Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2026-04-27

Topic Coverage:

Table of contents by topic:

Architecture and Training Dynamics (2)

1. SOC-ICNN: From Polyhedral to Conic Geometry for Learning Convex Surrogate Functions Authors: Kang Liu, Jianchen Hu

2. Relaxation-Informed Training of Neural Network Surrogate Models Authors: Calvin Tsay

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (1)

1. HGQ-LUT: Fast LUT-Aware Training and Efficient Architectures for DNN Inference Authors: Chang Sun, Zhiqiang Que, Bakhtiar Zadeh, Qibin Liu, Kevin H. Alvarez, Wayne Luk, Maria Spiropulu

Representation Learning Theory and Structure (1)

1. Shared Lexical Task Representations Explain Behavioral Variability In LLMs Authors: Zhuonan Yang, Jacob Xiaochen Li, Francisco Piedrahita Velez, Eric Todd, David Bau, Michael L. Littman, Stephen H. Bach, Ellie Pavlick

World Models, Exploration, and Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning (1)

1. Near-Optimal Regret for the Safe Learning-based Control of the Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulator Authors: Spencer Hutchinson, Nanfei Jiang, Mahnoosh Alizadeh

Architecture and Training Dynamics (2)

1. SOC-ICNN: From Polyhedral to Conic Geometry for Learning Convex Surrogate Functions

ArXiv ID: 2604.22355

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Kang Liu, Jianchen Hu

Abstract: Classical ReLU-based Input Convex Neural Networks (ICNNs) are equivalent to the optimal value functions of Linear Programming (LP). This intrinsic structural equivalence restricts their representational capacity to piecewise-linear polyhedral functions. To overcome this representational bottleneck, we propose the SOC-ICNN, an architecture that generalizes the underlying optimization class from LP to Second-Order Cone Programming (SOCP). By explicitly injecting positive semi-definite curvature and Euclidean norm-based conic primitives, our formulation introduces native smooth curvature into the representation while preserving a rigorous optimization-theoretic interpretation. We formally prove that SOC-ICNNs strictly expand the representational space of ReLU-ICNNs without increasing the asymptotic order of forward-pass complexity. Extensive experiments demonstrate that SOC-ICNN substantially improves function approximation, while delivering competitive downstream decision quality. The code is available at https://github.com/Kanyooo/SOC-ICNN.

Comment: Extends ICNNs from LP-equivalent polyhedral representations to SOCP-based conic geometry with provably richer convex function classes.

Topic Match: Best fit is architecture_training because the core contribution is a new neural architecture with a principled optimization-theoretic interpretation and expanded representational mechanism.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 8

2. Relaxation-Informed Training of Neural Network Surrogate Models

ArXiv ID: 2604.22746

Primary Topic: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Calvin Tsay

Abstract: ReLU neural networks trained as surrogate models can be embedded exactly in mixed-integer linear programs (MILPs), enabling global optimization over the learned function. The tractability of the resulting MILP depends on structural properties of the network, i.e., the number of binary variables in associated formulations and the tightness of the continuous LP relaxation. These properties are determined during training, yet standard training objectives (prediction loss with classical weight regularization) offer no mechanism to directly control them. This work studies training regularizers that directly target downstream MILP tractability. Specifically, we propose simple bound-based regularizers that penalize the big-M constants of MILP formulations and/or the number of unstable neurons. Moreover, we introduce an LP relaxation gap regularizer that explicitly penalizes the per-sample gap of the continuous relaxation at training points. We derive its associated gradient and provide an implementation from LP dual variables without custom automatic differentiation tools. We show that combining the above regularizers can approximate the full total derivative of the LP gap with respect to the network parameters, capturing both direct and indirect sensitivities. Experiments on non-convex benchmark functions and a two-stage stochastic programming problem with quantile neural network surrogates demonstrate that the proposed regularizers can reduce MILP solve times by up to four orders of magnitude relative to an unregularized baseline, while maintaining competitive surrogate model accuracy.

Comment: Regularizes neural-network training using MILP big-M bounds, unstable-neuron counts, and LP relaxation gaps to improve downstream optimization tractability.

Topic Match: The paper directly modifies training objectives to shape computational and stability properties of learned networks, which fits training dynamics best.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 8

Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training (1)

1. HGQ-LUT: Fast LUT-Aware Training and Efficient Architectures for DNN Inference

ArXiv ID: 2604.22293

Primary Topic: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training

Also Matches: Architecture and Training Dynamics

Authors: Chang Sun, Zhiqiang Que, Bakhtiar Zadeh, Qibin Liu, Kevin H. Alvarez, Wayne Luk, Maria Spiropulu

Abstract: Lookup-table (LUT) based neural networks can deliver ultra-low latency and excellent hardware efficiency on FPGAs by mapping arithmetic operations directly onto the logic primitives. However, state-of-the-art LUT-aware training (LAT) approaches remain difficult to use in practice: they are often orders of magnitude slower to train than conventional networks, require non-trivial manual tuning for hardware efficiency, and lack an end-to-end workflow. This work presents HGQ-LUT, integrated in https://github.com/calad0i/HGQ2, a new LAT approach that achieves state-of-the-art hardware efficiency while accelerating training by over 100 times on modern GPUs. HGQ-LUT introduces LUT-Dense and LUT-Conv layers that are implemented with regular, accelerator-efficient tensor operations during training, which are then compiled into logic LUTs for hardware. By combining these layers with fine-grained, element-wise heterogeneous quantization (including zero-bit pruning) and a LUT-aware resource surrogate, HGQ-LUT enables the automatic exploration of accuracy-resource trade-offs without manual bit-width tuning. We further integrate HGQ-LUT into open-source toolchains, enabling unified design, compilation, and bit-exact verification of hybrid architectures that mix LUT-based with conventional arithmetic blocks. These features make LAT-based DNNs practical for real-world deployment, such as at the CERN Large Hadron Collider's experiments.

Comment: Makes LUT-aware training practical by redesigning LUT layers for standard tensor ops and adding automated accuracy-resource co-optimization.

Topic Match: Best fit is efficiency_scaling because the main advance is a training-and-architecture workflow that materially improves hardware-efficient inference.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 8

Representation Learning Theory and Structure (1)

1. Shared Lexical Task Representations Explain Behavioral Variability In LLMs

ArXiv ID: 2604.22027

Primary Topic: Representation Learning Theory and Structure

Authors: Zhuonan Yang, Jacob Xiaochen Li, Francisco Piedrahita Velez, Eric Todd, David Bau, Michael L. Littman, Stephen H. Bach, Ellie Pavlick

Abstract: One of the most common complaints about large language models (LLMs) is their prompt sensitivity -- that is, the fact that their ability to perform a task or provide a correct answer to a question can depend unpredictably on the way the question is posed. We investigate this variation by comparing two very different but commonly-used styles of prompting: instruction-based prompts, which describe the task in natural language, and example-based prompts, which provide in-context few-shot demonstration pairs to illustrate the task. We find that, despite large variation in performance as a function of the prompt, the model engages some common underlying mechanisms across different prompts of a task. Specifically, we identify task-specific attention heads whose outputs literally describe the task -- which we dub lexical task heads -- and show that these heads are shared across prompting styles and trigger subsequent answer production. We further find that behavioral variation between prompts can be explained by the degree to which these heads are activated, and that failures are at least sometimes due to competing task representations that dilute the signal of the target task. Our results together present an increasingly clear picture of how LLMs' internal representations can explain behavior that otherwise seems idiosyncratic to users and developers.

Comment: Finds shared lexical task heads across prompt styles and links prompt sensitivity to activation strength of internal task representations.

Topic Match: The paper is squarely about internal representational structure in LLMs and how it explains behavioral variability.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 8

World Models, Exploration, and Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning (1)

1. Near-Optimal Regret for the Safe Learning-based Control of the Constrained Linear Quadratic Regulator

ArXiv ID: 2604.22158

Primary Topic: World Models, Exploration, and Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Spencer Hutchinson, Nanfei Jiang, Mahnoosh Alizadeh

Abstract: We study the problem of adaptive control of the stochastic linear quadratic regulator (LQR) with constraints that must be satisfied at every time step. Prior work on the multidimensional problem has shown $\tilde{O}(T^{2/3})$ regret and satisfaction of robust constraints, leaving open the question of whether $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret can be attained in the constrained LQR setting. We contribute to this problem by showing $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{T})$ regret and satisfaction of chance constraints. This type of constraints allow us to handle unbounded noise and also enable analytical techniques not directly applicable to robust constraints. Our proposed algorithm for this problem uses an SDP to select an optimistic policy, and then "scales back" this policy until it is verifiably-safe. Our theoretical analysis establishes regret and constraint guarantees via a key lemma that bounds the system covariance in terms of the chosen policy. This covariance-based analysis is in contrast with the cost-to-go based analysis that is typically used in adaptive LQR.

Comment: Achieves near-optimal regret for constrained adaptive LQR with always-safe chance constraints via optimistic control plus safety scaling.

Topic Match: Best fit is world_models_open_ended_rl because it is foundational theory for safe learning-based control and sequential decision-making.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 8

Paper Selection Prompt

System Prompt

You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.

User Prompt

Relevant Topics

Focus on specialized foundational research that remains worth reading even when it is not a daily hotspot.

Do not keep papers only because they are broadly frontier-relevant, widely discussed, or part of a major launch cycle. Broad daily frontier movement belongs in the hotspot digest unless the core contribution strongly matches the specialized topics below.

1. Architecture and Training Dynamics - Keep: work that introduces or analyzes core architectural or computational mechanisms such as MoE routing, attention variants, normalization or residual design, recurrent or state-space sequence modeling, dynamic or modular computation, or training-stability mechanisms. - Filter: papers that mainly apply an existing architecture to a new task or benchmark without new mechanistic insight.

2. Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training - Keep: quantization, sparsity, pruning, low-rank adaptation, KV-cache or cache design, memory-efficient inference or training, distributed training algorithms, communication or optimizer improvements, and training-system designs that materially change large-model training cost or behavior. - Filter: routine infrastructure optimization, deployment work, or straightforward tuning of standard efficiency methods without a clear new algorithmic or systems idea.

3. Representation Learning Theory and Structure - Keep: work on feature formation, sparse or dictionary learning, contrastive or self-supervised representation structure, training dynamics, identifiability, or other mechanistic understanding of learned representations. - Filter: papers that use representation-learning methods as standard components in downstream applications without new theoretical or methodological content.

4. Memory Structures and Agent Memory Systems - Keep: internal or external memory mechanisms, differentiable memory, recurrent or latent memory, long-context memory organization, memory compression or eviction, retrieval as a learned memory mechanism, episodic or semantic memory for agents, memory consolidation, forgetting, and agent memory systems whose core contribution is a new principle for storing, updating, recalling, or reasoning over memory. - Filter: standard RAG pipelines, vector-database plumbing, context stuffing, chat-history management, or agent products that add memory without a new memory mechanism, learning principle, or analysis.

5. World Models, Exploration, and Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning - Keep: model-based RL, action-conditioned world models, imagination or planning-based agents, open-ended exploration, automatic curriculum or environment generation, continual RL, reward-free skill discovery, and RL methods aimed at learning new behaviors or transferable knowledge through interaction. Also keep foundational work on pre-training agents or world models, foundation world models, generative interactive environments, or theoretical arguments about why world models or exploration are necessary for general-purpose agents. - Filter: RLHF, DPO, GRPO, RFT, instruction-following or alignment fine-tuning for LLMs; papers where RL is mainly a post-training optimizer for language models, reasoning traces, or tool-use agents without a new world-model, exploration, or generalization contribution; routine benchmark gains on a fixed environment without a new learning principle.

Usually leave these to the hotspot digest unless the core contribution is clearly foundational: - major model or product releases - broadly trendy agent or tooling launches - benchmark, leaderboard, or evaluation-only papers - downstream applications in medical imaging, segmentation, 3D vision, video understanding, information retrieval, summarization, recommendation, machine translation, speech recognition, time series, knowledge graphs, and similar domains

Scoring Criteria

Relevance and Novelty are independent axes. Score both from 1 to 10.

Relevance Scoring

• 9-10: directly centered on the target foundational topics; highest when the core contribution is clearly within them.
• 7-8: substantially related, but partly peripheral or focused on a narrower aspect.
• 5-6: touches the target topics, but the main contribution is elsewhere.
• 3-4: largely outside the target topics, often application-focused or domain-specific.
• 1-2: unrelated.

Important: Broad frontier relevance, major launch status, or daily buzz is not enough for a high Relevance score here. Those cases belong in the hotspot digest unless the paper strongly matches the specialized paper topics.

Novelty Scoring

• 9-10: new paradigm, theory, or major methodological breakthrough.
• 7-8: substantial methodological advance or strong new insight.
• 5-6: meaningful but incremental extension or refinement.
• 3-4: minor, narrow, or mostly engineering or domain-specific improvement.
• 1-2: little originality; mainly standard application of existing methods.

Topic Registry

Use exactly one PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID chosen from the stable topic IDs below. - architecture_training: Architecture and Training Dynamics - Core architectural or computational mechanisms, dynamic computation, and training-stability dynamics. - efficiency_scaling: Efficiency, Compression, and Large-Scale Training - Compression, sparsity, memory or cache efficiency, and large-scale training systems that materially change cost or behavior. - representation_structure: Representation Learning Theory and Structure - How learned representations form, organize, and support generalization or mechanistic understanding. - memory_systems: Memory Structures and Agent Memory Systems - Internal or external memory mechanisms, learned retrieval memory, consolidation, forgetting, and agent memory systems. - world_models_open_ended_rl: World Models, Exploration, and Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning - World models, model-based RL, exploration, continual learning, and RL for transferable knowledge acquisition rather than LLM post-training.

Papers

[PAPER LIST HERE]

Instructions

Respond in JSONL. Output exactly one JSON object per paper, one per line:

{"ARXIVID":"...","COMMENT":"...","RELEVANCE":0,"NOVELTY":0,"PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID":"...","MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS":[],"TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT":"...","HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS":[],"HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT":"..."}

Rules: - ARXIVID: the arXiv ID. - COMMENT: identify the single strongest matching criterion. Be brief and specific. Do not rely on generic phrases like "language modeling" or "advancement". Do not mention non-matching criteria. - RELEVANCE: integer from 1 to 10. - NOVELTY: integer from 1 to 10. - PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID: exactly one stable topic ID from the allowed topic registry. - MATCHED_TOPIC_IDS: zero or more stable topic IDs from the same allowed set. Include PRIMARY_TOPIC_ID when there are multiple matches. - TOPIC_MATCH_COMMENT: briefly explain why the primary topic is the best fit. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS: zero or more tags from this exact set only: daily_hot, new_frontier. - HOTSPOT_PAPER_COMMENT: briefly explain why the paper belongs in the daily hotspot paper feed when HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS is non-empty; otherwise use an empty string. - Use HOTSPOT_PAPER_TAGS sparingly. Most papers should return []. - daily_hot means the paper feels broadly important to the day and belongs in the daily hotspot paper section even if it is not part of the personalized foundational reading list. - new_frontier means the paper appears to open a genuinely new direction, paradigm, or field, even if the work is still early. - Do not output markdown, code fences, or any extra text.