Personalized Daily ArXiv Papers 2025-09-15
| [gpt-5] | Prompt | Completion | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Token | 27928 | 31815 | 59743 |
| Cost | $0.03 | $0.32 | $0.35 |
Total arXiv papers: 353
Total scanned papers: 220
Total relevant papers: 15
Table of contents with paper titles:
-
LAVa: Layer-wise KV Cache Eviction with Dynamic Budget Allocation Authors: Yiqun Shen, Song Yuan, Zhengze Zhang, Xiaoliang Wang, Daxin Jiang, Nguyen Cam-Tu
-
Multipole Semantic Attention: A Fast Approximation of Softmax Attention for Pretraining Authors: Rupert Mitchell, Kristian Kersting
-
Understanding Outer Optimizers in Local SGD: Learning Rates, Momentum, and Acceleration Authors: Ahmed Khaled, Satyen Kale, Arthur Douillard, Chi Jin, Rob Fergus, Manzil Zaheer
-
World Modeling with Probabilistic Structure Integration Authors: Klemen Kotar, Wanhee Lee, Rahul Venkatesh, Honglin Chen, Daniel Bear, Jared Watrous, Simon Kim, Khai Loong Aw, Lilian Naing Chen, Stefan Stojanov, Kevin Feigelis, Imran Thobani, Alex Durango, Khaled Jedoui, Atlas Kazemian, Dan Yamins
-
Why does your graph neural network fail on some graphs? Insights from exact generalisation error Authors: Nil Ayday, Mahalakshmi Sabanayagam, Debarghya Ghoshdastidar
-
Sparse Coding Representation of 2-way Data Authors: Boya Ma, Abram Magner, Maxwell McNeil, Petko Bogdanov
-
Beyond I'm Sorry, I Can't: Dissecting Large Language Model Refusal Authors: Nirmalendu Prakash, Yeo Wei Jie, Amir Abdullah, Ranjan Satapathy, Erik Cambria, Roy Ka Wei Lee
-
Adaptive Token Merging for Efficient Transformer Semantic Communication at the Edge Authors: Omar Erak, Omar Alhussein, Hatem Abou-Zeid, Mehdi Bennis, Sami Muhaidat
-
A Discrepancy-Based Perspective on Dataset Condensation Authors: Tong Chen, Raghavendra Selvan
-
Physics-informed sensor coverage through structure preserving machine learning Authors: Benjamin David Shaffer, Brooks Kinch, Joseph Klobusicky, M. Ani Hsieh, Nathaniel Trask
-
From the Gradient-Step Denoiser to the Proximal Denoiser and their associated convergent Plug-and-Play algorithms Authors: Vincent Herfeld, Baudouin Denis de Senneville, Arthur Leclaire, Nicolas Papadakis
-
Neural Scaling Laws for Deep Regression Authors: Tilen Cadez, Kyoung-Min Kim
-
CoDiCodec: Unifying Continuous and Discrete Compressed Representations of Audio Authors: Marco Pasini, Stefan Lattner, George Fazekas
-
Latency and Token-Aware Test-Time Compute Authors: Jenny Y. Huang, Mehul Damani, Yousef El-Kurdi, Ramon Astudillo, Wei Sun
-
Data distribution impacts the performance and generalisability of contrastive learning-based foundation models of electrocardiograms Authors: Gul Rukh Khattak, Konstantinos Patlatzoglou, Joseph Barker, Libor Pastika, Boroumand Zeidaabadi, Ahmed El-Medany, Hesham Aggour, Yixiu Liang, Antonio H. Ribeiro, Jeffrey Annis, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Junbo Ge, Daniel B. Kramer, Jonathan W. Waks, Evan Brittain, Nicholas Peters, Fu Siong Ng, Arunashis Sau
1. LAVa: Layer-wise KV Cache Eviction with Dynamic Budget Allocation
ArXiv ID: 2509.09754
Authors: Yiqun Shen, Song Yuan, Zhengze Zhang, Xiaoliang Wang, Daxin Jiang, Nguyen Cam-Tu
Abstract: KV Cache is commonly used to accelerate LLM inference with long contexts, yet its high memory demand drives the need for cache compression. Existing compression methods, however, are largely heuristic and lack dynamic budget allocation. To address this limitation, we introduce a unified framework for cache compression by minimizing information loss in Transformer residual streams. Building on it, we analyze the layer attention output loss and derive a new metric to compare cache entries across heads, enabling layer-wise compression with dynamic head budgets. Additionally, by contrasting cross-layer information, we also achieve dynamic layer budgets. LAVa is the first unified strategy for cache eviction and dynamic budget allocation that, unlike prior methods, does not rely on training or the combination of multiple strategies. Experiments with benchmarks (LongBench, Needle-In-A-Haystack, Ruler, and InfiniteBench) demonstrate its superiority. Moreover, our experiments reveal a new insight: dynamic layer budgets are crucial for generation tasks (e.g., code completion), while dynamic head budgets play a key role in extraction tasks (e.g., extractive QA). As a fully dynamic compression method, LAVa consistently maintains top performance across task types. Our code is available at https://github.com/MGDDestiny/Lava.
Comment: Model Compression and Efficiency: dynamic KV-cache eviction with per-layer and per-head budget allocation derived from minimizing residual-stream information loss in Transformers.
Relevance: 10 Novelty: 8
2. Multipole Semantic Attention: A Fast Approximation of Softmax Attention for Pretraining
ArXiv ID: 2509.10406
Authors: Rupert Mitchell, Kristian Kersting
Abstract: We present Multipole Semantic Attention (MuSe), an efficient approximation of softmax attention that combines semantic clustering with multipole expansions from computational physics. Our method addresses the quadratic computational complexity of transformers in the context length by clustering queries and keys separately in their learned representation spaces, enabling a hierarchical two-stage attention mechanism. Unlike prior clustering approaches that group only keys or use unified clustering, we maintain separate clusterings that respect attention's asymmetric treatment of these spaces. We augment centroid-based (monopole) approximations with dipole corrections that capture directional variance within clusters, preserving richer information during training. The method operates as a drop-in replacement for standard attention, requiring only hyperparameter specification without architectural modifications. Our approach achieves $\mathcal{O}(NCD)$ complexity for acausal attention with $C$ clusters and $\mathcal{O}(NCD \log N)$ for causal attention. On isolated attention layers, we demonstrate $3\times$ speedup over CUDNN Flash Attention at 8k context length, with relative squared errors below 20%. For causal attention, we develop a hierarchical block decomposition that combines exact local computation with efficient long-range approximation. In end-to-end pretraining of a 30M parameter model on book-length texts with 16k context, we achieve 12.2% runtime reduction with only 0.36% loss degradation, establishing the viability of multipole approximations for efficient transformer pretraining.
Comment: Model Efficiency/Transformer Architecture: fast softmax attention via separate query/key clustering and multipole (monopole+dipole) approximations; hierarchical causal block scheme; drop-in attention replacement.
Relevance: 10 Novelty: 8
3. Understanding Outer Optimizers in Local SGD: Learning Rates, Momentum, and Acceleration
ArXiv ID: 2509.10439
Authors: Ahmed Khaled, Satyen Kale, Arthur Douillard, Chi Jin, Rob Fergus, Manzil Zaheer
Abstract: Modern machine learning often requires training with large batch size, distributed data, and massively parallel compute hardware (like mobile and other edge devices or distributed data centers). Communication becomes a major bottleneck in such settings but methods like Local Stochastic Gradient Descent (Local SGD) show great promise in reducing this additional communication overhead. Local SGD consists of three parts: a local optimization process, an aggregation mechanism, and an outer optimizer that uses the aggregated updates from the nodes to produce a new model. While there exists an extensive literature on understanding the impact of hyperparameters in the local optimization process, the choice of outer optimizer and its hyperparameters is less clear. We study the role of the outer optimizer in Local SGD, and prove new convergence guarantees for the algorithm. In particular, we show that tuning the outer learning rate allows us to (a) trade off between optimization error and stochastic gradient noise variance, and (b) make up for ill-tuning of the inner learning rate. Our theory suggests that the outer learning rate should sometimes be set to values greater than $1$. We extend our results to settings where we use momentum in the outer optimizer, and we show a similar role for the momentum-adjusted outer learning rate. We also study acceleration in the outer optimizer and show that it improves the convergence rate as a function of the number of communication rounds, improving upon the convergence rate of prior algorithms that apply acceleration locally. Finally, we also introduce a novel data-dependent analysis of Local SGD that yields further insights on outer learning rate tuning. We conduct comprehensive experiments with standard language models and various outer optimizers to validate our theory.
Comment: High-Performance/Distributed Training: algorithmic analysis and design of outer optimizers (learning rate > 1, momentum, acceleration) for Local SGD with new convergence guarantees.
Relevance: 10 Novelty: 8
4. World Modeling with Probabilistic Structure Integration
ArXiv ID: 2509.09737
Authors: Klemen Kotar, Wanhee Lee, Rahul Venkatesh, Honglin Chen, Daniel Bear, Jared Watrous, Simon Kim, Khai Loong Aw, Lilian Naing Chen, Stefan Stojanov, Kevin Feigelis, Imran Thobani, Alex Durango, Khaled Jedoui, Atlas Kazemian, Dan Yamins
Abstract: We present Probabilistic Structure Integration (PSI), a system for learning richly controllable and flexibly promptable world models from data. PSI consists of a three-step cycle. The first step, Probabilistic prediction, involves building a probabilistic graphical model Psi of the data, in the form of a random-access autoregressive sequence model. Psi supports a complete set of learned conditional distributions describing the dependence of any variables in the data on any other set of variables. In step 2, Structure extraction, we show how to extract underlying low-dimensional properties in the data, corresponding to a diverse set of meaningful "intermediate structures", in a zero-shot fashion via causal inference on Psi. Step 3, Integration, completes the cycle by converting these structures into new token types that are then continually mixed back into the training diet as conditioning signals and prediction targets. Each such cycle augments the capabilities of Psi, both allowing it to model the underlying data better, and creating new control handles -- akin to an LLM-like universal prompting language. We train an instance of Psi on 1.4 trillion tokens of internet video data; we use it to perform a variety of useful video prediction and understanding inferences; we extract state-of-the-art optical flow, self-supervised depth and object segmentation; and we use these structures to support a full cycle of predictive improvements.
Comment: Model Architecture and Representation Learning: random-access autoregressive world model with causal structure extraction and iterative integration as control tokens enabling universal prompting and improved modeling.
Relevance: 9 Novelty: 9
5. Why does your graph neural network fail on some graphs? Insights from exact generalisation error
ArXiv ID: 2509.10337
Authors: Nil Ayday, Mahalakshmi Sabanayagam, Debarghya Ghoshdastidar
Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are widely used in learning on graph-structured data, yet a principled understanding of why they succeed or fail remains elusive. While prior works have examined architectural limitations such as over-smoothing and over-squashing, these do not explain what enables GNNs to extract meaningful representations or why performance varies drastically between similar architectures. These questions are related to the role of generalisation: the ability of a model to make accurate predictions on unlabelled data. Although several works have derived generalisation error bounds for GNNs, these are typically loose, restricted to a single architecture, and offer limited insight into what governs generalisation in practice. In this work, we take a different approach by deriving the exact generalisation error for GNNs in a transductive fixed-design setting through the lens of signal processing. From this viewpoint, GNNs can be interpreted as graph filter operators that act on node features via the graph structure. By focusing on linear GNNs while allowing non-linearity in the graph filters, we derive the first exact generalisation error for a broad range of GNNs, including convolutional, PageRank-based, and attention-based models. The exact characterisation of the generalisation error reveals that only the aligned information between node features and graph structure contributes to generalisation. Furthermore, we quantify the effect of homophily on generalisation. Our work provides a framework that explains when and why GNNs can effectively leverage structural and feature information, offering practical guidance for model selection.
Comment: Representation Learning: exact generalization error characterization for broad classes of GNNs, providing theoretical insights into structure–feature alignment and generalization.
Relevance: 9 Novelty: 8
6. Sparse Coding Representation of 2-way Data
ArXiv ID: 2509.10033
Authors: Boya Ma, Abram Magner, Maxwell McNeil, Petko Bogdanov
Abstract: Sparse dictionary coding represents signals as linear combinations of a few dictionary atoms. It has been applied to images, time series, graph signals and multi-way spatio-temporal data by jointly employing temporal and spatial dictionaries. Data-agnostic analytical dictionaries, such as the discrete Fourier transform, wavelets and graph Fourier, have seen wide adoption due to efficient implementations and good practical performance. On the other hand, dictionaries learned from data offer sparser and more accurate solutions but require learning of both the dictionaries and the coding coefficients. This becomes especially challenging for multi-dictionary scenarios since encoding coefficients correspond to all atom combinations from the dictionaries. To address this challenge, we propose a low-rank coding model for 2-dictionary scenarios and study its data complexity. Namely, we establish a bound on the number of samples needed to learn dictionaries that generalize to unseen samples from the same distribution. We propose a convex relaxation solution, called AODL, whose exact solution we show also solves the original problem. We then solve this relaxation via alternating optimization between the sparse coding matrices and the learned dictionaries, which we prove to be convergent. We demonstrate its quality for data reconstruction and missing value imputation in both synthetic and real-world datasets. For a fixed reconstruction quality, AODL learns up to 90\% sparser solutions compared to non-low-rank and analytical (fixed) dictionary baselines. In addition, the learned dictionaries reveal interpretable insights into patterns present within the samples used for training.
Comment: Representation Learning and Efficiency: sparse dictionary learning with a low-rank coding model, sample complexity guarantees, and a convex relaxation with convergence.
Relevance: 9 Novelty: 7
7. Beyond I'm Sorry, I Can't: Dissecting Large Language Model Refusal
ArXiv ID: 2509.09708
Authors: Nirmalendu Prakash, Yeo Wei Jie, Amir Abdullah, Ranjan Satapathy, Erik Cambria, Roy Ka Wei Lee
Abstract: Refusal on harmful prompts is a key safety behaviour in instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs), yet the internal causes of this behaviour remain poorly understood. We study two public instruction-tuned models, Gemma-2-2B-IT and LLaMA-3.1-8B-IT, using sparse autoencoders (SAEs) trained on residual-stream activations. Given a harmful prompt, we search the SAE latent space for feature sets whose ablation flips the model from refusal to compliance, demonstrating causal influence and creating a jailbreak. Our search proceeds in three stages: (1) Refusal Direction: find a refusal-mediating direction and collect SAE features near that direction; (2) Greedy Filtering: prune to a minimal set; and (3) Interaction Discovery: fit a factorization machine (FM) that captures nonlinear interactions among the remaining active features and the minimal set. This pipeline yields a broad set of jailbreak-critical features, offering insight into the mechanistic basis of refusal. Moreover, we find evidence of redundant features that remain dormant unless earlier features are suppressed. Our findings highlight the potential for fine-grained auditing and targeted intervention in safety behaviours by manipulating the interpretable latent space.
Comment: Matches Representation Learning criterion: uses sparse autoencoders on residual-stream activations to identify and causally manipulate refusal-mediating features, providing mechanistic insight via sparse features and interactions.
Relevance: 9 Novelty: 7
8. Adaptive Token Merging for Efficient Transformer Semantic Communication at the Edge
ArXiv ID: 2509.09955
Authors: Omar Erak, Omar Alhussein, Hatem Abou-Zeid, Mehdi Bennis, Sami Muhaidat
Abstract: Large-scale transformers are central to modern semantic communication, yet their high computational and communication costs hinder deployment on resource-constrained edge devices. This paper introduces a training-free framework for adaptive token merging, a novel mechanism that compresses transformer representations at runtime by selectively merging semantically redundant tokens under per-layer similarity thresholds. Unlike prior fixed-ratio reduction, our approach couples merging directly to input redundancy, enabling data-dependent adaptation that balances efficiency and task relevance without retraining. We cast the discovery of merging strategies as a multi-objective optimization problem and leverage Bayesian optimization to obtain Pareto-optimal trade-offs between accuracy, inference cost, and communication cost. On ImageNet classification, we match the accuracy of the unmodified transformer with 30\% fewer floating-point operations per second and under 20\% of the original communication cost, while for visual question answering our method achieves performance competitive with the full LLaVA model at less than one-third of the compute and one-tenth of the bandwidth. Finally, we show that our adaptive merging is robust across varying channel conditions and provides inherent privacy benefits, substantially degrading the efficacy of model inversion attacks. Our framework provides a practical and versatile solution for deploying powerful transformer models in resource-limited edge intelligence scenarios.
Comment: Model Compression and Efficiency: training-free adaptive token merging for Transformers with per-layer similarity thresholds and Pareto-optimized trade-offs in compute/communication.
Relevance: 9 Novelty: 7
9. A Discrepancy-Based Perspective on Dataset Condensation
ArXiv ID: 2509.10367
Authors: Tong Chen, Raghavendra Selvan
Abstract: Given a dataset of finitely many elements $\mathcal{T} = {\mathbf{x}i}}^N$, the goal of dataset condensation (DC) is to construct a synthetic dataset $\mathcal{S} = {\tilde{\mathbf{x}j}$ with a reduced set of points. In this work, we present a unified framework that encompasses existing DC methods and extend the task-specific notion of DC to a more general and formal definition using notions of discrepancy, which quantify the distance between probability distribution in different regimes. Our framework broadens the objective of DC beyond generalization, accommodating additional objectives such as robustness, privacy, and other desirable properties.}^M$ which is significantly smaller ($M \ll N$) such that a model trained from scratch on $\mathcal{S}$ achieves comparable or even superior generalization performance to a model trained on $\mathcal{T}$. Recent advances in DC reveal a close connection to the problem of approximating the data distribution represented by $\mathcal{T
Comment: Representation Learning: frames dataset condensation under discrepancy-based distribution matching, providing a unified theoretical objective beyond task-specific generalization.
Relevance: 8 Novelty: 8
10. Physics-informed sensor coverage through structure preserving machine learning
ArXiv ID: 2509.10363
Authors: Benjamin David Shaffer, Brooks Kinch, Joseph Klobusicky, M. Ani Hsieh, Nathaniel Trask
Abstract: We present a machine learning framework for adaptive source localization in which agents use a structure-preserving digital twin of a coupled hydrodynamic-transport system for real-time trajectory planning and data assimilation. The twin is constructed with conditional neural Whitney forms (CNWF), coupling the numerical guarantees of finite element exterior calculus (FEEC) with transformer-based operator learning. The resulting model preserves discrete conservation, and adapts in real time to streaming sensor data. It employs a conditional attention mechanism to identify: a reduced Whitney-form basis; reduced integral balance equations; and a source field, each compatible with given sensor measurements. The induced reduced-order environmental model retains the stability and consistency of standard finite-element simulation, yielding a physically realizable, regular mapping from sensor data to the source field. We propose a staggered scheme that alternates between evaluating the digital twin and applying Lloyd's algorithm to guide sensor placement, with analysis providing conditions for monotone improvement of a coverage functional. Using the predicted source field as an importance function within an optimal-recovery scheme, we demonstrate recovery of point sources under continuity assumptions, highlighting the role of regularity as a sufficient condition for localization. Experimental comparisons with physics-agnostic transformer architectures show improved accuracy in complex geometries when physical constraints are enforced, indicating that structure preservation provides an effective inductive bias for source identification.
Comment: Model Architecture: structure-preserving operator learning via conditional neural Whitney forms with transformer-based attention, enforcing discrete conservation.
Relevance: 8 Novelty: 8
11. From the Gradient-Step Denoiser to the Proximal Denoiser and their associated convergent Plug-and-Play algorithms
ArXiv ID: 2509.09793
Authors: Vincent Herfeld, Baudouin Denis de Senneville, Arthur Leclaire, Nicolas Papadakis
Abstract: In this paper we analyze the Gradient-Step Denoiser and its usage in Plug-and-Play algorithms. The Plug-and-Play paradigm of optimization algorithms uses off the shelf denoisers to replace a proximity operator or a gradient descent operator of an image prior. Usually this image prior is implicit and cannot be expressed, but the Gradient-Step Denoiser is trained to be exactly the gradient descent operator or the proximity operator of an explicit functional while preserving state-of-the-art denoising capabilities.
Comment: Optimization/Representation Learning: Plug-and-Play with denoisers trained to be explicit gradient/prox operators and associated convergent algorithms.
Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7
12. Neural Scaling Laws for Deep Regression
ArXiv ID: 2509.10000
Authors: Tilen Cadez, Kyoung-Min Kim
Abstract: Neural scaling laws--power-law relationships between generalization errors and characteristics of deep learning models--are vital tools for developing reliable models while managing limited resources. Although the success of large language models highlights the importance of these laws, their application to deep regression models remains largely unexplored. Here, we empirically investigate neural scaling laws in deep regression using a parameter estimation model for twisted van der Waals magnets. We observe power-law relationships between the loss and both training dataset size and model capacity across a wide range of values, employing various architectures--including fully connected networks, residual networks, and vision transformers. Furthermore, the scaling exponents governing these relationships range from 1 to 2, with specific values depending on the regressed parameters and model details. The consistent scaling behaviors and their large scaling exponents suggest that the performance of deep regression models can improve substantially with increasing data size.
Comment: Training dynamics/scaling laws: empirical neural scaling laws for deep regression across architectures, providing foundational insights.
Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7
13. CoDiCodec: Unifying Continuous and Discrete Compressed Representations of Audio
ArXiv ID: 2509.09836
Authors: Marco Pasini, Stefan Lattner, George Fazekas
Abstract: Efficiently representing audio signals in a compressed latent space is critical for latent generative modelling. However, existing autoencoders often force a choice between continuous embeddings and discrete tokens. Furthermore, achieving high compression ratios while maintaining audio fidelity remains a challenge. We introduce CoDiCodec, a novel audio autoencoder that overcomes these limitations by both efficiently encoding global features via summary embeddings, and by producing both compressed continuous embeddings at ~ 11 Hz and discrete tokens at a rate of 2.38 kbps from the same trained model, offering unprecedented flexibility for different downstream generative tasks. This is achieved through Finite Scalar Quantization (FSQ) and a novel FSQ-dropout technique, and does not require additional loss terms beyond the single consistency loss used for end-to-end training. CoDiCodec supports both autoregressive decoding and a novel parallel decoding strategy, with the latter achieving superior audio quality and faster decoding. CoDiCodec outperforms existing continuous and discrete autoencoders at similar bitrates in terms of reconstruction audio quality. Our work enables a unified approach to audio compression, bridging the gap between continuous and discrete generative modelling paradigms.
Comment: Model Compression and Efficiency: unified audio autoencoder using quantization (FSQ with FSQ-dropout) to produce both continuous and discrete compressed codes and enable efficient parallel decoding.
Relevance: 8 Novelty: 7
14. Latency and Token-Aware Test-Time Compute
ArXiv ID: 2509.09864
Authors: Jenny Y. Huang, Mehul Damani, Yousef El-Kurdi, Ramon Astudillo, Wei Sun
Abstract: Inference-time scaling has emerged as a powerful way to improve large language model (LLM) performance by generating multiple candidate responses and selecting among them. However, existing work on dynamic allocation for test-time compute typically considers only parallel generation methods such as best-of-N, overlooking incremental decoding methods like beam search, and has largely ignored latency, focusing only on token usage. We formulate inference-time scaling as a problem of dynamic compute allocation and method selection, where the system must decide which strategy to apply and how much compute to allocate on a per-query basis. Our framework explicitly incorporates both token cost and wall-clock latency, the latter being critical for user experience and particularly for agentic workflows where models must issue multiple queries efficiently. Experiments on reasoning benchmarks show that our approach consistently outperforms static strategies, achieving favorable accuracy-cost trade-offs while remaining practical for deployment.
Comment: Model Compression and Efficiency: latency- and token-aware dynamic allocation of test-time compute with per-query method selection (e.g., beam search vs best-of-N).
Relevance: 7 Novelty: 7
15. Data distribution impacts the performance and generalisability of contrastive learning-based foundation models of electrocardiograms
ArXiv ID: 2509.10369
Authors: Gul Rukh Khattak, Konstantinos Patlatzoglou, Joseph Barker, Libor Pastika, Boroumand Zeidaabadi, Ahmed El-Medany, Hesham Aggour, Yixiu Liang, Antonio H. Ribeiro, Jeffrey Annis, Antonio Luiz Pinho Ribeiro, Junbo Ge, Daniel B. Kramer, Jonathan W. Waks, Evan Brittain, Nicholas Peters, Fu Siong Ng, Arunashis Sau
Abstract: Contrastive learning is a widely adopted self-supervised pretraining strategy, yet its dependence on cohort composition remains underexplored. We present Contrasting by Patient Augmented Electrocardiograms (CAPE) foundation model and pretrain on four cohorts (n = 5,203,352), from diverse populations across three continents (North America, South America, Asia). We systematically assess how cohort demographics, health status, and population diversity influence the downstream performance for prediction tasks also including two additional cohorts from another continent (Europe). We find that downstream performance depends on the distributional properties of the pretraining cohort, including demographics and health status. Moreover, while pretraining with a multi-centre, demographically diverse cohort improves in-distribution accuracy, it reduces out-of-distribution (OOD) generalisation of our contrastive approach by encoding cohort-specific artifacts. To address this, we propose the In-Distribution Batch (IDB) strategy, which preserves intra-cohort consistency during pretraining and enhances OOD robustness. This work provides important insights for developing clinically fair and generalisable foundation models.
Comment: Representation Learning: investigates how pretraining data distribution affects contrastive representations and introduces an IDB pretraining strategy to improve OOD robustness.
Relevance: 7 Novelty: 7
Paper Selection Prompt
System Prompt
You are a helpful paper reading assistant whose job is to read daily posts from ArXiv and identify a few papers that your friend will enjoy reading. Your job is to carefully read the paper titles and abstracts below and find the ones that match the criteria below.
User Prompt
Instructions
Write the response in JSONL format with {ARXIVID, COMMENT, RELEVANCE, NOVELTY} on each line, one for each paper.
- ARXIVID: should be the ArXiv ID.
- COMMENT: should identify whether there is a criteria that match the paper very closely. These matches should not be based on general terms like "language modeling" or "advancements" and should specifically refer to a criterion. No need to mention the non-matching criteria.
- RELEVANCE: should be a score from 1-10.
- NOVELTY: should be a score from 1-10.
Scoring Criteria
The "Relevance" score measures how closely the paper aligns with the core topics of the prompt. The "Novelty" score assesses the originality and impact of the paper. They are two ORTHONORMAL axes and SHOULD NOT be confused with each other.
Relevance Scoring
- Relevance 9-10 (Completely Relevant)
- Focus: Fully aligned with core topics with no deviation, score the highest if contains relevant keywords in it.
Examples: Papers focused on foundational methods or theoretical research, whose titles contain topic keywords like "MoE".
Relevance 7-8 (Relevant)
- Focus: Retain a solid link to the main research area, though may touch on peripheral elements.
Examples: Papers research on the fundamental part of MoE through a less critical aspect like its behavior in GNN.
Relevance 5-6 (Borderline)
- Focus: Maintains a link to the core topic but also extends into at least one other domain/area beyond the primary focus.
Examples: Work referencing MoE centered on reinforcement learning.
Relevance 3-4 (Irrelevant)
- Focus: Largely outside our interests with no association to our topics.
Examples: Application-focused papers like using MoE to solve a problem in the real world.
Relevance 1-2 (Ignore)
- Focus: Purely unrelated to our topics. Completely a different domain.
- Exception: If the paper hints at a cutting-edge, radically new direction that could eventually transform the primary domain, consider a score of 9–10 despite initial appearances. (Usually a very rare concept that belongs to the fundamental research)
Novelty Scoring
- Novelty 9-10 (Breakthrough)
- Definition: Groundbreaking methods/theory introducing new directions or solving major challenges.
Examples: Entirely new paradigm for foundational models; a novel theory transforming representation learning.
Novelty 7-8 (Improvements)
- Definition: Substantial insights/enhancements, though not a full paradigm shift.
Examples: Modifications on existing methods yielding significantly better results.
Novelty 5-6 (Borderline)
- Definition: Incremental contributions with possible long-term benefits, not immediately transformative.
Examples: Moderately novel extension to an existing architecture; refining current methods without fundamentally altering them.
Novelty 3-4 (Tangential)
- Definition: Minor or domain-specific improvements with limited broader impact.
Examples: Slight modifications to known methods with strange motivation; purely engineering jobs like a new benchmark/dataset.
Novelty 1-2 (Low)
- Definition: Minimal originality, applying standard approaches without real innovation.
- Examples: Using an off-the-shelf model without adding new insights; purely application-driven studies like finetuning a pretrained model using existing methods.
Papers
[PAPER LIST HERE]
Relevant Topics
Use the following relevance criteria to focus on foundational research. Keep relevant papers and filter out irrelevant ones. Avoid purely application-driven work.
Model Architecture - Relevant: Mixture-of-Experts (MoE), Transformers, Conditional/Dynamic Networks, Autoencoders, analysis/innovations on existing architectures. - Irrelevant: Merely using existing architectures for a certain task without insights into the structure themselves.
Model Compression and Efficiency - Relevant: Sparsity, pruning, quantization, low-rank approaches, cache, or other algorithmic/theoretical efficiency breakthroughs. - Irrelevant: Straightforward applications of existing compression methods to new tasks.
High Performance Computing - Relevant: Algorithmic or systems-level innovations enabling training of large-scale models, distributed training techniques, memory optimization. - Irrelevant: Incremental engineering improvements without novel algorithmic contributions.
Representation Learning - Relevant: Insights into how deep networks encode information, feature/dictionary learning, sparse/contrastive methods, training dynamics in neural networks. - Irrelevant: Standard applications of known techniques lacking new theoretical or methodological contributions.
Keywords:
- Relevant: Mixture of Experts (MoE), Representation Learning, Compression/Efficiency, Sparse/Sparsity, Pruning, Quantization, Low-rank, Foundation Model, etc.
- Irrelevant: Reinforcement Learning, Transfer Learning, Federated Learning, Online Learning, Diffusion Models, etc.
- Application: Image Segmentation, Medical Imaging, 3D Vision, Video Understanding, Information Retrieval, Summarization, Recommendation Systems, Machine Translation, Speech Recognition, Signal Processing, Spatial/Temporal Modeling, Time Series, Knowledge Graph, etc.