This is a remedial run for missed papers from 01/22/2026 to 01/22/2026.

Results generated on 09/11/2026.

Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2026-01-23

_{Token counts are not reported for this run. 4 of 4 model calls succeeded, 365s of model wall clock.}

Topic Coverage:

Table of contents by topic:

Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency (1)

1. Sawtooth Wavefront Reordering: Enhanced CuTile FlashAttention on NVIDIA GB10 Authors: Yifan Zhu, Yekai Pan, Chen Ding

Architecture and Training Dynamics (1)

1. When to Think Fast and Slow? AMOR: Adaptive Entropy Gate for Hybrid Models Authors: Haoran Zheng, Chen Shani

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (2)

1. Space Filling Curves is All You Need: Communication-Avoiding Matrix Multiplication Made Simple Authors: Evangelos Georganas, Alexander Heinecke, Pradeep Dubey

2. Post-Training Neural Network Pruning using Graph Curvature Authors: Shuhang Tan, Jayson Sia, Paul Bogdan, Radoslav Ivanov

Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency (1)

1. Sawtooth Wavefront Reordering: Enhanced CuTile FlashAttention on NVIDIA GB10

ArXiv ID: 2601.16032

Primary Topic: Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency

Also Matches: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Yifan Zhu, Yekai Pan, Chen Ding

Abstract: High-performance attention kernels are essential for Large Language Models. This paper presents analysis of CuTile-based Flash Attention memory behavior and a technique to improve its cache performance. In particular, our analysis on the NVIDIA GB10 (Grace Blackwell) identifies the main cause of L2 cache miss. Leveraging this insight, we introduce a new programming technique called Sawtooth Wavefront Reordering that reduces L2 misses. We validate it in both CUDA and CuTile, observing 50\% or greater reduction in L2 misses and up to 60\% increase in throughput on GB10.

Comment: Pinpoints the L2 miss source in CuTile FlashAttention on GB10 and reorders tile wavefronts in a sawtooth pattern, cutting L2 misses by >=50% and lifting attention throughput up to 60%.

Topic Match: A concrete attention-kernel scheduling technique grounded in measured cache behaviour, which is the kernel and throughput layer of large-scale training systems.

Relevance: 7 Novelty: 6

Architecture and Training Dynamics (1)

1. When to Think Fast and Slow? AMOR: Adaptive Entropy Gate for Hybrid Models

ArXiv ID: 2602.13215

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Also Matches: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Haoran Zheng, Chen Shani

Abstract: Recurrent-attention hybrids aim to combine the efficiency of recurrence with the expressivity of attention, but existing approaches typically apply attention uniformly across all positions, even when the recurrent state alone is sufficient for accurate prediction. We introduce AMOR (Adaptive Metacognitive Output Router), a post-hoc hybrid architecture that selectively invokes attention based on predictive uncertainty. A recurrent backbone is augmented with entropy-gated attention blocks that activate only when the model's output entropy exceeds a dynamic threshold derived from a running batch median and scaled standard deviation. This yields a simple, gradient-free routing mechanism inspired by uncertainty-driven computation and the System 1 / System 2 distinction. Across Mamba2 and Gated DeltaNet backbones (180M-1.5B), AMOR consistently matches or outperforms both pure recurrent models and fixed-schedule hybrid baselines while invoking attention on only ~22% of tokens. It achieves strong performance on common-sense reasoning benchmarks and maintains stable long-context performance on LongBench, where prior hybrid models degrade under distribution shift. These results suggest that when attention is applied matters as much as how much: selectively allocating attention based on predictive uncertainty improves both efficiency and robustness, offering a simple alternative to uniform or fixed routing strategies and pointing toward adaptive hybrid architectures that dynamically match computation to input difficulty.

Comment: Entropy-gated, gradient-free dynamic computation: attention blocks fire only when output entropy exceeds a running-median threshold, so a recurrent backbone invokes attention on ~22% of tokens.

Topic Match: The contribution is an architectural mechanism for conditional computation inside recurrent-attention hybrids (Mamba2, Gated DeltaNet), which is squarely architecture and dynamic computation.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 6

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (2)

1. Space Filling Curves is All You Need: Communication-Avoiding Matrix Multiplication Made Simple

ArXiv ID: 2601.16294

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Also Matches: Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency

Authors: Evangelos Georganas, Alexander Heinecke, Pradeep Dubey

Abstract: General Matrix Multiplication (GEMM) is the cornerstone of HPC workloads and Deep Learning. State-of-the-art vendor libraries tune tensor layouts, parallelization schemes, and cache blocking to minimize data movement across the memory hierarchy and maximize throughput. Optimal settings for these parameters depend on the target platform and matrix shapes, making exhaustive tuning infeasible. We revisit Space Filling Curves (SFC) to alleviate this cumbersome tuning. We partition the Matrix Multiplication using advancements in SFC, and obtain platform-oblivious and shape-oblivious Matrix Multiplication schemes with high degree of data locality. We extend the SFC-based work partitioning to implement Communication-Avoiding (CA) algorithms that provably minimize data movement. The integration of CA-algorithms is seamless with compact code, achieving state-of-the-art results on multiple CPU platforms, outperforming vendor libraries up to 5.5x for a range of GEMM-shapes (1.8x Weighted Harmonic Mean speedup). We show the impact of our work on two real-world applications by leveraging our GEMM as compute backend: i) prefill of LLM inference with speedups up to 1.85x over State-Of-The-Art, and ii) distributed-memory Matrix Multiplication with speedups up to 2.2x.

Comment: Space-filling-curve partitioning produces communication-avoiding GEMM kernels with provably minimal data movement.

Topic Match: The core mechanism improves GEMM memory locality and compute efficiency; distributed matrix-multiplication benefits also connect to training systems.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

2. Post-Training Neural Network Pruning using Graph Curvature

ArXiv ID: 2601.16366

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Authors: Shuhang Tan, Jayson Sia, Paul Bogdan, Radoslav Ivanov

Abstract: This paper provides a fresh view of the neural network (NN) pruning problem through the lens of graph theory. To achieve effective pruning, we aim to identify the main NN data flows and the corresponding NN connections that are most and least important for the performance of the full model. Unlike the standard approach to NN data flow analysis, which is based on information theory, we employ the notion of graph curvature, specifically Ollivier-Ricci curvature (ORC). ORC has been successfully used to identify important graph edges in various domains such as road traffic analysis, biological networks, and social networks. In particular, edges with negative ORC are considered bottlenecks and are therefore critical to the graph's overall connectivity, whereas positive-ORC edges are less essential. We use this intuition for NNs to (1) construct a graph induced by the NN structure and introduce the notion of neural curvature (NC) based on ORC; (2) calculate curvatures based on activation patterns for a set of input examples; and (3) demonstrate that NC can be used to rank edges according to their importance for overall NN functionality. We evaluate our method through pruning experiments on a variety of small and medium size models trained on three image datasets: MNIST, CIFAR-10, and CIFAR-100. The results indicate that our method can identify a larger number of unimportant edges compared to existing pruning methods.

Comment: Pruning criterion from Ollivier-Ricci curvature over the activation-induced network graph, ranking edges by bottleneck structure instead of information-theoretic saliency.

Topic Match: Core contribution is a new sparsity/pruning importance measure, which is efficiency and compression; validation is limited to small and medium image models.

Relevance: 6 Novelty: 6

Paper Selection Prompt

System Prompt

You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.

User Prompt

Instructions

Respond in JSONL. Output exactly one JSON object per paper, one per line:

{"ARXIVID":"...","COMMENT":"...","RELEVANCE":0,"NOVELTY":0,"PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID":"...","MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS":[],"TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT":"...","HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS":[],"HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT":"..."}

Rules: - ARXIVID: the arXiv ID. - COMMENT: identify the single strongest matching criterion. Be brief and specific. Do not rely on generic phrases like "language modeling" or "advancement". Do not mention non-matching criteria. - RELEVANCE: integer from 1 to 10. - NOVELTY: integer from 1 to 10. - PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID: exactly one stable topic ID from the allowed topic registry. - MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS: zero or more stable topic IDs from the same allowed set. Include PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID when there are multiple matches. - TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT: briefly explain why the primary topic is the best fit. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS: zero or more tags from this exact set only: daily_hot, new_frontier. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT: briefly explain why the paper belongs in the daily hotspot paper feed when HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS is non-empty; otherwise use an empty string. - Use HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS sparingly. Most papers should return []. - daily_hot means the paper feels broadly important to the day and belongs in the daily hotspot paper section even if it is not part of the personalized foundational reading list. - new_frontier means the paper appears to open a genuinely new direction, paradigm, or field, even if the work is still early. - Do not output markdown, code fences, or any extra text.

Scoring Criteria

Relevance and Novelty are independent axes. Score both from 1 to 10.

Relevance Scoring

• 9-10: directly centered on the target foundational topics; highest when the core contribution is clearly within them.
• 7-8: substantially related, but partly peripheral or focused on a narrower aspect.
• 5-6: touches the target topics, but the main contribution is elsewhere.
• 3-4: largely outside the target topics, often application-focused or domain-specific.
• 1-2: unrelated.

Important: Broad frontier relevance, major launch status, or daily buzz is not enough for a high Relevance score here. Those cases belong in the hotspot digest unless the paper strongly matches the specialized paper topics.

Novelty Scoring

• 9-10: new paradigm, theory, or major methodological breakthrough.
• 7-8: substantial methodological advance or strong new insight.
• 5-6: meaningful but incremental extension or refinement.
• 3-4: minor, narrow, or mostly engineering or domain-specific improvement.
• 1-2: little originality; mainly standard application of existing methods.

Topic Registry

Use exactly one PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID chosen from the stable topic IDs below. - moe_training: MoE Training - Mixture-of-Experts training: routing, load balancing, expert granularity and shared experts, training stability, MoE parallelism and communication, and MoE kernels. - training_systems: Large-Scale Training Systems and Efficiency - Large-scale training systems and efficiency: distributed training algorithms, optimizers, and communication. - architecture_training: Architecture and Training Dynamics - Core architectural or computational mechanisms, dynamic computation, and training-stability dynamics. - efficiency_scaling: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training - Compression, sparsity, memory or cache efficiency, and large-scale training systems that materially change cost or behavior.

Papers

[PAPER LIST HERE]

Relevant Topics

This is a training-side feed. The centre of gravity is Mixture-of-Experts training and the large-scale training systems it sits on; architecture and efficiency work is kept when it bears on how a large model is trained or what it costs to train.

Keep a paper when its CORE CONTRIBUTION falls in one of the four topics below. Filter it when the topic is merely the setting for a downstream application, a benchmark, or a product result.

1. MoE Training (primary) - Keep: expert routing and gating mechanisms; load balancing, with or without auxiliary losses; expert granularity, fine-grained and shared experts; MoE training stability (loss spikes, router collapse, z-loss and related fixes); expert and hybrid parallelism; all-to-all dispatch/combine and the communication schedules MoE needs; MoE kernels and grouped-GEMM style implementations; expert capacity, token dropping, and upcycling dense checkpoints into MoE. - Filter: papers that merely train on top of a MoE model without a new routing, balancing, stability, parallelism, or kernel contribution; "mixture of experts" in the classical ensemble or recommender sense.

2. Large-Scale Training Systems - Keep: distributed training algorithms (data, tensor, pipeline, sequence, and expert parallelism, FSDP and ZeRO-style sharding); optimizers and preconditioners for large-scale pretraining; communication algorithms, overlap, and collective design; throughput and MFU work that materially changes what a training run costs or whether it converges; scaling-law work that informs how such runs are configured. - Filter: routine infrastructure tuning with no new algorithmic or systems idea.

3. Architecture and Training Dynamics - Keep: new or analysed architectural mechanisms (attention variants, normalization and residual design, state-space and recurrent sequence modelling, dynamic or modular computation); optimisation and training-dynamics analysis that explains why large models train the way they do. - Filter: applying an existing architecture to a new task or benchmark with no mechanistic insight.

4. Efficiency and Compression - Keep: quantization, sparsity, pruning, low-rank adaptation, KV-cache and memory-efficient designs, and other work that materially changes the cost of running or training a large model, especially when the mechanism is new rather than a tuned variant. - Filter: straightforward application of standard efficiency methods, and deployment or serving engineering with no new idea.

Leave these to the hotspot digest unless the core contribution clearly falls in one of the four topics above: - major model or product releases - agent, tooling, and RAG launches - benchmark, leaderboard, or evaluation-only papers - representation-learning theory, interpretability, and feature-formation analysis - memory mechanisms and agent memory systems - world models, exploration, and reinforcement learning - alignment and post-training (RLHF, DPO, GRPO, RFT, instruction tuning) - downstream applications in medical imaging, segmentation, 3D vision, video understanding, information retrieval, summarization, recommendation, machine translation, speech recognition, time series, knowledge graphs, and similar domains