Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2025-12-31

Total arXiv papers: 366

Total scanned papers: 253

Total relevant papers: 22

Table of contents with paper titles:

1. The Bayesian Geometry of Transformer Attention Authors: Naman Aggarwal, Siddhartha R. Dalal, Vishal Misra

2. Gradient Dynamics of Attention: How Cross-Entropy Sculpts Bayesian Manifolds Authors: Naman Aggarwal, Siddhartha R. Dalal, Vishal Misra

3. Learning When Not to Attend Globally Authors: Xuan Luo, Kailai Zhang, Xifeng Yan

4. MoR: Mixture Of Representations For Mixed-Precision Training Authors: Bor-Yiing Su, Peter Dykas, Mike Chrzanowski, Jatin Chhugani

5. Completed Hyperparameter Transfer across Modules, Width, Depth, Batch and Duration Authors: Bruno Mlodozeniec, Pierre Ablin, Louis B\'ethune, Dan Busbridge, Michal Klein, Jason Ramapuram, Marco Cuturi

6. Understanding the Mechanisms of Fast Hyperparameter Transfer Authors: Nikhil Ghosh, Denny Wu, Alberto Bietti

7. Theoretical Foundations of Scaling Law in Familial Models Authors: Huan Song, Qingfei Zhao, Ting Long, Shuyu Tian, Hongjun An, Jiawei Shao, Chi Zhang, Xuelong Li

8. AKG kernel Agent: A Multi-Agent Framework for Cross-Platform Kernel Synthesis Authors: Jinye Du, Quan Yuan, Zuyao Zhang, Yanzhi Yi, Jiahui Hu, Wangyi Chen, Yiyang Zhu, Qishui Zheng, Wenxiang Zou, Xiangyu Chang, Zuohe Zheng, Zichun Ye, Chao Liu, Shanni Li, Renwei Zhang, Yiping Deng, Xinwei Hu, Xuefeng Jin, Jie Zhao

9. KernelEvolve: Scaling Agentic Kernel Coding for Heterogeneous AI Accelerators at Meta Authors: Gang Liao, Hongsen Qin, Ying Wang, Alicia Golden, Michael Kuchnik, Yavuz Yetim, Jia Jiunn Ang, Chunli Fu, Yihan He, Samuel Hsia, Zewei Jiang, Dianshi Li, Uladzimir Pashkevich, Varna Puvvada, Feng Shi, Matt Steiner, Ruichao Xiao, Nathan Yan, Xiayu Yu, Zhou Fang, Abdul Zainul-Abedin, Ketan Singh, Hongtao Yu, Wenyuan Chi, Barney Huang, Sean Zhang, Noah Weller, Zach Marine, Wyatt Cook, Carole-Jean Wu, Gaoxiang Liu

10. GPU Kernel Optimization Beyond Full Builds: An LLM Framework with Minimal Executable Programs Authors: Ruifan Chu, Anbang Wang, Xiuxiu Bai, Shuai Liu, Xiaoshe Dong

11. FRoD: Full-Rank Efficient Fine-Tuning with Rotational Degrees for Fast Convergence Authors: Guoan Wan, Tianyu Chen, Fangzheng Feng, Haoyi Zhou, Runhua Xu

12. Trust Region Masking for Long-Horizon LLM Reinforcement Learning Authors: Yingru Li, Jiacai Liu, Jiawei Xu, Yuxuan Tong, Ziniu Li, Baoxiang Wang

13. The Law of Multi-Model Collaboration: Scaling Limits of Model Ensembling for Large Language Models Authors: Dakuan Lu, Jiaqi Zhang, Cheng Yuan, Jiawei Shao, Chi Zhang, Xuelong Li

14. Role-Based Fault Tolerance System for LLM RL Post-Training Authors: Zhenqian Chen, Baoquan Zhong, Xiang Li, Qing Dai, Xinkui Zhao, Miao Ye, Ren Cheng, Lufei Zhang, Jianwei Yin

15. Taming the Tail: Stable LLM Reinforcement Learning via Dynamic Vocabulary Pruning Authors: Yingru Li, Jiawei Xu, Jiacai Liu, Yuxuan Tong, Ziniu Li, Tianle Cai, Ge Zhang, Qian Liu, Baoxiang Wang

16. On the Existence and Behaviour of Secondary Attention Sinks Authors: Jeffrey T. H. Wong, Cheng Zhang, Louis Mahon, Wayne Luk, Anton Isopoussu, Yiren Zhao

17. Nightjar: Dynamic Adaptive Speculative Decoding for Large Language Models Serving Authors: Rui Li, Zhaoning Zhang, Libo Zhang, Huaimin Wang, Xiang Fu, Zhiquan Lai

18. Masking Teacher and Reinforcing Student for Distilling Vision-Language Models Authors: Byung-Kwan Lee, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, Ryo Hachiuma

19. Towards Efficient Post-Training via Fourier-Driven Adapter Architectures Authors: Donggyun Bae, Jongil Park

20. Splitwise: Collaborative Edge-Cloud Inference for LLMs via Lyapunov-Assisted DRL Authors: Abolfazl Younesi, Abbas Shabrang Maryan, Elyas Oustad, Zahra Najafabadi Samani, Mohsen Ansari, Thomas Fahringer

21. LLMBoost: Make Large Language Models Stronger with Boosting Authors: Zehao Chen, Tianxiang Ai, Yifei Li, Gongxun Li, Yuyang Wei, Wang Zhou, Guanghui Li, Bin Yu, Zhijun Chen, Hailong Sun, Fuzhen Zhuang, Jianxin Li, Deqing Wang, Yikun Ban

22. How Much Data Is Enough? Uniform Convergence Bounds for Generative & Vision-Language Models under Low-Dimensional Structure Authors: Paul M. Thompson

1. The Bayesian Geometry of Transformer Attention

ArXiv ID: 2512.22471

Authors: Naman Aggarwal, Siddhartha R. Dalal, Vishal Misra

Abstract: Transformers often appear to perform Bayesian reasoning in context, but verifying this rigorously has been impossible: natural data lack analytic posteriors, and large models conflate reasoning with memorization. We address this by constructing \emph{Bayesian wind tunnels} -- controlled environments where the true posterior is known in closed form and memorization is provably impossible. In these settings, small transformers reproduce Bayesian posteriors with $10^{-3}$-$10^{-4}$ bit accuracy, while capacity-matched MLPs fail by orders of magnitude, establishing a clear architectural separation. Across two tasks -- bijection elimination and Hidden Markov Model (HMM) state tracking -- we find that transformers implement Bayesian inference through a consistent geometric mechanism: residual streams serve as the belief substrate, feed-forward networks perform the posterior update, and attention provides content-addressable routing. Geometric diagnostics reveal orthogonal key bases, progressive query-key alignment, and a low-dimensional value manifold parameterized by posterior entropy. During training this manifold unfurls while attention patterns remain stable, a \emph{frame-precision dissociation} predicted by recent gradient analyses. Taken together, these results demonstrate that hierarchical attention realizes Bayesian inference by geometric design, explaining both the necessity of attention and the failure of flat architectures. Bayesian wind tunnels provide a foundation for mechanistically connecting small, verifiable systems to reasoning phenomena observed in large language models.

Comment: Representation Learning/Transformer internals: introduces “Bayesian wind tunnels” and a geometric mechanism showing how attention implements Bayesian inference.

Relevance: 10 Novelty: 9

2. Gradient Dynamics of Attention: How Cross-Entropy Sculpts Bayesian Manifolds

ArXiv ID: 2512.22473

Authors: Naman Aggarwal, Siddhartha R. Dalal, Vishal Misra

Abstract: Transformers empirically perform precise probabilistic reasoning in carefully constructed ``Bayesian wind tunnels'' and in large-scale language models, yet the mechanisms by which gradient-based learning creates the required internal geometry remain opaque. We provide a complete first-order analysis of how cross-entropy training reshapes attention scores and value vectors in a transformer attention head. Our core result is an \emph{advantage-based routing law} for attention scores, [ \frac{\partial L}{\partial s_{ij}} = \alpha_{ij}\bigl(b_{ij}-\mathbb{E}{\alpha_i}[b]\bigr), \qquad b$ are attention weights. These equations induce a positive feedback loop in which routing and content specialize together: queries route more strongly to values that are above-average for their error signal, and those values are pulled toward the queries that use them. We show that this coupled specialization behaves like a two-timescale EM procedure: attention weights implement an E-step (soft responsibilities), while values implement an M-step (responsibility-weighted prototype updates), with queries and keys adjusting the hypothesis frame. Through controlled simulations, including a sticky Markov-chain task where we compare a closed-form EM-style update to standard SGD, we demonstrate that the same gradient dynamics that minimize cross-entropy also sculpt the low-dimensional manifolds identified in our companion work as implementing Bayesian inference. This yields a unified picture in which optimization (gradient flow) gives rise to geometry (Bayesian manifolds), which in turn supports function (in-context probabilistic reasoning).} := u_i^\top v_j, ] coupled with a \emph{responsibility-weighted update} for values, [ \Delta v_j = -\eta\sum_i \alpha_{ij} u_i, ] where $u_i$ is the upstream gradient at position $i$ and $\alpha_{ij

Comment: Representation Learning/Training Dynamics: first-order gradient analysis of attention with advantage-based routing and EM-like specialization mechanism explaining how cross-entropy shapes internal geometry.

Relevance: 10 Novelty: 9

3. Learning When Not to Attend Globally

ArXiv ID: 2512.22562

Authors: Xuan Luo, Kailai Zhang, Xifeng Yan

Abstract: When reading books, humans focus primarily on the current page, flipping back to recap prior context only when necessary. Similarly, we demonstrate that Large Language Models (LLMs) can learn to dynamically determine when to attend to global context. We propose All-or-Here Attention (AHA), which utilizes a binary router per attention head to dynamically toggle between full attention and local sliding window attention for each token. Our results indicate that with a window size of 256 tokens, up to 93\% of the original full attention operations can be replaced by sliding window attention without performance loss. Furthermore, by evaluating AHA across various window sizes, we identify a long-tail distribution in context dependency, where the necessity for full attention decays rapidly as the local window expands. By decoupling local processing from global access, AHA reveals that full attention is largely redundant, and that efficient inference requires only on-demand access to the global context.

Comment: Model Architecture/Efficiency: conditional attention via per-head binary router switching between global and sliding-window attention to cut full attention usage.

Relevance: 10 Novelty: 8

4. MoR: Mixture Of Representations For Mixed-Precision Training

ArXiv ID: 2512.22804

Authors: Bor-Yiing Su, Peter Dykas, Mike Chrzanowski, Jatin Chhugani

Abstract: Mixed-precision training is a crucial technique for scaling deep learning models, but successful mixedprecision training requires identifying and applying the right combination of training methods. This paper presents our preliminary study on Mixture-of-Representations (MoR), a novel, per-tensor and sub-tensor level quantization framework that dynamically analyzes a tensor's numerical properties to select between a variety of different representations. Based on the framework, we have proposed and experimented concrete algorithms that choose dynamically between FP8 and BF16 representations for both per-tensor and sub-tensor level granularities. Our universal approach is designed to preserve model quality across various quantization partition strategies and datasets. Our initial findings show that this approach can achieve state-of-the-art results with 98.38% of tensors quantized to the FP8 format. This work highlights the potential of dynamic, property-aware quantization while preserving model quality. We believe this approach can generally improve the robustness of low precision training, as demonstrated by achieving FP8 accuracies that are on par with existing approaches without the need for fine-grain partitioning, or can be used in combination with other training methods to improve the leverage of even lower precision number formats such as NVFP4.

Comment: Model Compression/Efficiency: dynamic per-/sub-tensor mixed-precision (FP8 vs BF16) selection via Mixture-of-Representations to robustly enable low-precision training.

Relevance: 10 Novelty: 7

5. Completed Hyperparameter Transfer across Modules, Width, Depth, Batch and Duration

ArXiv ID: 2512.22382

Authors: Bruno Mlodozeniec, Pierre Ablin, Louis B\'ethune, Dan Busbridge, Michal Klein, Jason Ramapuram, Marco Cuturi

Abstract: Hyperparameter tuning can dramatically impact training stability and final performance of large-scale models. Recent works on neural network parameterisations, such as $\mu$P, have enabled transfer of optimal global hyperparameters across model sizes. These works propose an empirical practice of search for optimal global base hyperparameters at a small model size, and transfer to a large size. We extend these works in two key ways. To handle scaling along most important scaling axes, we propose the Complete$^{(d)}$ Parameterisation that unifies scaling in width and depth -- using an adaptation of CompleteP -- as well as in batch-size and training duration. Secondly, with our parameterisation, we investigate per-module hyperparameter optimisation and transfer. We characterise the empirical challenges of navigating the high-dimensional hyperparameter landscape, and propose practical guidelines for tackling this optimisation problem. We demonstrate that, with the right parameterisation, hyperparameter transfer holds even in the per-module hyperparameter regime. Our study covers an extensive range of optimisation hyperparameters of modern models: learning rates, AdamW parameters, weight decay, initialisation scales, and residual block multipliers. Our experiments demonstrate significant training speed improvements in Large Language Models with the transferred per-module hyperparameters.

Comment: Training dynamics/scaling: extends parameterization for hyperparameter transfer across width, depth, batch size, and training duration, including per-module transfer.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 8

6. Understanding the Mechanisms of Fast Hyperparameter Transfer

ArXiv ID: 2512.22768

Authors: Nikhil Ghosh, Denny Wu, Alberto Bietti

Abstract: The growing scale of deep learning models has rendered standard hyperparameter (HP) optimization prohibitively expensive. A promising solution is the use of scale-aware hyperparameters, which can enable direct transfer of optimal HPs from small-scale grid searches to large models with minimal performance loss. To understand the principles governing such transfer strategy, we develop a general conceptual framework for reasoning about HP transfer across scale, characterizing transfer as fast when the suboptimality it induces vanishes asymptotically faster than the finite-scale performance gap. We show formally that fast transfer is equivalent to useful transfer for compute-optimal grid search, meaning that transfer is asymptotically more compute-efficient than direct tuning. While empirical work has found that the Maximal Update Parameterization ($\mu$P) exhibits fast transfer when scaling model width, the mechanisms remain poorly understood. We show that this property depends critically on problem structure by presenting synthetic settings where transfer either offers provable computational advantage or fails to outperform direct tuning even under $\mu$P. To explain the fast transfer observed in practice, we conjecture that decomposing the optimization trajectory reveals two contributions to loss reduction: (1) a width-stable component that determines the optimal HPs, and (2) a width-sensitive component that improves with width but weakly perturbs the HP optimum. We present empirical evidence for this hypothesis across various settings, including large language model pretraining.

Comment: Training Dynamics/Representation Learning: theoretical framework for scale-aware hyperparameter transfer with compute-optimal analysis and mechanisms of fast transfer.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 8

7. Theoretical Foundations of Scaling Law in Familial Models

ArXiv ID: 2512.23407

Authors: Huan Song, Qingfei Zhao, Ting Long, Shuyu Tian, Hongjun An, Jiawei Shao, Chi Zhang, Xuelong Li

Abstract: Neural scaling laws have become foundational for optimizing large language model (LLM) training, yet they typically assume a single dense model output. This limitation effectively overlooks "Familial models, a transformative paradigm essential for realizing ubiquitous intelligence across heterogeneous device-edge-cloud hierarchies. Transcending static architectures, familial models integrate early exits with relay-style inference to spawn G deployable sub-models from a single shared backbone. In this work, we theoretically and empirically extend the scaling law to capture this "one-run, many-models" paradigm by introducing Granularity (G) as a fundamental scaling variable alongside model size (N) and training tokens (D). To rigorously quantify this relationship, we propose a unified functional form L(N, D, G) and parameterize it using large-scale empirical runs. Specifically, we employ a rigorous IsoFLOP experimental design to strictly isolate architectural impact from computational scale. Across fixed budgets, we systematically sweep model sizes (N) and granularities (G) while dynamically adjusting tokens (D). This approach effectively decouples the marginal cost of granularity from the benefits of scale, ensuring high-fidelity parameterization of our unified scaling law. Our results reveal that the granularity penalty follows a multiplicative power law with an extremely small exponent. Theoretically, this bridges fixed-compute training with dynamic architectures. Practically, it validates the "train once, deploy many" paradigm, demonstrating that deployment flexibility is achievable without compromising the compute-optimality of dense baselines.

Comment: HPC/Scaling Laws & Dynamic Architectures: extends neural scaling laws to early-exit/relay familial models via a unified L(N,D,G) with granularity as a scaling variable and IsoFLOP-controlled experiments.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 8

8. AKG kernel Agent: A Multi-Agent Framework for Cross-Platform Kernel Synthesis

ArXiv ID: 2512.23424

Authors: Jinye Du, Quan Yuan, Zuyao Zhang, Yanzhi Yi, Jiahui Hu, Wangyi Chen, Yiyang Zhu, Qishui Zheng, Wenxiang Zou, Xiangyu Chang, Zuohe Zheng, Zichun Ye, Chao Liu, Shanni Li, Renwei Zhang, Yiping Deng, Xinwei Hu, Xuefeng Jin, Jie Zhao

Abstract: Modern AI models demand high-performance computation kernels. The growing complexity of LLMs, multimodal architectures, and recommendation systems, combined with techniques like sparsity and quantization, creates significant computational challenges. Moreover, frequent hardware updates and diverse chip architectures further complicate this landscape, requiring tailored kernel implementations for each platform. However, manual optimization cannot keep pace with these demands, creating a critical bottleneck in AI system development. Recent advances in LLM code generation capabilities have opened new possibilities for automating kernel development. In this work, we propose AKG kernel agent (AI-driven Kernel Generator), a multi-agent system that automates kernel generation, migration, and performance tuning. AKG kernel agent is designed to support multiple domain-specific languages (DSLs), including Triton, TileLang, CPP, and CUDA-C, enabling it to target different hardware backends while maintaining correctness and portability. The system's modular design allows rapid integration of new DSLs and hardware targets. When evaluated on KernelBench using Triton DSL across GPU and NPU backends, AKG kernel agent achieves an average speedup of 1.46$\times$ over PyTorch Eager baselines implementations, demonstrating its effectiveness in accelerating kernel development for modern AI workloads.

Comment: High Performance Computing: automated kernel generation/tuning across multiple DSLs and hardware backends for AI workloads, addressing portability and performance.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 7

9. KernelEvolve: Scaling Agentic Kernel Coding for Heterogeneous AI Accelerators at Meta

ArXiv ID: 2512.23236

Authors: Gang Liao, Hongsen Qin, Ying Wang, Alicia Golden, Michael Kuchnik, Yavuz Yetim, Jia Jiunn Ang, Chunli Fu, Yihan He, Samuel Hsia, Zewei Jiang, Dianshi Li, Uladzimir Pashkevich, Varna Puvvada, Feng Shi, Matt Steiner, Ruichao Xiao, Nathan Yan, Xiayu Yu, Zhou Fang, Abdul Zainul-Abedin, Ketan Singh, Hongtao Yu, Wenyuan Chi, Barney Huang, Sean Zhang, Noah Weller, Zach Marine, Wyatt Cook, Carole-Jean Wu, Gaoxiang Liu

Abstract: Making deep learning recommendation model (DLRM) training and inference fast and efficient is important. However, this presents three key system challenges - model architecture diversity, kernel primitive diversity, and hardware generation and architecture heterogeneity. This paper presents KernelEvolve-an agentic kernel coding framework-to tackle heterogeneity at-scale for DLRM. KernelEvolve is designed to take kernel specifications as input and automate the process of kernel generation and optimization for recommendation model across heterogeneous hardware architectures. KernelEvolve does so by operating at multiple programming abstractions, from Triton and CuTe DSL to low-level hardware agnostic languages, spanning the full hardware-software optimization stack. The kernel optimization process is described as graph-based search with selection policy, universal operator, fitness function, and termination rule, dynamically adapts to runtime execution context through retrieval-augmented prompt synthesis. We designed, implemented, and deployed KernelEvolve to optimize a wide variety of production recommendation models across generations of NVIDIA and AMD GPUs, as well as Meta's AI accelerators. We validate KernelEvolve on the publicly-available KernelBench suite, achieving 100% pass rate on all 250 problems across three difficulty levels, and 160 PyTorch ATen operators across three heterogeneous hardware platforms, demonstrating 100% correctness. KernelEvolve reduces development time from weeks to hours and achieves substantial performance improvements over PyTorch baselines across diverse production use cases and for heterogeneous AI systems at-scale. Beyond performance efficiency improvements, KernelEvolve significantly mitigates the programmability barrier for new AI hardware by enabling automated kernel generation for in-house developed AI hardware.

Comment: High Performance Computing: agentic kernel coding framework automating kernel optimization across heterogeneous accelerators with graph-based search and RAG prompts.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 7

10. GPU Kernel Optimization Beyond Full Builds: An LLM Framework with Minimal Executable Programs

ArXiv ID: 2512.22147

Authors: Ruifan Chu, Anbang Wang, Xiuxiu Bai, Shuai Liu, Xiaoshe Dong

Abstract: In high-performance computing, hotspot GPU kernels are primary bottlenecks, and expert manual tuning is costly and hard to port. Large language model methods often assume kernels can be compiled and executed cheaply, which fails in large applications where full builds and runs are expensive. We present an end-to-end LLM framework with performance feedback that optimizes kernels without building the full application. From independently extracted hotspot kernels, it automatically completes code into a Minimal Executable Program (MEP), then performs multi-round iterative optimization and evaluation outside the full application. The framework integrates Automatic Error Repair and Performance Pattern Inheritance to fix faults, preserve correctness, reuse effective tiling/memory/synchronization strategies, and reduce search cost. Optimized variants are reintegrated into the original application for validation. We evaluate on NVIDIA GPUs and the Haiguang Deep Computing Unit (DCU) platform (AMD-licensed architecture) using PolyBench, the AMD APP SDK, and hotspot kernels from large-scale supercomputing applications. The method achieves average speedups of 5.05x (PolyBench on NVIDIA), 7.77x (PolyBench on DCU), 1.77x (AMD APP SDK), and 1.25x on three hotspot kernels, surpassing direct LLM optimization. The approach requires no full-source dependencies, offers cross-platform portability, and enables practical, low-cost GPU kernel optimization.

Comment: High Performance Computing: LLM-driven GPU kernel autotuning using minimal executable programs to avoid full builds, with automated repair and pattern inheritance for performance.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 7

11. FRoD: Full-Rank Efficient Fine-Tuning with Rotational Degrees for Fast Convergence

ArXiv ID: 2512.23485

Authors: Guoan Wan, Tianyu Chen, Fangzheng Feng, Haoyi Zhou, Runhua Xu

Abstract: Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) methods have emerged as a practical solution for adapting large foundation models to downstream tasks, reducing computational and memory costs by updating only a small subset of parameters. Among them, approaches like LoRA aim to strike a balance between efficiency and expressiveness, but often suffer from slow convergence and limited adaptation capacity due to their inherent low-rank constraints. This trade-off hampers the ability of PEFT methods to capture complex patterns needed for diverse tasks. To address these challenges, we propose FRoD, a novel fine-tuning method that combines hierarchical joint decomposition with rotational degrees of freedom. By extracting a globally shared basis across layers and injecting sparse, learnable perturbations into scaling factors for flexible full-rank updates, FRoD enhances expressiveness and efficiency, leading to faster and more robust convergence. On 20 benchmarks spanning vision, reasoning, and language understanding, FRoD matches full model fine-tuning in accuracy, while using only 1.72% of trainable parameters under identical training budgets.

Comment: Model Compression/Efficiency: new PEFT method using hierarchical joint decomposition and sparse rotational perturbations to enable full-rank updates with ~1.7% trainable params.

Relevance: 9 Novelty: 7

12. Trust Region Masking for Long-Horizon LLM Reinforcement Learning

ArXiv ID: 2512.23075

Authors: Yingru Li, Jiacai Liu, Jiawei Xu, Yuxuan Tong, Ziniu Li, Baoxiang Wang

Abstract: Policy gradient methods for large language models optimize a surrogate objective computed from samples of a rollout policy $\pi_{\text{roll}}$. When $\pi_{\text{roll}} \ne \pi_{\theta}$, there is approximation error between the surrogate and the true objective. Prior work has shown that this off-policy mismatch is unavoidable in modern LLM-RL due to implementation divergence, mixture-of-experts routing discontinuities, and distributed training staleness. Classical trust region bounds on the resulting error scale as $O(T^2)$ with sequence length $T$, rendering them vacuous for long-horizon tasks. We derive two tighter bounds: a Pinsker-Marginal bound scaling as $O(T^{3/2})$ and a Mixed bound scaling as $O(T)$. Crucially, both bounds depend on $D_{kl}^{tok,max}$ -- the maximum token-level KL divergence across all positions in a sequence. This is inherently a sequence-level quantity: it requires examining the entire trajectory to compute, and therefore cannot be controlled by token-independent methods like PPO clipping. We propose Trust Region Masking (TRM), which excludes entire sequences from gradient computation if any token violates the trust region, providing the first non-vacuous monotonic improvement guarantees for long-horizon LLM-RL.

Comment: Training dynamics/theory for LLM RL: new trust-region error bounds scaling with sequence length and Trust Region Masking to ensure non-vacuous guarantees.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 8

13. The Law of Multi-Model Collaboration: Scaling Limits of Model Ensembling for Large Language Models

ArXiv ID: 2512.23340

Authors: Dakuan Lu, Jiaqi Zhang, Cheng Yuan, Jiawei Shao, Chi Zhang, Xuelong Li

Abstract: Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) have been largely driven by scaling laws for individual models, which predict performance improvements as model parameters and data volume increase. However, the capabilities of any single LLM are inherently bounded. One solution originates from intricate interactions among multiple LLMs, rendering their collective performance surpasses that of any constituent model. Despite the rapid proliferation of multi-model integration techniques such as model routing and post-hoc ensembling, a unifying theoretical framework of performance scaling for multi-model collaboration remains absent. In this work, we propose the Law of Multi-model Collaboration, a scaling law that predicts the performance limits of LLM ensembles based on their aggregated parameter budget. To quantify the intrinsic upper bound of multi-model collaboration, we adopt a method-agnostic formulation and assume an idealized integration oracle where the total cross-entropy loss of each sample is determined by the minimum loss of any model in the model pool. Experimental results reveal that multi-model systems follow a power-law scaling with respect to the total parameter count, exhibiting a more significant improvement trend and a lower theoretical loss floor compared to single model scaling. Moreover, ensembles of heterogeneous model families achieve better performance scaling than those formed within a single model family, indicating that model diversity is a primary driver of collaboration gains. These findings suggest that model collaboration represents a critical axis for extending the intelligence frontier of LLMs.

Comment: Model architecture/scaling theory: proposes a scaling law for LLM ensembling (multi-model collaboration) with theoretical limits and power-law behavior.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

14. Role-Based Fault Tolerance System for LLM RL Post-Training

ArXiv ID: 2512.22492

Authors: Zhenqian Chen, Baoquan Zhong, Xiang Li, Qing Dai, Xinkui Zhao, Miao Ye, Ren Cheng, Lufei Zhang, Jianwei Yin

Abstract: RL post-training for LLMs has been widely scaled to enhance reasoning and tool-using capabilities. However, RL post-training interleaves training and inference workloads, exposing the system to faults from both sides. Existing fault tolerance frameworks for LLMs target either training or inference, leaving the optimization potential in the asynchronous execution unexplored for RL. Our key insight is role-based fault isolation so the failure in one machine does not affect the others. We treat trainer, rollout, and other management roles in RL training as distinct distributed sub-tasks. Instead of restarting the entire RL task in ByteRobust, we recover only the failed role and reconnect it to living ones, thereby eliminating the full-restart overhead including rollout replay and initialization delay. We present RobustRL, the first comprehensive robust system to handle GPU machine errors for RL post-training Effective Training Time Ratio improvement. (1) \textit{Detect}. We implement role-aware monitoring to distinguish actual failures from role-specific behaviors to avoid the false positive and delayed detection. (2) \textit{Restart}. For trainers, we implement a non-disruptive recovery where rollouts persist state and continue trajectory generation, while the trainer is rapidly restored via rollout warm standbys. For rollout, we perform isolated machine replacement without interrupting the RL task. (3) \textit{Reconnect}. We replace static collective communication with dynamic, UCX-based (Unified Communication X) point-to-point communication, enabling immediate weight synchronization between recovered roles. In an RL training task on a 256-GPU cluster with Qwen3-8B-Math workload under 10\% failure injection frequency, RobustRL can achieve an ETTR of over 80\% compared with the 60\% in ByteRobust and achieves 8.4\%-17.4\% faster in end-to-end training time.

Comment: High Performance Computing: role-based fault isolation and dynamic UCX P2P communication for resilient distributed LLM RL post-training, avoiding full restarts.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

15. Taming the Tail: Stable LLM Reinforcement Learning via Dynamic Vocabulary Pruning

ArXiv ID: 2512.23087

Authors: Yingru Li, Jiawei Xu, Jiacai Liu, Yuxuan Tong, Ziniu Li, Tianle Cai, Ge Zhang, Qian Liu, Baoxiang Wang

Abstract: Reinforcement learning for large language models (LLMs) faces a fundamental tension: high-throughput inference engines and numerically-precise training systems produce different probability distributions from the same parameters, creating a training-inference mismatch. We prove this mismatch has an asymmetric effect: the bound on log-probability mismatch scales as $(1-p)$ where $p$ is the token probability. For high-probability tokens, this bound vanishes, contributing negligibly to sequence-level mismatch. For low-probability tokens in the tail, the bound remains large, and moreover, when sampled, these tokens exhibit systematically biased mismatches that accumulate over sequences, destabilizing gradient estimation. Rather than applying post-hoc corrections, we propose constraining the RL objective to a dynamically-pruned ``safe'' vocabulary that excludes the extreme tail. By pruning such tokens, we trade large, systematically biased mismatches for a small, bounded optimization bias. Empirically, our method achieves stable training; theoretically, we bound the optimization bias introduced by vocabulary pruning.

Comment: Model Efficiency/Training stability: dynamic vocabulary pruning to bound tail-induced training–inference mismatch in LLM RL with theoretical guarantees.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

16. On the Existence and Behaviour of Secondary Attention Sinks

ArXiv ID: 2512.22213

Authors: Jeffrey T. H. Wong, Cheng Zhang, Louis Mahon, Wayne Luk, Anton Isopoussu, Yiren Zhao

Abstract: Attention sinks are tokens, often the beginning-of-sequence (BOS) token, that receive disproportionately high attention despite limited semantic relevance. In this work, we identify a class of attention sinks, which we term secondary sinks, that differ fundamentally from the sinks studied in prior works, which we term primary sinks. While prior works have identified that tokens other than BOS can sometimes become sinks, they were found to exhibit properties analogous to the BOS token. Specifically, they emerge at the same layer, persist throughout the network and draw a large amount of attention mass. Whereas, we find the existence of secondary sinks that arise primarily in middle layers and can persist for a variable number of layers, and draw a smaller, but still significant, amount of attention mass. Through extensive experiments across 11 model families, we analyze where these secondary sinks appear, their properties, how they are formed, and their impact on the attention mechanism. Specifically, we show that: (1) these sinks are formed by specific middle-layer MLP modules; these MLPs map token representations to vectors that align with the direction of the primary sink of that layer. (2) The $\ell_2$-norm of these vectors determines the sink score of the secondary sink, and also the number of layers it lasts for, thereby leading to different impacts on the attention mechanisms accordingly. (3) The primary sink weakens in middle layers, coinciding with the emergence of secondary sinks. We observe that in larger-scale models, the location and lifetime of the sinks, together referred to as sink levels, appear in a more deterministic and frequent manner. Specifically, we identify three sink levels in QwQ-32B and six levels in Qwen3-14B.

Comment: Representation Learning/Training Dynamics: mechanistic analysis of secondary attention sinks formed by MLPs and their layerwise behavior in Transformers.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

17. Nightjar: Dynamic Adaptive Speculative Decoding for Large Language Models Serving

ArXiv ID: 2512.22420

Authors: Rui Li, Zhaoning Zhang, Libo Zhang, Huaimin Wang, Xiang Fu, Zhiquan Lai

Abstract: Speculative decoding (SD) accelerates LLM inference by verifying draft tokens in parallel. However, this method presents a critical trade-off: it improves throughput in low-load, memory-bound systems but degrades performance in high-load, compute-bound environments due to verification overhead. Current SD implementations use a fixed speculative length, failing to adapt to dynamic request rates and creating a significant performance bottleneck in real-world serving scenarios. To overcome this, we propose Nightjar, a novel learning-based algorithm for adaptive speculative inference that adjusts to request load by dynamically selecting the optimal speculative length for different batch sizes and even disabling speculative decoding when it provides no benefit. Experiments show that Nightjar achieves up to 14.8% higher throughput and 20.2% lower latency compared to standard speculative decoding, demonstrating robust efficiency for real-time serving.

Comment: High-Performance Serving/Efficiency: adaptive speculative decoding that dynamically selects speculative length based on load to optimize throughput/latency.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

18. Masking Teacher and Reinforcing Student for Distilling Vision-Language Models

ArXiv ID: 2512.22238

Authors: Byung-Kwan Lee, Yu-Chiang Frank Wang, Ryo Hachiuma

Abstract: Large-scale vision-language models (VLMs) have recently achieved remarkable multimodal understanding, but their massive size makes them impractical for deployment on mobile or edge devices. This raises the need for compact yet capable VLMs that can efficiently learn from powerful large teachers. However, distilling knowledge from a large teacher to a small student remains challenging due to their large size gap: the student often fails to reproduce the teacher's complex, high-dimensional representations, leading to unstable learning and degraded performance. To address this, we propose Masters (Masking Teacher and Reinforcing Student), a mask-progressive reinforcement learning (RL) distillation framework. Masters first masks non-dominant weights of the teacher to reduce unnecessary complexity, then progressively restores the teacher by gradually increasing its capacity during training. This strategy allows the student to learn richer representations from the teacher in a smooth and stable manner. To further refine knowledge transfer, Masters integrates an offline RL stage with two complementary rewards: an accuracy reward that measures the correctness of the generated responses, and a distillation reward that quantifies the ease of transferring responses from teacher to student. Unlike online think-answer RL paradigms that are computationally expensive and generate lengthy responses, our offline RL leverages pre-generated responses from masked teachers. These provide rich yet efficient guidance, enabling students to achieve strong performance without requiring the think-answer process.

Comment: Model Compression/Distillation: mask-progressive teacher and offline RL-based rewards to stabilize and improve student VLM distillation.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

19. Towards Efficient Post-Training via Fourier-Driven Adapter Architectures

ArXiv ID: 2512.22378

Authors: Donggyun Bae, Jongil Park

Abstract: We propose a novel framework, termed Fourier-Activated Adapter (FAA), for parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large pre-trained language models. By incorporating random Fourier features into lightweight adapter modules, FAA decomposes intermediate representations into complementary low- and high-frequency components, enabling frequency-aware modulation of semantic information. This design allows the model to selectively emphasize informative frequency bands during adaptation while preserving the representational capacity of the frozen backbone. Extensive experiments on GLUE, E2E NLG, and instruction-tuning benchmarks demonstrate that FAA consistently achieves competitive or superior performance compared to existing parameter-efficient fine-tuning methods, while maintaining low computational and memory overhead. Ablation studies further verify the effectiveness of frequency-aware activation and adaptive weighting mechanisms, highlighting FAA as a robust and efficient approach for post-training large language models.

Comment: Model Architecture/Efficiency: adapter-based PEFT with random Fourier features for frequency-aware modulation of representations.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

20. Splitwise: Collaborative Edge-Cloud Inference for LLMs via Lyapunov-Assisted DRL

ArXiv ID: 2512.23310

Authors: Abolfazl Younesi, Abbas Shabrang Maryan, Elyas Oustad, Zahra Najafabadi Samani, Mohsen Ansari, Thomas Fahringer

Abstract: Deploying large language models (LLMs) on edge devices is challenging due to their limited memory and power resources. Cloud-only inference reduces device burden but introduces high latency and cost. Static edge-cloud partitions optimize a single metric and struggle when bandwidth fluctuates. We propose Splitwise, a novel Lyapunov-assisted deep reinforcement learning (DRL) framework for fine-grained, adaptive partitioning of LLMs across edge and cloud environments. Splitwise decomposes transformer layers into attention heads and feed-forward sub-blocks, exposing more partition choices than layer-wise schemes. A hierarchical DRL policy, guided by Lyapunov optimization, jointly minimizes latency, energy consumption, and accuracy degradation while guaranteeing queue stability under stochastic workloads and variable network bandwidth. Splitwise also guarantees robustness via partition checkpoints with exponential backoff recovery in case of communication failures. Experiments on Jetson Orin NX, Galaxy S23, and Raspberry Pi 5 with GPT-2 (1.5B), LLaMA-7B, and LLaMA-13B show that Splitwise reduces end-to-end latency by 1.4x-2.8x and cuts energy consumption by up to 41% compared with existing partitioners. It lowers the 95th-percentile latency by 53-61% relative to cloud-only execution, while maintaining accuracy and modest memory requirements.

Comment: HPC/Systems Efficiency: fine-grained edge-cloud partitioning of Transformer sub-blocks using Lyapunov-assisted DRL to minimize latency/energy under variable bandwidth.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

21. LLMBoost: Make Large Language Models Stronger with Boosting

ArXiv ID: 2512.22309

Authors: Zehao Chen, Tianxiang Ai, Yifei Li, Gongxun Li, Yuyang Wei, Wang Zhou, Guanghui Li, Bin Yu, Zhijun Chen, Hailong Sun, Fuzhen Zhuang, Jianxin Li, Deqing Wang, Yikun Ban

Abstract: Ensemble learning of LLMs has emerged as a promising alternative to enhance performance, but existing approaches typically treat models as black boxes, combining the inputs or final outputs while overlooking the rich internal representations and interactions across models.In this work, we introduce LLMBoost, a novel ensemble fine-tuning framework that breaks this barrier by explicitly leveraging intermediate states of LLMs. Inspired by the boosting paradigm, LLMBoost incorporates three key innovations. First, a cross-model attention mechanism enables successor models to access and fuse hidden states from predecessors, facilitating hierarchical error correction and knowledge transfer. Second, a chain training paradigm progressively fine-tunes connected models with an error-suppression objective, ensuring that each model rectifies the mispredictions of its predecessor with minimal additional computation. Third, a near-parallel inference paradigm design pipelines hidden states across models layer by layer, achieving inference efficiency approaching single-model decoding. We further establish the theoretical foundations of LLMBoost, proving that sequential integration guarantees monotonic improvements under bounded correction assumptions. Extensive experiments on commonsense reasoning and arithmetic reasoning tasks demonstrate that LLMBoost consistently boosts accuracy while reducing inference latency.

Comment: Model Architecture: introduces cross-model attention to fuse intermediate hidden states across LLMs in a boosting chain; Efficiency/HPC: near-parallel layer-wise pipelined inference; Theory: monotonic improvement guarantee under bounded corrections.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

22. How Much Data Is Enough? Uniform Convergence Bounds for Generative & Vision-Language Models under Low-Dimensional Structure

ArXiv ID: 2512.23109

Authors: Paul M. Thompson

Abstract: Modern generative and vision-language models (VLMs) are increasingly used in scientific and medical decision support, where predicted probabilities must be both accurate and well calibrated. Despite strong empirical results with moderate data, it remains unclear when such predictions generalize uniformly across inputs, classes, or subpopulations, rather than only on average-a critical issue in biomedicine, where rare conditions and specific groups can exhibit large errors even when overall loss is low. We study this question from a finite-sample perspective and ask: under what structural assumptions can generative and VLM-based predictors achieve uniformly accurate and calibrated behavior with practical sample sizes? Rather than analyzing arbitrary parameterizations, we focus on induced families of classifiers obtained by varying prompts or semantic embeddings within a restricted representation space. When model outputs depend smoothly on a low-dimensional semantic representation-an assumption supported by spectral structure in text and joint image-text embeddings-classical uniform convergence tools yield meaningful non-asymptotic guarantees. Our main results give finite-sample uniform convergence bounds for accuracy and calibration functionals of VLM-induced classifiers under Lipschitz stability with respect to prompt embeddings. The implied sample complexity depends on intrinsic/effective dimension, not ambient embedding dimension, and we further derive spectrum-dependent bounds that make explicit how eigenvalue decay governs data requirements. We conclude with implications for data-limited biomedical modeling, including when current dataset sizes can support uniformly reliable predictions and why average calibration metrics may miss worst-case miscalibration.

Comment: Representation Learning/Theory: finite-sample uniform convergence and calibration bounds for VLM-induced classifiers under low-dimensional/spectrum-dependent structure, tying sample complexity to intrinsic dimension.

Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7

Paper Selection Prompt

System Prompt

You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.

User Prompt

Instructions

Write the response in JSONL format with {ARXIVID, COMMENT, RELEVANCE, NOVELTY} on each line, one for each paper.

• ARXIVID: should be the ArXiv ID.
• COMMENT: should identify whether there is a criteria that match the paper very closely. These matches should not be based on general terms like "language modeling" or "advancements" and should specifically refer to a criterion. No need to mention the non-matching criteria.
• RELEVANCE: should be a score from 1-10.
• NOVELTY: should be a score from 1-10.

Scoring Criteria

The "Relevance" score measures how closely the paper aligns with the core topics of the prompt. The "Novelty" score assesses the originality and impact of the paper. They are two ORTHONORMAL axes and SHOULD NOT be confused with each other.

Relevance Scoring

• Relevance 9-10 (Completely Relevant)
• Focus: Fully aligned with core topics with no deviation, score the highest if contains relevant keywords in it.

• Examples: Papers focused on foundational methods or theoretical research, whose titles contain topic keywords like "MoE".

• Relevance 7-8 (Relevant)

• Focus: Retain a solid link to the main research area, though may touch on peripheral elements.

• Examples: Papers research on the fundamental part of MoE through a less critical aspect like its behavior in GNN.

• Relevance 5-6 (Borderline)

• Focus: Maintains a link to the core topic but also extends into at least one other domain/area beyond the primary focus.

• Examples: Work referencing MoE centered on reinforcement learning.

• Relevance 3-4 (Irrelevant)

• Focus: Largely outside our interests with no association to our topics.

• Examples: Application-focused papers like using MoE to solve a problem in the real world.

• Relevance 1-2 (Ignore)

• Focus: Purely unrelated to our topics. Completely a different domain.
• Exception: If the paper hints at a cutting-edge, radically new direction that could eventually transform the primary domain, consider a score of 9–10 despite initial appearances. (Usually a very rare concept that belongs to the fundamental research)

Novelty Scoring

• Novelty 9-10 (Breakthrough)
• Definition: Groundbreaking methods/theory introducing new directions or solving major challenges.

• Examples: Entirely new paradigm for foundational models; a novel theory transforming representation learning.

• Novelty 7-8 (Improvements)

• Definition: Substantial insights/enhancements, though not a full paradigm shift.

• Examples: Modifications on existing methods yielding significantly better results.

• Novelty 5-6 (Borderline)

• Definition: Incremental contributions with possible long-term benefits, not immediately transformative.

• Examples: Moderately novel extension to an existing architecture; refining current methods without fundamentally altering them.

• Novelty 3-4 (Tangential)

• Definition: Minor or domain-specific improvements with limited broader impact.

• Examples: Slight modifications to known methods with strange motivation; purely engineering jobs like a new benchmark/dataset.

• Novelty 1-2 (Low)

• Definition: Minimal originality, applying standard approaches without real innovation.
• Examples: Using an off-the-shelf model without adding new insights; purely application-driven studies like finetuning a pretrained model using existing methods.

Papers

[PAPER LIST HERE]

Relevant Topics

Use the following relevance criteria to focus on foundational research. Keep relevant papers and filter out irrelevant ones. Avoid purely application-driven work.

1. Model Architecture - Relevant: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE), Transformers, Conditional/Dynamic Networks, Autoencoders, analysis/innovations on existing architectures. - Irrelevant: Merely using existing architectures for a certain task without insights into the structure themselves.

2. Model Compression and Efficiency - Relevant: Sparsity, pruning, quantization, low-rank approaches, cache, or other algorithmic/theoretical efficiency breakthroughs. - Irrelevant: Straightforward applications of existing compression methods to new tasks.

3. High Performance Computing - Relevant: Algorithmic or systems-level innovations enabling training of large-scale models, distributed training techniques, memory optimization. - Irrelevant: Incremental engineering improvements without novel algorithmic contributions.

4. Representation Learning - Relevant: Insights into how deep networks encode information, feature/dictionary learning, sparse/contrastive methods, training dynamics in neural networks. - Irrelevant: Standard applications of known techniques lacking new theoretical or methodological contributions.

Keywords:

• Relevant: Mixture of Experts (MoE), Representation Learning, Compression/Efficiency, Sparse/Sparsity, Pruning, Quantization, Low-rank, Foundation Model, etc.
• Irrelevant: Reinforcement Learning, Transfer Learning, Federated Learning, Online Learning, Diffusion Models, etc.
• Application: Image Segmentation, Medical Imaging, 3D Vision, Video Understanding, Information Retrieval, Summarization, Recommendation Systems, Machine Translation, Speech Recognition, Signal Processing, Spatial/Temporal Modeling, Time Series, Knowledge Graph, etc.