Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2026-03-26

Topic Coverage:

Table of contents by topic:

Architecture and Training Dynamics (32)

1. Beyond Masks: Efficient, Flexible Diffusion Language Models via Deletion-Insertion Processes Authors: Fangyu Ding, Ding Ding, Sijin Chen, Kaibo Wang, Peng Xu, Zijin Feng, Haoli Bai, Kai Han, Youliang Yan, Binhang Yuan, Jiacheng Sun

2. Perturbation: A simple and efficient adversarial tracer for representation learning in language models Authors: Joshua Rozner, Cory Shain

3. Self-Distillation for Multi-Token Prediction Authors: Guoliang Zhao, Ruobing Xie, An Wang, Shuaipeng Li, Huaibing Xie, Xingwu Sun

4. The Diminishing Returns of Early-Exit Decoding in Modern LLMs Authors: Rui Wei, Rui Du, Hanfei Yu, Devesh Tiwari, Jian Li, Zhaozhuo Xu, Hao Wang

5. The Alignment Tax: Response Homogenization in Aligned LLMs and Its Implications for Uncertainty Estimation Authors: Mingyi Liu

6. Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs? Authors: Jeonghye Kim, Xufang Luo, Minbeom Kim, Sangmook Lee, Dohyung Kim, Jiwon Jeon, Dongsheng Li, Yuqing Yang

7. Inspection and Control of Self-Generated-Text Recognition Ability in Llama3-8b-Instruct Authors: Christopher Ackerman, Nina Panickssery

8. KARMA: Knowledge-Action Regularized Multimodal Alignment for Personalized Search at Taobao Authors: Zhi Sun, Wenming Zhang, Yi Wei, Liren Yu, Zhixuan Zhang, Dan Ou, Haihong Tang

9. StateLinFormer: Stateful Training Enhancing Long-term Memory in Navigation Authors: Zhiyuan Chen, Yuxuan Zhong, Fan Wang, Bo Yu, Pengtao Shao, Shaoshan Liu, Ning Ding

10. Probing Ethical Framework Representations in Large Language Models: Structure, Entanglement, and Methodological Challenges Authors: Weilun Xu, Alexander Rusnak, Frederic Kaplan

11. MSA: Memory Sparse Attention for Efficient End-to-End Memory Model Scaling to 100M Tokens Authors: Yu Chen, Runkai Chen, Sheng Yi, Xinda Zhao, Xiaohong Li, Jianjin Zhang, Jun Sun, Chuanrui Hu, Yunyun Han, Lidong Bing, Yafeng Deng, Tianqiao Chen

12. HDPO: Hybrid Distillation Policy Optimization via Privileged Self-Distillation Authors: Ken Ding

13. Mitigating Object Hallucinations in LVLMs via Attention Imbalance Rectification Authors: Han Sun, Qin Li, Peixin Wang, Min Zhang

14. Why the Maximum Second Derivative of Activations Matters for Adversarial Robustness Authors: Yunrui Yu, Hang Su, Jun Zhu

15. The Geometric Price of Discrete Logic: Context-driven Manifold Dynamics of Number Representations Authors: Long Zhang, Dai-jun Lin, Wei-neng Chen

16. Latent Algorithmic Structure Precedes Grokking: A Mechanistic Study of ReLU MLPs on Modular Arithmetic Authors: Anand Swaroop

17. Deep Neural Regression Collapse Authors: Akshay Rangamani, Altay Unal

18. Cost-Sensitive Neighborhood Aggregation for Heterophilous Graphs: When Does Per-Edge Routing Help? Authors: Eyal Weiss

19. Linear-Nonlinear Fusion Neural Operator for Partial Differential Equations Authors: Heng Wu, Junjie Wang, Benzhuo Lu

20. Evidence for Limited Metacognition in LLMs Authors: Christopher Ackerman

21. Circuit Complexity of Hierarchical Knowledge Tracing and Implications for Log-Precision Transformers Authors: Naiming Liu, Richard Baraniuk, Shashank Sonkar

22. Towards Effective Experiential Learning: Dual Guidance for Utilization and Internalization Authors: Fei Bai, Zhipeng Chen, Chuan Hao, Ming Yang, Ran Tao, Bryan Dai, Wayne Xin Zhao, Jian Yang, Hongteng Xu

23. Resolving gradient pathology in physics-informed epidemiological models Authors: Nickson Golooba, Woldegebriel Assefa Woldegerima

24. Manifold Generalization Provably Proceeds Memorization in Diffusion Models Authors: Zebang Shen, Ya-Ping Hsieh, Niao He

25. Kirchhoff-Inspired Neural Networks for Evolving High-Order Perception Authors: Tongfei Chen, Jingying Yang, Linlin Yang, Jinhu L\"u, David Doermann, Chunyu Xie, Long He, Tian Wang, Juan Zhang, Guodong Guo, Baochang Zhang

26. Stochastic Dimension-Free Zeroth-Order Estimator for High-Dimensional and High-Order PINNs Authors: Zhangyong Liang, Ji Zhang

27. Uniform Laws of Large Numbers in Product Spaces Authors: Ron Holzman, Shay Moran, Alexander Shlimovich

28. Boost Like a (Var)Pro: Trust-Region Gradient Boosting via Variable Projection Authors: Abhijit Chowdhary, Elizabeth Newman, Deepanshu Verma

29. Project and Generate: Divergence-Free Neural Operators for Incompressible Flows Authors: Xigui Li, Hongwei Zhang, Ruoxi Jiang, Deshu Chen, Chensen Lin, Limei Han, Yuan Qi, Xin Guo, Yuan Cheng

30. Minimal Sufficient Representations for Self-interpretable Deep Neural Networks Authors: Zhiyao Tan, Liu Li, Huazhen Lin

31. CGRL: Causal-Guided Representation Learning for Graph Out-of-Distribution Generalization Authors: Bowen Lu, Liangqiang Yang, Teng Li

32. PDGMM-VAE: A Variational Autoencoder with Adaptive Per-Dimension Gaussian Mixture Model Priors for Nonlinear ICA Authors: Yuan-Hao Wei, Yan-Jie Sun

Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible (2)

1. DVM: Real-Time Kernel Generation for Dynamic AI Models Authors: Jingzhi Fang, Xiong Gao, Renwei Zhang, Zichun Ye, Lei Chen, Jie Zhao, Chengnuo Huang, Hui Xu, Xuefeng Jin

2. A Theory of LLM Information Susceptibility Authors: Zhuo-Yang Song, Hua Xing Zhu

MoE Where It Changes the Design Space (1)

1. MoE-Sieve: Routing-Guided LoRA for Efficient MoE Fine-Tuning Authors: Andrea Manzoni

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (6)

1. Diet Your LLM: Dimension-wise Global Pruning of LLMs via Merging Task-specific Importance Score Authors: Jimyung Hong, Jaehyung Kim

2. Attention-aware Inference Optimizations for Large Vision-Language Models with Memory-efficient Decoding Authors: Fatih Ilhan, Gaowen Liu, Ramana Rao Kompella, Selim Furkan Tekin, Tiansheng Huang, Zachary Yahn, Yichang Xu, Ling Liu

3. TuneShift-KD: Knowledge Distillation and Transfer for Fine-tuned Models Authors: Yushi Guan, Jeanine Ohene-Agyei, Daniel Kwan, Jean Sebastien Dandurand, Yifei Zhang, Nandita Vijaykumar

4. Polynomial Speedup in Diffusion Models with the Multilevel Euler-Maruyama Method Authors: Arthur Jacot

5. Accelerating Diffusion-based Video Editing via Heterogeneous Caching: Beyond Full Computing at Sampled Denoising Timestep Authors: Tianyi Liu, Ye Lu, Linfeng Zhang, Chen Cai, Jianjun Gao, Yi Wang, Kim-Hui Yap, Lap-Pui Chau

6. Identification of NMF by choosing maximum-volume basis vectors Authors: Qianqian Qi, Zhongming Chen, Peter G. M. van der Heijden

Architecture and Training Dynamics (32)

1. Beyond Masks: Efficient, Flexible Diffusion Language Models via Deletion-Insertion Processes

ArXiv ID: 2603.23507

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Fangyu Ding, Ding Ding, Sijin Chen, Kaibo Wang, Peng Xu, Zijin Feng, Haoli Bai, Kai Han, Youliang Yan, Binhang Yuan, Jiacheng Sun

Abstract: While Masked Diffusion Language Models (MDLMs) relying on token masking and unmasking have shown promise in language modeling, their computational efficiency and generation flexibility remain constrained by the masking paradigm. In this paper, we propose Deletion-Insertion Diffusion language models (DID) that rigorously formulate token deletion and insertion as discrete diffusion processes, replacing the masking and unmasking processes in current MDLMs. DID improves training and inference efficiency by eliminating two major sources of computational overhead in MDLMs: the computations on non-informative 1) tokens inherent to the paradigm, and 2) tokens introduced in variable-length settings. Furthermore, DID offers greater flexibility by: 1) natively supporting variable-length sequences without requiring fixed-length padding, and 2) an intrinsic self-correction mechanism during generation due to insertion that dynamically adjusts token positions. To train DID, we design a score-based approach that assigns scores to token insertion operations and derive appropriate training objectives. The objectives involve subsequence counting problems, which we efficiently solve via a parallelized dynamic programming algorithm. Our experiments across fixed and variable-length settings demonstrate the advantage of DID over baselines of MDLMs and existing insertion-based LMs, in terms of modeling performance, sampling quality, and training/inference speed, without any hyperparameter tuning.

Comment: Replaces masked diffusion with deletion-insertion processes, removing mask and padding computation while supporting native variable-length generation.

Topic Match: The core contribution replaces the language model's diffusion process and derives the corresponding training objective; experimental scales remain unspecified.

Relevance: 10 Novelty: 9

2. Perturbation: A simple and efficient adversarial tracer for representation learning in language models

ArXiv ID: 2603.23821

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Joshua Rozner, Cory Shain

Abstract: Linguistic representation learning in deep neural language models (LMs) has been studied for decades, for both practical and theoretical reasons. However, finding representations in LMs remains an unsolved problem, in part due to a dilemma between enforcing implausible constraints on representations (e.g., linearity; Arora et al. 2024) and trivializing the notion of representation altogether (Sutter et al., 2025). Here we escape this dilemma by reconceptualizing representations not as patterns of activation but as conduits for learning. Our approach is simple: we perturb an LM by fine-tuning it on a single adversarial example and measure how this perturbation ``infects'' other examples. Perturbation makes no geometric assumptions, and unlike other methods, it does not find representations where it should not (e.g., in untrained LMs). But in trained LMs, perturbation reveals structured transfer at multiple linguistic grain sizes, suggesting that LMs both generalize along representational lines and acquire linguistic abstractions from experience alone.

Comment: Single-example training perturbations expose structured learning transfer, with untrained models providing a negative control.

Topic Match: The contribution tests how learned linguistic structure channels subsequent updates and generalization, making training dynamics the best fit.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 8

3. Self-Distillation for Multi-Token Prediction

ArXiv ID: 2603.23911

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Guoliang Zhao, Ruobing Xie, An Wang, Shuaipeng Li, Huaibing Xie, Xingwu Sun

Abstract: As Large Language Models (LLMs) scale up, inference efficiency becomes a critical bottleneck. Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) could accelerate LLM inference by predicting multiple future tokens in parallel. However, existing MTP approaches still face two challenges: limited acceptance rates of MTP heads, and difficulties in jointly training multiple MTP heads. Therefore, we propose MTP-D, a simple yet effective self-distillation method with minimal additional training cost, which boosts MTP head acceptance rates (+7.5\%) while maximumly preserving main-head performance. We also introduce a looped extension strategy for MTP-D, enabling effective and economical MTP head extension and further significant inference speedup to 1-head MTP (+220.4\%). Moreover, we systematically explore and validate key insights on the distillation strategies and the potential scalability of MTP through extensive experiments on seven benchmarks. These results demonstrate that our MTP-D and looped extension strategy effectively enhance MTP-head performance and inference efficiency, facilitating the practical usage of MTP in LLMs.

Comment: Uses self-distillation to jointly train multi-token prediction heads while preserving main-head performance.

Topic Match: Joint prediction-head training is a concrete internal training contribution, although the mechanism is an incremental distillation extension.

Relevance: 7 Novelty: 5

4. The Diminishing Returns of Early-Exit Decoding in Modern LLMs

ArXiv ID: 2603.23701

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Rui Wei, Rui Du, Hanfei Yu, Devesh Tiwari, Jian Li, Zhaozhuo Xu, Hao Wang

Abstract: In Large Language Model (LLM) inference, early-exit refers to stopping computation at an intermediate layer once the prediction is sufficiently confident, thereby reducing latency and cost. However, recent LLMs adopt improved pretraining recipes and architectures that reduce layer redundancy, potentially limiting early-exit opportunities. We re-evaluate layer-wise early-exit in modern LLMs and analyze how intermediate representations evolve during training. We introduce a metric to quantify a model's intrinsic suitability for early-exit and propose a benchmark for researchers to explore the potential early-exit benefits on different models and workloads. Our results show a diminishing trend in early-exit effectiveness across newer model generations. We further find that dense transformers generally offer greater early-exit potential than Mixture-of-Experts and State Space Models. In addition, larger models, particularly those with more than 20 billion parameters, and base pretrained models without specialized tuning tend to exhibit higher early-exit potential.

Comment: Measures how layerwise representations and early-exit potential vary across training and model generations.

Topic Match: Layer redundancy connects to architecture, but the central contribution evaluates inference suitability and introduces a benchmark.

Relevance: 6 Novelty: 6

5. The Alignment Tax: Response Homogenization in Aligned LLMs and Its Implications for Uncertainty Estimation

ArXiv ID: 2603.24124

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Mingyi Liu

Abstract: RLHF-aligned language models exhibit response homogenization: on TruthfulQA (n=790), 40-79% of questions produce a single semantic cluster across 10 i.i.d. samples. On affected questions, sampling-based uncertainty methods have zero discriminative power (AUROC=0.500), while free token entropy retains signal (0.603). This alignment tax is task-dependent: on GSM8K (n=500), token entropy achieves 0.724 (Cohen's d=0.81). A base-vs-instruct ablation confirms the causal role of alignment: the base model shows 1.0% single-cluster rate vs. 28.5% for the instruct model (p SFT 1.5% -> DPO 4.0% SCR) localizes the cause to DPO, not SFT. Cross-family replication on four model families reveals alignment tax severity varies by family and scale. We validate across 22 experiments, 5 benchmarks, 4 model families, and 3 model scales (3B-14B), with Jaccard, embedding, and NLI-based baselines at three DeBERTa scales (all ~0.51 AUROC). Cross-embedder validation with two independent embedding families rules out coupling bias. Cross-dataset validation on WebQuestions (58.0% SCR) confirms generalization beyond TruthfulQA. The central finding -- response homogenization -- is implementation-independent and label-free. Motivated by this diagnosis, we explore a cheapest-first cascade (UCBD) over orthogonal uncertainty signals. Selective prediction raises GSM8K accuracy from 84.4% to 93.2% at 50% coverage; weakly dependent boundaries (|r| <= 0.12) enable 57% cost savings.

Comment: Controlled comparisons link DPO to response homogenization that defeats sampling-based uncertainty scores.

Topic Match: Training-effects analysis is the nearest category, but the collapse concerns post-training output diversity rather than architectural instability or benchmark validity.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 7

6. Why Does Self-Distillation (Sometimes) Degrade the Reasoning Capability of LLMs?

ArXiv ID: 2603.24472

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Jeonghye Kim, Xufang Luo, Minbeom Kim, Sangmook Lee, Dohyung Kim, Jiwon Jeon, Dongsheng Li, Yuqing Yang

Abstract: Self-distillation has emerged as an effective post-training paradigm for LLMs, often improving performance while shortening reasoning traces. However, in mathematical reasoning, we find that it can reduce response length while degrading performance. We trace this degradation to the suppression of epistemic verbalization - the model's expression of uncertainty during reasoning. Through controlled experiments varying conditioning context richness and task coverage, we show that conditioning the teacher on rich information suppresses uncertainty expression, enabling rapid in-domain optimization with limited task coverage but harming OOD performance, where unseen problems benefit from expressing uncertainty and adjusting accordingly. Across Qwen3-8B, DeepSeek-Distill-Qwen-7B, and Olmo3-7B-Instruct, we observe performance drops of up to 40%. Our findings highlight that exposing appropriate levels of uncertainty is crucial for robust reasoning and underscore the importance of optimizing reasoning behavior beyond merely reinforcing correct answer traces.

Comment: Links self-distillation degradation to suppressed uncertainty expression through controlled teacher-context experiments.

Topic Match: Training dynamics is the nearest category; the subject is post-training reasoning behavior and generalization.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 6

7. Inspection and Control of Self-Generated-Text Recognition Ability in Llama3-8b-Instruct

ArXiv ID: 2410.02064

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Christopher Ackerman, Nina Panickssery

Abstract: It has been reported that LLMs can recognize their own writing. As this has potential implications for AI safety, yet is relatively understudied, we investigate the phenomenon, seeking to establish whether it robustly occurs at the behavioral level, how the observed behavior is achieved, and whether it can be controlled. First, we find that the Llama3-8b-Instruct chat model - but not the base Llama3-8b model - can reliably distinguish its own outputs from those of humans, and present evidence that the chat model is likely using its experience with its own outputs, acquired during post-training, to succeed at the writing recognition task. Second, we identify a vector in the residual stream of the model that is differentially activated when the model makes a correct self-written-text recognition judgment, show that the vector activates in response to information relevant to self-authorship, present evidence that the vector is related to the concept of "self" in the model, and demonstrate that the vector is causally related to the model's ability to perceive and assert self-authorship. Finally, we show that the vector can be used to control both the model's behavior and its perception, steering the model to claim or disclaim authorship by applying the vector to the model's output as it generates it, and steering the model to believe or disbelieve it wrote arbitrary texts by applying the vector to them as the model reads them.

Comment: A base-versus-instruct comparison links self-authorship recognition to post-training experience.

Topic Match: Learned computation is the nearest connection, but the study centers on identifying and steering a self-recognition feature.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 6

8. KARMA: Knowledge-Action Regularized Multimodal Alignment for Personalized Search at Taobao

ArXiv ID: 2603.22779

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Zhi Sun, Wenming Zhang, Yi Wei, Liren Yu, Zhixuan Zhang, Dan Ou, Haihong Tang

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are equipped with profound semantic knowledge, making them a natural choice for injecting semantic generalization into personalized search systems. However, in practice we find that directly fine-tuning LLMs on industrial personalized tasks (e.g. next item prediction) often yields suboptimal results. We attribute this bottleneck to a critical Knowledge--Action Gap: the inherent conflict between preserving pre-trained semantic knowledge and aligning with specific personalized actions by discriminative objectives. Empirically, action-only training objectives induce Semantic Collapse, such as attention ``sinks''. This degradation severely cripples the LLM's generalization, failing to bring improvements to personalized search systems. We propose KARMA (Knowledge--Action Regularized Multimodal Alignment), a unified framework that treats semantic reconstruction as a train-only regularizer. KARMA optimizes a next-interest embedding for retrieval (Action) while enforcing semantic decodability (Knowledge) through two complementary objectives: (i) history-conditioned semantic generation, which anchors optimization to the LLM's native next-token distribution, and (ii) embedding-conditioned semantic reconstruction, which constrains the interest embedding to remain semantically recoverable. On Taobao search system, KARMA mitigates semantic collapse (attention-sink analysis) and improves both action metrics and semantic fidelity. In ablations, semantic decodability yields up to +22.5 HR@200. With KARMA, we achieve +0.25 CTR AUC in ranking, +1.86 HR in pre-ranking and +2.51 HR in recalling. Deployed online with low inference overhead at ranking stage, KARMA drives +0.5% increase in Item Click.

Comment: Semantic reconstruction regularizes discriminative fine-tuning and reduces the accompanying attention-sink behavior.

Topic Match: Its training objectives address semantic collapse, but the core contribution is a personalized-search system and its retrieval results.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 5

9. StateLinFormer: Stateful Training Enhancing Long-term Memory in Navigation

ArXiv ID: 2603.23571

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Zhiyuan Chen, Yuxuan Zhong, Fan Wang, Bo Yu, Pengtao Shao, Shaoshan Liu, Ning Ding

Abstract: Effective navigation intelligence relies on long-term memory to support both immediate generalization and sustained adaptation. However, existing approaches face a dilemma: modular systems rely on explicit mapping but lack flexibility, while Transformer-based end-to-end models are constrained by fixed context windows, limiting persistent memory across extended interactions. We introduce StateLinFormer, a linear-attention navigation model trained with a stateful memory mechanism that preserves recurrent memory states across consecutive training segments instead of reinitializing them at each batch boundary. This training paradigm effectively approximates learning on infinitely long sequences, enabling the model to achieve long-horizon memory retention. Experiments across both MAZE and ProcTHOR environments demonstrate that StateLinFormer significantly outperforms its stateless linear-attention counterpart and standard Transformer baselines with fixed context windows. Notably, as interaction length increases, persistent stateful training substantially improves context-dependent adaptation, suggesting an enhancement in the model's In-Context Learning (ICL) capabilities for navigation tasks.

Comment: Recurrent state persists across training segments instead of resetting at batch boundaries.

Topic Match: The training-state decision is architectural, but the contribution and validation concern navigation memory.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 5

10. Probing Ethical Framework Representations in Large Language Models: Structure, Entanglement, and Methodological Challenges

ArXiv ID: 2603.23659

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Weilun Xu, Alexander Rusnak, Frederic Kaplan

Abstract: When large language models make ethical judgments, do their internal representations distinguish between normative frameworks, or collapse ethics into a single acceptability dimension? We probe hidden representations across five ethical frameworks (deontology, utilitarianism, virtue, justice, commonsense) in six LLMs spanning 4B--72B parameters. Our analysis reveals differentiated ethical subspaces with asymmetric transfer patterns -- e.g., deontology probes partially generalize to virtue scenarios while commonsense probes fail catastrophically on justice. Disagreement between deontological and utilitarian probes correlates with higher behavioral entropy across architectures, though this relationship may partly reflect shared sensitivity to scenario difficulty. Post-hoc validation reveals that probes partially depend on surface features of benchmark templates, motivating cautious interpretation. We discuss both the structural insights these methods provide and their epistemological limitations.

Comment: Cross-framework probe transfer and template-confound checks test whether ethical representations are meaningfully differentiated.

Topic Match: Representation analysis is the nearest category; the paper characterizes ethical features without identifying the computation producing them.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 5

11. MSA: Memory Sparse Attention for Efficient End-to-End Memory Model Scaling to 100M Tokens

ArXiv ID: 2603.23516

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Yu Chen, Runkai Chen, Sheng Yi, Xinda Zhao, Xiaohong Li, Jianjin Zhang, Jun Sun, Chuanrui Hu, Yunyun Han, Lidong Bing, Yafeng Deng, Tianqiao Chen

Abstract: Long-term memory is a cornerstone of human intelligence. Enabling AI to process lifetime-scale information remains a long-standing pursuit in the field. Due to the constraints of full-attention architectures, the effective context length of large language models (LLMs) is typically limited to 1M tokens. Existing approaches, such as hybrid linear attention, fixed-size memory states (e.g., RNNs), and external storage methods like RAG or agent systems, attempt to extend this limit. However, they often suffer from severe precision degradation and rapidly increasing latency as context length grows, an inability to dynamically modify memory content, or a lack of end-to-end optimization. These bottlenecks impede complex scenarios like large-corpus summarization, Digital Twins, and long-history agent reasoning, while limiting memory capacity and slowing inference. We present Memory Sparse Attention (MSA), an end-to-end trainable, efficient, and massively scalable memory model framework. Through core innovations including scalable sparse attention and document-wise RoPE, MSA achieves linear complexity in both training and inference while maintaining exceptional stability, exhibiting less than 9% degradation when scaling from 16K to 100M tokens. Furthermore, KV cache compression, combined with Memory Parallel, enables 100M-token inference on 2xA800 GPUs. We also propose Memory Interleaving to facilitate complex multi-hop reasoning across scattered memory segments. MSA significantly surpasses frontier LLMs, state-of-the-art RAG systems, and leading memory agents in long-context benchmarks. These results demonstrate that by decoupling memory capacity from reasoning, MSA provides a scalable foundation to endow general-purpose models with intrinsic, lifetime-scale memory.

Comment: Sparse attention and document-wise positional encoding enable end-to-end training over a 100M-token memory.

Topic Match: Attention design is the nearest category, but long-context extension and lifetime memory capacity are the core subjects.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 7

12. HDPO: Hybrid Distillation Policy Optimization via Privileged Self-Distillation

ArXiv ID: 2603.23871

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Ken Ding

Abstract: Large language models trained with reinforcement learning (RL) for mathematical reasoning face a fundamental challenge: on problems the model cannot solve at all - "cliff" prompts - the RL gradient vanishes entirely, preventing any learning signal from reaching these failure modes. We introduce Hybrid Distillation Policy Optimization (HDPO), which augments standard RL with privileged self-distillation targeting cliff prompts. On each training step, HDPO identifies prompts where all rollouts fail, generates privileged rollouts by providing the model with ground-truth information, filters for correct solutions, and distills the teacher's token-level distribution into the student. Because teacher and student share the same weights - differing only in their input - the realizability gap is provably bounded, unlike cross-model distillation. We prove that R=1 filtered privileged generation recovers the optimal KL-regularized RL policy in the hard-threshold limit. Experiments on OpenMathInstruct-2 with Qwen2.5-Math-1.5B-Instruct show that HDPO consistently improves coverage metrics (pass@4 by +0.8-1.1%, pass@8 by +0.4-1.7%) while maintaining greedy accuracy, with the distillation weight lambda providing direct control over the exploration-exploitation tradeoff.

Comment: Privileged self-distillation supplies token-level updates when every reinforcement-learning rollout fails.

Topic Match: The optimization signal is the closest training connection, but the contribution is mathematical-reasoning post-training rather than architectural stability.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 6

13. Mitigating Object Hallucinations in LVLMs via Attention Imbalance Rectification

ArXiv ID: 2603.24058

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Han Sun, Qin Li, Peixin Wang, Min Zhang

Abstract: Object hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) severely compromises their reliability in real-world applications, posing a critical barrier to their deployment in high-stakes scenarios such as autonomous driving and medical image analysis. Through systematic empirical investigation, we identify that the imbalanced attention allocation, both across modalities (i.e., vision and language) and within modalities (among individual tokens), exhibits a strong causal correlation with the occurrence of object hallucination. Leveraging this insight, we introduce a novel concept termed attention imbalance, which not only quantifies the degree of attention disparity but also visually delineates the underlying patterns (e.g., over-attentiveness to irrelevant language tokens or under-attentiveness to discriminative visual features) that drive object hallucination. To mitigate object hallucination, we further propose Attention Imbalance Rectification (AIR), a lightweight decoding-time intervention method that reallocates attention weights and adjusts attention distributions to rectify modality-wise and token-wise imbalances. Extensive evaluations on four mainstream LVLMs and three benchmarks (CHAIR, POPE, and MM-Vet) with seven baselines demonstrate that AIR consistently reduces object hallucination rates, achieving up to a 35.1% reduction compared to the baselines, while improving up to 15.9% of LVLMs' general capability across diverse vision-language tasks.

Comment: Reallocates attention across modalities and tokens to reduce object hallucinations during decoding.

Topic Match: Attention manipulation supplies the architectural connection; the core subject is hallucination mitigation at inference.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 5

14. Why the Maximum Second Derivative of Activations Matters for Adversarial Robustness

ArXiv ID: 2603.23860

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Yunrui Yu, Hang Su, Jun Zhu

Abstract: This work investigates the critical role of activation function curvature -- quantified by the maximum second derivative $\max|\sigma''|$ -- in adversarial robustness. Using the Recursive Curvature-Tunable Activation Family (RCT-AF), which enables precise control over curvature through parameters $\alpha$ and $\beta$, we systematically analyze this relationship. Our study reveals a fundamental trade-off: insufficient curvature limits model expressivity, while excessive curvature amplifies the normalized Hessian diagonal norm of the loss, leading to sharper minima that hinder robust generalization. This results in a non-monotonic relationship where optimal adversarial robustness consistently occurs when $\max|\sigma''|$ falls within 4 to 10, a finding that holds across diverse network architectures, datasets, and adversarial training methods. We provide theoretical insights into how activation curvature affects the diagonal elements of the hessian matrix of the loss, and experimentally demonstrate that the normalized Hessian diagonal norm exhibits a U-shaped dependence on $\max|\sigma''|$, with its minimum within the optimal robustness range, thereby validating the proposed mechanism.

Comment: Connects activation curvature to a non-monotonic robustness optimum through loss-Hessian geometry.

Topic Match: Activation design supplies the architectural connection; the core subject is adversarial robustness without an identified LM-training setting.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

15. The Geometric Price of Discrete Logic: Context-driven Manifold Dynamics of Number Representations

ArXiv ID: 2603.23577

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Long Zhang, Dai-jun Lin, Wei-neng Chen

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) generalize smoothly across continuous semantic spaces, yet strict logical reasoning demands the formation of discrete decision boundaries. Prevailing theories relying on linear isometric projections fail to resolve this fundamental tension. In this work, we argue that task context operates as a non-isometric dynamical operator that enforces a necessary "topological distortion." By applying Gram-Schmidt decomposition to residual-stream activations , we reveal a dual-modulation mechanism driving this process: a class-agnostic topological preservation that anchors global structure to prevent semantic collapse, and a specific algebraic divergence that directionally tears apart cross-class concepts to forge logical boundaries. We validate this geometric evolution across a gradient of tasks, from simple mapping to complex primality testing. Crucially, targeted specific vector ablation establishes a strict causal binding between this topology and model function: algebraically erasing the divergence component collapses parity classification accuracy from 100% to chance levels (38.57%). Furthermore, we uncover a three-phase layer-wise geometric dynamic and demonstrate that under social pressure prompts, models fail to generate sufficient divergence. This results in a "manifold entanglement" that geometrically explains sycophancy and hallucination. Ultimately, our findings revise the linear-isometric presumption, demonstrating that the emergence of discrete logic in LLMs is purchased at an irreducible cost of topological deformation.

Comment: Targeted ablation links context-dependent representational divergence to discrete classification decisions.

Topic Match: Computation analysis is the nearest category, but the core subject is reasoning-time number geometry rather than architecture construction or training dynamics.

Relevance: 5 Novelty: 8

16. Latent Algorithmic Structure Precedes Grokking: A Mechanistic Study of ReLU MLPs on Modular Arithmetic

ArXiv ID: 2603.23784

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Anand Swaroop

Abstract: Grokking-the phenomenon where validation accuracy of neural networks on modular addition of two integers rises long after training data has been memorized-has been characterized in previous works as producing sinusoidal input weight distributions in transformers and multi-layer perceptrons (MLPs). We find empirically that ReLU MLPs in our experimental setting instead learn near-binary square wave input weights, where intermediate-valued weights appear exclusively near sign-change boundaries, alongside output weight distributions whose dominant Fourier phases satisfy a phase-sum relation $\phi_{\mathrm{out}} = \phi_a + \phi_b$; this relation holds even when the model is trained on noisy data and fails to grok. We extract the frequency and phase of each neuron's weights via DFT and construct an idealized MLP: Input weights are replaced by perfect binary square waves and output weights by cosines, both parametrized by the frequencies, phases, and amplitudes extracted from the dominant Fourier components of the real model weights. This idealized model achieves 95.5% accuracy when the frequencies and phases are extracted from the weights of a model trained on noisy data that itself achieves only 0.23% accuracy. This suggests that grokking does not discover the correct algorithm, but rather sharpens an algorithm substantially encoded during memorization, progressively binarizing the input weights into cleaner square waves and aligning the output weights, until generalization becomes possible.

Comment: Reconstruction recovers an accurate modular-addition algorithm from weights of a model that fails to generalize.

Topic Match: The mechanism concerns memorization-to-generalization dynamics, but its demonstration is confined to toy arithmetic MLPs rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 9

17. Deep Neural Regression Collapse

ArXiv ID: 2603.23805

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Akshay Rangamani, Altay Unal

Abstract: Neural Collapse is a phenomenon that helps identify sparse and low rank structures in deep classifiers. Recent work has extended the definition of neural collapse to regression problems, albeit only measuring the phenomenon at the last layer. In this paper, we establish that Neural Regression Collapse (NRC) also occurs below the last layer across different types of models. We show that in the collapsed layers of neural regression models, features lie in a subspace that corresponds to the target dimension, the feature covariance aligns with the target covariance, the input subspace of the layer weights aligns with the feature subspace, and the linear prediction error of the features is close to the overall prediction error of the model. In addition to establishing Deep NRC, we also show that models that exhibit Deep NRC learn the intrinsic dimension of low rank targets and explore the necessity of weight decay in inducing Deep NRC. This paper provides a more complete picture of the simple structure learned by deep networks in the context of regression.

Comment: Regression collapse extends through intermediate layers and tracks the target's intrinsic dimension.

Topic Match: Layerwise collapse is training-dynamics analysis, but the subject is regression networks rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 6

18. Cost-Sensitive Neighborhood Aggregation for Heterophilous Graphs: When Does Per-Edge Routing Help?

ArXiv ID: 2603.24291

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Eyal Weiss

Abstract: Recent work distinguishes two heterophily regimes: adversarial, where cross-class edges dilute class signal and harm classification, and informative, where the heterophilous structure itself carries useful signal. We ask: when does per-edge message routing help, and when is a uniform spectral channel sufficient? To operationalize this question we introduce Cost-Sensitive Neighborhood Aggregation (CSNA), a GNN layer that computes pairwise distance in a learned projection and uses it to soft-route each message through concordant and discordant channels with independent transformations. Under a contextual stochastic block model we show that cost-sensitive weighting preserves class-discriminative signal where mean aggregation provably attenuates it, provided $w_+/w_- > q/p$. On six benchmarks with uniform tuning, CSNA is competitive with state-of-the-art methods on adversarial-heterophily datasets (Texas, Wisconsin, Cornell, Actor) but underperforms on informative-heterophily datasets (Chameleon, Squirrel) -- precisely the regime where per-edge routing has no useful decomposition to exploit. The pattern is itself the finding: the cost function's ability to separate edge types serves as a diagnostic for the heterophily regime, revealing when fine-grained routing adds value over uniform channels and when it does not. Code is available at https://github.com/eyal-weiss/CSNA-public .

Comment: Derives a criterion for useful per-edge routing and reports the graph regimes where routing underperforms.

Topic Match: Message-routing design is architectural, but it concerns graph classification rather than language-model or MoE training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

19. Linear-Nonlinear Fusion Neural Operator for Partial Differential Equations

ArXiv ID: 2603.24143

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Heng Wu, Junjie Wang, Benzhuo Lu

Abstract: Neural operator learning directly constructs the mapping relationship from the equation parameter space to the solution space, enabling efficient direct inference in practical applications without the need for repeated solution of partial differential equations (PDEs) - an advantage that is difficult to achieve with traditional numerical methods. In this work, we find that explicitly decoupling linear and nonlinear effects within such operator mappings leads to markedly improved learning efficiency. This yields a novel network structure, namely the Linear-Nonlinear Fusion Neural Operator (LNF-NO), which models operator mappings via the multiplicative fusion of a linear component and a nonlinear component, thus achieving a lightweight and interpretable representation. This linear-nonlinear decoupling enables efficient capture of complex solution features at the operator level while maintaining stability and generality. LNF-NO naturally supports multiple functional inputs and is applicable to both regular grids and irregular geometries. Across a diverse suite of PDE operator-learning benchmarks, including nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann equations and multi-physics coupled systems, LNF-NO is typically substantially faster to train than Deep Operator Networks (DeepONet) and Fourier Neural Operators (FNO), while achieving comparable or better accuracy in most cases. On the tested 3D Poisson-Boltzmann case, LNF-NO attains the best accuracy among the compared models and trains approximately 2.7x faster than a 3D FNO baseline.

Comment: Separates linear and nonlinear operator components and combines them multiplicatively, with explicit accuracy and training-cost comparisons.

Topic Match: The contribution is an architectural factorization for PDE surrogates, placing it outside language-model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

20. Evidence for Limited Metacognition in LLMs

ArXiv ID: 2509.21545

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Christopher Ackerman

Abstract: The possibility of LLM self-awareness and even sentience is gaining increasing public attention and has major safety and policy implications, but the science of measuring them is still in a nascent state. Here we introduce a novel methodology for quantitatively evaluating metacognitive abilities in LLMs. Taking inspiration from research on metacognition in nonhuman animals, our approach eschews model self-reports and instead tests to what degree models can strategically deploy knowledge of internal states. Using two experimental paradigms, we demonstrate that frontier LLMs introduced since early 2024 show increasingly strong evidence of certain metacognitive abilities, specifically the ability to assess and utilize their own confidence in their ability to answer factual and reasoning questions correctly and the ability to anticipate what answers they would give and utilize that information appropriately. We buttress these behavioral findings with an analysis of the token probabilities returned by the models, which suggests the presence of an upstream internal signal that could provide the basis for metacognition. We further find that these abilities 1) are limited in resolution, 2) emerge in context-dependent manners, and 3) seem to be qualitatively different from those of humans. We also report intriguing differences across models of similar capabilities, suggesting that LLM post-training may have a role in developing metacognitive abilities.

Comment: Behavioral experiments test whether LLMs can use their own confidence and anticipate their responses.

Topic Match: Internal-state use is the closest architectural connection, but the contribution is a new behavioral evaluation methodology.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

21. Circuit Complexity of Hierarchical Knowledge Tracing and Implications for Log-Precision Transformers

ArXiv ID: 2603.23823

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Naiming Liu, Richard Baraniuk, Shashank Sonkar

Abstract: Knowledge tracing models mastery over interconnected concepts, often organized by prerequisites. We analyze hierarchical prerequisite propagation through a circuit-complexity lens to clarify what is provable about transformer-style computation on deep concept hierarchies. Using recent results that log-precision transformers lie in logspace-uniform $\mathsf{TC}^0$, we formalize prerequisite-tree tasks including recursive-majority mastery propagation. Unconditionally, recursive-majority propagation lies in $\mathsf{NC}^1$ via $O(\log n)$-depth bounded-fanin circuits, while separating it from uniform $\mathsf{TC}^0$ would require major progress on open lower bounds. Under a monotonicity restriction, we obtain an unconditional barrier: alternating ALL/ANY prerequisite trees yield a strict depth hierarchy for \emph{monotone} threshold circuits. Empirically, transformer encoders trained on recursive-majority trees converge to permutation-invariant shortcuts; explicit structure alone does not prevent this, but auxiliary supervision on intermediate subtrees elicits structure-dependent computation and achieves near-perfect accuracy at depths 3--4. These findings motivate structure-aware objectives and iterative mechanisms for prerequisite-sensitive knowledge tracing on deep hierarchies.

Comment: Separates a provable monotone-circuit depth barrier from unresolved lower bounds for general transformers.

Topic Match: Transformer expressivity is the nearest architectural topic, but the theory and experiments target hierarchical knowledge tracing.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

22. Towards Effective Experiential Learning: Dual Guidance for Utilization and Internalization

ArXiv ID: 2603.24093

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Fei Bai, Zhipeng Chen, Chuan Hao, Ming Yang, Ran Tao, Bryan Dai, Wayne Xin Zhao, Jian Yang, Hongteng Xu

Abstract: Recently, reinforcement learning~(RL) has become an important approach for improving the capabilities of large language models~(LLMs). In particular, reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards~(RLVR) has emerged as a promising paradigm for reasoning tasks. However, existing RL-based training still remains only a rough approximation to human learning. Human learners leverage both external and internal experience to guide exploration and gradually internalize useful trajectories into stable knowledge. Motivated by this gap, we ask: how can LLMs better utilize and internalize experience during RLVR training? To answer this question, we propose \textbf{D}ual \textbf{G}uidance \textbf{O}ptimization~(\textbf{DGO}), a unified framework that leverages \emph{external} and \emph{internal experience} to improve training effectiveness. Specifically, DGO first constructs an experience bank from previously explored trajectories. The policy then performs exploration under the joint guidance of the experience bank and the model's internal knowledge. The resulting trajectories are further used to refine the experience bank and optimize model parameters, forming a closed loop of experience utilization and internalization. Experiments show that DGO consistently outperforms baseline methods, suggesting that better utilization and internalization of experience lead to more effective reasoning.

Comment: Feeds an evolving trajectory bank back into reinforcement-learning exploration and parameter updates.

Topic Match: Training methodology is the nearest category; the contribution concerns experience-guided reasoning post-training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 5

23. Resolving gradient pathology in physics-informed epidemiological models

ArXiv ID: 2603.23799

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Nickson Golooba, Woldegebriel Assefa Woldegerima

Abstract: Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are increasingly used in mathematical epidemiology to bridge the gap between noisy clinical data and compartmental models, such as the susceptible-exposed-infected-removed (SEIR) model. However, training these hybrid networks is often unstable due to competing optimization objectives. As established in recent literature on ``gradient pathology," the gradient vectors derived from the data loss and the physical residual often point in conflicting directions, leading to slow convergence or optimization deadlock. While existing methods attempt to resolve this by balancing gradient magnitudes or projecting conflicting vectors, we propose a novel method, conflict-gated gradient scaling (CGGS), to address gradient conflicts in physics-informed neural networks for epidemiological modelling, ensuring stable and efficient training and a computationally efficient alternative. This method utilizes the cosine similarity between the data and physics gradients to dynamically modulate the penalty weight. Unlike standard annealing schemes that only normalize scales, CGGS acts as a geometric gate: it suppresses the physical constraint when directional conflict is high, allowing the optimizer to prioritize data fidelity, and restores the constraint when gradients align. We prove that this gating mechanism preserves the standard $O(1/T)$ convergence rate for smooth non-convex objectives, a guarantee that fails under fixed-weight or magnitude-balanced training when gradients conflict. We demonstrate that this mechanism autonomously induces a curriculum learning effect, improving parameter estimation in stiff epidemiological systems compared to magnitude-based baselines. Our empirical results show improved peak recovery and convergence over magnitude-based methods.

Comment: Uses gradient-direction conflict to gate the physics-loss weight and induce a training curriculum.

Topic Match: Loss balancing connects to optimization dynamics; the models being trained are epidemiological PINNs.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 5

24. Manifold Generalization Provably Proceeds Memorization in Diffusion Models

ArXiv ID: 2603.23792

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Zebang Shen, Ya-Ping Hsieh, Niao He

Abstract: Diffusion models often generate novel samples even when the learned score is only \emph{coarse} -- a phenomenon not accounted for by the standard view of diffusion training as density estimation. In this paper, we show that, under the \emph{manifold hypothesis}, this behavior can instead be explained by coarse scores capturing the \emph{geometry} of the data while discarding the fine-scale distributional structure of the population measure~$\mu_{\scriptscriptstyle\mathrm{data}}$. Concretely, whereas estimating the full data distribution $\mu_{\scriptscriptstyle\mathrm{data}}$ supported on a $k$-dimensional manifold is known to require the classical minimax rate $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(N^{-1/k})$, we prove that diffusion models trained with coarse scores can exploit the \emph{regularity of the manifold support} and attain a near-parametric rate toward a \emph{different} target distribution. This target distribution has density uniformly comparable to that of~$\mu_{\scriptscriptstyle\mathrm{data}}$ throughout any $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\bigl(N^{-\beta/(4k)}\bigr)$-neighborhood of the manifold, where $\beta$ denotes the manifold regularity. Our guarantees therefore depend only on the smoothness of the underlying support, and are especially favorable when the data density itself is irregular, for instance non-differentiable. In particular, when the manifold is sufficiently smooth, we obtain that \emph{generalization} -- formalized as the ability to generate novel, high-fidelity samples -- occurs at a statistical rate strictly faster than that required to estimate the full population distribution~$\mu_{\scriptscriptstyle\mathrm{data}}$.

Comment: Separates learning manifold geometry from estimating the full data distribution, deriving distinct statistical rates.

Topic Match: Generalization dynamics are the nearest category, but the theory concerns continuous score-based diffusion rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 8

25. Kirchhoff-Inspired Neural Networks for Evolving High-Order Perception

ArXiv ID: 2603.23977

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Tongfei Chen, Jingying Yang, Linlin Yang, Jinhu L\"u, David Doermann, Chunyu Xie, Long He, Tian Wang, Juan Zhang, Guodong Guo, Baochang Zhang

Abstract: Deep learning architectures are fundamentally inspired by neuroscience, particularly the structure of the brain's sensory pathways, and have achieved remarkable success in learning informative data representations. Although these architectures mimic the communication mechanisms of biological neurons, their strategies for information encoding and transmission are fundamentally distinct. Biological systems depend on dynamic fluctuations in membrane potential; by contrast, conventional deep networks optimize weights and biases by adjusting the strengths of inter-neural connections, lacking a systematic mechanism to jointly characterize the interplay among signal intensity, coupling structure, and state evolution. To tackle this limitation, we propose the Kirchhoff-Inspired Neural Network (KINN), a state-variable-based network architecture constructed based on Kirchhoff's current law. KINN derives numerically stable state updates from fundamental ordinary differential equations, enabling the explicit decoupling and encoding of higher-order evolutionary components within a single layer while preserving physical consistency, interpretability, and end-to-end trainability. Extensive experiments on partial differential equation (PDE) solving and ImageNet image classification validate that KINN outperforms state-of-the-art existing methods.

Comment: Kirchhoff-derived state updates encode higher-order dynamics within a single neural layer.

Topic Match: The paper proposes a neural-layer architecture, validated on PDE solving and image classification rather than language-model training.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

26. Stochastic Dimension-Free Zeroth-Order Estimator for High-Dimensional and High-Order PINNs

ArXiv ID: 2603.24002

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Zhangyong Liang, Ji Zhang

Abstract: Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for high-dimensional and high-order partial differential equations (PDEs) are primarily constrained by the $\mathcal{O}(d^k)$ spatial derivative complexity and the $\mathcal{O}(P)$ memory overhead of backpropagation (BP). While randomized spatial estimators successfully reduce the spatial complexity to $\mathcal{O}(1)$, their reliance on first-order optimization still leads to prohibitive memory consumption at scale. Zeroth-order (ZO) optimization offers a BP-free alternative; however, naively combining randomized spatial operators with ZO perturbations triggers a variance explosion of $\mathcal{O}(1/\varepsilon^2)$, leading to numerical divergence. To address these challenges, we propose the \textbf{S}tochastic \textbf{D}imension-free \textbf{Z}eroth-order \textbf{E}stimator (\textbf{SDZE}), a unified framework that achieves dimension-independent complexity in both space and memory. Specifically, SDZE leverages \emph{Common Random Numbers Synchronization (CRNS)} to algebraically cancel the $\mathcal{O}(1/\varepsilon^2)$ variance by locking spatial random seeds across perturbations. Furthermore, an \emph{implicit matrix-free subspace projection} is introduced to reduce parameter exploration variance from $\mathcal{O}(P)$ to $\mathcal{O}(r)$ while maintaining an $\mathcal{O}(1)$ optimizer memory footprint. Empirical results demonstrate that SDZE enables the training of 10-million-dimensional PINNs on a single NVIDIA A100 GPU, delivering significant improvements in speed and memory efficiency over state-of-the-art baselines.

Comment: Synchronized randomness cancels zeroth-order variance blow-up while preserving constant optimizer memory.

Topic Match: The estimator is closest to optimizer design, but its training demonstration concerns physics-informed neural networks.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

27. Uniform Laws of Large Numbers in Product Spaces

ArXiv ID: 2603.24493

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Ron Holzman, Shay Moran, Alexander Shlimovich

Abstract: Uniform laws of large numbers form a cornerstone of Vapnik--Chervonenkis theory, where they are characterized by the finiteness of the VC dimension. In this work, we study uniform convergence phenomena in cartesian product spaces, under assumptions on the underlying distribution that are compatible with the product structure. Specifically, we assume that the distribution is absolutely continuous with respect to the product of its marginals, a condition that captures many natural settings, including product distributions, sparse mixtures of product distributions, distributions with low mutual information, and more. We show that, under this assumption, a uniform law of large numbers holds for a family of events if and only if the linear VC dimension of the family is finite. The linear VC dimension is defined as the maximum size of a shattered set that lies on an axis-parallel line, namely, a set of vectors that agree on all but at most one coordinate. This dimension is always at most the classical VC dimension, yet it can be arbitrarily smaller. For instance, the family of convex sets in $\mathbb{R}^d$ has linear VC dimension $2$, while its VC dimension is infinite already for $d\ge 2$. Our proofs rely on estimator that departs substantially from the standard empirical mean estimator and exhibits more intricate structure. We show that such deviations from the standard empirical mean estimator are unavoidable in this setting. Throughout the paper, we propose several open questions, with a particular focus on quantitative sample complexity bounds.

Comment: A product-aware estimator makes uniform convergence depend on linear VC dimension rather than classical VC dimension.

Topic Match: Statistical learning theory is the closest available category, but no language-model architecture or training mechanism is studied.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 8

28. Boost Like a (Var)Pro: Trust-Region Gradient Boosting via Variable Projection

ArXiv ID: 2603.23658

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Abhijit Chowdhary, Elizabeth Newman, Deepanshu Verma

Abstract: Gradient boosting, a method of building additive ensembles from weak learners, has established itself as a practical and theoretically-motivated approach to approximate functions, especially using decision tree weak learners. Comparable methods for smooth parametric learners, such as neural networks, remain less developed in both training methodology and theory. To this end, we introduce \texttt{VPBoost} ({\bf V}ariable {\bf P}rojection {\bf Boost}ing), a gradient boosting algorithm for separable smooth approximators, i.e., models with a smooth nonlinear featurizer followed by a final linear mapping. \texttt{VPBoost} fuses variable projection, a training paradigm for separable models that enforces optimality of the linear weights, with a second-order weak learning strategy. The combination of second-order boosting, separable models, and variable projection give rise to a closed-form solution for the optimal linear weights and a natural interpretation of \VPBoost as a functional trust-region method. We thereby leverage trust-region theory to prove \VPBoost converges to a stationary point under mild geometric conditions and, under stronger assumptions, achieves a superlinear convergence rate. Comprehensive numerical experiments on synthetic data, image recognition, and scientific machine learning benchmarks demonstrate that \VPBoost learns an ensemble with improved evaluation metrics in comparison to gradient-descent-based boosting and attains competitive performance relative to an industry-standard decision tree boosting algorithm.

Comment: Variable projection solves linear weights exactly within a second-order trust-region boosting procedure.

Topic Match: Optimizer design is the closest category, but the method trains smooth boosting ensembles rather than language models.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

29. Project and Generate: Divergence-Free Neural Operators for Incompressible Flows

ArXiv ID: 2603.24500

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Xigui Li, Hongwei Zhang, Ruoxi Jiang, Deshu Chen, Chensen Lin, Limei Han, Yuan Qi, Xin Guo, Yuan Cheng

Abstract: Learning-based models for fluid dynamics often operate in unconstrained function spaces, leading to physically inadmissible, unstable simulations. While penalty-based methods offer soft regularization, they provide no structural guarantees, resulting in spurious divergence and long-term collapse. In this work, we introduce a unified framework that enforces the incompressible continuity equation as a hard, intrinsic constraint for both deterministic and generative modeling. First, to project deterministic models onto the divergence-free subspace, we integrate a differentiable spectral Leray projection grounded in the Helmholtz-Hodge decomposition, which restricts the regression hypothesis space to physically admissible velocity fields. Second, to generate physically consistent distributions, we show that simply projecting model outputs is insufficient when the prior is incompatible. To address this, we construct a divergence-free Gaussian reference measure via a curl-based pushforward, ensuring the entire probability flow remains subspace-consistent by construction. Experiments on 2D Navier-Stokes equations demonstrate exact incompressibility up to discretization error and substantially improved stability and physical consistency.

Comment: A constrained hypothesis space and compatible Gaussian prior enforce incompressibility throughout generation.

Topic Match: Intrinsic architectural constraints are the nearest match, but the trained models are fluid-dynamics neural operators.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 7

30. Minimal Sufficient Representations for Self-interpretable Deep Neural Networks

ArXiv ID: 2603.24041

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Zhiyao Tan, Liu Li, Huazhen Lin

Abstract: Deep neural networks (DNNs) achieve remarkable predictive performance but remain difficult to interpret, largely due to overparameterization that obscures the minimal structure required for interpretation. Here we introduce DeepIn, a self-interpretable neural network framework that adaptively identifies and learns the minimal representation necessary for preserving the full expressive capacity of standard DNNs. We show that DeepIn can correctly identify the minimal representation dimension, select relevant variables, and recover the minimal sufficient network architecture for prediction. The resulting estimator achieves optimal non-asymptotic error rates that adapt to the learned minimal dimension, demonstrating that recovering minimal sufficient structure fundamentally improves generalization error. Building on these guarantees, we further develop hypothesis testing procedures for both selected variables and learned representations, bridging deep representation learning with formal statistical inference. Across biomedical and vision benchmarks, DeepIn improves both predictive accuracy and interpretability, reducing error by up to 30% on real-world datasets while automatically uncovering human-interpretable discriminative patterns. Our results suggest that interpretability and statistical rigor can be embedded directly into deep architectures without sacrificing performance.

Comment: Jointly learns a minimal sufficient representation and the network dimension needed for prediction.

Topic Match: Adaptive representation size is architectural, but the stated contribution serves interpretable biomedical and vision prediction.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

31. CGRL: Causal-Guided Representation Learning for Graph Out-of-Distribution Generalization

ArXiv ID: 2603.24304

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Bowen Lu, Liangqiang Yang, Teng Li

Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved impressive performance in graph-related tasks. However, they suffer from poor generalization on out-of-distribution (OOD) data, as they tend to learn spurious correlations. Such correlations present a phenomenon that GNNs fail to stably learn the mutual information between prediction representations and ground-truth labels under OOD settings. To address these challenges, we formulate a causal graph starting from the essence of node classification, adopt backdoor adjustment to block non-causal paths, and theoretically derive a lower bound for improving OOD generalization of GNNs. To materialize these insights, we further propose a novel approach integrating causal representation learning and a loss replacement strategy. The former captures node-level causal invariance and reconstructs graph posterior distribution. The latter introduces asymptotic losses of the same order to replace the original losses. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of our method in OOD generalization and effectively alleviating the phenomenon of unstable mutual information learning.

Comment: Derives a backdoor-adjusted representation objective and loss replacement strategy for graph distribution shifts.

Topic Match: Representation objectives place it nearest architecture and training, but its subject is graph node classification.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 6

32. PDGMM-VAE: A Variational Autoencoder with Adaptive Per-Dimension Gaussian Mixture Model Priors for Nonlinear ICA

ArXiv ID: 2603.23547

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Yuan-Hao Wei, Yan-Jie Sun

Abstract: Independent component analysis is a core framework within blind source separation for recovering latent source signals from observed mixtures under statistical independence assumptions. In this work, we propose PDGMM-VAE, a source-oriented variational autoencoder in which each latent dimension, interpreted explicitly as an individual source signal, is assigned its own Gaussian mixture model prior. Unlike conventional VAE formulations with a shared simple prior, the proposed framework imposes per-dimension heterogeneous prior constraints, enabling the model to capture diverse non-Gaussian source statistics and thereby promote source separation under a probabilistic encoder-decoder architecture. Importantly, the parameters of these per-dimension GMM priors are not fixed in advance, but are adaptively learned and automatically refined toward convergence together with the encoder and decoder parameters under the overall training objective. Within this formulation, the encoder serves as a demixing mapping from observations to latent sources, while the decoder reconstructs the observed mixtures from the inferred components. The proposed model provides a systematic study of an idea that had previously only been noted in our preliminary form, namely, equipping different latent sources with different GMM priors for ICA, and formulates it as a full VAE framework with end-to-end training and per-dimension prior learning. Experimental results on both linear and nonlinear mixing problems demonstrate that PDGMM-VAE can recover latent source signals and achieve satisfactory separation performance.

Comment: Jointly learns a separate adaptive Gaussian-mixture prior for each latent source dimension.

Topic Match: Latent-prior design is the nearest architectural category; the model is a variational source-separation system.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 5

Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible (2)

1. DVM: Real-Time Kernel Generation for Dynamic AI Models

ArXiv ID: 2603.24239

Primary Topic: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible

Authors: Jingzhi Fang, Xiong Gao, Renwei Zhang, Zichun Ye, Lei Chen, Jie Zhao, Chengnuo Huang, Hui Xu, Xuefeng Jin

Abstract: Dynamism is common in AI computation, e.g., the dynamic tensor shapes and the dynamic control flows in models. Due to the long compilation time, existing runtime compilation damages the model efficiency, while the offline compilers either suffer from the long compilation time and device memory footprint to cover all the possible execution instances of a dynamic model, or sacrifice optimization opportunities for usability. In this paper, we rethink the feasibility of runtime compilation for dynamic models and identify that the key for it to work is to speed up the compilation or hide the compilation overhead. To do this, we propose a real-time compiler, DVM. In DVM, we design a runtime operator compiler based on a bytecode virtual machine to perform effective and efficient compilation for each dynamic operator instance given its input. Specifically, instead of compiling programs into machine code, we encode the operator program into bytecode on the CPU and decode the bytecode into virtual instructions for direct execution on the NPU. Based on the runtime operator compiler, we further propose an operator fuser, which performs symbol-deduction-based fusion on static graphs and runtime fusion on dynamic graphs. Both pattern- and stacking-based fusion are supported to increase fusion opportunities. Evaluation on operators, subgraphs, and models shows that, compared with TorchInductor, PyTorch-eager and MindSpore-graph-O0, we are up to 11.77$\times$ better in terms of the operator/model efficiency and up to 5 orders of magnitude faster in terms of the maximum compilation time.

Comment: Bytecode execution and dynamic operator fusion reduce runtime compilation overhead.

Topic Match: Training systems is the nearest implementation category, but the contribution changes compilation and execution speed rather than the training algorithm.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 5

2. A Theory of LLM Information Susceptibility

ArXiv ID: 2603.23626

Primary Topic: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible

Authors: Zhuo-Yang Song, Hua Xing Zhu

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed as optimization modules in agentic systems, yet the fundamental limits of such LLM-mediated improvement remain poorly understood. Here we propose a theory of LLM information susceptibility, centred on the hypothesis that when computational resources are sufficiently large, the intervention of a fixed LLM does not increase the performance susceptibility of a strategy set with respect to budget. We develop a multi-variable utility-function framework that generalizes this hypothesis to architectures with multiple co-varying budget channels, and discuss the conditions under which co-scaling can exceed the susceptibility bound. We validate the theory empirically across structurally diverse domains and model scales spanning an order of magnitude, and show that nested, co-scaling architectures open response channels unavailable to fixed configurations. These results clarify when LLM intervention helps and when it does not, demonstrating that tools from statistical physics can provide predictive constraints for the design of AI systems. If the susceptibility hypothesis holds generally, the theory suggests that nested architectures may be a necessary structural condition for open-ended agentic self-improvement.

Comment: Separates fixed-model and co-scaled agent performance responses to computational budgets.

Topic Match: Budget-scaling analysis is the nearest category; the quantities studied concern agent execution.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 7

MoE Where It Changes the Design Space (1)

1. MoE-Sieve: Routing-Guided LoRA for Efficient MoE Fine-Tuning

ArXiv ID: 2603.24044

Primary Topic: MoE Where It Changes the Design Space

Authors: Andrea Manzoni

Abstract: Standard LoRA fine-tuning of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models applies adapters to every expert, yet our profiling shows that per-layer expert routing is highly skewed: a small subset of experts handles most tokens in each layer, while many others are rarely activated ("cold"). We propose MoE-Sieve, a simple routing-guided framework for LoRA fine-tuning, and pair it with a systematic profiling study of expert routing across architectures and tasks. The method is simple: profile routing counts on a small calibration set, select the top-k most-routed experts per layer, and apply LoRA only to those experts. Across two architecturally distinct MoE models and three diverse tasks, tuning only the top 25% routed experts per layer remains competitive with full LoRA, with mean differences within +/-1 percentage point across all conditions. This reduces LoRA trainable parameters by 70-73%, adapter checkpoint size by 71-73%, and wall-clock training time by up to 50%. We also observe a non-monotonic relationship between expert count and seed-to-seed variance, consistent with the hypothesis that adapting cold experts can introduce gradient noise without improving accuracy. Further ablations show that random expert selection at matched budget is about 2.5 percentage points worse, indicating that the routing signal matters, while greedy per-layer budget optimization does not improve over uniform top-k.

Comment: Routing profiles select the expert subset receiving LoRA updates, with matched-budget random selection as a control.

Topic Match: Expert selection is the nearest MoE connection, but the core intervention allocates LoRA adapters without changing routing, balance, or expert structure.

Relevance: 5 Novelty: 5

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (6)

1. Diet Your LLM: Dimension-wise Global Pruning of LLMs via Merging Task-specific Importance Score

ArXiv ID: 2603.23985

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Jimyung Hong, Jaehyung Kim

Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, but their massive scale poses significant challenges for practical deployment. Structured pruning offers a promising solution by removing entire dimensions or layers, yet existing methods face critical trade-offs: task-agnostic approaches cannot adapt to task-specific requirements, while task-aware methods require costly training to learn task adaptability. We propose DIET (Dimension-wise global pruning of LLMs via merging Task-wise importance scores), a training-free structured pruning method that combines dimension-level granularity with task-aware selection. DIET profiles activation magnitudes across tasks using only 100 samples per task, then applies majority voting to construct a single global mask. DIET does not require large costs from pre-computation or training. Experiments on seven zero-shot benchmarks using Gemma-2 2B and 9B models demonstrate the effectiveness of DIET; for example, at 20% sparsity on Gemma-2 2B, DIET achieves near 10% average accuracy improvement, compared to previous state-of-the-art structured pruning methods. This advantage persists across various sparsity levels and model scales, positioning DIET as a practical and robust choice for structured LLM pruning.

Comment: Combines task-specific activation-importance scores into one dimension-pruning mask through majority voting.

Topic Match: Structured compression is the closest category; the mechanism incrementally refines importance-based pruning for deployment.

Relevance: 5 Novelty: 5

2. Attention-aware Inference Optimizations for Large Vision-Language Models with Memory-efficient Decoding

ArXiv ID: 2603.23914

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Fatih Ilhan, Gaowen Liu, Ramana Rao Kompella, Selim Furkan Tekin, Tiansheng Huang, Zachary Yahn, Yichang Xu, Ling Liu

Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) have achieved remarkable success in multi-modal reasoning, but their inference time efficiency remains a significant challenge due to the memory overhead during decoding, especially when the query and answer of VLMs consist of long sequences of visual and text tokens. This paper presents AttentionPack, an adaptive and attention-aware optimization framework tailored for large vision-language models with improving memory-efficiency during decoding, focusing on addressing the challenges due to the increased high number of visual inputs and interactions, particularly in long-context tasks with multiple high-resolution images or videos. AttentionPack is novel in two aspects: (i) We introduce a multi-head attention compaction method for economically storing key and value matrices by exploiting the implicit low-rank structure, and (ii) we develop a token-specific attention-aware decompression mechanism to reduce latency overhead. Experimental results on multiple benchmarks demonstrate that AttentionPack improves memory efficiency by up to 8x, enabling higher batch sizes and faster batch inference while preserving the model output quality or longer context lengths for superior retrieval performance. We also report the effectiveness of AttentionPack combined with eviction, quantization and kernel fusion, showing further efficiency gains for resource-limited environments.

Comment: Low-rank KV compaction pairs with token-specific decompression during VLM decoding.

Topic Match: KV compression is the nearest category, but the intervention targets inference memory and batching without establishing a training capability or lossless guarantee.

Relevance: 4 Novelty: 6

3. TuneShift-KD: Knowledge Distillation and Transfer for Fine-tuned Models

ArXiv ID: 2603.24518

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Yushi Guan, Jeanine Ohene-Agyei, Daniel Kwan, Jean Sebastien Dandurand, Yifei Zhang, Nandita Vijaykumar

Abstract: To embed domain-specific or specialized knowledge into pre-trained foundation models, fine-tuning using techniques such as parameter efficient fine-tuning (e.g. LoRA) is a common practice. However, as new LLM architectures and pre-trained models emerge, transferring this specialized knowledge to newer models becomes an important task. In many scenarios, the original specialized data may be unavailable due to privacy or commercial restrictions, necessitating distillation and transfer of this specialized knowledge from the fine-tuned base model to a different pre-trained model. We present TuneShift-KD, a novel approach that automatically distills specialized knowledge from a fine-tuned model to a target model using only a few examples representative of the specialized information. Our key insight is that specialized knowledge can be identified through perplexity differences between base and fine-tuned models: prompts where the fine-tuned model responds confidently (low perplexity), but the base model struggles (high perplexity), indicate queries corresponding to the specialized knowledge learned by the fine-tuned model. TuneShift-KD leverages this insight to create a synthetic training dataset to transfer the specialized knowledge. Using an iterative process, TuneShift-KD generates more prompts similar to those that generated responses with specialized knowledge. TuneShift-KD does not require training discriminators or access to training datasets. It is an automated approach that only requires the initial fine-tuned and base models and a few representative prompts. Our experiments demonstrate that models fine-tuned using TuneShift-KD achieve higher accuracy than prior approaches, enabling ease of deployment and more effective transfer of the specialized knowledge.

Comment: Uses base-versus-fine-tuned perplexity differences to select synthetic examples carrying specialized knowledge.

Topic Match: Distillation provides the nearest efficiency connection; the objective is transferring downstream specialization between existing models.

Relevance: 3 Novelty: 6

4. Polynomial Speedup in Diffusion Models with the Multilevel Euler-Maruyama Method

ArXiv ID: 2603.24594

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Arthur Jacot

Abstract: We introduce the Multilevel Euler-Maruyama (ML-EM) method compute solutions of SDEs and ODEs using a range of approximators $f^1,\dots,f^k$ to the drift $f$ with increasing accuracy and computational cost, only requiring a few evaluations of the most accurate $f^k$ and many evaluations of the less costly $f^1,\dots,f^{k-1}$. If the drift lies in the so-called Harder than Monte Carlo (HTMC) regime, i.e. it requires $\epsilon^{-\gamma}$ compute to be $\epsilon$-approximated for some $\gamma>2$, then ML-EM $\epsilon$-approximates the solution of the SDE with $\epsilon^{-\gamma}$ compute, improving over the traditional EM rate of $\epsilon^{-\gamma-1}$. In other terms it allows us to solve the SDE at the same cost as a single evaluation of the drift. In the context of diffusion models, the different levels $f^{1},\dots,f^{k}$ are obtained by training UNets of increasing sizes, and ML-EM allows us to perform sampling with the equivalent of a single evaluation of the largest UNet. Our numerical experiments confirm our theory: we obtain up to fourfold speedups for image generation on the CelebA dataset downscaled to 64x64, where we measure a $\gamma\approx2.5$. Given that this is a polynomial speedup, we expect even stronger speedups in practical applications which involve orders of magnitude larger networks.

Comment: Multilevel drift evaluations reduce sampling complexity when approximation cost has exponent greater than two.

Topic Match: The nearest category is computational efficiency, but the result is a conditional sampling speedup demonstrated with image-generating U-Nets.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 8

5. Accelerating Diffusion-based Video Editing via Heterogeneous Caching: Beyond Full Computing at Sampled Denoising Timestep

ArXiv ID: 2603.24260

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Tianyi Liu, Ye Lu, Linfeng Zhang, Chen Cai, Jianjun Gao, Yi Wang, Kim-Hui Yap, Lap-Pui Chau

Abstract: Diffusion-based video editing has emerged as an important paradigm for high-quality and flexible content generation. However, despite their generality and strong modeling capacity, Diffusion Transformers (DiT) remain computationally expensive due to the iterative denoising process, posing challenges for practical deployment. Existing video diffusion acceleration methods primarily exploit denoising timestep-level feature reuse, which mitigates the redundancy in denoising process, but overlooks the architectural redundancy within the DiT that many attention operations over spatio-temporal tokens are redundantly executed, offering little to no incremental contribution to the model output. This work introduces HetCache, a training-free diffusion acceleration framework designed to exploit the inherent heterogeneity in diffusion-based masked video-to-video (MV2V) generation and editing. Instead of uniformly reuse or randomly sampling tokens, HetCache assesses the contextual relevance and interaction strength among various types of tokens in designated computing steps. Guided by spatial priors, it divides the spatial-temporal tokens in DiT model into context and generative tokens, and selectively caches the context tokens that exhibit the strongest correlation and most representative semantics with generative ones. This strategy reduces redundant attention operations while maintaining editing consistency and fidelity. Experiments show that HetCache achieves a noticeable acceleration, including a 2.67$\times$ latency speedup and FLOPs reduction over commonly used foundation models, with negligible degradation in editing quality.

Comment: Selectively caches context-token features to reduce redundant video-diffusion attention computation.

Topic Match: Caching places it nearest efficiency; its contribution accelerates video-editing inference.

Relevance: 1 Novelty: 5

6. Identification of NMF by choosing maximum-volume basis vectors

ArXiv ID: 2603.24227

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Qianqian Qi, Zhongming Chen, Peter G. M. van der Heijden

Abstract: In nonnegative matrix factorization (NMF), minimum-volume-constrained NMF is a widely used framework for identifying the solution of NMF by making basis vectors as similar as possible. This typically induces sparsity in the coefficient matrix, with each row containing zero entries. Consequently, minimum-volume-constrained NMF may fail for highly mixed data, where such sparsity does not hold. Moreover, the estimated basis vectors in minimum-volume-constrained NMF may be difficult to interpret as they may be mixtures of the ground truth basis vectors. To address these limitations, in this paper we propose a new NMF framework, called maximum-volume-constrained NMF, which makes the basis vectors as distinct as possible. We further establish an identifiability theorem for maximum-volume-constrained NMF and provide an algorithm to estimate it. Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Comment: Maximum-volume basis selection replaces minimum-volume identification for highly mixed nonnegative data.

Topic Match: Low-rank factorization is the nearest category, but the contribution concerns general NMF identifiability rather than language-model compression.

Relevance: 2 Novelty: 7

Paper Selection Prompt

System Prompt

You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.

User Prompt

Relevant Topics

This is a training-side feed for someone who builds and modifies model internals. The centre of gravity is what a frontier model is made of and how it is trained: architecture, training dynamics, and the decisions a lab actually made. MoE is still in scope, but only when the contribution changes the design space, not when it tunes an existing MoE.

Keep a paper when its CORE CONTRIBUTION falls in one of the five topics below. Filter it when the topic is merely the setting for a downstream application, a benchmark, or a product result.

THE SUBJECT IS LANGUAGE-MODEL TRAINING. Every topic below is scoped to it. A technique named in one of them -- decentralised or asynchronous training, discrete diffusion, byte-level modelling, 1-bit weights, mixture-of-experts -- earns nothing when the model being trained is an image generator, a recommender, a scientific surrogate, or a vision classifier. Match on what is being trained, not on the vocabulary in the abstract.

THE ONE QUESTION THAT DECIDES A HIGH SCORE, asked before the topic list:

Does this paper REMOVE or REPLACE a component that everyone downstream inherits without thinking, or DECOUPLE two quantities the field currently conflates -- and does it say which end is held fixed while the other moves?

A paper that ADDS a mechanism on top of existing primitives is ordinary work, however good the numbers. A paper that takes one away, or splits one knob into two, is the reason this feed exists. Papers whose gains are CONDITIONAL (only above some batch size, only in one budget regime, only with an extra training stage) are ordinary work too, even when the mechanism is new: a conditional win is a new knob, not a removed one.

1. Frontier Model Releases and Technical Reports (primary) - Keep: model and technical reports that DISCLOSE architecture or training decisions -- layer and attention design, normalization and residual choices, hybrid attention/state-space stacks, sparsity and expert layout, tokenizer and vocabulary decisions, data mixture and curriculum, optimizer and schedule, precision and numerics, stability fixes and what broke; open-weight releases whose report explains a choice rather than only reporting it. - Filter: releases that are a scorecard -- benchmark tables, a capability announcement, a product or API launch, or a report that names its recipe without saying why it was chosen. A frontier name in the title earns nothing on its own.

2. Architecture and Training Dynamics (primary) - Keep: new or analysed architectural mechanisms (attention variants, normalization and residual design, state-space and recurrent sequence modelling, positional schemes, dynamic or modular computation, tokenizer-free and byte-level or learned-chunking stacks, non-autoregressive and discrete-diffusion generation); optimizers, preconditioners, and parameterisations, especially hyperparameter transfer across scale; training-dynamics and stability analysis that explains why large models train the way they do; work that removes a standard component (normalization, weight decay, positional encoding, the tokenizer, left-to-right decoding) and shows the model still trains. - Filter: applying an existing architecture to a new task or benchmark with no mechanistic insight; an architectural tweak evaluated only at toy scale with no account of what it costs.

3. Large-Scale Training Systems - Keep: distributed training ALGORITHMS that change what is possible, not only what is fast -- asynchronous, low-communication and decentralised optimisation, sharding and parallelism schemes with a new invariant, numerics and low-precision training (FP8, FP4, ternary and 1-bit) when the claim is about training stability rather than a kernel; scaling-law work that informs how a run is configured, including data-constrained and repeated-data regimes and critical batch size. - Filter: kernel engineering, communication scheduling, overlap, caching, serving and inference throughput. This is a real exclusion, not a soft one: work whose contribution is "the same model, faster" belongs to someone else's feed even when it is excellent and even when it is about MoE.

4. MoE Where It Changes the Design Space - Keep: routing that is newly differentiable or newly stable; the training/inference router gap; expert collapse and what actually prevents it; expert granularity, shared experts and layout when a new axis is opened rather than tuned; dense-to-MoE conversion; MoE scaling laws that fix one quantity and vary another; analyses that carry a criterion which could have failed (a random-guess baseline, an ablation with a predicted sign) rather than similarity heatmaps. - Filter: MoE SYSTEMS and inference work (expert parallelism, all-to-all schedules, grouped GEMM, offload, prefetching, capacity and scheduling tricks, compression for serving); MoE surveys; papers that train on top of a MoE without a routing, balancing, stability, or structural contribution; "mixture of experts" in the classical ensemble or recommender sense. - The exclusion above is about MAKING MoE RUN FASTER, and it does not reach routing and expert design. A paper on how tokens are assigned to experts, how experts specialise, how balance is enforced, or how a dense model becomes sparse stays fully in scope and scores on its merits, even when the mechanism is a small one.

5. Efficiency and Compression When the Mechanism Is New - Keep: quantization, sparsity, pruning and low-rank work whose mechanism is new and whose gain is unconditional; compression that changes what can be trained, not only what can be served; attribution of a model's behaviour to its data. - Filter: tuned variants of standard efficiency methods; deployment and serving engineering; anything whose headline is a compression ratio with no account of what was given up.

Also keep, even though they read like evaluation work, because the field has no one checking them: - benchmark validity itself: contamination, saturation, LLM-as-judge reliability, whether a benchmark measures what it claims. A paper AUDITING a benchmark is in scope; a paper PROPOSING one is not.

Subjects He Has Never Once Kept

Measured, not guessed. Over nine months where he was actively curating, 4953 papers passed this filter and 274 made his list -- a keep rate of 5.2%. Each subject below appeared in the rejected pile the number of times shown and appeared ZERO times in his entire 508-entry list.

Filter a paper whose CORE SUBJECT is one of these. The count is the evidence; where a paper only mentions the term in passing while contributing somewhere in the five topics above, keep it.

variational methods and inference (52) unlearning (41) long-context methods (40) neural operators (35) time series (35) vision transformers (35) parameter-efficient fine-tuning (28) stochastic gradient analysis (21) LLM safety (20) LLM reasoning as a subject (20) hallucination (20) sequence modelling as a subject (19) differential equations (19) spiking neural networks (17) post-training quantization (16) mechanistic interpretability as a framing (15) test-time scaling (13)

Two more he kept exactly once each, so suppress rather than drop: graph neural networks (1 of 42), knowledge distillation (1 of 39).

Do NOT extend this list by analogy. Four subjects that look like they belong here were checked and do not: diffusion models (8.1% kept), prompting (10.0%), benchmarks (9.1%) and neural architecture search (13.3%) all sit ABOVE his 5.2% base rate.

Note the one distinction that matters: he rejects papers FRAMED as interpretability, while analysis of how a trained model's computation is organised is among his highest-rated work. The subject is the framing, not the act of analysing.

Leave these to the hotspot digest unless the core contribution clearly falls in one of the five topics above: - agent, tooling, and RAG launches, and agent framework papers - new benchmarks, leaderboards, and evaluation-only papers - interpretability that stops at cataloguing features, with nothing said about the mechanism that produced them. Analysis of how a trained model's computation is organised -- what drives expert selection, what a circuit computes, how representations reorganise across training -- is IN scope, not here. - memory mechanisms and agent memory systems - world models, exploration, and reinforcement learning - alignment and post-training (RLHF, DPO, GRPO, RFT, instruction tuning), EXCEPT where the subject is how post-training destabilises the architecture itself - downstream applications in medical imaging, segmentation, 3D vision, video understanding, information retrieval, summarization, recommendation, machine translation, speech recognition, time series, knowledge graphs, and similar domains

Scoring Criteria

Score five independent axes from 1 to 10: Relevance, Novelty, Evidence, Load, Proximity.

They answer different questions and must not be collapsed. Relevance: is this the kind of work this feed is for. Evidence: did the paper earn its claim. Load: what does it cost to get the usable result out. Proximity: how close is it to what the reader is working on right now (see Active Lines below).

Novelty is scored for continuity with the archive and for the hotspot spotlight cutoffs, and it does NOT order the feed. Measured against 274 hand-tiered papers it carried no signal at all: papers scoring 8 or more were his must-reads exactly as often as papers scoring 5 or less, both at the pool's base rate. Every abstract claims novelty, so the axis measures the claiming rather than the work. Score it honestly and do not let it influence the other four.

A strong claim with thin evidence is a worse read than a modest claim that holds. Score each axis on its own; do not let a high one pull up a low one.

Relevance Scoring

• 9-10: directly centered on the target topics; highest when the core contribution is clearly within them and the paper is about how a model is BUILT or TRAINED.
• 7-8: substantially related, but partly peripheral or focused on a narrower aspect.
• 5-6: touches the target topics, but the main contribution is elsewhere.
• 3-4: largely outside the target topics, often application-focused or domain-specific.
• 1-2: unrelated.

Important: Daily buzz, a frontier lab's name, or a large headline number is not enough for a high Relevance score. A model release scores high only when the report explains an architecture or training decision; a release that only reports results is hotspot material, not this feed.

Work whose contribution is "the same model, faster" -- kernels, communication schedules, overlap, caching, serving -- caps at Relevance 5 even when it is excellent and even when it is about MoE. Making a known design run faster is a different job from changing the design.

That cap is about SPEED, not about size. Compression that is lossless, or that changes what can be trained or held in memory at all rather than how quickly it runs, is not capped: it changes what is possible, which is the thing this feed is for.

Analysis of how a trained model's computation is actually organised -- what a circuit computes, what drives expert selection, how representations reorganise over training -- IS in scope and scores like any other work on mechanism. Only interpretability that stops at describing features, with nothing said about the mechanism that produced them, drops out of the feed.

Novelty Scoring

Novelty means a change to the design space, not a change to a number. Score against this ladder:

• 9-10: removes or replaces a component the whole field inherits without thinking (normalization, weight decay, the tokenizer, positional encoding, left-to-right decoding, the standard optimizer, a numerical format), or decouples two quantities everyone conflates -- AND states which end is held fixed while the other moves. The claim is unconditional: it does not require a particular scale, budget regime, or extra stage. An ANALYSIS paper reaches this band when it settles a mechanism-level question with a criterion that could have come out the other way.
• 7-8: a substantial new mechanism, or a decoupling whose gain is real but CONDITIONAL (holds above some batch size, in one budget band, or with an added training phase). A conditional win is a new knob, not a removed one, and belongs here rather than above.
• 5-6: meaningful but incremental extension or refinement of an existing primitive; a tuned variant; a well-executed combination of known parts.
• 3-4: minor, narrow, or mostly engineering or domain-specific improvement; a survey or overview, however thorough.
• 1-2: little originality; mainly standard application of existing methods.

Score the claim as the paper states it here. Whether the paper supports that claim is Evidence, and it is scored separately -- do not discount Novelty for weak experiments, and do not raise it because the framing is confident. Phrases like "we remove", "without X", "holding Y fixed" are what the paper SAYS; they earn a high Novelty only if the thing named really is a component the field inherits by default, not a component this paper introduced two sentences earlier.

Evidence Scoring

Does the demonstration reach as far as the claim?

• 9-10: shown at the scale and breadth the claim asserts -- language-model pretraining at billion-parameter or hundred-billion-token scale, or across several model families, sizes, or domains -- with ablations that isolate the named mechanism and could have failed.
• 7-8: one credible setting that matches the claim's stated scope, with the baselines a skeptic would ask for.
• 5-6: a single small setting, or a claim stated more broadly than the demonstration reaches.
• 3-4: the claim is about transformers or language models in general, but the demonstration lives in one narrow domain or one small benchmark -- image classification alone, a single toy task, one dataset; or the comparisons a reader needs in order to believe it are missing.
• 1-2: the central claim is asserted, illustrated, or supported only by plots that could not have come out the other way.

A structural claim demonstrated only outside the setting it claims is capped at 4, however striking the claim. "We removed a component everyone uses" shown only on small vision models is a result about small vision models.

When the abstract names no scale, no dataset, and no baseline at all, score exactly 5. Do not infer rigor from confident writing. Unstated is not the same as strong, and two thirds of abstracts say nothing here: guessing on those was measured to make this axis worse.

Adjustments: subtract 1 when no code is released and the procedure is not reproducible from the paper alone; subtract 1 when the method's cost grows in the number of components it adds (one loss per pair of experts, one module per domain) and the paper does not account for that growth; add 1 when the paper states its own limitation precisely enough that a reader could design the experiment that breaks it.

Load Scoring

What does it cost to get the usable result out? This is about the reader's effort, not quality.

• 9-10: the result cannot be taken without following the derivation -- a new theoretical framework, unfamiliar mathematical machinery, or a proof that IS the contribution.
• 7-8: substantial theory or an involved formalism, but the operational result is stated plainly somewhere.
• 4-6: ordinary methods paper; the recipe is legible from the paper's own description.
• 1-3: the takeaway is a single decision or number a reader can act on immediately.

A high Load is not a criticism. It only says the paper is a project rather than a read.

Proximity Scoring

How close is this to the Active Lines stated below? This axis is about the reader, not the paper, and a paper can be excellent and distant at the same time.

• 9-10: squarely on a centre line -- the paper's core contribution is the thing the reader is working on, and a result here changes what they would do next.
• 7-8: on a centre line but from a direction they are not working from, or on an adjacent line where the result carries over directly.
• 5-6: adjacent: same stack, different layer; they would want to know it happened.
• 3-4: far: recognisable as the same field, but nothing here reaches their work.
• 1-2: another area entirely.

Judge distance from the reader's stated centre, NOT from whatever is currently prominent in the field. A paper everyone is discussing is not thereby close.

Topic Registry

Use exactly one PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID chosen from the stable topic IDs below. - frontier_models: Frontier Model Releases and Technical Reports - Frontier model and technical reports that disclose an architecture or training decision: layer and attention design, normalization and residual choices, hybrid stacks, sparsity layout, tokenizer and data mixture, optimizer and schedule, precision, and the stability problems that had to be solved. - architecture_training: Architecture and Training Dynamics - Architectural and optimisation mechanisms, and the training dynamics that explain them: attention and normalization design, positional schemes, state-space and recurrent stacks, tokenizer-free and learned-chunking models, non-autoregressive and discrete-diffusion generation, optimizers and parameterisations including hyperparameter transfer across scale, and work that removes a standard component and shows the model still trains. - training_systems: Training Algorithms That Change What Is Possible - Distributed training algorithms that change what can be trained rather than how fast it runs: asynchronous, low-communication and decentralised optimisation, parallelism schemes with a new invariant, low-precision and 1-bit training when the claim is stability, and scaling laws including data-constrained regimes and critical batch size. - moe_training: MoE Where It Changes the Design Space - Mixture-of-Experts work that opens or closes a design axis: differentiable and stable routing, the training/inference router gap, expert collapse, granularity and layout as a new axis, dense-to-MoE conversion, and MoE scaling laws that fix one quantity and vary another. MoE systems and inference work is out. - efficiency_scaling: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training - Compression, sparsity, quantization, pruning, low-rank and memory or cache efficiency whose mechanism is new and whose gain is unconditional.

Papers

[PAPER LIST HERE]

Instructions

Respond in JSONL. Output exactly one JSON object per paper, one per line:

{"ARXIVID":"...","COMMENT":"...","RELEVANCE":0,"NOVELTY":0,"EVIDENCE":0,"LOAD":0,"PROXIMITY":0,"PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID":"...","MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS":[],"TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT":"...","HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS":[],"HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT":"..."}

Rules: - ARXIVID: the arXiv ID. - COMMENT: identify the single strongest matching criterion. Be brief and specific. Do not rely on generic phrases like "language modeling" or "advancement". Do not mention non-matching criteria. - RELEVANCE: integer from 1 to 10. - NOVELTY: integer from 1 to 10, scoring the claim as stated. - EVIDENCE: integer from 1 to 10, scoring whether the demonstration reaches as far as the claim. - LOAD: integer from 1 to 10, scoring what it costs the reader to extract the usable result. - PROXIMITY: integer from 1 to 10, scoring distance from the stated Active Lines. - PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID: exactly one stable topic ID from the allowed topic registry. - MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS: zero or more stable topic IDs from the same allowed set. Include PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID when there are multiple matches. - TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT: briefly explain why the primary topic is the best fit. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS: zero or more tags from this exact set only: daily_hot, new_frontier. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT: briefly explain why the paper belongs in the daily hotspot paper feed when HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS is non-empty; otherwise use an empty string. - Use HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS sparingly. Most papers should return []. - daily_hot means the paper feels broadly important to the day and belongs in the daily hotspot paper section even if it is not part of the personalized foundational reading list. - new_frontier means the paper appears to open a genuinely new direction, paradigm, or field, even if the work is still early. - Do not output markdown, code fences, or any extra text.