it.

variational methods and inference (52) unlearning (41) long-context methods (40) neural operators (35) time series (35) vision transformers (35) parameter-efficient fine-tuning (28) stochastic gradient analysis (21) LLM safety (20) LLM reasoning as a subject (20) hallucination (20) sequence modelling as a subject (19) differential equations (19) spiking neural networks (17) post-training quantization (16) mechanistic interpretability as a framing (15) test-time scaling (13)

Two more he kept exactly once each, so suppress rather than drop: graph neural networks (1 of 42), knowledge distillation (1 of 39).

Do NOT extend this list by analogy. Four subjects that look like they belong here were checked and do not: diffusion models (8.1% kept), prompting (10.0%), benchmarks (9.1%) and neural architecture search (13.3%) all sit ABOVE his 5.2% base rate.

Note the one distinction that matters: he rejects papers FRAMED as interpretability, while analysis of how a trained model's computation is organised is among his highest-rated work. The subject is the framing, not the act of analysing.

Leave these to the hotspot digest unless the core contribution clearly falls in one of the five topics above: - agent, tooling, and RAG launches, and agent framework papers - new benchmarks, leaderboards, and evaluation-only papers - interpretability that stops at cataloguing features, with nothing said about the mechanism that produced them. Analysis of how a trained model's computation is organised -- what drives expert selection, what a circuit computes, how representations reorganise across training -- is IN scope, not here. - memory mechanisms and agent memory systems - world models, exploration, and reinforcement learning - alignment and post-training (RLHF, DPO, GRPO, RFT, instruction tuning), EXCEPT where the subject is how post-training destabilises the architecture itself - downstream applications in medical imaging, segmentation, 3D vision, video understanding, information retrieval, summarization, recommendation, machine translation, speech recognition, time series, knowledge graphs, and similar domains

Scoring Criteria

Score five independent axes from 1 to 10: Relevance, Novelty, Evidence, Load, Proximity.

They answer different questions and must not be collapsed. Relevance: is this the kind of work this feed is for. Evidence: did the paper earn its claim. Load: what does it cost to get the usable result out. Proximity: how close is it to what the reader is working on right now (see Active Lines below).

Novelty is scored for continuity with the archive and for the hotspot spotlight cutoffs, and it does NOT order the feed. Measured against 274 hand-tiered papers it carried no signal at all: papers scoring 8 or more were his must-reads exactly as often as papers scoring 5 or less, both at the pool's base rate. Every abstract claims novelty, so the axis measures the claiming rather than the work. Score it honestly and do not let it influence the other four.

A strong claim with thin evidence is a worse read than a modest claim that holds. Score each axis on its own; do not let a high one pull up a low one.

Relevance Scoring

• 9-10: directly centered on the target topics; highest when the core contribution is clearly within them and the paper is about how a model is BUILT or TRAINED.
• 7-8: substantially related, but partly peripheral or focused on a narrower aspect.
• 5-6: touches the target topics, but the main contribution is elsewhere.
• 3-4: largely outside the target topics, often application-focused or domain-specific.
• 1-2: unrelated.

Important: Daily buzz, a frontier lab's name, or a large headline number is not enough for a high Relevance score. A model release scores high only when the report explains an architecture or training decision; a release that only reports results is hotspot material, not this feed.

Work whose contribution is "the same model, faster" -- kernels, communication schedules, overlap, caching, serving -- caps at Relevance 5 even when it is excellent and even when it is about MoE. Making a known design run faster is a different job from changing the design.

That cap is about SPEED, not about size. Compression that is lossless, or that changes what can be trained or held in memory at all rather than how quickly it runs, is not capped: it changes what is possible, which is the thing this feed is for.

Analysis of how a trained model's computation is actually organised -- what a circuit computes, what drives expert selection, how representations reorganise over training -- IS in scope and scores like any other work on mechanism. Only interpretability that stops at describing features, with nothing said about the mechanism that produced them, drops out of the feed.

Novelty Scoring

Novelty means a change to the design space, not a change to a number. Score against this ladder:

• 9-10: removes or replaces a component the whole field inherits without thinking (normalization, weight decay, the tokenizer, positional encoding, left-to-right decoding, the standard optimizer, a numerical format), or decouples two quantities everyone conflates -- AND states which end is held fixed while the other moves. The claim is unconditional: it does not require a particular scale, budget regime, or extra stage. An ANALYSIS paper reaches this band when it settles a mechanism-level question with a criterion that could have come out the other way.
• 7-8: a substantial new mechanism, or a decoupling whose gain is real but CONDITIONAL (holds above some batch size, in one budget band, or with an added training phase). A conditional win is a new knob, not a removed one, and belongs here rather than above.
• 5-6: meaningful but incremental extension or refinement of an existing primitive; a tuned variant; a well-executed combination of known parts.
• 3-4: minor, narrow, or mostly engineering or domain-specific improvement; a survey or overview, however thorough.
• 1-2: little originality; mainly standard application of existing methods.

Score the claim as the paper states it here. Whether the paper supports that claim is Evidence, and it is scored separately -- do not discount Novelty for weak experiments, and do not raise it because the framing is confident. Phrases like "we remove", "without X", "holding Y fixed" are what the paper SAYS; they earn a high Novelty only if the thing named really is a component the field inherits by default, not a component this paper introduced two sentences earlier.

Evidence Scoring

Does the demonstration reach as far as the claim?

• 9-10: shown at the scale and breadth the claim asserts -- language-model pretraining at billion-parameter or hundred-billion-token scale, or across several model families, sizes, or domains -- with ablations that isolate the named mechanism and could have failed.
• 7-8: one credible setting that matches the claim's stated scope, with the baselines a skeptic would ask for.
• 5-6: a single small setting, or a claim stated more broadly than the demonstration reaches.
• 3-4: the claim is about transformers or language models in general, but the demonstration lives in one narrow domain or one small benchmark -- image classification alone, a single toy task, one dataset; or the comparisons a reader needs in order to believe it are missing.
• 1-2: the central claim is asserted, illustrated, or supported only by plots that could not have come out the other way.

A structural claim demonstrated only outside the setting it claims is capped at 4, however striking the claim. "We removed a component everyone uses" shown only on small vision models is a result about small vision models.

When the abstract names no scale, no dataset, and no baseline at all, score exactly 5. Do not infer rigor from confident writing. Unstated is not the same as strong, and two thirds of abstracts say nothing here: guessing on those was measured to make this axis worse.

Adjustments: subtract 1 when no code is released and the procedure is not reproducible from the paper alone; subtract 1 when the method's cost grows in the number of components it adds (one loss per pair of experts, one module per domain) and the paper does not account for that growth; add 1 when the paper states its own limitation precisely enough that a reader could design the experiment that breaks it.

Load Scoring

What does it cost to get the usable result out? This is about the reader's effort, not quality.

• 9-10: the result cannot be taken without following the derivation -- a new theoretical framework, unfamiliar mathematical machinery, or a proof that IS the contribution.
• 7-8: substantial theory or an involved formalism, but the operational result is stated plainly somewhere.
• 4-6: ordinary methods paper; the recipe is legible from the paper's own description.
• 1-3: the takeaway is a single decision or number a reader can act on immediately.

A high Load is not a criticism. It only says the paper is a project rather than a read.

Proximity Scoring

How close is this to the Active Lines stated below? This axis is about the reader, not the paper, and a paper can be excellent and distant at the same time.

• 9-10: squarely on a centre line -- the paper's core contribution is the thing the reader is working on, and a result here changes what they would do next.
• 7-8: on a centre line but from a direction they are not working from, or on an adjacent line where the result carries over directly.
• 5-6: adjacent: same stack, different layer; they would want to know it happened.
• 3-4: far: recognisable as the same field, but nothing here reaches their work.
• 1-2: another area entirely.

Judge distance from the reader's stated centre, NOT from whatever is currently prominent in the field. A paper everyone is discussing is not thereby close.

Topic Registry

Use exactly one PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID chosen from the stable topic IDs below. - frontier_models: Frontier Model Releases and Technical Reports - Frontier model and technical reports that disclose an architecture or training decision: layer and attention design, normalization and residual choices, hybrid stacks, sparsity layout, tokenizer and data mixture, optimizer and schedule, precision, and the stability problems that had to be solved. - architecture_training: Architecture and Training Dynamics - Architectural and optimisation mechanisms, and the training dynamics that explain them: attention and normalization design, positional schemes, state-space and recurrent stacks, tokenizer-free and learned-chunking models, non-autoregressive and discrete-diffusion generation, optimizers and parameterisations including hyperparameter transfer across scale, and work that removes a standard component and shows the model still trains. - training_systems: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible - Distributed training algorithms that change what can be trained rather than how fast it runs: asynchronous, low-communication and decentralised optimisation, parallelism schemes with a new invariant, low-precision and 1-bit training when the claim is stability, and scaling laws including data-constrained regimes and critical batch size. - moe_training: MoE Where It Changes the Design Space - Mixture-of-Experts work that opens or closes a design axis: differentiable and stable routing, the training/inference router gap, expert collapse, granularity and layout as a new axis, dense-to-MoE conversion, and MoE scaling laws that fix one quantity and vary another. MoE systems and inference work is out. - efficiency_scaling: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training - Compression, sparsity, quantization, pruning, low-rank and memory or cache efficiency whose mechanism is new and whose gain is unconditional.

Papers

[PAPER LIST HERE]

Instructions

Respond in JSONL. Output exactly one JSON object per paper, one per line:

{"ARXIVID":"...","COMMENT":"...","RELEVANCE":0,"NOVELTY":0,"EVIDENCE":0,"LOAD":0,"PROXIMITY":0,"PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID":"...","MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS":[],"TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT":"...","HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS":[],"HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT":"..."}

Rules: - ARXIVID: the arXiv ID. - COMMENT: identify the single strongest matching criterion. Be brief and specific. Do not rely on generic phrases like "language modeling" or "advancement". Do not mention non-matching criteria. - RELEVANCE: integer from 1 to 10. - NOVELTY: integer from 1 to 10, scoring the claim as stated. - EVIDENCE: integer from 1 to 10, scoring whether the demonstration reaches as far as the claim. - LOAD: integer from 1 to 10, scoring what it costs the reader to extract the usable result. - PROXIMITY: integer from 1 to 10, scoring distance from the stated Active Lines. - PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID: exactly one stable topic ID from the allowed topic registry. - MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS: zero or more stable topic IDs from the same allowed set. Include PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID when there are multiple matches. - TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT: briefly explain why the primary topic is the best fit. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS: zero or more tags from this exact set only: daily_hot, new_frontier. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT: briefly explain why the paper belongs in the daily hotspot paper feed when HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS is non-empty; otherwise use an empty string. - Use HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS sparingly. Most papers should return []. - daily_hot means the paper feels broadly important to the day and belongs in the daily hotspot paper section even if it is not part of the personalized foundational reading list. - new_frontier means the paper appears to open a genuinely new direction, paradigm, or field, even if the work is still early. - Do not output markdown, code fences, or any extra text.