Previous Day 2026-02-25
Monthly Overview 2026-02
Next Day 2026-02-27

This is a remedial run for missed papers from 02/25/2026 to 02/25/2026.

Results generated on 09/11/2026.

Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2026-02-26

Model Metric Usage Papers
Prompt Completion Total Total arXiv Scanned Relevant
local agent CLI Tokens not reported not reported not reported 318 318 7
Cost not reported not reported not reported

Token counts are not reported for this run. 4 of 5 model calls succeeded, 1,513s of model wall clock.

Topic Coverage:

TopicPapers
MoE Training1
Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency2
Architecture and Training Dynamics3
Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training1

Table of contents by topic:

MoE Training (1)

  1. Excitation: Momentum For Experts Authors: Sagi Shaier

Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency (2)

  1. The Design Space of Tri-Modal Masked Diffusion Models Authors: Louis Bethune, Victor Turrisi, Bruno Kacper Mlodozeniec, Pau Rodriguez Lopez, Lokesh Boominathan, Nikhil Bhendawade, Amitis Shidani, Joris Pelemans, Theo X. Olausson, Devon Hjelm, Paul Dixon, Joao Monteiro, Pierre Ablin, Vishnu Banna, Arno Blaas, Nick Henderson, Kari Noriy, Dan Busbridge, Josh Susskind, Marco Cuturi, Irina Belousova, Luca Zappella, Russ Webb, Jason Ramapuram

  2. Orthogonal Weight Modification Enhances Learning Scalability and Convergence Efficiency without Gradient Backpropagation Authors: Guoqing Ma, Shan Yu

Architecture and Training Dynamics (3)

  1. Support Tokens, Stability Margins, and a New Foundation for Robust LLMs Authors: Deepak Agarwal, Dhyey Dharmendrakumar Mavani, Suyash Gupta, Karthik Sethuraman, Tejas Dharamsi

  2. WaveSSM: Multiscale State-Space Models for Non-stationary Signal Attention Authors: Ruben Solozabal, Velibor Bojkovic, Hilal Alquabeh, Klea Ziu, Kentaro Inui, Martin Takac

  3. Efficient Continual Learning in Language Models via Thalamically Routed Cortical Columns Authors: Afshin Khadangi

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (1)

  1. Sparsity Induction for Accurate Post-Training Pruning of Large Language Models Authors: Minhao Jiang, Zhikai Li, Xuewen Liu, Jing Zhang, Mengjuan Chen, Qingyi Gu

MoE Training (1)

1. Excitation: Momentum For Experts

ArXiv ID: 2602.21798

Primary Topic: MoE Training

Also Matches: Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency

Authors: Sagi Shaier

Abstract: We propose Excitation, a novel optimization framework designed to accelerate learning in sparse architectures such as Mixture-of-Experts (MoEs). Unlike traditional optimizers that treat all parameters uniformly, Excitation dynamically modulates updates using batch-level expert utilization. It introduces a competitive update dynamic that amplifies updates to highly-utilized experts and can selectively suppress low-utilization ones, effectively sharpening routing specialization. Notably, we identify a phenomenon of "structural confusion" in deep MoEs, where standard optimizers fail to establish functional signal paths; Excitation acts as a specialization catalyst, "rescuing" these models and enabling stable training where baselines remain trapped. Excitation is optimizer-, domain-, and model-agnostic, requires minimal integration effort, and introduces neither additional per-parameter optimizer state nor learnable parameters, making it highly viable for memory-constrained settings. Across language and vision tasks, Excitation consistently improves convergence speed and final performance in MoE models, indicating that active update modulation is a key mechanism for effective conditional computation.

Comment: Optimizer that modulates updates by batch-level expert utilization to sharpen routing specialization and rescue MoEs from router/path collapse; stateless and directly targets MoE training stability.

Topic Match: Core contribution is an MoE-specific update rule addressing expert utilization, specialization and training stability.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 7


Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency (2)

1. The Design Space of Tri-Modal Masked Diffusion Models

ArXiv ID: 2602.21472

Primary Topic: Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency

Also Matches: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Louis Bethune, Victor Turrisi, Bruno Kacper Mlodozeniec, Pau Rodriguez Lopez, Lokesh Boominathan, Nikhil Bhendawade, Amitis Shidani, Joris Pelemans, Theo X. Olausson, Devon Hjelm, Paul Dixon, Joao Monteiro, Pierre Ablin, Vishnu Banna, Arno Blaas, Nick Henderson, Kari Noriy, Dan Busbridge, Josh Susskind, Marco Cuturi, Irina Belousova, Luca Zappella, Russ Webb, Jason Ramapuram

Abstract: Discrete diffusion models have emerged as strong alternatives to autoregressive language models, with recent work initializing and fine-tuning a base unimodal model for bimodal generation. Diverging from previous approaches, we introduce the first tri-modal masked diffusion model pretrained from scratch on text, image-text, and audio-text data. We systematically analyze multimodal scaling laws, modality mixing ratios, noise schedules, and batch-size effects, and we provide optimized inference sampling defaults. Our batch-size analysis yields a novel stochastic differential equation (SDE)-based reparameterization that eliminates the need for tuning the optimal batch size as reported in recent work. This reparameterization decouples the physical batch size, often chosen based on compute constraints (GPU saturation, FLOP efficiency, wall-clock time), from the logical batch size, chosen to balance gradient variance during stochastic optimization. Finally, we pretrain a preliminary 3B-parameter tri-modal model on 6.4T tokens, demonstrating the capabilities of a unified design and achieving strong results in text generation, text-to-image tasks, and text-to-speech tasks. Our work represents the largest-scale systematic open study of multimodal discrete diffusion models conducted to date, providing insights into scaling behaviors across multiple modalities.

Comment: SDE-based batch-size reparameterization that decouples physical from logical batch size and removes optimal-batch-size tuning, alongside multimodal scaling laws and noise schedules for a 3B/6.4T-token pretraining run.

Topic Match: The transferable contribution is scaling-law and batch-size/optimization configuration for large pretraining runs.

Relevance: 7 Novelty: 7


2. Orthogonal Weight Modification Enhances Learning Scalability and Convergence Efficiency without Gradient Backpropagation

ArXiv ID: 2602.22259

Primary Topic: Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency

Also Matches: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Guoqing Ma, Shan Yu

Abstract: Recognizing the substantial computational cost of backpropagation (BP), non-BP methods have emerged as attractive alternatives for efficient learning on emerging neuromorphic systems. However, existing non-BP approaches still face critical challenges in efficiency and scalability. Inspired by neural representations and dynamic mechanisms in the brain, we propose a perturbation-based approach called LOw-rank Cluster Orthogonal (LOCO) weight modification. We find that low-rank is an inherent property of perturbation-based algorithms. Under this condition, the orthogonality constraint limits the variance of the node perturbation (NP) gradient estimates and enhances the convergence efficiency. Through extensive evaluations on multiple datasets, LOCO demonstrates the capability to locally train the deepest spiking neural networks to date (more than 10 layers), while exhibiting strong continual learning ability, improved convergence efficiency, and better task performance compared to other brain-inspired non-BP algorithms. Notably, LOCO requires only O(1) parallel time complexity for weight updates, which is significantly lower than that of BP methods. This offers a promising direction for achieving high-performance, real-time, and lifelong learning on neuromorphic systems.

Comment: Low-rank orthogonal node-perturbation weight updates that cut gradient-estimate variance and train 10+ layer networks without backpropagation at O(1) parallel update time.

Topic Match: A learning-rule and convergence-efficiency contribution, though aimed at neuromorphic rather than large-model pretraining.

Relevance: 6 Novelty: 6


Architecture and Training Dynamics (3)

1. Support Tokens, Stability Margins, and a New Foundation for Robust LLMs

ArXiv ID: 2602.22271

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Deepak Agarwal, Dhyey Dharmendrakumar Mavani, Suyash Gupta, Karthik Sethuraman, Tejas Dharamsi

Abstract: Self-attention is usually described as a flexible, content-adaptive way to mix a token with information from its past. We reinterpret causal self-attention transformers, the backbone of modern foundation models, within a probabilistic framework, much as classical PCA is extended to probabilistic PCA. This reformulation reveals a key structural consequence of the underlying change of variables: a barrier constraint emerges on the parameters of self-attention. The resulting geometry exposes a degeneracy boundary where the attention-induced mapping becomes locally ill-conditioned, yielding a stability-margin interpretation analogous to the margin in support vector machines. This, in turn, naturally gives rise to the concept of support tokens. We further show that causal transformers define a consistent stochastic process over infinite token sequences, providing a rigorous probabilistic foundation for sequence modeling. Building on this view, we derive a Bayesian MAP training objective that requires only a minimal modification to standard LLM training: adding a smooth log-barrier penalty to the usual cross-entropy loss. Empirically, the resulting training objective improves robustness to input perturbations and sharpens the margin geometry of the learned representations without sacrificing out-of-sample accuracy.

Comment: Probabilistic reformulation of causal self-attention yielding a barrier constraint and stability-margin geometry, cashed out as a log-barrier term added to the standard LM training objective.

Topic Match: Core contribution is a mechanistic account of the attention map's conditioning plus a matching training objective — architecture and training dynamics.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7


2. WaveSSM: Multiscale State-Space Models for Non-stationary Signal Attention

ArXiv ID: 2602.22266

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Ruben Solozabal, Velibor Bojkovic, Hilal Alquabeh, Klea Ziu, Kentaro Inui, Martin Takac

Abstract: State-space models (SSMs) have emerged as a powerful foundation for long-range sequence modeling, with the HiPPO framework showing that continuous-time projection operators can be used to derive stable, memory-efficient dynamical systems that encode the past history of the input signal. However, existing projection-based SSMs often rely on polynomial bases with global temporal support, whose inductive biases are poorly matched to signals exhibiting localized or transient structure. In this work, we introduce \emph{WaveSSM}, a collection of SSMs constructed over wavelet frames. Our key observation is that wavelet frames yield a localized support on the temporal dimension, useful for tasks requiring precise localization. Empirically, we show that on equal conditions, \textit{WaveSSM} outperforms orthogonal counterparts as S4 on real-world datasets with transient dynamics, including physiological signals on the PTB-XL dataset and raw audio on Speech Commands.

Comment: Constructs HiPPO-style state-space operators over wavelet frames so the projection basis has localized temporal support instead of global polynomial support.

Topic Match: A new basis for state-space sequence modelling, a core architectural mechanism.

Relevance: 7 Novelty: 6


3. Efficient Continual Learning in Language Models via Thalamically Routed Cortical Columns

ArXiv ID: 2602.22479

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Afshin Khadangi

Abstract: Large language models deployed in the wild must adapt to evolving data, user behavior, and task mixtures without erasing previously acquired capabilities. In practice, this remains difficult: sequential updates induce catastrophic forgetting, while many stabilization methods rely on external procedures that are costly, brittle, or difficult to scale. We present TRC$^{2}$ (Thalamically Routed Cortical Columns), a decoder-only architecture that makes continual learning a property of the backbone itself. TRC$^{2}$ combines stacked cortical columns with a thalamic modulatory pathway for selective inter-column communication and a hippocampal pathway for event selective retrieval, delayed surprise-based writing, and replay-driven consolidation. This design localizes fast plasticity while preserving a slower stable computation pathway. We further introduce a causal memory-update scheme and an online replay controller that adjusts consolidation strength from measured forgetting. Across a task-sequential language-modeling stream over C4, WikiText-103, and GSM8K, TRC$^{2}$ consistently improves task-boundary modeling quality and substantially reduces cumulative forgetting relative to Transformer, Mamba, MoE, DeepSeek and continual learning baselines trained under the same pipeline. Ablations show that the thalamic and hippocampal components are central to the retention gains, while the full model remains competitive in throughput and training cost.

Comment: Decoder backbone built from stacked columns with a thalamic routing pathway for selective inter-column communication plus surprise-gated memory writes — a modular dynamic-computation architecture benchmarked against MoE and Mamba.

Topic Match: The contribution is a new routing-and-modularity mechanism in the backbone itself, which is architecture work; the memory/continual-learning framing is the motivation, not the mechanism.

Relevance: 6 Novelty: 6


Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (1)

1. Sparsity Induction for Accurate Post-Training Pruning of Large Language Models

ArXiv ID: 2602.21652

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Minhao Jiang, Zhikai Li, Xuewen Liu, Jing Zhang, Mengjuan Chen, Qingyi Gu

Abstract: Large language models have demonstrated capabilities in text generation, while their increasing parameter scales present challenges in computational and memory efficiency. Post-training sparsity (PTS), which reduces model cost by removing weights from dense networks, is an effective approach. However, native dense matrices lack high sparsity, making existing approaches that directly remove weights disrupt model states, resulting in unsatisfactory performance recovery even with post-tuning. We propose Sparsity Induction, which promotes models toward higher sparsity at both distribution and feature levels before pruning, to push the limits of PTS. At the distribution level, we enhance distributional sparsity through mathematically equivalent scaling transformations, which are fully absorbable and incur no extra parameters or inference-time overhead. At the feature level, we introduce Spectral Norm Loss to promote feature sparsity from a low-rank perspective. Experiments across diverse model architectures and tasks demonstrate that our method further enhances sparsity-friendliness, achieving superior pruning performance over existing approaches.

Comment: Makes weights sparsity-friendly before pruning via absorbable equivalent scaling transformations plus a spectral-norm loss for low-rank feature sparsity, rather than pruning the dense matrix directly.

Topic Match: A new post-training sparsity mechanism for LLMs with zero inference-time overhead.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 6


Paper Selection Prompt

System Prompt

You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.

User Prompt

Instructions

Respond in JSONL. Output exactly one JSON object per paper, one per line:

{"ARXIVID":"...","COMMENT":"...","RELEVANCE":0,"NOVELTY":0,"PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID":"...","MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS":[],"TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT":"...","HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS":[],"HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT":"..."}

Rules: - ARXIVID: the arXiv ID. - COMMENT: identify the single strongest matching criterion. Be brief and specific. Do not rely on generic phrases like "language modeling" or "advancement". Do not mention non-matching criteria. - RELEVANCE: integer from 1 to 10. - NOVELTY: integer from 1 to 10. - PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID: exactly one stable topic ID from the allowed topic registry. - MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS: zero or more stable topic IDs from the same allowed set. Include PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID when there are multiple matches. - TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT: briefly explain why the primary topic is the best fit. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS: zero or more tags from this exact set only: daily_hot, new_frontier. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT: briefly explain why the paper belongs in the daily hotspot paper feed when HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS is non-empty; otherwise use an empty string. - Use HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS sparingly. Most papers should return []. - daily_hot means the paper feels broadly important to the day and belongs in the daily hotspot paper section even if it is not part of the personalized foundational reading list. - new_frontier means the paper appears to open a genuinely new direction, paradigm, or field, even if the work is still early. - Do not output markdown, code fences, or any extra text.

Scoring Criteria

Relevance and Novelty are independent axes. Score both from 1 to 10.

Relevance Scoring

  • 9-10: directly centered on the target foundational topics; highest when the core contribution is clearly within them.
  • 7-8: substantially related, but partly peripheral or focused on a narrower aspect.
  • 5-6: touches the target topics, but the main contribution is elsewhere.
  • 3-4: largely outside the target topics, often application-focused or domain-specific.
  • 1-2: unrelated.

Important: Broad frontier relevance, major launch status, or daily buzz is not enough for a high Relevance score here. Those cases belong in the hotspot digest unless the paper strongly matches the specialized paper topics.

Novelty Scoring

  • 9-10: new paradigm, theory, or major methodological breakthrough.
  • 7-8: substantial methodological advance or strong new insight.
  • 5-6: meaningful but incremental extension or refinement.
  • 3-4: minor, narrow, or mostly engineering or domain-specific improvement.
  • 1-2: little originality; mainly standard application of existing methods.

Topic Registry

Use exactly one PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID chosen from the stable topic IDs below. - moe_training: MoE Training - Mixture-of-Experts training: routing, load balancing, expert granularity and shared experts, training stability, MoE parallelism and communication, and MoE kernels. - training_systems: Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency - Large-scale training systems and efficiency: distributed training algorithms, optimizers, and communication. - architecture_training: Architecture and Training Dynamics - Core architectural or computational mechanisms, dynamic computation, and training-stability dynamics. - efficiency_scaling: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training - Compression, sparsity, memory or cache efficiency, and large-scale training systems that materially change cost or behavior.

Papers

[PAPER LIST HERE]

Relevant Topics

This is a training-side feed. The centre of gravity is Mixture-of-Experts training and the large-scale training systems it sits on; architecture and efficiency work is kept when it bears on how a large model is trained or what it costs to train.

Keep a paper when its CORE CONTRIBUTION falls in one of the four topics below. Filter it when the topic is merely the setting for a downstream application, a benchmark, or a product result.

  1. MoE Training (primary) - Keep: expert routing and gating mechanisms; load balancing, with or without auxiliary losses; expert granularity, fine-grained and shared experts; MoE training stability (loss spikes, router collapse, z-loss and related fixes); expert and hybrid parallelism; all-to-all dispatch/combine and the communication schedules MoE needs; MoE kernels and grouped-GEMM style implementations; expert capacity, token dropping, and upcycling dense checkpoints into MoE. - Filter: papers that merely train on top of a MoE model without a new routing, balancing, stability, parallelism, or kernel contribution; "mixture of experts" in the classical ensemble or recommender sense.

  2. Large-Scale Training Systems - Keep: distributed training algorithms (data, tensor, pipeline, sequence, and expert parallelism, FSDP and ZeRO-style sharding); optimizers and preconditioners for large-scale pretraining; communication algorithms, overlap, and collective design; throughput and MFU work that materially changes what a training run costs or whether it converges; scaling-law work that informs how such runs are configured. - Filter: routine infrastructure tuning with no new algorithmic or systems idea.

  3. Architecture and Training Dynamics - Keep: new or analysed architectural mechanisms (attention variants, normalization and residual design, state-space and recurrent sequence modelling, dynamic or modular computation); optimisation and training-dynamics analysis that explains why large models train the way they do. - Filter: applying an existing architecture to a new task or benchmark with no mechanistic insight.

  4. Efficiency and Compression - Keep: quantization, sparsity, pruning, low-rank adaptation, KV-cache and memory-efficient designs, and other work that materially changes the cost of running or training a large model, especially when the mechanism is new rather than a tuned variant. - Filter: straightforward application of standard efficiency methods, and deployment or serving engineering with no new idea.

Leave these to the hotspot digest unless the core contribution clearly falls in one of the four topics above: - major model or product releases - agent, tooling, and RAG launches - benchmark, leaderboard, or evaluation-only papers - representation-learning theory, interpretability, and feature-formation analysis - memory mechanisms and agent memory systems - world models, exploration, and reinforcement learning - alignment and post-training (RLHF, DPO, GRPO, RFT, instruction tuning) - downstream applications in medical imaging, segmentation, 3D vision, video understanding, information retrieval, summarization, recommendation, machine translation, speech recognition, time series, knowledge graphs, and similar domains