This is a remedial run for missed papers from 04/02/2026 to 04/02/2026.
Results generated on 09/11/2026.
Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2026-04-03
| Model | Metric | Usage | Papers | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prompt | Completion | Total | Total arXiv | Scanned | Relevant | ||
local agent CLI |
Tokens | not reported | not reported | not reported | 352 | 352 | 10 |
| Cost | not reported | not reported | not reported | ||||
Token counts are not reported for this run. 4 of 5 model calls succeeded, 1,531s of model wall clock.
Topic Coverage:
| Topic | Papers |
|---|---|
| MoE Training | 1 |
| Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency | 1 |
| Architecture and Training Dynamics | 6 |
| Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training | 2 |
Table of contents by topic:
MoE Training (1)
- FourierMoE: Fourier Mixture-of-Experts Adaptation of Large Language Models Authors: Juyong Jiang, Fan Wang, Hong Qi, Sunghun Kim, Jing Tang
Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency (1)
- Optimal Projection-Free Adaptive SGD for Matrix Optimization Authors: Dmitry Kovalev
Architecture and Training Dynamics (6)
-
Does Your Optimizer Care How You Normalize? Normalization-Optimizer Coupling in LLM Training Authors: Abdelrahman Abouzeid
-
go-$m$HC: Direct Parameterization of Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections via Generalized Orthostochastic Matrices Authors: Torque Dandachi, Sophia Diggs-Galligan
-
Homogenized Transformers Authors: Hugo Koubbi, Borjan Geshkovski, Philippe Rigollet
-
Coupled Query-Key Dynamics for Attention Authors: Barak Gahtan, Alex M. Bronstein
-
On the Role of Depth in the Expressivity of RNNs Authors: Maude Lizaire, Michael Rizvi-Martel, Éric Dupuis, Guillaume Rabusseau
-
Ouroboros: Dynamic Weight Generation for Recursive Transformers via Input-Conditioned LoRA Modulation Authors: Jaber Jaber, Osama Jaber
Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (2)
-
AA-SVD : Anchored and Adaptive SVD for Large Language Model Compression Authors: Atul Kumar Sinha, François Fleuret
-
MiCA Learns More Knowledge Than LoRA and Full Fine-Tuning Authors: Sten Rüdiger, Sebastian Raschka
MoE Training (1)
1. FourierMoE: Fourier Mixture-of-Experts Adaptation of Large Language Models
ArXiv ID: 2604.01762
Primary Topic: MoE Training
Also Matches: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training
Authors: Juyong Jiang, Fan Wang, Hong Qi, Sunghun Kim, Jing Tang
Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) has emerged as a crucial paradigm for adapting large language models (LLMs) under constrained computational budgets. However, standard PEFT methods often struggle in multi-task fine-tuning settings, where diverse optimization objectives induce task interference and limited parameter budgets lead to representational deficiency. While recent approaches incorporate mixture-of-experts (MoE) to alleviate these issues, they predominantly operate in the spatial domain, which may introduce structural redundancy and parameter overhead. To overcome these limitations, we reformulate adaptation in the spectral domain. Our spectral analysis reveals that different tasks exhibit distinct frequency energy distributions, and that LLM layers display heterogeneous frequency sensitivities. Motivated by these insights, we propose FourierMoE, which integrates the MoE architecture with the inverse discrete Fourier transform (IDFT) for frequency-aware adaptation. Specifically, FourierMoE employs a frequency-adaptive router to dispatch tokens to experts specialized in distinct frequency bands. Each expert learns a set of conjugate-symmetric complex coefficients, preserving complete phase and amplitude information while theoretically guaranteeing lossless IDFT reconstruction into real-valued spatial weights. Extensive evaluations across 28 benchmarks, multiple model architectures, and scales demonstrate that FourierMoE consistently outperforms competitive baselines in both single-task and multi-task settings while using significantly fewer trainable parameters. These results highlight the promise of spectral-domain expert adaptation as an effective and parameter-efficient paradigm for LLM fine-tuning.
Comment: MoE routing in the spectral domain: a frequency-adaptive router dispatches tokens to experts holding conjugate-symmetric Fourier coefficients that reconstruct losslessly into real weights, cutting expert parameter overhead in multi-task adaptation.
Topic Match: The core contribution is a new router and expert parameterization, though it lives in PEFT rather than pretraining.
Relevance: 7 Novelty: 6
Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency (1)
1. Optimal Projection-Free Adaptive SGD for Matrix Optimization
ArXiv ID: 2604.02505
Primary Topic: Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency
Authors: Dmitry Kovalev
Abstract: Recently, Jiang et al. [2026] developed Leon, a practical variant of One-sided Shampoo [Xie et al., 2025a, An et al., 2025] algorithm for online convex optimization, which does not require computing a costly quadratic projection at each iteration. Unfortunately, according to the existing analysis, Leon requires tuning an additional hyperparameter in its preconditioner and cannot achieve dimension-independent convergence guarantees for convex optimization problems beyond the bounded gradients assumption. In this paper, we resolve this issue by proving certain stability properties of Leon's preconditioner. Using our improved analysis, we show that tuning the extra hyperparameter can be avoided and, more importantly, develop the first practical variant of One-sided Shampoo with Nesterov acceleration, which does not require computing projections at each iteration. As a side contribution, we obtain improved dimension-independent rates in the non-smooth non-convex setting and develop a unified analysis of the proposed algorithm, which yields accelerated projection-free adaptive SGD with (block-)diagonal preconditioners.
Comment: Proves stability of Leon's preconditioner, removing a tuned hyperparameter and yielding the first projection-free accelerated One-sided Shampoo variant.
Topic Match: Matrix preconditioner design in the Shampoo lineage is squarely optimizer work for large-scale training.
Relevance: 7 Novelty: 7
Architecture and Training Dynamics (6)
1. Does Your Optimizer Care How You Normalize? Normalization-Optimizer Coupling in LLM Training
ArXiv ID: 2604.01563
Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics
Also Matches: Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency
Authors: Abdelrahman Abouzeid
Abstract: In LLM training, normalization layers and optimizers are typically treated as independent design choices. In a 3x2 factorial at 1B parameters and 1000 training steps, we show this assumption can fail: Dynamic Erf (Derf; Chen & Liu, 2025) suffers a large negative interaction with Muon (Jordan, 2024), with its gap to RMSNorm growing from +0.31 nats under AdamW to +0.97 under Muon, approximately three times larger. Dynamic Tanh (DyT; Zhu et al., 2025), included as a bounded-normalizer control, shows no such penalty. Our evidence points to two failure modes of erf under Muon's faster spectral-norm growth: saturation (lossy compression) and scale blindness (discarding activation magnitude). An EMA-blend that reintroduces running scale estimates recovers ~84% of the gap. Separately, reducing Derf's alpha from its published default (0.5 to 0.3) recovers ~80% by keeping erf in its near-linear regime, where it approximately preserves relative scale; this setting is not the published default of Chen & Liu (2025). Using Derf's published default alpha with Muon incurs a 0.66-nat interaction penalty without producing NaNs or divergence, making the failure easy to miss in short pilot runs.
Comment: Factorial 1B-scale study showing normalizer and optimizer are not independent choices: Derf's gap to RMSNorm triples under Muon, traced to erf saturation and scale blindness under faster spectral-norm growth, with an EMA-blend and alpha fix each recovering most of the penalty.
Topic Match: Normalization design interacting with a large-scale pretraining optimizer, i.e. training-dynamics analysis that changes configuration decisions.
Relevance: 9 Novelty: 6
2. go-$m$HC: Direct Parameterization of Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections via Generalized Orthostochastic Matrices
ArXiv ID: 2604.02309
Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics
Authors: Torque Dandachi, Sophia Diggs-Galligan
Abstract: Doubly stochastic matrices enable learned mixing across residual streams, but parameterizing the set of doubly stochastic matrices (the Birkhoff polytope) exactly and efficiently remains an open challenge. Existing exact methods scale factorially with the number of streams ($d$), while Kronecker-factorized approaches are efficient but expressivity-limited. We introduce a novel exact parameterization grounded in the theory of generalized orthostochastic matrices, which scales as $\mathcal{O}(d^3)$ and exposes a single hyperparameter $s$ which continuously interpolates between a computationally efficient boundary and the fully expressive Birkhoff polytope. Building on Manifold-Constrained Hyper-Connections ($m$HC), a framework for learned dynamic layer connectivity, we instantiate this parameterization in go-$m$HC. Our method composes naturally with Kronecker-factorized methods, substantially recovering expressivity at similar FLOP costs. Spectral analysis indicates that go-$m$HC fills the Birkhoff polytope far more completely than Kronecker-factorized baselines. On synthetic stream-mixing tasks, go-$m$HC achieves the minimum theoretical loss while converging up to $10\times$ faster. We validate our approach in a 30M parameter GPT-style language model. The expressivity, efficiency, and exactness of go-$m$HC offer a practical avenue for scaling $d$ as a new dimension of model capacity.
Comment: Exact O(d^3) parameterization of doubly stochastic residual-stream mixing via generalized orthostochastic matrices, replacing factorially-scaling exact methods and expressivity-limited Kronecker factorizations, making the number of residual streams a scalable capacity dimension.
Topic Match: Residual and layer-connectivity design mechanism, validated so far only at 30M scale.
Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7
3. Homogenized Transformers
ArXiv ID: 2604.01978
Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics
Authors: Hugo Koubbi, Borjan Geshkovski, Philippe Rigollet
Abstract: We study a random model of deep multi-head self-attention in which the weights are resampled independently across layers and heads, as at initialization of training. Viewing depth as a time variable, the residual stream defines a discrete-time interacting particle system on the unit sphere. We prove that, under suitable joint scalings of the depth, the residual step size, and the number of heads, this dynamics admits a nontrivial homogenized limit. Depending on the scaling, the limit is either deterministic or stochastic with common noise; in the mean-field regime, the latter leads to a stochastic nonlinear Fokker--Planck equation for the conditional law of a representative token. In the Gaussian setting, the limiting drift vanishes, making the homogenized dynamics explicit enough to study representation collapse. This yields quantitative trade-offs between dimension, context length, and temperature, and identifies regimes in which clustering can be mitigated.
Comment: Proves a homogenized depth-scaling limit for multi-head attention residual streams, yielding quantitative conditions on depth, step size, head count and temperature under which token clustering/representation collapse is mitigated.
Topic Match: Mechanistic theory of the attention/residual architecture at initialization scaling, i.e. training-dynamics analysis rather than an application.
Relevance: 7 Novelty: 8
4. Coupled Query-Key Dynamics for Attention
ArXiv ID: 2604.01683
Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics
Authors: Barak Gahtan, Alex M. Bronstein
Abstract: Standard scaled dot-product attention computes scores from static, independent projections of the input. We show that evolving queries and keys \emph{jointly} through shared learned dynamics before scoring - which we call \textbf{coupled QK dynamics} - improves language modeling perplexity and training stability. On WikiText-103 at 60M parameters, coupled dynamics achieves 22.55--22.62 perplexity vs.\ 24.22 for standard attention ($-$6.6--6.9\%), with only 0.11\% additional parameters (shared across both instantiations). A structural ablation isolates coupling as the active ingredient: a symplectic (Hamiltonian) and a non-symplectic (Euler) integrator perform identically when both couple Q and K, while an uncoupled MLP baseline of matched capacity reaches only 23.81 with 8$\times$ higher seed variance. The integration step count (1--7) is similarly irrelevant - a single coupled step suffices. A compute-matched comparison reveals that coupling is a \emph{sample-efficiency} mechanism: standard attention trained for 2.4$\times$ longer (matching wall-clock) reaches the same perplexity, but requires 2.4$\times$ more tokens. The advantage scales to 150M ($-$6.7\%) but narrows at 350M ($-$1.0\%), where Differential Attention (18.93) overtakes coupled dynamics (19.35). The benefit is corpus-dependent: coupling helps on domain-coherent text (WikiText-103 $-$6.6\%, PubMed $-$4.5\%) but degrades on heterogeneous web text ($+$10.3\%) and shows no benefit on GLUE. We characterize when coupling helps and when it does not, providing practical guidelines.
Comment: Attention variant that evolves queries and keys through shared learned dynamics before scoring, with an ablation isolating coupling itself as the active ingredient and an honest compute-matched analysis showing it is a sample-efficiency mechanism that narrows by 350M.
Topic Match: New attention mechanism analysed for perplexity, training stability and scaling behaviour.
Relevance: 8 Novelty: 6
5. On the Role of Depth in the Expressivity of RNNs
ArXiv ID: 2604.02201
Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics
Authors: Maude Lizaire, Michael Rizvi-Martel, Éric Dupuis, Guillaume Rabusseau
Abstract: The benefits of depth in feedforward neural networks are well known: composing multiple layers of linear transformations with nonlinear activations enables complex computations. While similar effects are expected in recurrent neural networks (RNNs), it remains unclear how depth interacts with recurrence to shape expressive power. Here, we formally show that depth increases RNNs' memory capacity efficiently with respect to the number of parameters, thus enhancing expressivity both by enabling more complex input transformations and improving the retention of past information. We broaden our analysis to 2RNNs, a generalization of RNNs with multiplicative interactions between inputs and hidden states. Unlike RNNs, which remain linear without nonlinear activations, 2RNNs perform polynomial transformations whose maximal degree grows with depth. We further show that multiplicative interactions cannot, in general, be replaced by layerwise nonlinearities. Finally, we validate these insights empirically on synthetic and real-world tasks.
Comment: Formal result that depth increases RNN memory capacity efficiently per parameter, and that multiplicative interactions in 2RNNs cannot be replaced by layerwise nonlinearities.
Topic Match: Mechanistic expressivity analysis of recurrent sequence modelling, exactly the analysed-architecture case.
Relevance: 7 Novelty: 6
6. Ouroboros: Dynamic Weight Generation for Recursive Transformers via Input-Conditioned LoRA Modulation
ArXiv ID: 2604.02051
Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics
Also Matches: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training
Authors: Jaber Jaber, Osama Jaber
Abstract: Recursive transformers reuse a shared weight block across multiple depth steps, trading parameters for compute. A core limitation: every step applies the same transformation, preventing the model from composing distinct operations across depth. We present Ouroboros, a system that attaches a compact Controller hypernetwork to a recursive transformer block. The Controller observes the current hidden state, produces a per-step diagonal modulation vector, and applies it to frozen SVD-initialized LoRA bases, making each recurrence step input-dependent. We combine this with gated recurrence (bias-initialized to 88% retention) and per-step LayerNorm for stable deep iteration. On Qwen2.5-3B split into a Prelude/Recurrent/Coda architecture (17 of 36 layers retained), Ouroboros reduces training loss by 43.4% over the unmodified 17-layer baseline, recovering 51.3% of the performance gap caused by layer removal. The full system adds only 9.2M trainable parameters (Controller, gate, and per-step norms) yet outperforms equivalently-sized static per-step LoRA by 1.44 loss points at depth 1 and remains ahead across all tested depths (1, 4, 8, 16) and ranks (8, 32, 64). We also find that gated recurrence is essential: without it, recursive layer application makes the model strictly worse. These gains are measured on the training distribution; on held-out text, the Controller does not yet improve over the baseline, a limitation we attribute to frozen downstream layers and discuss in detail. Code: https://github.com/RightNow-AI/ouroboros
Comment: Makes each step of a weight-shared recursive transformer input-dependent through a controller hypernetwork that modulates frozen SVD-initialized LoRA bases, plus gated recurrence that the ablation shows is required for depth reuse to help at all.
Topic Match: Dynamic computation over shared depth: a parameter-for-compute mechanism, though gains so far are on the training distribution only.
Relevance: 7 Novelty: 6
Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (2)
1. AA-SVD : Anchored and Adaptive SVD for Large Language Model Compression
ArXiv ID: 2604.02119
Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training
Authors: Atul Kumar Sinha, François Fleuret
Abstract: We introduce a fast low-rank factorization-based framework for compressing large language models that enables rapid compression of billion-parameter models without retraining. Unlike existing factorization-based approaches that optimize only on the original inputs, ignoring distribution shifts from upstream compression and thus propagating errors forward, or those that rely only on shifted inputs and risk drifting away from the original outputs, our approach accounts for both. Beyond individual layer compression, we further refine each transformer block end-to-end, minimizing block-level output distortion and allowing compressed layers to jointly compensate for accumulated errors. By anchoring each compressed layer to the original outputs while explicitly modeling input distribution shifts, our method finds a low-rank approximation that maintains functional equivalence with the original model. Experiments on large language models show that our method consistently outperforms existing SVD-based baselines across compression ratios, with the advantage becoming increasingly pronounced at aggressive compression budgets, where competing methods degrade substantially or collapse entirely, offering a practical solution for efficient, large-scale model deployment.
Comment: Low-rank factorization that anchors each compressed layer to original outputs while modeling upstream-induced input distribution shift, with block-level end-to-end refinement.
Topic Match: Retraining-free low-rank compression of billion-parameter models is core compression work.
Relevance: 7 Novelty: 6
2. MiCA Learns More Knowledge Than LoRA and Full Fine-Tuning
ArXiv ID: 2604.01694
Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training
Authors: Sten Rüdiger, Sebastian Raschka
Abstract: Minor Component Adaptation (MiCA) is a novel parameter-efficient fine-tuning method for large language models that focuses on adapting underutilized subspaces of model representations. Unlike conventional methods such as Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA), which target dominant subspaces, MiCA leverages Singular Value Decomposition to identify subspaces related to minor singular vectors associated with the least significant singular values and constrains the update of parameters during fine-tuning to those directions. This strategy leads to up to 5.9x improvement in knowledge acquisition under optimized training hyperparameters and a minimal parameter footprint of 6-60% compared to LoRA. These results suggest that constraining adaptation to minor singular directions provides a more efficient and stable mechanism for integrating new knowledge into pre-trained language models.
Comment: Constrains adaptation to minor singular directions instead of dominant subspaces, claiming much better knowledge acquisition than LoRA at a smaller parameter footprint.
Topic Match: Low-rank adaptation with a genuinely inverted subspace choice, which is a new mechanism rather than a tuned LoRA variant.
Relevance: 7 Novelty: 6
Paper Selection Prompt
System Prompt
You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.
User Prompt
Instructions
Respond in JSONL. Output exactly one JSON object per paper, one per line:
{"ARXIVID":"...","COMMENT":"...","RELEVANCE":0,"NOVELTY":0,"PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID":"...","MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS":[],"TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT":"...","HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS":[],"HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT":"..."}
Rules: - ARXIVID: the arXiv ID. - COMMENT: identify the single strongest matching criterion. Be brief and specific. Do not rely on generic phrases like "language modeling" or "advancement". Do not mention non-matching criteria. - RELEVANCE: integer from 1 to 10. - NOVELTY: integer from 1 to 10. - PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID: exactly one stable topic ID from the allowed topic registry. - MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS: zero or more stable topic IDs from the same allowed set. Include PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID when there are multiple matches. - TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT: briefly explain why the primary topic is the best fit. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS: zero or more tags from this exact set only:
daily_hot,new_frontier. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT: briefly explain why the paper belongs in the daily hotspot paper feed when HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS is non-empty; otherwise use an empty string. - Use HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS sparingly. Most papers should return[]. -daily_hotmeans the paper feels broadly important to the day and belongs in the daily hotspot paper section even if it is not part of the personalized foundational reading list. -new_frontiermeans the paper appears to open a genuinely new direction, paradigm, or field, even if the work is still early. - Do not output markdown, code fences, or any extra text.Scoring Criteria
Relevance and Novelty are independent axes. Score both from 1 to 10.
Relevance Scoring
- 9-10: directly centered on the target foundational topics; highest when the core contribution is clearly within them.
- 7-8: substantially related, but partly peripheral or focused on a narrower aspect.
- 5-6: touches the target topics, but the main contribution is elsewhere.
- 3-4: largely outside the target topics, often application-focused or domain-specific.
- 1-2: unrelated.
Important: Broad frontier relevance, major launch status, or daily buzz is not enough for a high Relevance score here. Those cases belong in the hotspot digest unless the paper strongly matches the specialized paper topics.
Novelty Scoring
- 9-10: new paradigm, theory, or major methodological breakthrough.
- 7-8: substantial methodological advance or strong new insight.
- 5-6: meaningful but incremental extension or refinement.
- 3-4: minor, narrow, or mostly engineering or domain-specific improvement.
- 1-2: little originality; mainly standard application of existing methods.
Topic Registry
Use exactly one PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID chosen from the stable topic IDs below. - moe_training: MoE Training - Mixture-of-Experts training: routing, load balancing, expert granularity and shared experts, training stability, MoE parallelism and communication, and MoE kernels. - training_systems: Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency - Large-scale training systems and efficiency: distributed training algorithms, optimizers, and communication. - architecture_training: Architecture and Training Dynamics - Core architectural or computational mechanisms, dynamic computation, and training-stability dynamics. - efficiency_scaling: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training - Compression, sparsity, memory or cache efficiency, and large-scale training systems that materially change cost or behavior.
Papers
[PAPER LIST HERE]
Relevant Topics
This is a training-side feed. The centre of gravity is Mixture-of-Experts training and the large-scale training systems it sits on; architecture and efficiency work is kept when it bears on how a large model is trained or what it costs to train.
Keep a paper when its CORE CONTRIBUTION falls in one of the four topics below. Filter it when the topic is merely the setting for a downstream application, a benchmark, or a product result.
MoE Training (primary) - Keep: expert routing and gating mechanisms; load balancing, with or without auxiliary losses; expert granularity, fine-grained and shared experts; MoE training stability (loss spikes, router collapse, z-loss and related fixes); expert and hybrid parallelism; all-to-all dispatch/combine and the communication schedules MoE needs; MoE kernels and grouped-GEMM style implementations; expert capacity, token dropping, and upcycling dense checkpoints into MoE. - Filter: papers that merely train on top of a MoE model without a new routing, balancing, stability, parallelism, or kernel contribution; "mixture of experts" in the classical ensemble or recommender sense.
Large-Scale Training Systems - Keep: distributed training algorithms (data, tensor, pipeline, sequence, and expert parallelism, FSDP and ZeRO-style sharding); optimizers and preconditioners for large-scale pretraining; communication algorithms, overlap, and collective design; throughput and MFU work that materially changes what a training run costs or whether it converges; scaling-law work that informs how such runs are configured. - Filter: routine infrastructure tuning with no new algorithmic or systems idea.
Architecture and Training Dynamics - Keep: new or analysed architectural mechanisms (attention variants, normalization and residual design, state-space and recurrent sequence modelling, dynamic or modular computation); optimisation and training-dynamics analysis that explains why large models train the way they do. - Filter: applying an existing architecture to a new task or benchmark with no mechanistic insight.
Efficiency and Compression - Keep: quantization, sparsity, pruning, low-rank adaptation, KV-cache and memory-efficient designs, and other work that materially changes the cost of running or training a large model, especially when the mechanism is new rather than a tuned variant. - Filter: straightforward application of standard efficiency methods, and deployment or serving engineering with no new idea.
Leave these to the hotspot digest unless the core contribution clearly falls in one of the four topics above: - major model or product releases - agent, tooling, and RAG launches - benchmark, leaderboard, or evaluation-only papers - representation-learning theory, interpretability, and feature-formation analysis - memory mechanisms and agent memory systems - world models, exploration, and reinforcement learning - alignment and post-training (RLHF, DPO, GRPO, RFT, instruction tuning) - downstream applications in medical imaging, segmentation, 3D vision, video understanding, information retrieval, summarization, recommendation, machine translation, speech recognition, time series, knowledge graphs, and similar domains